This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | → | Archive 65 |
Owner of IFrogz, developer of InvisibleSHIELD [1], cited in TheStreet.com [2], abc4.com [3]. --- Trevj ( talk) 10:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
This template is used for a tool on the Toolserver. The URL of the Tool is
This tool is linked on more than 2000 (!) Pages in the german WP. The script has been moved before. maybe, important informations to prevent deleting have been lost at that time. Antonsusi ( talk) 18:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
That needs an adjust of the PHP-script on the toolserver and I've no access to the script. The last user, that has made an edit (when I remember well), was User:Kolossos. I can ask him, but as first step the template shoudt be undeleted to make the tool as quickly as possible usable. The next step is an adjusting of the script to use annother template page. Antonsusi ( talk) 22:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
An email archived as ticket # 2011111410022819 in the permissions queue confirms permission from the owner of KevinBreak.com under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). - MorganKevinJ (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I strongly believe that page should not be deleted. In my opinion the A7 is not applicable for this case, since the mentioned article is as important (or unimportant) as the Travian, Freeciv.net, Evony or any other game from the List_of_multiplayer_browser_games. With the logic every article from List_of_multiplayer_browser_games should be given A7 and deleted.
Additionally it appears that the article has been created and deleted 3 more times in the past, which does not make sense. - LevanJugheli ( talk) 05:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
to edit - Stinalaurensanders ( talk) 10:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I deleted this file from Commons, as it is a logo. It was requested that I comment this here, in case someone wanted to restore the file locally under a non-free criteria. - Cambalachero ( talk) 13:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
is a valid article topic - Wbm1058 ( talk) 15:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I do not understand why this article was deleted. The topic is not a hoax (Google it). Several Wikipedia articles link to this article, and they now have red links. The user User:Jmckeon ie who resumed editing on December 24 after over a year hiatus, and proposed deletion on Christmas day retired from Wikipedia on New Years Day?!
Sorry, but could not figure out how to contact admin directly. Admin removed our company's wiki page based on copyright violations, but alleged voilation was descriptive text of our company from our website. We can easily modify descriptive text on Wikipedia to avoid exact duplication of text on our website if that addresses Wikipedia's concern, but entire Fenwick & West wiki page should not have been deleted. - Rkshimako ( talk) 15:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Could I have a copy of the source code restored to my userspace so that I can work on addressing the concerns about the page so its possible for me to move the code to a different Wiki? - Ls883 ( talk) 00:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Used in (recently undeleted) article ZAGG Inc. --- Trevj ( talk) 09:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
this article is pure fact and i dont understand that reference stuff just leave as is please - Gamehogger911 ( talk) 03:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The page was originally deleted because there was "No independent and reliable cites to support claim of notability". Now ther is a scientific journal (Bioinformatics) peer-reviewed published article that in my opinion qualifies as an independent source. I thus ask you to undelete the page. Thank you very much. - Cibioltg ( talk) 09:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Clignett73 ( talk) 11:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clignett#Clignett http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Arunsingh16 has proposed deletion of de Clignett article. Why can't there be a Clignett article? -- Clignett73 ( talk) 11:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I was the fourth one to re-create the article. After I was done, it was said that it needed a clean-up and minutes later, they deleted the article and they didn't even give me any further notice. So, I recreated it again. Right after I was done, I refreshed it and an administrator said that I vandalised it and contested it for deletion, but after I was done making my reason of why not to delete the article, it was already deleted. And why was the reason that it was vandalised, Yeah, I may say that I re-created it, but I didn't vandalised. Instead, I was giving more verifiable resources for the article. - Oidsofipsd ( talk) 12:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The page was deleted and i want to know why. It was accepted yesterday, but someone deleted it today. - XMaXixX ( talk) 15:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This is the valid information of a singer from Lahore Pakistan who is working with industry since 2005 . - Khurramwazir23 ( talk) 15:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
DHWANI is most popular culfest of engineering collages in kerela which is hosted by College of Engineering, Trivandrum - 117.213.51.191 ( talk) 15:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This page was deleted was deleted with no warning. It did not meet the requirements for speedy deletion. Please restore the page with the appropriate flags so the article can be corrected. 173.45.194.71 ( talk) 17:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC) - 173.45.194.71 ( talk) 17:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Please can you re-check PO SUM ON should not have been deleted it is an official medicine that is sold worldwide.
Po Sum On was registered and officially marketed in Hong Kong in 1907. It is a multi-million pound turnover company based in Hong Kong.
Please see offical web page: http://www.posumon.com.hk/ Thanks." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.221.139 ( talk) 19:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I own the copyright to the material and I balanced the discussion with critiques of the approach as well as supporters - Profdavidf ( talk) 20:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The page of Shawn Butler may have chances that it doesn't violate copyrights and deletion, as
List of miscellaneous General Hospital characters had; I don't know how notable this character is, though. -
George Ho (
talk) 20:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC) What about the other two characters? I sure hope they do not violate copyrights of Soapcentral.com. --
George Ho (
talk) 20:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Contrary to some opinions, this is an important band that does have a dedicated fan base. A simple google search should be sufficient to show that this is a legitimate band that does warrant a wikipedia page. It was not for self promotion or about a band with releases on "unimportant indie labels". In fact, their albums are widely distributed and are readily available and quite easy to obtain on many websites, most notably Amazon. Please restore this page as soon as possible. - Chilejay7 ( talk) 02:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I am a Wikipedia viewer and use the site quite often. I am not a moderator and never edit any page, so forgive me if I am doing this incorrectly. I noticed that the Ultimatum (band) page for the American Heavy Metal Band, Ultimatum was deleted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ultimatum_%28American_band%29 Apparently the band was taken down because, "WP:MUSIC#5 - "Has released two or more albums on a major label or on one of the more important indie labels."
Ultimatum have released records on Massacre Records, Rowe Productions and Retroactive Records. Anyone with even the remotest knowledge of the Christian metal genre which they are a part of would know that these are well known and respected labels. Retroactive Records is an active label with a roster that includes some very well known names in the CCM and Christian Metal genre including Deliverance, Bride, Saint, among many others. Rowe Productions was a label with major U.S. distribution through the Diamante Music Group. To say these are not an "important indie labels" would be an poor judgment call or show clear ignorance of the music genre.
As well, the band has a 20 year history, has performed all over the country and have been on many, many compilation albums on several different labels. They have five full lengths albums out and an EP. If the administrators that deleted the band are not familiar with Christian metal, then I respectfully ask that they not make judgement calls on what "important indie labels" are for that genre.
A quick search on Google under Ultimatum metal, Ultimatum Christian metal, Ultimatum heavy metal, or any similar title reveals a long list of articles and photos, including articles for the Associated Press: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=71JIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=IP4DAAAAIBAJ&pg=1765,9477515&dq=scott-waters+ultimatum&hl=en
Ultimatum is included in the well known printed book Collector's Guide to Heavy Metal by Martin Popoff, as well as just about every heavy metal website out there including such well known sites as Metal-Archives, BNRMetal, nolifetilmetal.com, AllMusic.com, Amazon.com, etc. Ultimatum has been featured on the cover of HM Magazine as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hm_magazine
Can you please restore the Ultimatum page. - Ultmetal ( talk) 02:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Substantial article about a notable institution which just needs some cleanup. It's a listed building; hundreds of books as potential sources; public campaigns of support. Andrew Davidson ( talk) 07:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Beastkiller1298 ( talk) 19:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
I am trying to support the writing of a wikipedia page on Yo-yo's and this is a scan of a book printed by the company itself. I mistakenly didn't select the right copyright approval it should have been Historical Significant fair use. - ADogNamedGromit ( talk) 03:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Marwaadwalas ( talk) 05:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC) i have been informed that marwari namkeen is similar like rajasthani cuisine but there is a lot of difference between them because marwari namkeen contains different types of snack food whereas rajasthani cuisine have dishes like vegetables and Curry to eat with Indian bread call 'roti'. so please consider the fact and take your best decision.
The original older article should not have been deleted in favor of a recent article with less content. Please restore the original Snow Kid article, so a normal merge can be done. - Benjwong ( talk) 11:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
There is no clear reason for which the page was deleted. The band did not even create this page - I have it on good authority from the vocalist. - 174.92.96.45 ( talk) 13:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
This file was deleted from One Day at a Time under grounds that the non-free image consisted of a copyright-ineligible logo. However, per WP:non-free content review#File:I Love Lucy Titlecard.png, there is a debate between replacing and keeping on the basis of (ir)replaecability of non-free title cards. There must be a recovery of this image if kept alive in admin data. Then when time goes by, this may be put under review. - George Ho ( talk) 00:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Rubenoff ( talk) 22:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
why was the article daytime running and fog lamps deleted??
If the person doing the deletion has better qualifications than I Lets see them
Grade 12 with 65 years in the mechanical trades welding and vehicle repair and rebuilding
Licensed in Vehicle repair and vehicle inspection, trained in accident investigation and accident prevention, Trained in preparation of training programmes
35 years a s a Govt fleet manager in B.C Canada responsible for operation of 20 major repair facilities and hiring and training staff, ordering replacement parts and replacement vehicles and disposal of surplus equipment, preparing annul orders for all supplies elated to equipment operations
reasoning - Tophthemetalbender ( talk) 00:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Components: V S M 01:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - 41.213.68.35 ( talk) 04:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Please userify so I can work on it. Thanks - Mathewignash ( talk) 06:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
I want to get my details back - Ayesh.kahawala ( talk) 14:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
requesting userfication, mistakenly created outside of my user area - my first attempt at an article - I have now gathered all of my notability references and was coming back in to complete the article. Sorry for screwing up the authoring process, trying to learn. - Phil801 ( talk) 17:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Phil801/DOA Tactical. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 10:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
This article was intended to be used to add additional legitimate information with which to be able to contact schools, so that we could deliver workshops and possible lessons. We have no website for the time being and this was to provide that function. Given that there are many other authors/organisations on here that DON'T state WHY they're on here, we feel that this treatment is grossly unfair and shortsighted. - Lascorza ( talk) 21:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Revert PROD so content can be merged & page can be redirected to main article Aqua Teen Hunger Force without loss of edit history - Cybercobra (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
It had been said that I created it and was deleted due to vandalism. The question is, how can you call it a vandalism, if the writer itself was the only one who edited the page, and it was only edited once. Okay, there is also the reason of creating hoaxes, why do you call it a hoax? The singer is real, it had already released 2 singles and is actually signed by a record label. - Jfskdfjksdfhjksd ( talk) 09:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - RobertGBrooks ( talk) 22:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Most responses on deletion discussion favored keeping the article, with those proposing deletion not responding to the latest finding/opinion that the outside coverage was sufficient and the article met the standards set forth in the GNG. - YoungLochinvar ( talk) 22:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Goanna300 ( talk) 23:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Dear Administrators,
While I am a national journalist with Australia's ABC as well as a media lecturer, I am not really familiar with the style you consider "encyclopedic."
ColorGHear: PROD; notified Goanna300 (talk · contribs) 03:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Reason: non notable plugin, no references, written in a very unencyclopedic style
A later post-deletion log item described the item as advertising.
Please let me explain. I originally saw this item as of intense media interest: A video colourist has developed a series of settings for someone else's software. He seems to be claiming intellectual property rights for these settings, although he has not so far produced anything which seems to be patented. The intriguing question is whether colours in moving images can be something which can be patented. Will users of motion picture settings (Hue, saaturation, brightness, etc) one day have to pay for using them? Add to the film's credits the following, "Colour settings (c)20011 ColorGHear inc."
Now, this was a collaborative Wikipedia item which was evolving well. I had started it off saying, "it seems to be some sort of plugin for [Adobe After effects]. Someone else contributed the line "..is a collection of presets" Someone [else] added some complementary info about the advantage of these settings. I edited this all, deleting my remark about plugins and re-positioning the "collection of settings" line to the top. Finally, I added the tag, "Citation Needed" to the complementary remark or definition - because, although that remark may have been over--complementary, its contributor deserved the chance to quote his/her sources.
Isn't that how Wikipedia works?
I have no personal opinion of ColorGHear. It looks impressive, subjectively - but video colourisation can often be made to look good at first. We needed a professional colourist to test and review ColorGHear's settings. WHich was why I wrote that the product[?] had not yet been reviewed.
Photo use authorization was granted by owner - 24.8.102.71 ( talk) 06:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
It seems to have been asserted that the photo of Hazel Barnes was not authorized by the owner. However I assert that the photo was taken by myself, Reed Lindberg, in my home, on Hazel's 92nd birthday. My wife, Betty Cannon, is Hazel's literary executor. We were contacted by a Wikipedia representative and granted use of the picture. You may contact me for further clarification. Reed Lindberg
The page was a valid 3rd party-created page about an internationally known artist who is referred to in many other Wikipedia posts. I will be honest that I am an interested party (he is my boyfriend) but I know that he didn't create the page, and we are not sure why it was taken down. He has enough "notability" to have a page, as he has been putting out music for 14 years (see Discogs.com) was just profiled in DJ Weekly http://www.djmag.com/news/detail/3077 and his new EP featured on The Untz among other places. These and other reliable sources can be included to improve the page, if it were put back up. Thank you. - 99.14.160.199 ( talk) 01:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
please help me to restore the page to my userspace so i can merge info in the version which being speedy deleted to the current version - C933103 ( talk) 21:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Can anyone explain what's been going on with this article? It's been speedy deleted three times and restored twice in the past few months. I don't think there's any doubt that he qualifies as a notable figure, but I can't find much in the way of discussion about the deletions or restorations. - Eureka Lott 05:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deleted as being the same as a deleted article. It wasn't as subject had gained 'notability' since original deletion - Egghead06 ( talk) 06:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
the alleged copyright infringement does not apply as I am the author of the original article published on http://africaoutreach.blogspot.com and at the end of the article I have put a copyright notice allowing for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. - Cawsocia ( talk) 07:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I like JavaScript - BrandonSkyPimenta ( talk) 14:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Vanessa1000 ( talk) 16:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - AfghanUS ( talk) 21:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, you have deleted the page Azim Wardak even after I have added two references. Can you please undelete this page ?
Thank you very much.
Sincerely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AfghanUS ( talk • contribs) 21:28, 13 January 2012
reasoning - Cdrexpert ( talk) 21:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Please note WP:Conflict of interest. —Jeremy v^_^v Components: V S M 03:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
When I accessed this article it was little more than a stub, so I expanded it with accurate information (from my head) and intended to come back to it to improve it later (with proper sources), and I left a note on the talk page explaining this. But then the article was 'speedy deleted' on notability grounds, and now I can't improve it at all. What I left there was very much a work in progress - I know it didn't yet meet Wikipedia standards - but it was better than what it replaced, which is why I did it, and I would like to have the chance to establish notability. Please could it be restored to my namespace so I can improve it? Thank you. - Kimelea ( talk) 03:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
This film exists as well as all the references. To start with check: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0279367/ - CatWizard777 ( talk) 06:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
this band existed with a very well known line up, histrionically all is correct as well as references - believe this page was sabotaged - CatWizard777 ( talk) 06:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Dear Sir, It is to request you to that this page is of fully Non-Profit Organisation, of Kashmir India which is in its initial stage and is in need for recognition so that the trouble hit kashmiri youths who are unskilled get the information about skill possesion and the future prespectives.So it is requested to not to delete this page as it is spreading the knowledge to 1000's of kashmiri youth who don't have acess to basic technical education due to its political reasons etc. which world is aware of.
Kaiser Farooq - Jullious11 ( talk) 16:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Jaume Cañellas Galindo · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 | afd3 ) · [ revisions This is one of the best child psychiatrists now living. The older article has been deleted due to reasons that the last translation ( Spanish Wikipedia ) no longer exist.
The previous two attacks for deletion have been aggressively offensive (difamatory) and shows a special interest by Catalan separatists (Independentists) to attack the character. Surely because is a defender of universal human rights and equality in the world (especially in Spain). The character is a human rights activist in the world of psychiatry and child and adolescent. Spokesman of various organizations on childhood and adolescence and leading figure in the promotion and dissemination of mental health of children and adolescents throughout the world. Especially in the Spanish-American countries, where it is a referent in psychiatry and mental health.
The character is a philanthropist, activist for the rights of children and non-profit organizations and Ambassador for Save the Children Spain.
If such prominent figures like this do not deserve an article in Wikipedia, as we maintain the quality ?
Surely we must improve the translation, but not delete it.-- Winterfree2000 ( talk) 22:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
the need for this article exists - Chaipau ( talk) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
The article was created after a discussion by a number of Wikipedians, given here. The need for a "parent" article still exists, and even more so because the Maithili script too is similar to these scripts. Chaipau ( talk) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
It is the Team Logo - NYGFan ( talk) 05:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Also as it is the team logo, someone who does not like NY teams must have deleted them. - NYGFan ( talk) 05:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Regards. Please undelete the Spaceseed band wiki. The article was still under construction and is all factual and relevant. References will be provided. thanks jp - Johnpack1 ( talk) 06:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Japanese band which released 12 singles and 8 original albums (and at least 6 compilations), most of them ranking in the top 20 of japanese oricon charts (ref : singles ranking, albums ranking) - 86.68.60.81 ( talk) 09:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
This page was deleted because it was termed to be about an organization that was not deemed relevant enough to have a wikipedia page, while several other organizations in similar size and scope in the same area are still active. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Messianic_Jewish_organizations for an example of those organizations. - Staein ( talk) 21:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 55 | ← | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 | Archive 61 | → | Archive 65 |
Owner of IFrogz, developer of InvisibleSHIELD [1], cited in TheStreet.com [2], abc4.com [3]. --- Trevj ( talk) 10:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
This template is used for a tool on the Toolserver. The URL of the Tool is
This tool is linked on more than 2000 (!) Pages in the german WP. The script has been moved before. maybe, important informations to prevent deleting have been lost at that time. Antonsusi ( talk) 18:57, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
That needs an adjust of the PHP-script on the toolserver and I've no access to the script. The last user, that has made an edit (when I remember well), was User:Kolossos. I can ask him, but as first step the template shoudt be undeleted to make the tool as quickly as possible usable. The next step is an adjusting of the script to use annother template page. Antonsusi ( talk) 22:21, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
An email archived as ticket # 2011111410022819 in the permissions queue confirms permission from the owner of KevinBreak.com under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). - MorganKevinJ (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I strongly believe that page should not be deleted. In my opinion the A7 is not applicable for this case, since the mentioned article is as important (or unimportant) as the Travian, Freeciv.net, Evony or any other game from the List_of_multiplayer_browser_games. With the logic every article from List_of_multiplayer_browser_games should be given A7 and deleted.
Additionally it appears that the article has been created and deleted 3 more times in the past, which does not make sense. - LevanJugheli ( talk) 05:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
to edit - Stinalaurensanders ( talk) 10:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I deleted this file from Commons, as it is a logo. It was requested that I comment this here, in case someone wanted to restore the file locally under a non-free criteria. - Cambalachero ( talk) 13:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
is a valid article topic - Wbm1058 ( talk) 15:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
I do not understand why this article was deleted. The topic is not a hoax (Google it). Several Wikipedia articles link to this article, and they now have red links. The user User:Jmckeon ie who resumed editing on December 24 after over a year hiatus, and proposed deletion on Christmas day retired from Wikipedia on New Years Day?!
Sorry, but could not figure out how to contact admin directly. Admin removed our company's wiki page based on copyright violations, but alleged voilation was descriptive text of our company from our website. We can easily modify descriptive text on Wikipedia to avoid exact duplication of text on our website if that addresses Wikipedia's concern, but entire Fenwick & West wiki page should not have been deleted. - Rkshimako ( talk) 15:41, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Could I have a copy of the source code restored to my userspace so that I can work on addressing the concerns about the page so its possible for me to move the code to a different Wiki? - Ls883 ( talk) 00:27, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Used in (recently undeleted) article ZAGG Inc. --- Trevj ( talk) 09:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
this article is pure fact and i dont understand that reference stuff just leave as is please - Gamehogger911 ( talk) 03:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The page was originally deleted because there was "No independent and reliable cites to support claim of notability". Now ther is a scientific journal (Bioinformatics) peer-reviewed published article that in my opinion qualifies as an independent source. I thus ask you to undelete the page. Thank you very much. - Cibioltg ( talk) 09:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Clignett73 ( talk) 11:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clignett#Clignett http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Arunsingh16 has proposed deletion of de Clignett article. Why can't there be a Clignett article? -- Clignett73 ( talk) 11:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I was the fourth one to re-create the article. After I was done, it was said that it needed a clean-up and minutes later, they deleted the article and they didn't even give me any further notice. So, I recreated it again. Right after I was done, I refreshed it and an administrator said that I vandalised it and contested it for deletion, but after I was done making my reason of why not to delete the article, it was already deleted. And why was the reason that it was vandalised, Yeah, I may say that I re-created it, but I didn't vandalised. Instead, I was giving more verifiable resources for the article. - Oidsofipsd ( talk) 12:51, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The page was deleted and i want to know why. It was accepted yesterday, but someone deleted it today. - XMaXixX ( talk) 15:18, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This is the valid information of a singer from Lahore Pakistan who is working with industry since 2005 . - Khurramwazir23 ( talk) 15:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
DHWANI is most popular culfest of engineering collages in kerela which is hosted by College of Engineering, Trivandrum - 117.213.51.191 ( talk) 15:50, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
This page was deleted was deleted with no warning. It did not meet the requirements for speedy deletion. Please restore the page with the appropriate flags so the article can be corrected. 173.45.194.71 ( talk) 17:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC) - 173.45.194.71 ( talk) 17:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Please can you re-check PO SUM ON should not have been deleted it is an official medicine that is sold worldwide.
Po Sum On was registered and officially marketed in Hong Kong in 1907. It is a multi-million pound turnover company based in Hong Kong.
Please see offical web page: http://www.posumon.com.hk/ Thanks." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.236.221.139 ( talk) 19:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
I own the copyright to the material and I balanced the discussion with critiques of the approach as well as supporters - Profdavidf ( talk) 20:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The page of Shawn Butler may have chances that it doesn't violate copyrights and deletion, as
List of miscellaneous General Hospital characters had; I don't know how notable this character is, though. -
George Ho (
talk) 20:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC) What about the other two characters? I sure hope they do not violate copyrights of Soapcentral.com. --
George Ho (
talk) 20:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Contrary to some opinions, this is an important band that does have a dedicated fan base. A simple google search should be sufficient to show that this is a legitimate band that does warrant a wikipedia page. It was not for self promotion or about a band with releases on "unimportant indie labels". In fact, their albums are widely distributed and are readily available and quite easy to obtain on many websites, most notably Amazon. Please restore this page as soon as possible. - Chilejay7 ( talk) 02:30, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I am a Wikipedia viewer and use the site quite often. I am not a moderator and never edit any page, so forgive me if I am doing this incorrectly. I noticed that the Ultimatum (band) page for the American Heavy Metal Band, Ultimatum was deleted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ultimatum_%28American_band%29 Apparently the band was taken down because, "WP:MUSIC#5 - "Has released two or more albums on a major label or on one of the more important indie labels."
Ultimatum have released records on Massacre Records, Rowe Productions and Retroactive Records. Anyone with even the remotest knowledge of the Christian metal genre which they are a part of would know that these are well known and respected labels. Retroactive Records is an active label with a roster that includes some very well known names in the CCM and Christian Metal genre including Deliverance, Bride, Saint, among many others. Rowe Productions was a label with major U.S. distribution through the Diamante Music Group. To say these are not an "important indie labels" would be an poor judgment call or show clear ignorance of the music genre.
As well, the band has a 20 year history, has performed all over the country and have been on many, many compilation albums on several different labels. They have five full lengths albums out and an EP. If the administrators that deleted the band are not familiar with Christian metal, then I respectfully ask that they not make judgement calls on what "important indie labels" are for that genre.
A quick search on Google under Ultimatum metal, Ultimatum Christian metal, Ultimatum heavy metal, or any similar title reveals a long list of articles and photos, including articles for the Associated Press: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=71JIAAAAIBAJ&sjid=IP4DAAAAIBAJ&pg=1765,9477515&dq=scott-waters+ultimatum&hl=en
Ultimatum is included in the well known printed book Collector's Guide to Heavy Metal by Martin Popoff, as well as just about every heavy metal website out there including such well known sites as Metal-Archives, BNRMetal, nolifetilmetal.com, AllMusic.com, Amazon.com, etc. Ultimatum has been featured on the cover of HM Magazine as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hm_magazine
Can you please restore the Ultimatum page. - Ultmetal ( talk) 02:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
Substantial article about a notable institution which just needs some cleanup. It's a listed building; hundreds of books as potential sources; public campaigns of support. Andrew Davidson ( talk) 07:20, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Beastkiller1298 ( talk) 19:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
I am trying to support the writing of a wikipedia page on Yo-yo's and this is a scan of a book printed by the company itself. I mistakenly didn't select the right copyright approval it should have been Historical Significant fair use. - ADogNamedGromit ( talk) 03:41, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Marwaadwalas ( talk) 05:52, 8 January 2012 (UTC) i have been informed that marwari namkeen is similar like rajasthani cuisine but there is a lot of difference between them because marwari namkeen contains different types of snack food whereas rajasthani cuisine have dishes like vegetables and Curry to eat with Indian bread call 'roti'. so please consider the fact and take your best decision.
The original older article should not have been deleted in favor of a recent article with less content. Please restore the original Snow Kid article, so a normal merge can be done. - Benjwong ( talk) 11:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
There is no clear reason for which the page was deleted. The band did not even create this page - I have it on good authority from the vocalist. - 174.92.96.45 ( talk) 13:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
This file was deleted from One Day at a Time under grounds that the non-free image consisted of a copyright-ineligible logo. However, per WP:non-free content review#File:I Love Lucy Titlecard.png, there is a debate between replacing and keeping on the basis of (ir)replaecability of non-free title cards. There must be a recovery of this image if kept alive in admin data. Then when time goes by, this may be put under review. - George Ho ( talk) 00:51, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Rubenoff ( talk) 22:05, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
why was the article daytime running and fog lamps deleted??
If the person doing the deletion has better qualifications than I Lets see them
Grade 12 with 65 years in the mechanical trades welding and vehicle repair and rebuilding
Licensed in Vehicle repair and vehicle inspection, trained in accident investigation and accident prevention, Trained in preparation of training programmes
35 years a s a Govt fleet manager in B.C Canada responsible for operation of 20 major repair facilities and hiring and training staff, ordering replacement parts and replacement vehicles and disposal of surplus equipment, preparing annul orders for all supplies elated to equipment operations
reasoning - Tophthemetalbender ( talk) 00:43, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v Components: V S M 01:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - 41.213.68.35 ( talk) 04:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Please userify so I can work on it. Thanks - Mathewignash ( talk) 06:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
I want to get my details back - Ayesh.kahawala ( talk) 14:42, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
requesting userfication, mistakenly created outside of my user area - my first attempt at an article - I have now gathered all of my notability references and was coming back in to complete the article. Sorry for screwing up the authoring process, trying to learn. - Phil801 ( talk) 17:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Phil801/DOA Tactical. Graeme Bartlett ( talk) 10:08, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
This article was intended to be used to add additional legitimate information with which to be able to contact schools, so that we could deliver workshops and possible lessons. We have no website for the time being and this was to provide that function. Given that there are many other authors/organisations on here that DON'T state WHY they're on here, we feel that this treatment is grossly unfair and shortsighted. - Lascorza ( talk) 21:39, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
Revert PROD so content can be merged & page can be redirected to main article Aqua Teen Hunger Force without loss of edit history - Cybercobra (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
It had been said that I created it and was deleted due to vandalism. The question is, how can you call it a vandalism, if the writer itself was the only one who edited the page, and it was only edited once. Okay, there is also the reason of creating hoaxes, why do you call it a hoax? The singer is real, it had already released 2 singles and is actually signed by a record label. - Jfskdfjksdfhjksd ( talk) 09:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - RobertGBrooks ( talk) 22:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Most responses on deletion discussion favored keeping the article, with those proposing deletion not responding to the latest finding/opinion that the outside coverage was sufficient and the article met the standards set forth in the GNG. - YoungLochinvar ( talk) 22:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Goanna300 ( talk) 23:04, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
Dear Administrators,
While I am a national journalist with Australia's ABC as well as a media lecturer, I am not really familiar with the style you consider "encyclopedic."
ColorGHear: PROD; notified Goanna300 (talk · contribs) 03:50, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Reason: non notable plugin, no references, written in a very unencyclopedic style
A later post-deletion log item described the item as advertising.
Please let me explain. I originally saw this item as of intense media interest: A video colourist has developed a series of settings for someone else's software. He seems to be claiming intellectual property rights for these settings, although he has not so far produced anything which seems to be patented. The intriguing question is whether colours in moving images can be something which can be patented. Will users of motion picture settings (Hue, saaturation, brightness, etc) one day have to pay for using them? Add to the film's credits the following, "Colour settings (c)20011 ColorGHear inc."
Now, this was a collaborative Wikipedia item which was evolving well. I had started it off saying, "it seems to be some sort of plugin for [Adobe After effects]. Someone else contributed the line "..is a collection of presets" Someone [else] added some complementary info about the advantage of these settings. I edited this all, deleting my remark about plugins and re-positioning the "collection of settings" line to the top. Finally, I added the tag, "Citation Needed" to the complementary remark or definition - because, although that remark may have been over--complementary, its contributor deserved the chance to quote his/her sources.
Isn't that how Wikipedia works?
I have no personal opinion of ColorGHear. It looks impressive, subjectively - but video colourisation can often be made to look good at first. We needed a professional colourist to test and review ColorGHear's settings. WHich was why I wrote that the product[?] had not yet been reviewed.
Photo use authorization was granted by owner - 24.8.102.71 ( talk) 06:34, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
It seems to have been asserted that the photo of Hazel Barnes was not authorized by the owner. However I assert that the photo was taken by myself, Reed Lindberg, in my home, on Hazel's 92nd birthday. My wife, Betty Cannon, is Hazel's literary executor. We were contacted by a Wikipedia representative and granted use of the picture. You may contact me for further clarification. Reed Lindberg
The page was a valid 3rd party-created page about an internationally known artist who is referred to in many other Wikipedia posts. I will be honest that I am an interested party (he is my boyfriend) but I know that he didn't create the page, and we are not sure why it was taken down. He has enough "notability" to have a page, as he has been putting out music for 14 years (see Discogs.com) was just profiled in DJ Weekly http://www.djmag.com/news/detail/3077 and his new EP featured on The Untz among other places. These and other reliable sources can be included to improve the page, if it were put back up. Thank you. - 99.14.160.199 ( talk) 01:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
please help me to restore the page to my userspace so i can merge info in the version which being speedy deleted to the current version - C933103 ( talk) 21:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Can anyone explain what's been going on with this article? It's been speedy deleted three times and restored twice in the past few months. I don't think there's any doubt that he qualifies as a notable figure, but I can't find much in the way of discussion about the deletions or restorations. - Eureka Lott 05:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deleted as being the same as a deleted article. It wasn't as subject had gained 'notability' since original deletion - Egghead06 ( talk) 06:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
the alleged copyright infringement does not apply as I am the author of the original article published on http://africaoutreach.blogspot.com and at the end of the article I have put a copyright notice allowing for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License. - Cawsocia ( talk) 07:33, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
I like JavaScript - BrandonSkyPimenta ( talk) 14:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - Vanessa1000 ( talk) 16:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
reasoning - AfghanUS ( talk) 21:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hello, you have deleted the page Azim Wardak even after I have added two references. Can you please undelete this page ?
Thank you very much.
Sincerely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AfghanUS ( talk • contribs) 21:28, 13 January 2012
reasoning - Cdrexpert ( talk) 21:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10
User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Please note WP:Conflict of interest. —Jeremy v^_^v Components: V S M 03:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
When I accessed this article it was little more than a stub, so I expanded it with accurate information (from my head) and intended to come back to it to improve it later (with proper sources), and I left a note on the talk page explaining this. But then the article was 'speedy deleted' on notability grounds, and now I can't improve it at all. What I left there was very much a work in progress - I know it didn't yet meet Wikipedia standards - but it was better than what it replaced, which is why I did it, and I would like to have the chance to establish notability. Please could it be restored to my namespace so I can improve it? Thank you. - Kimelea ( talk) 03:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
This film exists as well as all the references. To start with check: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0279367/ - CatWizard777 ( talk) 06:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
this band existed with a very well known line up, histrionically all is correct as well as references - believe this page was sabotaged - CatWizard777 ( talk) 06:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Dear Sir, It is to request you to that this page is of fully Non-Profit Organisation, of Kashmir India which is in its initial stage and is in need for recognition so that the trouble hit kashmiri youths who are unskilled get the information about skill possesion and the future prespectives.So it is requested to not to delete this page as it is spreading the knowledge to 1000's of kashmiri youth who don't have acess to basic technical education due to its political reasons etc. which world is aware of.
Kaiser Farooq - Jullious11 ( talk) 16:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Jaume Cañellas Galindo · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 | afd3 ) · [ revisions This is one of the best child psychiatrists now living. The older article has been deleted due to reasons that the last translation ( Spanish Wikipedia ) no longer exist.
The previous two attacks for deletion have been aggressively offensive (difamatory) and shows a special interest by Catalan separatists (Independentists) to attack the character. Surely because is a defender of universal human rights and equality in the world (especially in Spain). The character is a human rights activist in the world of psychiatry and child and adolescent. Spokesman of various organizations on childhood and adolescence and leading figure in the promotion and dissemination of mental health of children and adolescents throughout the world. Especially in the Spanish-American countries, where it is a referent in psychiatry and mental health.
The character is a philanthropist, activist for the rights of children and non-profit organizations and Ambassador for Save the Children Spain.
If such prominent figures like this do not deserve an article in Wikipedia, as we maintain the quality ?
Surely we must improve the translation, but not delete it.-- Winterfree2000 ( talk) 22:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
the need for this article exists - Chaipau ( talk) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
The article was created after a discussion by a number of Wikipedians, given here. The need for a "parent" article still exists, and even more so because the Maithili script too is similar to these scripts. Chaipau ( talk) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
It is the Team Logo - NYGFan ( talk) 05:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Also as it is the team logo, someone who does not like NY teams must have deleted them. - NYGFan ( talk) 05:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Regards. Please undelete the Spaceseed band wiki. The article was still under construction and is all factual and relevant. References will be provided. thanks jp - Johnpack1 ( talk) 06:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Japanese band which released 12 singles and 8 original albums (and at least 6 compilations), most of them ranking in the top 20 of japanese oricon charts (ref : singles ranking, albums ranking) - 86.68.60.81 ( talk) 09:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
This page was deleted because it was termed to be about an organization that was not deemed relevant enough to have a wikipedia page, while several other organizations in similar size and scope in the same area are still active. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Messianic_Jewish_organizations for an example of those organizations. - Staein ( talk) 21:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)