Anujror ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)

13 July 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

• Anuj Ror Haryana 08 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Same topic area ( Ror). Similar user ID. Seems to be a case of WP:DUCK. Requesting CU. Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 17:36, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Perhaps this case page wasn't meant to be moved like that. My apologies. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 18:03, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Confirmed. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 19:58, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply
•  In progress Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Also  Confirmed is Anuj Haryana ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC) reply
• Everything seems to be in order, closing. Spicy ( talk) 03:13, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply

24 July 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

• Chaudhary of Haryana ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Same editing area ( Ror - related). Added the same content with the same source like the blocked user [1] [2]. Requesting CU as well. Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 12:36, 24 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Requesting page protection of Ror as well. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 12:48, 24 July 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• They're looking pretty  Likely to me, and taking the time of creation and the editing history into account, I'm tagging as proven. Blocked. The page is already semi protected, I'm not sure there's been enough recent disruption to justify raising the protection level at present. Feel free to ask for a 2nd opinion at RfPP. Girth Summit _(blether) 13:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC) reply

12 August 2022

Suspected sockpuppets

• Kaithal ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Same editing area (Ror; Neeraj Chopra; Teontha, Kaitha). Similar addition of kshatriya/warrior caste POV in the article [3] [4] [5]. Substantial interaction for a few day old sock [6]. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:12, 12 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Same large country. Not much else that technically links.  Possible. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 15:00, 12 August 2022 (UTC) reply
•  Awaiting administrative action - despite the lukewarm CU result, I think the behavioural evidence is strong enough to block Kaithal as a suspected sock. Within only a handful of edits they are making similar edits emphasizing caste on Neeraj Chopra [7] [8] [9] [10], editing the same obscure village article whose only substantial edits have been from Anujror socks [11], and inserting the same POV on Ror (caste) as noted in the filing. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 17:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC) reply
•  Blocked and tagged. Closing. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 13:19, 19 August 2022 (UTC) reply

10 March 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

• अनुज रोड़ हरियाणा ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Edits concern mostly the Rors' ancestry and people with the surname Ror, except for Draft:KC Seedpuriya. Examples include [12], their own userpage, Draft:Rahul Turan, and Draft:Ancestral North India (deleted per G12, like four revisions of Draft:Rahul Turan). Grammar and spelling are mediocre, and the username means "Anuj Ror Haryana" in Hindi. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 16:24, 10 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Diffs: [13] − by confirmed sockpuppet 'User:Chaudhary of Haryana' and [14] - by the User:अनुज रोड़ हरियाणा, are very similar, and considering the user name and the editing area, it seems like a WP:DUCK. - 117.201.113.82 ( talk) 10:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• The behaviour makes this look pretty likely to be related. CU makes this technically  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely). Given those two I've blocked as a suspected sock. Closing. Callanecc ( talk • contribs • logs) 04:32, 2 April 2023 (UTC) reply

27 June 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

• Anuj Choudhary Ror ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) (  Clerk note: original case name)

• Rudradaman127 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 103.48.65.132 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser ( log))
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Diffs linked for each username: Anuj Choudhary Ror and Rudradaman127 making the same edit, similar edits back in 2022 from 103.48.65.132. All three have been editing similar pages: 103.48.65.132 and Anuj Choudhary Ror both editing Rohri, with Rudradaman127 having the exact same agenda as them without ever editing the page. Also see the interaction timeline, with no overlap between the timing of their edits. ( Roundish ⋆ t) 14:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC) reply

@Rudradaman127 @103.48.65.132 ,I don't know who they are, I have nothing to do with them, may be they are same editing guy because they are writing truth and erasing lies that's why they look alike and to you they are same -seems to be related

Thank you Anuj Choudhary Ror ( talk) 07:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Combining text from duplicate filings on the same day RoySmith (talk) 13:58, 19 July 2023 (UTC)... reply

Similar user name (Anuj Choudhary Ror) and same editing area (Ror related). Linked user Rudradaman127 which might be another sock since substantial interaction. Editor interaction here - [15]. Requesting CU. Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Anuj Choudhary Ror is obvious per the diffs listed by me here in the SPI which has been removed now. Copy-pasting from my request -

Similar user name (Anuj Choudhary Ror) and same editing area (Ror related). Linked user Rudradaman127 which might be another sock since substantial interaction. Editor interaction here - [16]. Requesting CU. Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 09:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC) reply

Adding diffs. Same kind of 'warrior race' POV [17] [18] [19] [20]. POV pushing the same source [21] [22]. - Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 12:11, 1 July 2023 (UTC) reply

- Fylindfotberserk ( talk) 14:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Clerk assistance requested: - Probably needs merging into Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anujror. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC) reply
• Moved the case myself. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 20:17, 2 July 2023 (UTC) reply
• I am a checkuser, not a clerk. This case is currently awaiting a clerk to endorse or decline the request. As an opinion only, I suggest this may be suitable for a checkuser; that is, I think this could be endorsed. Obviously, checkusers will not comment ont he IP address. -- Yamla ( talk) 21:47, 16 July 2023 (UTC) reply
•  In progress - RoySmith (talk) 13:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC) reply
• Anuj Choudhary Ror is  Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) to अनुज रोड़ हरियाणा (from the archive). Rudradaman127 is  Possible to those. RoySmith (talk) 14:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC) reply
• I've blocked Anuj Choudhary Ror given the incredibly obvious username and various similarities in edit summaries etc. Not convinced about Rudradaman127, and the IP hasn't edited in ages. Closing. Thanks, Spicy ( talk) 16:42, 18 August 2023 (UTC) reply

17 September 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

• Transe Ænd Danse ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Balwant Chopra ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

I believe I've encountered two sockpuppets associated with this case, both reverting to restore the edits made by User:Anuj Choudhary Ror to Iron pillar of Delhi. I had undone that editor's changes because they were harmful, and only later found that they were a blocked sockpuppet. The accounts I am now reporting are:

• User:Transe Ænd Danse: created on 1 August at 11:41. Blocked sockpuppet Anuj Choudhary Ror had made its final edit on 1 August at 08:16. The new account edited Ror Dynasty on 13 September ( [23]), which seems to be a topic of particular interest of previous socks. On Iron pillar of Delhi, the account reverted my reversion of the previous sockpuppet here.
• User:Balwant Chopra: created on 30 August. Several edits to Ror Dynasty ( [24]), and today began reverting on Iron pillar of Delhi, with no explanation: [25], [26]. There are some articles recently created by this user which were later edited by the other account I am reporting ( [27], [28]), and other articles where both accounts have edited ( [29], [30]). Klastoy ( talk) 14:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• @ Klastoy Well, I just reverted your one edit at the Iron Pillar page with an explanation that sourced content was removed, nothing else, and expect this undo. I didn't revert any edits of previous editors or socks that you're mentioning here, and yes, I made more than 4000 edits on old pages and new pages without knowing their creators just to improve all articles, nothing else. you can check my all previous history of edits. Transe Ænd Danse ( talk) 17:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Both  Confirmed to Anuj Choudhary Ror. Blocked and tagged, closing. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:54, 1 October 2023 (UTC) reply

15 November 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

• Darya2023 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Fancy vibēs ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Darya2023 has a singular focus on Anna Oleksandrivna Katrulina, previously created by Fancy vibēs, a confirmed sock. See also Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Darya2023. Yamla ( talk) 13:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Unrelated. -- Yamla ( talk) 13:32, 15 November 2023 (UTC) reply

26 October 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

• Fancy vibēs ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) (  Clerk note: originally filed under this user)

• HorseRiderr ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• O chawal ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Exact same interest in the niche topic of creating articles on clans (sub-castes) of the Gurjar caste in India (also covered under WP:CASTE sanctions). The writing, referencing styles etc. are the same as well, see for e.g. Baniya (clan) and Vania clan by the sock and Hun clan and Tomar Gurjar (clan) by the master.

While the connection of these accounts is pretty apparent asking for CU to further verify this and see if this is part of a previous CASTE-based sock network. Gotitbro ( talk) 17:53, 26 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Another SPI has been opened regarding the sock (relaying apprehensions that the sock is indeed a part of a past network): Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bensebgli. Gotitbro ( talk) 03:47, 4 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Similar to Fancy vibēs, O Chawal is also editing pages related to Gurjar castes, Turkish dynasties, and Muslim tribes. Both users prefer to edit similar topics and have created hoax articles associating certain dynasties with Gurjars. For instance, Fancy vibēs added Gurjara words to the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty page here, while O Chawal created the Pratihara (clan) article and inserted the same Gurjar POV information. These actions mirror those of Fancy vibēs and previous socks. Both of them have edited many same pages.

Additionally, the edit summaries of both users are similar, including words such as Rmv ( Diff1, Diff2), inclusion ( Diff3, Diff4, Diff5, Diff6), colonial era (( Diff7, Diff8) and Good faith ( Diff9, Diff10). O Chawal also removed content from caste-related articles by referencing the WP:RAJ essay in the summary, a tactic similar to Fancy vibēs ( Diff11, Diff12).

O Chawal requested protection for the Pratihara (clan) page at WP:RFPP, emulating the actions of Fancy Vibes, who had done the same for the Gurjara-Pratihara dynasty.( Diff13, Permlink)

Fancy Vibes nominated Dewal Pratiharas for deletion, and O Chawal added a delete vote in the AfD. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 12:27, 12 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Clerk endorsed - Please, compare those three accounts. Vanjagenije (talk) 01:16, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply
• I've taken a look at these, and I'd be inclined to say  Inconclusive due to proxy use, but given the level of behavioural evidence presented I'll leave it as endorsed for another CU with a stronger grasp on proxies than me to take a look at. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:57, 13 November 2023 (UTC) reply
• Some separation going on, but I don't think it's proxies. I'd say O chawal is very  Likely to Fancy vibēs, while HorseRiderr borders on  Confirmed, and behaviour seals the deal (notes on cuwiki). Moving to Anujror, blocking (no TPA since we just had a revocation for FV), tagging, closing. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 13:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC) reply

22 October 2023

Suspected sockpuppets

• Bensebgli ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki) (  Clerk note: originally filed under this user)

• Fancy vibēs ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Fancy vibēs created their account in February 2022 but began editing on 2 October, 2023, making over 2,200 edits in just 20 days. Fancy vibēs recreated the Hun (clan) ( Hun clan) page, which was previously created by masters User:Johnbendenz and User:Bensebgli. Additionally, Fancy vibēs created other Gurjar clan articles using Javed Rahi's books as sources, following a similar approach to that of master Bensebgli's socks, User:Oku Ali and User:أسامة بن عبد الله وليد, who previously created similar Gurjar POV-pushing articles on subjects like Maitrak, Pratihara clan, Kushan clan, and Chalukiya, among others. 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 ^{𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜} 05:29, 22 October 2023 (UTC) reply

Fancy Vibēs created an article titled ' Tomar Gurjar (clan)' and asserted in that article that 'Prominent rulers, such as "Anangpal I Gurjar" of the Tomara dynasty and "Man Singh Tomar Gujar" of the Tomaras of Gwalior, belonged to the Tomar Gurjar clan.' However, in the main articles ( Tomaras of Gwalior and Tomara dynasty), it is stated that 'The Tomaras of Gwalior (also referred to as Tomar in modern vernaculars due to schwa deletion) were Rajput,' and 'The Tomara dynasty belonged to the Tomar clan of the Rajputs.' Fancy Vibēs has created numerous other hoax articles about South Indian castes ( WP:GSCASTE), much like Master User:Bensebgli and User:Johnbendenz. They are attempting to introduce Gurjar POV into the articles by citing books authored by Gurjar writer Javaid Rahi as their source. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 11:25, 7 November 2023 (UTC) reply

They've recently made changes to the dynasties in WP:GSCASTE articles, by removing other dynasties and introducing the Gurjar caste. See here. – DreamRimmer ( talk) 02:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

WP:Duck, apart from the glaring evidences raised above which includes using non-reliable Javed Rahi as a source, they are also citing Rahul Khari just like previous socks. Abecedare is not around from last few months, who is familiar with this sockfarm as well. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 05:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

→ Further, I am pinging User:Doug Weller who caught User:Hanshingling earlier this year, to quickly take a look and issue the necessary block as it is apparently another case of ducking. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 05:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Benseblgi is stale, but the data in the CU logs in consistent with these two being the same person. However, I am very confident indeed that Fancy vibēs is the same person as Transe Ænd Danse, which is blocked as a confirmed sock of Anuj Choudhary Ror and a suspect sock of Anujror. Blocking and tagging as confirmed to that case; I don't have time right now to do a behavioural analysis to determine whether this case ought to be merged into that one. Girth Summit _(blether) 12:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC) reply
• Moved report to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Anujror. If someone wants to evaluate if Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bensebgli, be my guest. Closing. MarioGom ( talk) 14:49, 5 December 2023 (UTC) reply

22 January 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

• Kokaabi ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Similar interest in Gujjar clan editing, in particular restoring content created by a sockpuppet at Solankis. Kokaabi's pattern of speech appears very similar to recently-blocked sock User:Fancy vibēs, compare Special:Diff/1184990546 to Special:Diff/1197986736. In addition to having linguistic quirks in common, this comment from Kokaabi suggests a far wider familiarity with Wikipedia policy than could be explained by their own editing history. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:15, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Confirmed to Fancy vibēs -  Blocked and tagged. Closing.. Girth Summit _(blether) 20:22, 22 January 2024 (UTC) reply

26 May 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

• Formal punjabiz ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

Formal punjabiz created 16 May. Today, first edits were to game autoconfirm with a dozen minor edits over a half hour, then recreated Kushan (clan)/ Kushana at Kasana (clan). Wikishovel ( talk) 19:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Blocked, tagged, closing. Bbb23 ( talk) 21:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC) reply

20 June 2024

Suspected sockpuppets

• B s sodha ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

B s sodha created 10 January. First edits began 14 June, flurry of minor edits, followed by recreation of Kasana (clan) at Kasana Gotra. Then resumed series of minor edits. Wikishovel ( talk) 20:21, 20 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Apparently aware of this SPI, as they've just moved Kasana Gotra to Draft:Kasana Gotra. Wikishovel ( talk) 22:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Requesting checkuser for further sleepers, since this account was created four months before the last SPI. Wikishovel ( talk) 07:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Comment There's an active case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bensebgli which is likely operated by the same person as this sockfarm. Ratnahastin ( talk) 16:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• They're  Technically indistinguishable from previous socks in this case. The following are all  Confirmed to the proposed account (many of them apparent sleepers created in quick succession):
  • Mahesh Chaluk ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Shhamsherrana ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Vishnupal badgurjar ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Bhola786 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Teja Singh Bhati ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Rana Aslamm ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Ashutosh katariya ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Gujarati Kshatriya ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Also separately  Confirmed to Formal punjabiz are:
  • Sundhal Khattak ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Teja Singh Bhati ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Bjs238912 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Salimbhatt234 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • BDANC ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Ahaan Chap ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • AmyJadeja ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Gujarati Kshatriya ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Rana Aslamm ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Ashutosh katariya ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Blocking all the above. There is more digging to do, but I'm out of time - leaving this open, endorsed for CU should anyone else want to look at it before I get chance to circle back around to it. There are also some accounts on the same IPs that might be them, but there are some technical differences and not sufficiently confident to block - come back if you spot any other accounts behaving similarly, even if the behaviour predates this check. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:22, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply
•  Endorsed by a checkuser - see above. Girth Summit _(blether) 11:23, 22 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• The accounts listed by GS above are all part of a singular technical cluster indistinguishable from past Anujror socks. I can add the following accounts to the list:
  • Tanviralvi2362 ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Vanrajeya ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • NitinThakud ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
  • Feniles ( talk ⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser( log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Feniles is a somewhat special case. They're indistinguishable from this group, and directly confirmed to Sanwalniazik and Popalzixs from the Thakor Sumant Sinhji Jhala SPI. Per Spicy, that master is is sharing accounts with this one. I'll block the unblocked ones. I'm hesitant to spend more time on disentangling the linkage to TSSJ and/or Bensebgli in light of the significant SPI backlog and the fact that the question seems at least partly academic. -- Blablubbs ( talk) 08:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC) reply
• All accounts are blocked, and in light of the current backlog detangling which sock is used by which master(s) seems to not be a worthwhile endeavor (if it is even possible). The Wordsmith ^{Talk to me} 22:30, 12 July 2024 (UTC) reply