The account "Tomcat96" was created today, and has only been used to edit the articles that "Jeneral28" has been editing. The account is also "agreeing" with "Jeneral28" on talk page discussions that they started. Another block avoiding sock by Jeneral28 ( Neptune123456) was blocked yesterday. Fre h ley 14:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
What the/ a new user cannot edit page and get accused of a term I have never heard of? Wher is the Unniversal Declaration of Human Rights? America's constitution? Tomcat96 ( talk) 14:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Administrator note blocked by
FisherQueen (
talk ·
contribs). Also see
this related ANI report, for the record.
Amalthea
15:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Icestorm815 • Talk 15:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Jeneral28 was indefinitely blocked on May 29, 2009. The user created at least two sockpuppet accounts to evade this block, including Tomcat96 and Neptune123456; both accounts were blocked as sockpuppets within a day or two of the indef block. The account that is the subject of this report, Foxhound66, was created on May 30, 2009, the day after the indef block was imposed on Jeneral28, on May 30, 2009.
Two IP-addresses, 147.188.244.61 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 147.188.244.59 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), were confirmed to be sockpuppets of Jeneral28; both IP addresses are registered to the University of Birmingham. Meanwhile, two separate IP addresses have been blocked within the last week as sockpuppets of Foxhound66, 147.188.254.154 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 147.188.254.210 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). These IP addresses are very close to the IP addresses used by Jeneral28, and both are also registered to the University of Birmingham.
Both Jeneral28 and Foxhound66 share very specific editing interests. See this, which to me highly suggests that the two accounts are related. Of note, both accounts have a tendency to edit articles relating to international political economy, Jennette McCurdy, Toto, and two specific schools located in Singapore: Raffles Girls' School (Secondary) and Singapore Chinese Girls' School. Some specific examples of shared editing interests are as follows:
Both Jeneral28 and Foxhound66 also act similarly. They both consistently blank their talk pages after other users edit it. They both attack Wikipedia and its users (for example, see: [3], [4], [5], [6]). Finally, as noted above by other users, both have a tendency to go back to their previous edits while logged in on a sock account and continue previous conversations started from their "master" account. For example, see this edit by FoxHound66, this edit by Neptune123456, this edit by Tomcat96, this edit by a confirmed IP-sock of Foxhound66, etc.
In summary, the evidence suggests that both users are 1) affiliated with the University of Birmingham, 2) are interested in Jennette McCurdy, the band Toto, international political economy, and two specific Singapore girls schools, 3) and have similar etiquette issues. Foxhound66's account was created the day after Jeneral28 was indef blocked. Circumstantial evidence seems to support that there is a connection between these two accounts. I am unsure if a checkuser would help here, given that Jeneral28 has been blocked for two years now, though an admin suggested that checkuser data related to sockpuppet users is sometimes preserved.
The evidence linking the third IP address, 78.109.182.43, to Jeneral28 are less concrete, but the IP address does share similar editing interests as Foxhound66 (international development, international political economy, British military articles, and Singapore military). Moreover, this third IP address has been going onto the talk pages of users that Foxhound66 has edited prior to being blocked (or users he has worked with using his IP address as his main account is currently blocked), and continuing conversations.
A checkuser may be useful here to see if there is a connection between this third IP address and Foxhound66. 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 11:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
If Jeneral28's data is too old, would it be possible/viable to open a new SPI with Foxhound66 listed as the main sockmaster on that last 78.109 apparent sock, given the fairly strong editing similarity? Strange Passerby ( talk • cont) 12:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
The data on any named accounts is Stale and checkuser does not generally disclose connections between IPs and named accounts.
TN
X
Man
12:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Cibwins2885 was created the exact same day the previous blocked sock, Foxhound66, was blocked, and continued to edit the same articles. Cibwins2885 was indefinitely blocked by LessHeard vanU ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) on 30 June. This is a procedural report, and also a request to find any new accounts this sockmaster might have created since, if possible. I've left the "checkuser" field as "no" for now, but the patrolling clerk might think it a reasonable request to sweep for sleepers. Strange Passerby ( talk • cont) 03:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk endorsed Self-endorsed. Every time an account was blocked, a new one was opened almost immediately. I think it is prudent to take a look to see if a new account has been created, and perhaps if there is an underlying small IP range or other action that can stop this behavior.
Shirik (
Questions or Comments?)
03:44, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Jeneral28 is stale. The following accounts are related on a technical level:
Please only block an account if there is also a behavioural match. The exception to this is Cibrules95 which I have blocked myself as the technical evidence is pretty clear that the account was created with the intent of evading an impending block. -- (ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 14:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
After a little birdie kindly pointed out the similarities between Phd8511 and long-ago blocked Jeneral28, it was obvious as daylight: the user name, the snippiness, the syntax/rhetoric of their edit summaries, and their interests. The overlap between the two accounts is convincing, and a similar overlap was found with a randomly-picked old sock, Mphil1805. I mean, an amazing overlap. Account already blocked, will run CU just in case. [nothing found, but I filed on the CU wiki] Drmies ( talk) 02:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account was created at 04:31 on 12 April 2016, after the previous sock, Phd8511, was blocked at 03:26 the same day. The editor's user name has a similar theme, with a nod to academia in the name. The contribution history reveals lots of overlaps, with edits to articles such as International Development Association ( here and here) and United Nations Development Group, and a shared interest in the military, political economy academics (e.g. this and this) and American TV series (e.g. this and this). A quack case, I think. Cordless Larry ( talk) 12:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: accounts were already blocked and tagged but the status was not switched. Now closed.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Adding references to the edit summary (eg [20], [21], and [22]); this was found to be a particular practice of this sockpuppet. With only 31 edits, this user has 9 pages in common with the most recent socks ( checked against Cantab1985 and Phd8511 using Editor Interaction Analyser). Most edits are to military related articles (as with previous socks), with the notable exception of an edit to While My Guitar Gently Weeps (which was also edited by Jeneral28 [23]). I welcomed/challenged the user on 8 December 2016 but they simply deleted it. They have recently been warned for uncivil behaviour. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 02:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The accounts in the archive are Stale. CU declined.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrator note Behavioral evidence looks good. Account seems like it's been more-or-less abandoned, but I'll block anyway.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
14:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Adding references to the edit summary (most recently [24], [25], and [26]); this has been noted as a particular practice of this sockpuppet. The account was created just hours after I left a message about sockpuppetry on a different sock's talk page (ACSilver); this account creation is therefore directly linked with that challenge. This account has edited more than sixty of the same articles as the most recent two socks ( as seen with Editor Interaction Analyser). Its other edits are related to the British military; Jeneral28 and sock's favourite topic. As with other socks, this user has been warned for incivility. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 00:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Very similar behavior patterns. As with previous socks, user is adding references to the edit summary (see [27], [28], [29] for three most recent examples, all within the last few days). The Ajaxrocks account was created on July 14, only one day after the most recent SPI was filed. Note the similarities between this user name, and the most recently tagged sock -- Ajaxrocks and JessPavarocks. In addition, like almost all of the previous socks, this user also blanks their talk page after receiving messages [see [30] and [31]. Finally, for a user that's only been active for a month a half, there is an amazing overlap in editing interests, see [32] for overlap with last tagged sock. Seems like a WP:DUCK to me, so I'm not requesting a CU, but if a clerk, CU, admin, or other user thinks one should be done, please feel free to overrule me (data from the last sock is not yet stale). 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 20:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
This user's most previous sock, Ajaxrocks, was blocked for block evasion a few days ago. I reverted some of the user's edits for sockpuppetry, but one single edit was reverted back to the state it was as Ajaxrocks left it. In addition, the user went to the talk page of a user that Ajaxrocks previously had a content dispute with and continued the argument, only a few hours after Ajaxrocks' unblock request was denied. Looking back at the IP's previous edits, it also has hallmarks of Jeneral28's pattern of edits: snippy edits bordering on written abuse and personal attacks [33] [34] [35] (see these edits for similar behavior on a previous sock: [36], [37]), and putting URLs directly in edit summaries [38] [39]. Articles edited are the same topic area as Jeneral28 -- British military and political articles. Finally, this IP was previously blocked for block evasion, though I cannot tell from the block log or talk page what block this IP was evading [40]. Based on the aforementioned insult to the IP user a few hours ago (that Ajaxrocks had a content dispute with) alone, I strongly feel like this is a WP:DUCK. 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 02:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I agree that it looks like him. Seems like a static IP; blocked for 1 year since the previous block was 6 months. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 07:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Investigation requested by Thewolfchild on my talk page. The master requested a merge discussion and deletion of several related articles; the socks all commented in support, and have few other edits. See below. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Ok, so....
The piece of evidence that got me started on this; this account on Military Wikia, named Jeneral28– akin to the blocked puppeteer Jeneral28. I found this Wikia account whilst doing research for an article I was creating a few days back, I noticed that it had had a very similar editing style and pattern to BlueD954 and so I politely inquired on his talk page, which he then removed without answering, with the edit summary "How dare a lon term blocked user lecture me." (I'm not too sure what this means). So I Initially left it there, until Thewolfchild alerted me to Jeneral28 having been blocked on Wikipedia 10 years ago, at this point I started to look a bit more into it, and evidence of sockpuppetry became clearer.
1) BlueD954's edits on Wikipedia, and those of Jeneral28 on Wikia are very much similar– often even identical in nature. E.g.
2) BlueD954 edits many of the same articles that Jeneral28 and their sockpuppets did, for example:
3) Both Jeneral28 and his sockpuppets, and BlueD954 have a very distinct way of utilising talk pages. This, quite often consists of a link (in url format), with a sentence beneath, and then signed beneath that; sometimes the sentence is omitted and instead used as a section header.
I think you probably get the idea, BlueD945 use an identical MOS, to the sockpuppets, for writing on talk pages.
4) BlueD954 has also used sockpuppers and canvassing in the past, in order to 'gain support' for a particular discussion that affects him.
Evidence of using sockpuppers: here, here, and more which I won't bother including.
5) More similarities to Jeneral28, and their sockpuppets as laid out here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeneral28/Archive
6) BlueD954 and Jeneral28;s sockpuppets use many of the same box templates (can't for the life of me remember their name) on their User page.
To sum up BlueD954 has many, many of the same editing styles and habits as Jeneral28 and their numerous sockpuppet accounts. Also BlueD954 seems to be the same person as Jeneral28 on Military Wikia, who has the same name as Jeneral28 on Wikipedia, leading me to believe that they are linked. I know this was a lot of information, so thanks for reading I guess. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 ( Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 14:59, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
"Sammartinlai" is not registered on this wiki. With regards to tagging, there is little need to add a tag to that userpage as now no account exists for that username and they haven't used that username for over 2 years. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:38, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Edits + email sent to me with evidence Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Pro forma. Applied range blocks for 2 weeks. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Condo951795
1) The sockpuppeteer in question, Jeneral28's last account to be banned ( User:BlueD954) was banned on the 2 May 2021, and this new account became regularly active on the 4 May 2021.
2) This account edits many of the same articles that Jeneral28 and his sockpuppets did, for example: (I have included a small number of example edits on each article)
3) This users MoS is consistent with those of Jeneral28 and his sockpuppets. As noted in previous investigations:
HDev411
1) Once more the account became active on 4 May 2021, just after BlueD954 was blocked from editing.
2) Editing these two niche articles around the same time as Condo951795:
3) Again the unusual practice of links in the edit summary, instead of the written prose:
4) The mix of military, food, and intelligence related edits match that of the previous sockpuppets. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 ( Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 17:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The account "Tomcat96" was created today, and has only been used to edit the articles that "Jeneral28" has been editing. The account is also "agreeing" with "Jeneral28" on talk page discussions that they started. Another block avoiding sock by Jeneral28 ( Neptune123456) was blocked yesterday. Fre h ley 14:17, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
What the/ a new user cannot edit page and get accused of a term I have never heard of? Wher is the Unniversal Declaration of Human Rights? America's constitution? Tomcat96 ( talk) 14:20, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Administrator note blocked by
FisherQueen (
talk ·
contribs). Also see
this related ANI report, for the record.
Amalthea
15:21, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
![]() |
This case has been marked as closed. It has been archived automatically. |
Icestorm815 • Talk 15:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"
Jeneral28 was indefinitely blocked on May 29, 2009. The user created at least two sockpuppet accounts to evade this block, including Tomcat96 and Neptune123456; both accounts were blocked as sockpuppets within a day or two of the indef block. The account that is the subject of this report, Foxhound66, was created on May 30, 2009, the day after the indef block was imposed on Jeneral28, on May 30, 2009.
Two IP-addresses, 147.188.244.61 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 147.188.244.59 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), were confirmed to be sockpuppets of Jeneral28; both IP addresses are registered to the University of Birmingham. Meanwhile, two separate IP addresses have been blocked within the last week as sockpuppets of Foxhound66, 147.188.254.154 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and 147.188.254.210 ( talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). These IP addresses are very close to the IP addresses used by Jeneral28, and both are also registered to the University of Birmingham.
Both Jeneral28 and Foxhound66 share very specific editing interests. See this, which to me highly suggests that the two accounts are related. Of note, both accounts have a tendency to edit articles relating to international political economy, Jennette McCurdy, Toto, and two specific schools located in Singapore: Raffles Girls' School (Secondary) and Singapore Chinese Girls' School. Some specific examples of shared editing interests are as follows:
Both Jeneral28 and Foxhound66 also act similarly. They both consistently blank their talk pages after other users edit it. They both attack Wikipedia and its users (for example, see: [3], [4], [5], [6]). Finally, as noted above by other users, both have a tendency to go back to their previous edits while logged in on a sock account and continue previous conversations started from their "master" account. For example, see this edit by FoxHound66, this edit by Neptune123456, this edit by Tomcat96, this edit by a confirmed IP-sock of Foxhound66, etc.
In summary, the evidence suggests that both users are 1) affiliated with the University of Birmingham, 2) are interested in Jennette McCurdy, the band Toto, international political economy, and two specific Singapore girls schools, 3) and have similar etiquette issues. Foxhound66's account was created the day after Jeneral28 was indef blocked. Circumstantial evidence seems to support that there is a connection between these two accounts. I am unsure if a checkuser would help here, given that Jeneral28 has been blocked for two years now, though an admin suggested that checkuser data related to sockpuppet users is sometimes preserved.
The evidence linking the third IP address, 78.109.182.43, to Jeneral28 are less concrete, but the IP address does share similar editing interests as Foxhound66 (international development, international political economy, British military articles, and Singapore military). Moreover, this third IP address has been going onto the talk pages of users that Foxhound66 has edited prior to being blocked (or users he has worked with using his IP address as his main account is currently blocked), and continuing conversations.
A checkuser may be useful here to see if there is a connection between this third IP address and Foxhound66. 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 11:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
If Jeneral28's data is too old, would it be possible/viable to open a new SPI with Foxhound66 listed as the main sockmaster on that last 78.109 apparent sock, given the fairly strong editing similarity? Strange Passerby ( talk • cont) 12:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
The data on any named accounts is Stale and checkuser does not generally disclose connections between IPs and named accounts.
TN
X
Man
12:42, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Cibwins2885 was created the exact same day the previous blocked sock, Foxhound66, was blocked, and continued to edit the same articles. Cibwins2885 was indefinitely blocked by LessHeard vanU ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) on 30 June. This is a procedural report, and also a request to find any new accounts this sockmaster might have created since, if possible. I've left the "checkuser" field as "no" for now, but the patrolling clerk might think it a reasonable request to sweep for sleepers. Strange Passerby ( talk • cont) 03:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk endorsed Self-endorsed. Every time an account was blocked, a new one was opened almost immediately. I think it is prudent to take a look to see if a new account has been created, and perhaps if there is an underlying small IP range or other action that can stop this behavior.
Shirik (
Questions or Comments?)
03:44, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
Jeneral28 is stale. The following accounts are related on a technical level:
Please only block an account if there is also a behavioural match. The exception to this is Cibrules95 which I have blocked myself as the technical evidence is pretty clear that the account was created with the intent of evading an impending block. -- (ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 14:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
After a little birdie kindly pointed out the similarities between Phd8511 and long-ago blocked Jeneral28, it was obvious as daylight: the user name, the snippiness, the syntax/rhetoric of their edit summaries, and their interests. The overlap between the two accounts is convincing, and a similar overlap was found with a randomly-picked old sock, Mphil1805. I mean, an amazing overlap. Account already blocked, will run CU just in case. [nothing found, but I filed on the CU wiki] Drmies ( talk) 02:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account was created at 04:31 on 12 April 2016, after the previous sock, Phd8511, was blocked at 03:26 the same day. The editor's user name has a similar theme, with a nod to academia in the name. The contribution history reveals lots of overlaps, with edits to articles such as International Development Association ( here and here) and United Nations Development Group, and a shared interest in the military, political economy academics (e.g. this and this) and American TV series (e.g. this and this). A quack case, I think. Cordless Larry ( talk) 12:58, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Clerk note: accounts were already blocked and tagged but the status was not switched. Now closed.
Ivanvector (
Talk/
Edits)
18:12, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Adding references to the edit summary (eg [20], [21], and [22]); this was found to be a particular practice of this sockpuppet. With only 31 edits, this user has 9 pages in common with the most recent socks ( checked against Cantab1985 and Phd8511 using Editor Interaction Analyser). Most edits are to military related articles (as with previous socks), with the notable exception of an edit to While My Guitar Gently Weeps (which was also edited by Jeneral28 [23]). I welcomed/challenged the user on 8 December 2016 but they simply deleted it. They have recently been warned for uncivil behaviour. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 02:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The accounts in the archive are Stale. CU declined.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrator note Behavioral evidence looks good. Account seems like it's been more-or-less abandoned, but I'll block anyway.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
14:18, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
Adding references to the edit summary (most recently [24], [25], and [26]); this has been noted as a particular practice of this sockpuppet. The account was created just hours after I left a message about sockpuppetry on a different sock's talk page (ACSilver); this account creation is therefore directly linked with that challenge. This account has edited more than sixty of the same articles as the most recent two socks ( as seen with Editor Interaction Analyser). Its other edits are related to the British military; Jeneral28 and sock's favourite topic. As with other socks, this user has been warned for incivility. Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 00:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Very similar behavior patterns. As with previous socks, user is adding references to the edit summary (see [27], [28], [29] for three most recent examples, all within the last few days). The Ajaxrocks account was created on July 14, only one day after the most recent SPI was filed. Note the similarities between this user name, and the most recently tagged sock -- Ajaxrocks and JessPavarocks. In addition, like almost all of the previous socks, this user also blanks their talk page after receiving messages [see [30] and [31]. Finally, for a user that's only been active for a month a half, there is an amazing overlap in editing interests, see [32] for overlap with last tagged sock. Seems like a WP:DUCK to me, so I'm not requesting a CU, but if a clerk, CU, admin, or other user thinks one should be done, please feel free to overrule me (data from the last sock is not yet stale). 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 20:14, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by Sro23 as part of the clerk training process. Please allow them to process the entire case without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on their Talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
This user's most previous sock, Ajaxrocks, was blocked for block evasion a few days ago. I reverted some of the user's edits for sockpuppetry, but one single edit was reverted back to the state it was as Ajaxrocks left it. In addition, the user went to the talk page of a user that Ajaxrocks previously had a content dispute with and continued the argument, only a few hours after Ajaxrocks' unblock request was denied. Looking back at the IP's previous edits, it also has hallmarks of Jeneral28's pattern of edits: snippy edits bordering on written abuse and personal attacks [33] [34] [35] (see these edits for similar behavior on a previous sock: [36], [37]), and putting URLs directly in edit summaries [38] [39]. Articles edited are the same topic area as Jeneral28 -- British military and political articles. Finally, this IP was previously blocked for block evasion, though I cannot tell from the block log or talk page what block this IP was evading [40]. Based on the aforementioned insult to the IP user a few hours ago (that Ajaxrocks had a content dispute with) alone, I strongly feel like this is a WP:DUCK. 青い(Aoi) ( talk) 02:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I agree that it looks like him. Seems like a static IP; blocked for 1 year since the previous block was 6 months. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 07:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Investigation requested by Thewolfchild on my talk page. The master requested a merge discussion and deletion of several related articles; the socks all commented in support, and have few other edits. See below. Ivanvector ( Talk/ Edits) 18:10, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Ok, so....
The piece of evidence that got me started on this; this account on Military Wikia, named Jeneral28– akin to the blocked puppeteer Jeneral28. I found this Wikia account whilst doing research for an article I was creating a few days back, I noticed that it had had a very similar editing style and pattern to BlueD954 and so I politely inquired on his talk page, which he then removed without answering, with the edit summary "How dare a lon term blocked user lecture me." (I'm not too sure what this means). So I Initially left it there, until Thewolfchild alerted me to Jeneral28 having been blocked on Wikipedia 10 years ago, at this point I started to look a bit more into it, and evidence of sockpuppetry became clearer.
1) BlueD954's edits on Wikipedia, and those of Jeneral28 on Wikia are very much similar– often even identical in nature. E.g.
2) BlueD954 edits many of the same articles that Jeneral28 and their sockpuppets did, for example:
3) Both Jeneral28 and his sockpuppets, and BlueD954 have a very distinct way of utilising talk pages. This, quite often consists of a link (in url format), with a sentence beneath, and then signed beneath that; sometimes the sentence is omitted and instead used as a section header.
I think you probably get the idea, BlueD945 use an identical MOS, to the sockpuppets, for writing on talk pages.
4) BlueD954 has also used sockpuppers and canvassing in the past, in order to 'gain support' for a particular discussion that affects him.
Evidence of using sockpuppers: here, here, and more which I won't bother including.
5) More similarities to Jeneral28, and their sockpuppets as laid out here Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jeneral28/Archive
6) BlueD954 and Jeneral28;s sockpuppets use many of the same box templates (can't for the life of me remember their name) on their User page.
To sum up BlueD954 has many, many of the same editing styles and habits as Jeneral28 and their numerous sockpuppet accounts. Also BlueD954 seems to be the same person as Jeneral28 on Military Wikia, who has the same name as Jeneral28 on Wikipedia, leading me to believe that they are linked. I know this was a lot of information, so thanks for reading I guess. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 ( Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 14:59, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
"Sammartinlai" is not registered on this wiki. With regards to tagging, there is little need to add a tag to that userpage as now no account exists for that username and they haven't used that username for over 2 years. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 21:38, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Edits + email sent to me with evidence Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Pro forma. Applied range blocks for 2 weeks. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 11:56, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Condo951795
1) The sockpuppeteer in question, Jeneral28's last account to be banned ( User:BlueD954) was banned on the 2 May 2021, and this new account became regularly active on the 4 May 2021.
2) This account edits many of the same articles that Jeneral28 and his sockpuppets did, for example: (I have included a small number of example edits on each article)
3) This users MoS is consistent with those of Jeneral28 and his sockpuppets. As noted in previous investigations:
HDev411
1) Once more the account became active on 4 May 2021, just after BlueD954 was blocked from editing.
2) Editing these two niche articles around the same time as Condo951795:
3) Again the unusual practice of links in the edit summary, instead of the written prose:
4) The mix of military, food, and intelligence related edits match that of the previous sockpuppets. SɱαɾƚყPαɳƚʂ22 ( Ⓣⓐⓛⓚ) 17:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.