Edits by Hunan201p demonstrate an obsession with sock puppet and meat puppet editing as a rationale for POV pushing in article spaces [1], [2].
This includes accusing other editors of being socks and/or meat puppets [3], [4]. Notice Hunan201p's focus on WorldCreaterFighter in each of the above diffs.
While blocked Hunan201p accused IPs of editing as sock puppets while implying that an editor in good standing is their meatpuppet [5]. In that diff you can also see Hunan pinged four editors speciously "alerting" them of sock puppetry and meat puppetry. This was an end around to control pages for which they were originally blocked for disruptive editing [6], [7].This turned out to be highly disruptive for which Hunan lost talk page privileges during their block. They are still blocked until August 16, 2020 [8].
Lithuist, an absolutely new editor, with currently only two edits [9], has the ability to smoothly post their view on two user talk pages [10], [11].
Both posts are flawless, including correctly signing each post. Each post is also almost civil. Now notice the emphasis with "You have to check the sources before you allow abusive sockcontent." There is also a claim "... [the subject] isn’t backed up by the sources. There is not one sentence in the given references", which is not true as other editors agree with restoring this content [12], [13], [14].
This is classic Hunan201p - bringing sock puppetry or meat puppetry into the conversation (as shown by the above diffs) and discounting the editing judgement of all other editors who don't agree, speciously claiming there are no sources, or the sources are inadequate (for example, low quality sources) [15], [16], [17]. Here Hunan is claiming consensus isn't for real because "...that noticeboard discussion was three cliquish and shady editors voting for each other" [18], further discounting other editors who don't agree with Hunan's POV editing.
Also, I think it would be a good idea to see if Hunan201p and Lithuist are socks of WorldCreaterFighter via check user.--- Steve Quinn ( talk) 15:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Well, this is interesting. The shared interests between Hunan201p and WorldCreatorFighter, as demonstrated by their editing are remarkable. I refer to "shared interest in human genetics and things like hair color" as mentioned below.
Hunan201p has demonstrated a strong interest in this area. Looking at this edit where Hunan tried to reach out from their talk page (while blocked) [19] shows concern for edits related to Asian peoples'appearance [20], genetics (studies) [21], and before being blocked, removed content about genetics (an archaeological study) [22]. Of course this is just a small sample. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 17:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by RoySmith as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case (including admin actions against suspected socks) without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
Per WP:DUCK. IP editor deletes content in West Eurasians for various (justified and unjustified) reasons. Hunan201p has constantly deleted material in pages about anthropology and ethnic groups by regularly citing WP:MEDRS, even though there is no medical content. The IP now cites the same guideline, which appears too far-fetched to be a coincidence.
– Austronesier ( talk) 11:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Looks like a WP:DUCK case or Nanuh2020 could be a troll who is disguised as currently blocked Hunan201p. Both have very similar userpages. Compare [31] with [32]. The new account then removed this part [33] which was identical to Hunan201p's userpage. The rest of stuff on their talk pages are same, more or less. Same targeted articles; please take a look at Editor Interaction Analyser results. Since Hunan201p is blocked for 3 months, I request a checkuser because there may be a sock farm for block evasion. Wario-Man ( talk) 06:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Edits by Hunan201p demonstrate an obsession with sock puppet and meat puppet editing as a rationale for POV pushing in article spaces [1], [2].
This includes accusing other editors of being socks and/or meat puppets [3], [4]. Notice Hunan201p's focus on WorldCreaterFighter in each of the above diffs.
While blocked Hunan201p accused IPs of editing as sock puppets while implying that an editor in good standing is their meatpuppet [5]. In that diff you can also see Hunan pinged four editors speciously "alerting" them of sock puppetry and meat puppetry. This was an end around to control pages for which they were originally blocked for disruptive editing [6], [7].This turned out to be highly disruptive for which Hunan lost talk page privileges during their block. They are still blocked until August 16, 2020 [8].
Lithuist, an absolutely new editor, with currently only two edits [9], has the ability to smoothly post their view on two user talk pages [10], [11].
Both posts are flawless, including correctly signing each post. Each post is also almost civil. Now notice the emphasis with "You have to check the sources before you allow abusive sockcontent." There is also a claim "... [the subject] isn’t backed up by the sources. There is not one sentence in the given references", which is not true as other editors agree with restoring this content [12], [13], [14].
This is classic Hunan201p - bringing sock puppetry or meat puppetry into the conversation (as shown by the above diffs) and discounting the editing judgement of all other editors who don't agree, speciously claiming there are no sources, or the sources are inadequate (for example, low quality sources) [15], [16], [17]. Here Hunan is claiming consensus isn't for real because "...that noticeboard discussion was three cliquish and shady editors voting for each other" [18], further discounting other editors who don't agree with Hunan's POV editing.
Also, I think it would be a good idea to see if Hunan201p and Lithuist are socks of WorldCreaterFighter via check user.--- Steve Quinn ( talk) 15:59, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Well, this is interesting. The shared interests between Hunan201p and WorldCreatorFighter, as demonstrated by their editing are remarkable. I refer to "shared interest in human genetics and things like hair color" as mentioned below.
Hunan201p has demonstrated a strong interest in this area. Looking at this edit where Hunan tried to reach out from their talk page (while blocked) [19] shows concern for edits related to Asian peoples'appearance [20], genetics (studies) [21], and before being blocked, removed content about genetics (an archaeological study) [22]. Of course this is just a small sample. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 17:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This case is being reviewed by RoySmith as part of the clerk training process. Please allow him to process the entire case (including admin actions against suspected socks) without interference, and pose any questions or concerns either on his talk page or on this page if more appropriate.
Per WP:DUCK. IP editor deletes content in West Eurasians for various (justified and unjustified) reasons. Hunan201p has constantly deleted material in pages about anthropology and ethnic groups by regularly citing WP:MEDRS, even though there is no medical content. The IP now cites the same guideline, which appears too far-fetched to be a coincidence.
– Austronesier ( talk) 11:07, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Looks like a WP:DUCK case or Nanuh2020 could be a troll who is disguised as currently blocked Hunan201p. Both have very similar userpages. Compare [31] with [32]. The new account then removed this part [33] which was identical to Hunan201p's userpage. The rest of stuff on their talk pages are same, more or less. Same targeted articles; please take a look at Editor Interaction Analyser results. Since Hunan201p is blocked for 3 months, I request a checkuser because there may be a sock farm for block evasion. Wario-Man ( talk) 06:15, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.