Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 22:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – An IP editor has repeatedly restored this disputed content to the article: A fan who sent a text message to Cetrone regarding the Snyder Cut's existence later posted a doctored screenshot of them, falsely claiming that Cetrone confirmed the Snyder Cut's existence.
It was originally removed by editor Dcdiehardfan for being not noteworthy
[1], before being restored by the IP editor, at which point I removed it before the IP editor restored it multiple times, with increasing personal attacks in their edit summaries directed towards Dcdiehardfan: Yet another case of sourced references deleted without reason. User is a repeated remover using WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT logic.
[2]; Do you not see what section it was put in? It's factually relevant to everything the extremist fanbase did throughout. Hence why someone included it in the first place and (once again) it was incoherently removed by an obvious biased fanboy who has repeatedly/illogically removed anything negative related to the movie or Snyder bit by bit while laughably claiming "cleaned up".
[3]; It's not "two separate editors", one of them is a factually proven troll.
[4]. The IP editor has refused to engage in
the talk page discussion, where a third editor, JascaDucato, has said they agree that the content is not noteworthy. In response to a warning about their personal attacks on the IP's talk page, they responded with "stop the disruptive defending" LOL Piss off you pathetic troll-defending hypocrite. I repeatedly/effortlessly exposed the weirdo fanboy blanking out sourced info over and over solely because it was negative towards the movie. Soooo disruptive.
Reporting all of you now. And stop stalking my edits, douche.
At this point, it doesn't seem like that the IP editor is going to be willing to engage in a discussion about the content on the article's talk page, and is rather going to try to edit war the content in despite three other editors disagreeing with its inclusion. –
notwally (
talk)
03:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Please semi-salt this talk page without an article that has now been created 3 times Me Da Wikipedian ( talk) 03:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sock puppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 ( talk) 04:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spree of new accounts coming to remove sourced content reflecting negatively on the subject of the page. GraziePrego ( talk) 05:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. GeographicAccountant ( talk) 07:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page belongs to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict article class and should be protected by Wikipedia policy (see its talk page [ [5]]) from edits by IP users or those lacking extended confirmed account. During last days the page was vandalized twice. Please add protection per WP policy. רמרום ( talk) 08:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Replace the semi-protection; highly visible BLP page. The page's extended confirmed protection expired. MAL MALDIVE ( talk) 09:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs in the 2a0a:ef40:* and 2a02:c7c:* ranges slow edit warring with increasingly misleading edit summaries to remove particular content from the article (eg. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]). Appears to be LTA User:Lam312321321 who is currently subject to a SPI rangeblock on a subset of 2a0a:ef40:*, a subset that has blanked content from this article ( [12]) which the wider IP range has later tried to blank again. Belbury ( talk) 09:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary, because it was placed for an edit war which was 14 years ago. I think it is time to consider unprotecting the page. 74.14.6.233 ( talk) 05:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
{{
Edit protected}}
, {{
Edit template-protected}}
, {{
Edit extended-protected}}
, or {{
Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.{{
Edit COI}}
template should be used.
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Request a specific to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Paul Vaurie ( talk) 22:56, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes: Persistent
disruptive editing – An IP editor has repeatedly restored this disputed content to the article: A fan who sent a text message to Cetrone regarding the Snyder Cut's existence later posted a doctored screenshot of them, falsely claiming that Cetrone confirmed the Snyder Cut's existence.
It was originally removed by editor Dcdiehardfan for being not noteworthy
[1], before being restored by the IP editor, at which point I removed it before the IP editor restored it multiple times, with increasing personal attacks in their edit summaries directed towards Dcdiehardfan: Yet another case of sourced references deleted without reason. User is a repeated remover using WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT logic.
[2]; Do you not see what section it was put in? It's factually relevant to everything the extremist fanbase did throughout. Hence why someone included it in the first place and (once again) it was incoherently removed by an obvious biased fanboy who has repeatedly/illogically removed anything negative related to the movie or Snyder bit by bit while laughably claiming "cleaned up".
[3]; It's not "two separate editors", one of them is a factually proven troll.
[4]. The IP editor has refused to engage in
the talk page discussion, where a third editor, JascaDucato, has said they agree that the content is not noteworthy. In response to a warning about their personal attacks on the IP's talk page, they responded with "stop the disruptive defending" LOL Piss off you pathetic troll-defending hypocrite. I repeatedly/effortlessly exposed the weirdo fanboy blanking out sourced info over and over solely because it was negative towards the movie. Soooo disruptive.
Reporting all of you now. And stop stalking my edits, douche.
At this point, it doesn't seem like that the IP editor is going to be willing to engage in a discussion about the content on the article's talk page, and is rather going to try to edit war the content in despite three other editors disagreeing with its inclusion. –
notwally (
talk)
03:30, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Please semi-salt this talk page without an article that has now been created 3 times Me Da Wikipedian ( talk) 03:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent sock puppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TyMega. HorrorLover555 ( talk) 04:09, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spree of new accounts coming to remove sourced content reflecting negatively on the subject of the page. GraziePrego ( talk) 05:20, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism. GeographicAccountant ( talk) 07:21, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Page belongs to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict article class and should be protected by Wikipedia policy (see its talk page [ [5]]) from edits by IP users or those lacking extended confirmed account. During last days the page was vandalized twice. Please add protection per WP policy. רמרום ( talk) 08:45, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Replace the semi-protection; highly visible BLP page. The page's extended confirmed protection expired. MAL MALDIVE ( talk) 09:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – IPs in the 2a0a:ef40:* and 2a02:c7c:* ranges slow edit warring with increasingly misleading edit summaries to remove particular content from the article (eg. [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]). Appears to be LTA User:Lam312321321 who is currently subject to a SPI rangeblock on a subset of 2a0a:ef40:*, a subset that has blanked content from this article ( [12]) which the wider IP range has later tried to blank again. Belbury ( talk) 09:18, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: The protection is no longer necessary, because it was placed for an edit war which was 14 years ago. I think it is time to consider unprotecting the page. 74.14.6.233 ( talk) 05:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
{{
Edit protected}}
, {{
Edit template-protected}}
, {{
Edit extended-protected}}
, or {{
Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.{{
Edit COI}}
template should be used.
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.