Bigshowandkane64 was blocked for edit-warring yesterday. Soon after deleting the block notice from his talk page, Marionluigi49, who then created MarioandSonic56, was created. The similarity in the name format (<name1>n/and<name2><no.>) is too coincidental given Marionluigi49's subsequent editing. Bigshowandkane64 predominantly edited at Thomas & Friends related articles, mostly undoing edits made by other editors, while Marionluigi49 is editing at Thomas and Friends (series 2) reverting the same editors that Bigshowandkane64 had reverted there. MarioandSonic56 has likely been created as a sleeper for use in the event that Marionluigi49 is blocked. AussieLegend ( talk) 03:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Both Confirmed and indefinitely blocked. Bigshowandkane64's block has been extended to 2 weeks. --
MuZemike
04:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Consistent similar disruption to Thomas & Friends. Compare [1] and [2]. Alerted by this edit Rob Sinden ( talk) 16:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
User has been making disruptive edits to Mike Pollock that are most likely in nature to Supermariokart64 before being blocked. ( [3], [4]) Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 16:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Evidence is as follows:
Appears to be an obvious WP:DUCK. Request checkuser and look for sleepers. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 14:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
There's also a lot of recent activity by all three on Billy Bletcher. Simpsons and Wikipedia seems to be editing more or less contemporaneously, generally backing one another up. I could do that with a desktop and a laptop. -- Drmargi ( talk) 02:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
"I'm not the user you guy's are looking for, neither is WikipediaGuy01543, but he did want me to let you guy's know he/she is not that user at all, and me neither, but if you look at this edit here that Characterfan876 made ... I can tell it must be FF2 that made that, I revert it back to normal and told him not to remove other users messages, because it's against the rules."If I were a betting man, I'd say that WikipediaGuy01543 and Characterfan876 are two accounts that ya should definitely look into. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I already replied on Favonian's talk page and I already told them I'm not the user they are looking for, I don't even know anything about that user at all. Even WikipediaGuy01543 reply on my talk page and told me he's/she's not that user either, because he/she also got a notice too about a sock puppet invistigation, I think, I'm not sure. But anyways, I'm not the user your looking for at all. TheSimpsons98 ( talk) 19:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Were just trying to make wikipedia a lot better for users and other people when they do research, please don't report us. Were not sock puppets. WikipediaGuy01543 ( talk) 19:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
No, I'm not the same user at all, I'm not any of those users at all. TheSimpsons98 ( talk) 01:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
What's the big deal about my spelling?, my computer keeps telling me I'm mispelling it. And that why my spelling becomes like that when I correct it, I don't really see the big deal about my write, just saying. TheSimpsons98 ( talk) 02:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
It was messing up the article that way, that why I was trying to put it this way. TheSimpsons98 ( talk) 14:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Clerk note: Per the discussion above (and for example
[7] vs
[8] and
[9] vs
[10]) I've added WikipediaGuy01543 to the list. CharacterFan876 and 73.38.132.31 have both already been blocked as FrozenFan2 socks.
TDL (
talk)
23:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
User editing same articles in same way as User:FrozenFan2. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 02:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Suspected sock account is reverting edits back to last edits made by blocked User:FrozenFan2 sock, User:TheSimpsons98. WP:DUCK. See contributions here: [13] -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I am Jason I am not a sockpuppet, i am reverting those edits back because that blocked user had the right info and it was reverted because he or she was a vandal. I believe that any info that is correct should stay even if it was added by a vandal. Run a checkuser,i guarantee you will find i am not a sockpuppet. Stop reverting good edits from vandals.everyone has a right to have their content stay if its not vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkusAlBertson ( talk • contribs) 21:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
That's where you are wrong. The whole ocncept of wikipedia is everyone can edit. Just because some is evading a block doesn't mean their edits should be reverted because they are vandals. It's like you're playing favorites. Wikipedia is about getting info ,not about who puts that info in.I am not a puppet of this person. I am a casual observer who saw an injustice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkusAlBertson ( talk • contribs) 22:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Does my grammar look like Frozen Fan ok the truth is I look through sockpuppet case pages . I recall the fact that your site falsely blocked over a hundred of suspected 'socks' recently only to be found out to be wrong. This whole site is a witch hunt that hides behind 'duck' nonsense. So many good editors are lost this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkusAlBertson ( talk • contribs) 23:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Bbb23: I just noticed with what you just hatted, that I had been posting in a section I shouldn't have been. I blindly followed the others posting there, and should have been paying closer attention, but didn't. My sincere apologies. As far as your statement about inappropriate comments - what, specifically, was inappropriate? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 04:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
This discussion is inappropriate and disruptive, and some of the users shouldn't even be posting in this section, let alone saying the things they are saying.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 04:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I have agree with MarnetteD here,
Vanjagenije. I don't understand why you wouldn't want a CU. To look for sleepers as well as make sure all the "ducks" are in a row (pun intended). The second I read that the sock "admitted" being a longtime sock master with tons of sock accounts, I knew it was a ruse so a CU wouldn't be run. Perhaps it is time for another clerk to take a look at this. --
WV ●
✉
✓
01:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Same articles, same edits. A Duck, quacking loudly.
Evidence:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Evidence is as follows:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I was only correcting information on articles, because some information on this site is incorrect, and I was fixing them to correct them. 71.232.184.131 ( talk) 22:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
No I wasn't. 71.232.184.131 ( talk) 23:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
After yesterdays block of 71.232.184.131 ( talk · contribs) this new editor shows up and makes the same edits to several articles including Michael Brandon - IP, R though this one does have a source it is Brandon's own blog wich fails WP:RS. Allan Levine - edit by confirmed sock WikipediaGuy01543 ( talk · contribs) and this one by R and various edits to the Bill Farmer article which has been edited by several of FF2's socks. The message on the userpage matches the usual "I am add sources" when, in fact they don't. MarnetteD| Talk 17:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sign.... I've told you already I'm not him, I like to make thing correct in the articles. Your the one causing vandalism in the articles when I'm trying too correcting them. Please stop stocking me so I can edit please. I'm not another user, I'm completely new. Besides I already reported you too an admin. R-TruthFan76 ( talk) 17:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
A new weekend and a new IP goes right back to one of FF2's favorite articles Bill Farmer ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). IP geolocates to the same area as the others. MarnetteD| Talk 00:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Thank you Ponyo. It is possible that filing this SPI caused them to stop editing from this IP. Your protection the article will help as well. MarnetteD| Talk 22:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
IP geolocates to New Hampshire as the others have done. Has hit several old favorites like Russi Taylor ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Pinto Colvig ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Ludwig Von Drake ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) but has moved on to new articles as well. Continues to add unsourced info to articles as here [18], here [19] and here [20]. The apology here for not adding sources is much like those in the past. This being but one example. To my knowledge this person has only used IPs in the last few months so I don't know if a checkuser would do any good, thus, I have not asked for one MarnetteD| Talk 22:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See evidence here on my page. Note especially HomerSimpson543's attempt here to remove the most damning evidence. Bishonen | talk 16:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Geolocates to New Hampshire as the other IPs have. Editing many of the same voice actor articles like Russi Taylor ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Bill Farmer ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) although new articles are being hit as well. Still adding details about families without sourcing the year added is not in the ref that was already there. Still adding unsourced items like this. This person seems to only be using IPs so I haven't asked for a checkuser but if anyone else has encountered an editor with a username we can always change that. MarnetteD| Talk 00:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Began editing as the IP and then, when reverted, moved onto the named account. Still hitting the voice actor articles including Frank Welker. The personal attacks are much the same as last time as well. Looks like Acroterion has blocked T6 so this is just a formality to to get the tag changed from suspected to confirmed. MarnetteD| Talk 03:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Recently created account has gone right back to adding unsourced info to many of the old favorites including Pinto Colvig ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Ludwig Von Drake ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Phil LaMarr ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). This version has branched out to some location articles - notably a couple from New Hampshire which is where the bulk of the IP socks have geolocated from. MarnetteD| Talk 22:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't know what your talking about. I know no such user named Bigshowandkane on here. I've read all the rules on here before I started editing on this site and I didn't saying anything bad to you guy's. I didn't say any swears of say any bad threats too you at all ether. InformationExpertIsRight ( talk) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
But it makes no sense at all. He's been doing his voice for many years, Also, Paul voiced him until his death in 1986 not 1961 to 1967. I do agree that we do need sources, but it just makes no sense when he first removed it. Also, Disney Studios confirmed themselves that he voices him, and Corey's website says it as well. InformationExpertIsRight ( talk) 23:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
23:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The IP was making the usual edits to articles adding unsourced info as they did here. It does geolocate to the same area as the previous ones. After they had been found out the Popeye sock was created and started making the same edits while adding edit summaries like this one stating that they don't need to add sourcing. This is a hallmark of this persons attitude to editing articles. This is another repeat of the kind of edit summary of past socks. After the Popeye account was blocked a threat to continue socking was made on their talk page. Then the Thomas account was created and the same edits (including more unsourced BLP info here as the other two commenced. MarnetteD| Talk 22:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Occupation and unsourced editting on Joe Alaskey, Phil Hartman, Craig T. Nelson, Alex Borstein, Don Messick and others. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 20:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Adding some more IP's who are all restoring each other's edits and making the same sorts of edits to voice actor articles: [27], [28], [29] Sro23 ( talk) 20:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Their one edit is as WP:DUCK as it gets. MarnetteD| Talk 03:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account blocked. Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 11:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Edits on Grey DeLisle from IP starting with 2600:1000:B ‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 19:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Edits on Grey DeLisle from IP starting with 2600:1000:B, personal attacks ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 19:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Added 2600:1000:b02b:4e83:90cd:e3f8:705d:b1f7, an obvious duck. Sro23 ( talk) 20:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th IPs continued to remove the sock-puppet template from the first IP, but first, the fifth IP removed content from Pat Fraley without giving a reason, then came back as the sixth IP and attacked Sro23 for reverting that edit. Woodstop45 ( talk) 15:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
More of the same: edit warring on Robin Williams, as well as the characteristic legal threat: [33] Sro23 ( talk) 23:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The IPs have the same characteristic legal threats and harassment on Sro23 ( talk · contribs) and Ebyabe ( talk · contribs) using the 2600:1000 IP range ( [34]) as with the previously blocked IPs ( [35], [36]) on that page. They are geographically based in Massachusetts, where the user in question has IPs at his disposal, so I think that a range block would be necessary. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 11:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Added an IP that attempted to remove another IP from this report. — Gestrid ( talk) 22:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
sock}}
templates from pages of IPs they've socked from. I'll try to continue this until someone starts looking into this. That way, the admin who looks into this will have as much info as possible for a rangeblock. —
Gestrid (
talk)
00:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Wiping the talk page of one of Bigshowandkane64's IP socks, User:2600:1000:B01F:C6C2:BCCB:1538:39B6:F18F Mr. Vernon ( talk) 06:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This user appears to hop from IP to IP. Would a range block be possible by any chance if it is confirmed that these are indeed socks? JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Just end this sock puppet investigation crap thing. I can remove those tags as many times I want. 2600:1000:B02A:CE6C:A1B5:44FA:7B16:D2DB ( talk) 17:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
See this edit compared to this one. Also this and this. Note how the account made several null edits to become autoconfirmed, similar to what other socks did. Sro23 ( talk) 19:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Blocked but awaiting tags
This edit pretty much confirmed the puppetry. —
C.Fred (
talk)
19:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Username+dummy edits to get autoconfirmed ( [37], [38])+ edit warring to include "stand-up" ( [39] [40]) Sro23 ( talk) 15:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed and blocked. No tag per
WP:DENY. Closing.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Same type of unproductive editing on Thomas & Friends series articles. Perhaps a range block is in order for the 2601:81 and :82 ranges, since there are a number of other IP addresses that I did not include? ‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 20:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Attacks on talk page ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 14:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Bigshowandkane64 was blocked for edit-warring yesterday. Soon after deleting the block notice from his talk page, Marionluigi49, who then created MarioandSonic56, was created. The similarity in the name format (<name1>n/and<name2><no.>) is too coincidental given Marionluigi49's subsequent editing. Bigshowandkane64 predominantly edited at Thomas & Friends related articles, mostly undoing edits made by other editors, while Marionluigi49 is editing at Thomas and Friends (series 2) reverting the same editors that Bigshowandkane64 had reverted there. MarioandSonic56 has likely been created as a sleeper for use in the event that Marionluigi49 is blocked. AussieLegend ( talk) 03:49, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Both Confirmed and indefinitely blocked. Bigshowandkane64's block has been extended to 2 weeks. --
MuZemike
04:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Consistent similar disruption to Thomas & Friends. Compare [1] and [2]. Alerted by this edit Rob Sinden ( talk) 16:40, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
User has been making disruptive edits to Mike Pollock that are most likely in nature to Supermariokart64 before being blocked. ( [3], [4]) Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 16:01, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Evidence is as follows:
Appears to be an obvious WP:DUCK. Request checkuser and look for sleepers. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 14:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
There's also a lot of recent activity by all three on Billy Bletcher. Simpsons and Wikipedia seems to be editing more or less contemporaneously, generally backing one another up. I could do that with a desktop and a laptop. -- Drmargi ( talk) 02:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
"I'm not the user you guy's are looking for, neither is WikipediaGuy01543, but he did want me to let you guy's know he/she is not that user at all, and me neither, but if you look at this edit here that Characterfan876 made ... I can tell it must be FF2 that made that, I revert it back to normal and told him not to remove other users messages, because it's against the rules."If I were a betting man, I'd say that WikipediaGuy01543 and Characterfan876 are two accounts that ya should definitely look into. Cyphoidbomb ( talk) 17:08, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
I already replied on Favonian's talk page and I already told them I'm not the user they are looking for, I don't even know anything about that user at all. Even WikipediaGuy01543 reply on my talk page and told me he's/she's not that user either, because he/she also got a notice too about a sock puppet invistigation, I think, I'm not sure. But anyways, I'm not the user your looking for at all. TheSimpsons98 ( talk) 19:42, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Were just trying to make wikipedia a lot better for users and other people when they do research, please don't report us. Were not sock puppets. WikipediaGuy01543 ( talk) 19:48, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
No, I'm not the same user at all, I'm not any of those users at all. TheSimpsons98 ( talk) 01:02, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
What's the big deal about my spelling?, my computer keeps telling me I'm mispelling it. And that why my spelling becomes like that when I correct it, I don't really see the big deal about my write, just saying. TheSimpsons98 ( talk) 02:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
It was messing up the article that way, that why I was trying to put it this way. TheSimpsons98 ( talk) 14:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Clerk note: Per the discussion above (and for example
[7] vs
[8] and
[9] vs
[10]) I've added WikipediaGuy01543 to the list. CharacterFan876 and 73.38.132.31 have both already been blocked as FrozenFan2 socks.
TDL (
talk)
23:59, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
User editing same articles in same way as User:FrozenFan2. --‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 02:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Suspected sock account is reverting edits back to last edits made by blocked User:FrozenFan2 sock, User:TheSimpsons98. WP:DUCK. See contributions here: [13] -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 21:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I am Jason I am not a sockpuppet, i am reverting those edits back because that blocked user had the right info and it was reverted because he or she was a vandal. I believe that any info that is correct should stay even if it was added by a vandal. Run a checkuser,i guarantee you will find i am not a sockpuppet. Stop reverting good edits from vandals.everyone has a right to have their content stay if its not vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkusAlBertson ( talk • contribs) 21:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
That's where you are wrong. The whole ocncept of wikipedia is everyone can edit. Just because some is evading a block doesn't mean their edits should be reverted because they are vandals. It's like you're playing favorites. Wikipedia is about getting info ,not about who puts that info in.I am not a puppet of this person. I am a casual observer who saw an injustice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkusAlBertson ( talk • contribs) 22:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Does my grammar look like Frozen Fan ok the truth is I look through sockpuppet case pages . I recall the fact that your site falsely blocked over a hundred of suspected 'socks' recently only to be found out to be wrong. This whole site is a witch hunt that hides behind 'duck' nonsense. So many good editors are lost this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarkusAlBertson ( talk • contribs) 23:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
Bbb23: I just noticed with what you just hatted, that I had been posting in a section I shouldn't have been. I blindly followed the others posting there, and should have been paying closer attention, but didn't. My sincere apologies. As far as your statement about inappropriate comments - what, specifically, was inappropriate? -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 04:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
This discussion is inappropriate and disruptive, and some of the users shouldn't even be posting in this section, let alone saying the things they are saying.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 04:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC) |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
I have agree with MarnetteD here,
Vanjagenije. I don't understand why you wouldn't want a CU. To look for sleepers as well as make sure all the "ducks" are in a row (pun intended). The second I read that the sock "admitted" being a longtime sock master with tons of sock accounts, I knew it was a ruse so a CU wouldn't be run. Perhaps it is time for another clerk to take a look at this. --
WV ●
✉
✓
01:31, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
|
Same articles, same edits. A Duck, quacking loudly.
Evidence:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Evidence is as follows:
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
I was only correcting information on articles, because some information on this site is incorrect, and I was fixing them to correct them. 71.232.184.131 ( talk) 22:54, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
No I wasn't. 71.232.184.131 ( talk) 23:06, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
After yesterdays block of 71.232.184.131 ( talk · contribs) this new editor shows up and makes the same edits to several articles including Michael Brandon - IP, R though this one does have a source it is Brandon's own blog wich fails WP:RS. Allan Levine - edit by confirmed sock WikipediaGuy01543 ( talk · contribs) and this one by R and various edits to the Bill Farmer article which has been edited by several of FF2's socks. The message on the userpage matches the usual "I am add sources" when, in fact they don't. MarnetteD| Talk 17:34, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Sign.... I've told you already I'm not him, I like to make thing correct in the articles. Your the one causing vandalism in the articles when I'm trying too correcting them. Please stop stocking me so I can edit please. I'm not another user, I'm completely new. Besides I already reported you too an admin. R-TruthFan76 ( talk) 17:38, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
A new weekend and a new IP goes right back to one of FF2's favorite articles Bill Farmer ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). IP geolocates to the same area as the others. MarnetteD| Talk 00:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Thank you Ponyo. It is possible that filing this SPI caused them to stop editing from this IP. Your protection the article will help as well. MarnetteD| Talk 22:05, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
IP geolocates to New Hampshire as the others have done. Has hit several old favorites like Russi Taylor ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Pinto Colvig ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Ludwig Von Drake ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) but has moved on to new articles as well. Continues to add unsourced info to articles as here [18], here [19] and here [20]. The apology here for not adding sources is much like those in the past. This being but one example. To my knowledge this person has only used IPs in the last few months so I don't know if a checkuser would do any good, thus, I have not asked for one MarnetteD| Talk 22:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
See evidence here on my page. Note especially HomerSimpson543's attempt here to remove the most damning evidence. Bishonen | talk 16:29, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Geolocates to New Hampshire as the other IPs have. Editing many of the same voice actor articles like Russi Taylor ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Bill Farmer ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) although new articles are being hit as well. Still adding details about families without sourcing the year added is not in the ref that was already there. Still adding unsourced items like this. This person seems to only be using IPs so I haven't asked for a checkuser but if anyone else has encountered an editor with a username we can always change that. MarnetteD| Talk 00:42, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Began editing as the IP and then, when reverted, moved onto the named account. Still hitting the voice actor articles including Frank Welker. The personal attacks are much the same as last time as well. Looks like Acroterion has blocked T6 so this is just a formality to to get the tag changed from suspected to confirmed. MarnetteD| Talk 03:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Recently created account has gone right back to adding unsourced info to many of the old favorites including Pinto Colvig ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs), Ludwig Von Drake ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Phil LaMarr ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs). This version has branched out to some location articles - notably a couple from New Hampshire which is where the bulk of the IP socks have geolocated from. MarnetteD| Talk 22:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but I don't know what your talking about. I know no such user named Bigshowandkane on here. I've read all the rules on here before I started editing on this site and I didn't saying anything bad to you guy's. I didn't say any swears of say any bad threats too you at all ether. InformationExpertIsRight ( talk) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
But it makes no sense at all. He's been doing his voice for many years, Also, Paul voiced him until his death in 1986 not 1961 to 1967. I do agree that we do need sources, but it just makes no sense when he first removed it. Also, Disney Studios confirmed themselves that he voices him, and Corey's website says it as well. InformationExpertIsRight ( talk) 23:05, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
23:45, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
The IP was making the usual edits to articles adding unsourced info as they did here. It does geolocate to the same area as the previous ones. After they had been found out the Popeye sock was created and started making the same edits while adding edit summaries like this one stating that they don't need to add sourcing. This is a hallmark of this persons attitude to editing articles. This is another repeat of the kind of edit summary of past socks. After the Popeye account was blocked a threat to continue socking was made on their talk page. Then the Thomas account was created and the same edits (including more unsourced BLP info here as the other two commenced. MarnetteD| Talk 22:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Occupation and unsourced editting on Joe Alaskey, Phil Hartman, Craig T. Nelson, Alex Borstein, Don Messick and others. ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 20:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Adding some more IP's who are all restoring each other's edits and making the same sorts of edits to voice actor articles: [27], [28], [29] Sro23 ( talk) 20:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Their one edit is as WP:DUCK as it gets. MarnetteD| Talk 03:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Account blocked. Closing.-- Bbb23 ( talk) 11:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Edits on Grey DeLisle from IP starting with 2600:1000:B ‖ Ebyabe talk - Repel All Boarders ‖ 19:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Edits on Grey DeLisle from IP starting with 2600:1000:B, personal attacks ‖ Ebyabe talk - Attract and Repel ‖ 19:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Added 2600:1000:b02b:4e83:90cd:e3f8:705d:b1f7, an obvious duck. Sro23 ( talk) 20:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
The 2nd, 3rd, and 4th IPs continued to remove the sock-puppet template from the first IP, but first, the fifth IP removed content from Pat Fraley without giving a reason, then came back as the sixth IP and attacked Sro23 for reverting that edit. Woodstop45 ( talk) 15:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
More of the same: edit warring on Robin Williams, as well as the characteristic legal threat: [33] Sro23 ( talk) 23:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
The IPs have the same characteristic legal threats and harassment on Sro23 ( talk · contribs) and Ebyabe ( talk · contribs) using the 2600:1000 IP range ( [34]) as with the previously blocked IPs ( [35], [36]) on that page. They are geographically based in Massachusetts, where the user in question has IPs at his disposal, so I think that a range block would be necessary. Lord Sjones23 ( talk - contributions) 11:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Added an IP that attempted to remove another IP from this report. — Gestrid ( talk) 22:30, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
sock}}
templates from pages of IPs they've socked from. I'll try to continue this until someone starts looking into this. That way, the admin who looks into this will have as much info as possible for a rangeblock. —
Gestrid (
talk)
00:31, 27 November 2016 (UTC)Wiping the talk page of one of Bigshowandkane64's IP socks, User:2600:1000:B01F:C6C2:BCCB:1538:39B6:F18F Mr. Vernon ( talk) 06:20, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
This user appears to hop from IP to IP. Would a range block be possible by any chance if it is confirmed that these are indeed socks? JudgeRM (talk to me) 03:22, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Just end this sock puppet investigation crap thing. I can remove those tags as many times I want. 2600:1000:B02A:CE6C:A1B5:44FA:7B16:D2DB ( talk) 17:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
See this edit compared to this one. Also this and this. Note how the account made several null edits to become autoconfirmed, similar to what other socks did. Sro23 ( talk) 19:29, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Blocked but awaiting tags
This edit pretty much confirmed the puppetry. —
C.Fred (
talk)
19:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Username+dummy edits to get autoconfirmed ( [37], [38])+ edit warring to include "stand-up" ( [39] [40]) Sro23 ( talk) 15:38, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Confirmed and blocked. No tag per
WP:DENY. Closing.--
Bbb23 (
talk)
15:47, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
Same type of unproductive editing on Thomas & Friends series articles. Perhaps a range block is in order for the 2601:81 and :82 ranges, since there are a number of other IP addresses that I did not include? ‖ Ebyabe talk - Border Town ‖ 20:47, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Attacks on talk page ‖ Ebyabe talk - Welfare State ‖ 14:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.