Evidence as follows:
"and no Hippeus or anyone else sprung up in that fishing expedition!"is oddly worded. Onceinawhile ( talk) 10:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Oshwah: thank you. Editing style suggests they are very experienced; if the accounts are connected, I would think there is a reasonable chance of sleepers. Would it be possible to run a sleeper check or are the ranges too wide? Onceinawhile ( talk) 22:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I am too have participated almost in all of these threads. Does it mean that I am anyone sock? Those all hot button issues that attract editors that interested in the conflict. -- Shrike ( talk) 21:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I've seen Hippeus around, mostly at noticeboards and publicized discussions. I did not "threaten" Jontel, I placed a standard uw-defamatory3 warning for this edit (as "Zio" is an ethnic slur). I do spend time patrolling recent changes for vandalism and disruption, but I prefer to use RedWarn.
This report is part of a never ending vendetta by Onceinawhile. Back in January, I reported Onceinawhile to AE, leading to a logged warning. When AE was going against him, he reported me as a NoCal100 sock and this was rejected by CU (and no Hippeus or anyone else sprung up in that fishing expedition!). The report here is on the same level, by the evidence Onceinwhile present they themselves are a sock because they participate on the same boards.
This harassment by Onceinawhile needs to stop. 11Fox11 ( talk) 09:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Evidence as follows:
"and no Hippeus or anyone else sprung up in that fishing expedition!"is oddly worded. Onceinawhile ( talk) 10:02, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
@ Oshwah: thank you. Editing style suggests they are very experienced; if the accounts are connected, I would think there is a reasonable chance of sleepers. Would it be possible to run a sleeper check or are the ranges too wide? Onceinawhile ( talk) 22:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I am too have participated almost in all of these threads. Does it mean that I am anyone sock? Those all hot button issues that attract editors that interested in the conflict. -- Shrike ( talk) 21:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
I've seen Hippeus around, mostly at noticeboards and publicized discussions. I did not "threaten" Jontel, I placed a standard uw-defamatory3 warning for this edit (as "Zio" is an ethnic slur). I do spend time patrolling recent changes for vandalism and disruption, but I prefer to use RedWarn.
This report is part of a never ending vendetta by Onceinawhile. Back in January, I reported Onceinawhile to AE, leading to a logged warning. When AE was going against him, he reported me as a NoCal100 sock and this was rejected by CU (and no Hippeus or anyone else sprung up in that fishing expedition!). The report here is on the same level, by the evidence Onceinwhile present they themselves are a sock because they participate on the same boards.
This harassment by Onceinawhile needs to stop. 11Fox11 ( talk) 09:45, 17 March 2021 (UTC)