![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 305 | Archive 306 | Archive 307 | Archive 308 | Archive 309 | Archive 310 | → | Archive 315 |
I, Wiley Bumtail, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wiley Bumtail ( talk) 01:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Wiley Bumtail, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wiley Bumtail ( talk) 01:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal ( talk) 12:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
I, PeanutButterMarshmallowTime, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PeanutButterMarshmallowTime ( talk) 22:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Picher Alley, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. heyho ( talk) 22:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
I, 97.125.173.98, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 97.125.173.98 ( talk) 01:36, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Article was well sourced and about the most important English language news source in Colombia. After research, it appears that it was deleted by an individual Richard3120 who works for the company and was unhappy with the unbiased critical nature of the entry. Request that the article be restored in its entirety as it is both accurate and extremely relevant. — Malachi ( talk) 11:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
The page was created and maintained by an ex-employee of our company. He has been removing any of his work on which access was still allowed. — 149.248.242.41 ( talk) 17:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — RichardLyons74 ( talk) 13:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
This is a fair use in this article as the image is relevant to a historically significant contributor in the film, namely Ray Harryhausen and the image used is for information purposes and does accurately represents the film the article is about. Both the image of Harryhausen and the inclusion of the small model Kraken appear in the film. The third person is the film’s director John Walsh (filmmaker). It does fit into existing policy on Wikipedia for such film related images.
I, Jmlucero, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jmlucero ( talk) 19:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
This page was deleted as an expired PROD. Accordingly it must be restored on request. I therefore request that it be restored, as the deletion rationale had no basis in policy or guideline and was in fact completely bizarre total nonsense.
World Trade Organisation dispute settlement cases obviously satisfy LISTN, having received and enormous amount of coverage both individually and as a group. We do not delete articles because they need to be updated or expanded (doing so would violate WP:PRESERVE and WP:ATD, and especially WP:SOFIXIT). We do not delete articles because the information can be found in non-WMF sources (1) All the information on Wikipedia can be found elsewhere because of WP:V and WP:NOR. Wikipedia never includes information not available from other sources. (2) There is no reason to assume that the WTO website will be perpetually available. They could slap a massive paywall on that tomorrow, or remove it from the web altogether. (3) There is no way a list of cases can be incorrect. It is a fact that those cases happened.
I cannot understand why this ludicrous nomination was rubber stamped by an admin. — James500 ( talk) 03:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — 104.37.116.200 ( talk) 06:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Sienna Smith ( talk) 15:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Have you read what I'm interested in? Sienna Smith ( talk) 15:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Cschff, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cschff ( talk) 15:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Mathewfaust, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mathewfaust ( talk) 17:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I plan to work on this page to make the changes that were originally recommended to me to make it publishable. — Mathewfaust ( talk) 17:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I must have been mistaken for the purpose of the sandbox. I was under the impression that the sandbox was here for me to upload wiki edits that are not complete and still in the making. I work for BiT DMS and I was writing edits for their help page that were not ready to upload but needs to be uploaded now. I don't understand why my sandbox was deleted. I spent many work hours working on these wiki edits, and I need the content back because I do not have it backed up in another location. I am requesting that if the page is not restored, that the content from the page is sent to me as quickly as possible. thank you. — Kaylabrownie ( talk) 15:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
'Some' administrator? Can you point me in the direction of 'some' administrator that will do so? I need this content as soon as possible so I can post it to the proper page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaylabrownie ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
PRODed, please restore so it can be redirected to the list of mayors. — RAN ( talk) 01:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC) -- RAN ( talk) 01:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
There were versions of an article for Sandy Reed deleted back in 2010 and in 2015, by an editor who is no longer an administrator and by another who has retired. Could someone possibly please provide either or both to me, if they have anything to do with a stonemason or builder or architect in the state of Idaho. -- Doncram ( talk) 02:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC) — Doncram ( talk) 02:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal ( talk) 05:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Composter, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Composter ( talk) 05:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Before it was redirected to the now deleted Portal:Suffolk, this was its own page that was recently redirected without discussion. Please could it be restored to it's pre-redirect state. — Inops ( talk) 14:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Dfrydel ( talk) 23:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
I was in the process of job change and was compelled to leave the article abandoned. I would like to pick up on my unfinished work.
I, Robertjgray, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Robertjgray ( talk) 19:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
the page was deleted as I had not worked on it for some time. I intend to complete it now and submit it for publication — Robertjgray ( talk) 20:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
. --
TheSandDoctor
Talk 04:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)This page (originally at Talk:Time Warner/Comments) is not, and has never been, a "test page". It should instead just be redirected to Talk:WarnerMedia. — GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 05:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Love on the Brain, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 14:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
just need to have some help on have My Late Instructors Bio not removed. please send me to someone who can help me publish this probperly. I'm sorry if I have not followed the proper steps but will learn so i do not make the same mistakes and waste so many editors time.
Peelsan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peelsan ( talk • contribs) 04:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
I used this template on my old user talk page (User:DrStrauss) and found it useful but it has since been deleted. I'm happy for it to be refunded to my user namespace if I will be the only one using it. — StraussInTheHouse ( talk) 12:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
I acknowledge that the article was created prematurely since I used the title I found in a Wikimedia Commons file. However, i think I could improve upon it if userfied. Please userfy this to my user name. — Thylacoop5 ( talk) 13:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Dbouchaffra, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dbouchaffra ( talk) 18:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
PROD-ded in 2015, but they were just promoted to the Serbian second division. The information in the article should still be generally relevant and the club should easily pass WP:NFOOTY. — SportingFlyer talk 19:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Narayansg ( talk) 20:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC) The page on Mike Levin, a congressional candidate in California's 49th district, was deleted after it attracted vandalism from his political opponent in the primary election that occurred on June 5. Mike won the primary, and is the Democratic nominee for Congress in the 49th District. During the discussion regarding the deletion of the page, some administrators (although I do not know who) said that Levin will be notable enough for a Wikipedia page if he wins the primary and the Democratic nomination. Since he has won the primary and the Democratic nomination, this page should be undeleted and put back up.
I, Asoccer maniac, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Asoccer maniac ( talk) 22:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Please note that I want to undelete the version from 2016/7 (i.e first edited Dec 2016/last edited ca. Jan 2017). Asoccer maniac ( talk) 22:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
PRODded in 2011 for no showing of ever having participated in the Serbian Cup. They made it to the 2nd round of the 2017-18 Serbian Cup, and I'd like to recreate the article. — SportingFlyer talk 04:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
(a) The proposed article is based on State of Texas legislature documents, which are in the public domain; (b) There is much debate but little centralized knowledge on the "Emerging Research Institution" requirements and similar programs in Texas — 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 21:10, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Please see link: http://www.house.state.tx.us/help/website-policies/texas-public-information-act/
Also note that there is no (c) copyright note in the document linked below, or in any similar documents cited in Draft:Texas Research Initiatives
http://www.house.state.tx.us/_media/pdf/committees/reports/82interim/House-Committee-on-Higher-Education-Interim-Report-2012.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 21:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
The purpose of the Draft:Texas Research Initiatives was to centralize information originating from State of Texas agencies. University of Texas System is an agency of the State of Texas. Please undelete the articles and I and others could reword it based on the Texas House documents which are in the public domain. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 21:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
In my opinion speedy deletion under G12 has been applied too harshly to this particular draft article. Please restore it so that the copyright issues can be addressed. Thank you and good luck to the soccer teams of your countries in the 2018 FIFA World Cup! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 01:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
This was only a draft article. Undelete it and it will be fixed. The concept of "emerging research university/institution" occurs in several places on Wikipedia, but it is not explained anywhere. It is why I started the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 03:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Examples:
Here's a similar page: Texas_Emerging_Technology_Fund to the one I wanted created.
Please be reasonable - thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 04:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Hut 8.5 I can address all these issues, but I do not have access to the article any more - like you administrators apparently have. The subject is an important one to many people as I tried to explain above, so please, be so kind and undelete the draft article. Thank you for your cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 16:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Hut 8.5, it would be very helpful to have the source back - thanks. And if I start a new draft article, can it have the same title i.e. "Texas Research Initiatives"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 19:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
You wrote that you can grant me access to the sources of the original draft article. Could you please do so? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 16:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Texas Research Initiatives was only a draft article and obviously imperfect. After a warning about the alleged copyright issues, I would have fixed the article right-away. As of right now, I lost any motivation to rewrite it from scratch. Please follow this link [1] and read how damages in copyright infringements are calculated. Who do you think would have written a 3-4 page court complain, pay $420 to file it in court and get zero in return? Because any judge would have found the similarities with the cited references fair use [2].
P.S. Wikipedia exists because of the content that is dded, not deleted, and maybe administrators should be also concerned about not driving editors away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 19:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
References
I request the undeletion of this page. It was deleted under WP:G11 but It's not a promotion at all. It's essential and useful article since this product has made a lot of news and is a best seller and has been recognized by critics as 'the best hair repair product'. it definitely has the required notability and verifiability. the "Hair care products" category needs this article — CerberaOdollam ( talk) 05:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Kelvin Mason ( talk) 11:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC) I have added blue interal Wikipedia links to the page
there is no reason why this page has been deleted. This page is important for the history of both the AFL and WAFL. This man is now a sandover medalist, an E.B Cook Medalist, two time Simpson Medalist, 3 time State player and played over 50 games for the Claremont Football Club. He is an amazing role model for his community and a biography is a must. Please allow page creation for this man. I do not understand why it was deleted on the first place? Thank you. — 144.138.241.130 ( talk) 16:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I used Twinkle on Module:Miscellaneous pages with authority control identifiers and assumed it created the correct entry for the Module, but instead it created a request for the Template. I wish to retrieve the Template and will delete the Module later. — ~ Tom.Reding ( talk ⋅ dgaf) 15:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I want to improve this page to make it eligible fow wikipedia — Sparkychknet ( talk) 23:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I, 165.125.181.19, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 165.125.181.19 ( talk) 01:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Inamabidi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. inam 07:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Prof Crawf, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof Crawf ( talk • contribs) 17:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a
draft or
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —
C.Fred (
talk) 17:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
WP:REFUND applies as there was a deletion debate "with little or no participation other than the nominator". No other editor supported deletion, and one editor (myself) favoured retention, citing the relevant criterion. One other editor commented on the acceptability of the images, but that is not relevant to article deletion. No editor suggested that my justification might be invalid. The nominator did not mention PJ's recording history in the proposal — Davidships ( talk) 17:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Done
WP:Articles for deletion/Peter Jarvis closed as a soft delete, per the closing admin (
Premeditated Chaos). —
C.Fred (
talk) 18:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
He is the Democratic nominee for Congress in California's 50th District and he has won the primary so he is notable at this point — Narayansg ( talk) 17:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a
deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammar Campa-Najjar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the
administrator who closed the discussion, user
A Train (
talk ·
contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at
deletion review. @
Narayansg: Please note that winning the primary is not winning an election, so per
WP:NPOLITICIAN, he is still not notable. Further, the article was redirected, not deleted. —
C.Fred (
talk) 18:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
The page is important to him for college admission and we can correct any update any missing information/links — Nofal eg ( talk) 14:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a
deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youssef Hazem, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the
administrator who closed the discussion, user
Timotheus Canens (
talk ·
contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at
deletion review.
Please note that Youssef Hazem BIO was moved to Youssef Hazem prior to the AfD. Technically, all that existed at this title was a redirect to the deleted article. — C.Fred ( talk) 18:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I've done some digging and can find quite a bit of mention of Gliese 3991 (mostly under the name G 203-47). Furthermore, it's the host system of the 9th nearest white dwarf, and the nearest compact white dwarf binary system. — exoplanetaryscience ( talk) 22:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Codo2411 ( talk) 00:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The previously deleted article contained copyrighted martial if restored any copyrighted content will be removed.
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Codo2411 ( talk) 00:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC) The previously deleted article contained copyrighted martial if restored any copyrighted content will be removed.
I, Arlo Barnes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arlo James Barnes 03:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
I want to see my user page that was speedily deleted. I don't want it restored for public view, I just want to see it to copy it, and then I'll make a user page that fits the requirements — Chuck Baggett ( talk) 07:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)-- Chuck Baggett ( talk) 07:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 305 | Archive 306 | Archive 307 | Archive 308 | Archive 309 | Archive 310 | → | Archive 315 |
I, Wiley Bumtail, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wiley Bumtail ( talk) 01:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Wiley Bumtail, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wiley Bumtail ( talk) 01:10, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal ( talk) 12:54, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
I, PeanutButterMarshmallowTime, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. PeanutButterMarshmallowTime ( talk) 22:02, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Picher Alley, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. heyho ( talk) 22:50, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
I, 97.125.173.98, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 97.125.173.98 ( talk) 01:36, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Article was well sourced and about the most important English language news source in Colombia. After research, it appears that it was deleted by an individual Richard3120 who works for the company and was unhappy with the unbiased critical nature of the entry. Request that the article be restored in its entirety as it is both accurate and extremely relevant. — Malachi ( talk) 11:22, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
The page was created and maintained by an ex-employee of our company. He has been removing any of his work on which access was still allowed. — 149.248.242.41 ( talk) 17:12, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — RichardLyons74 ( talk) 13:29, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
This is a fair use in this article as the image is relevant to a historically significant contributor in the film, namely Ray Harryhausen and the image used is for information purposes and does accurately represents the film the article is about. Both the image of Harryhausen and the inclusion of the small model Kraken appear in the film. The third person is the film’s director John Walsh (filmmaker). It does fit into existing policy on Wikipedia for such film related images.
I, Jmlucero, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jmlucero ( talk) 19:53, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
This page was deleted as an expired PROD. Accordingly it must be restored on request. I therefore request that it be restored, as the deletion rationale had no basis in policy or guideline and was in fact completely bizarre total nonsense.
World Trade Organisation dispute settlement cases obviously satisfy LISTN, having received and enormous amount of coverage both individually and as a group. We do not delete articles because they need to be updated or expanded (doing so would violate WP:PRESERVE and WP:ATD, and especially WP:SOFIXIT). We do not delete articles because the information can be found in non-WMF sources (1) All the information on Wikipedia can be found elsewhere because of WP:V and WP:NOR. Wikipedia never includes information not available from other sources. (2) There is no reason to assume that the WTO website will be perpetually available. They could slap a massive paywall on that tomorrow, or remove it from the web altogether. (3) There is no way a list of cases can be incorrect. It is a fact that those cases happened.
I cannot understand why this ludicrous nomination was rubber stamped by an admin. — James500 ( talk) 03:45, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — 104.37.116.200 ( talk) 06:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Sienna Smith ( talk) 15:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Have you read what I'm interested in? Sienna Smith ( talk) 15:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Cschff, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cschff ( talk) 15:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Mathewfaust, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mathewfaust ( talk) 17:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I plan to work on this page to make the changes that were originally recommended to me to make it publishable. — Mathewfaust ( talk) 17:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
I must have been mistaken for the purpose of the sandbox. I was under the impression that the sandbox was here for me to upload wiki edits that are not complete and still in the making. I work for BiT DMS and I was writing edits for their help page that were not ready to upload but needs to be uploaded now. I don't understand why my sandbox was deleted. I spent many work hours working on these wiki edits, and I need the content back because I do not have it backed up in another location. I am requesting that if the page is not restored, that the content from the page is sent to me as quickly as possible. thank you. — Kaylabrownie ( talk) 15:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
'Some' administrator? Can you point me in the direction of 'some' administrator that will do so? I need this content as soon as possible so I can post it to the proper page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaylabrownie ( talk • contribs) 17:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
PRODed, please restore so it can be redirected to the list of mayors. — RAN ( talk) 01:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC) -- RAN ( talk) 01:14, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
There were versions of an article for Sandy Reed deleted back in 2010 and in 2015, by an editor who is no longer an administrator and by another who has retired. Could someone possibly please provide either or both to me, if they have anything to do with a stonemason or builder or architect in the state of Idaho. -- Doncram ( talk) 02:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC) — Doncram ( talk) 02:26, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Abyssal, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Abyssal ( talk) 05:53, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Composter, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Composter ( talk) 05:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Before it was redirected to the now deleted Portal:Suffolk, this was its own page that was recently redirected without discussion. Please could it be restored to it's pre-redirect state. — Inops ( talk) 14:22, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Dfrydel ( talk) 23:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
I was in the process of job change and was compelled to leave the article abandoned. I would like to pick up on my unfinished work.
I, Robertjgray, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Robertjgray ( talk) 19:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
the page was deleted as I had not worked on it for some time. I intend to complete it now and submit it for publication — Robertjgray ( talk) 20:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
{{subst:submit}}
. --
TheSandDoctor
Talk 04:09, 17 June 2018 (UTC)This page (originally at Talk:Time Warner/Comments) is not, and has never been, a "test page". It should instead just be redirected to Talk:WarnerMedia. — GeoffreyT2000 ( talk) 05:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Love on the Brain, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — MUST BE Love on the Brain. 14:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
just need to have some help on have My Late Instructors Bio not removed. please send me to someone who can help me publish this probperly. I'm sorry if I have not followed the proper steps but will learn so i do not make the same mistakes and waste so many editors time.
Peelsan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peelsan ( talk • contribs) 04:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
I used this template on my old user talk page (User:DrStrauss) and found it useful but it has since been deleted. I'm happy for it to be refunded to my user namespace if I will be the only one using it. — StraussInTheHouse ( talk) 12:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
I acknowledge that the article was created prematurely since I used the title I found in a Wikimedia Commons file. However, i think I could improve upon it if userfied. Please userfy this to my user name. — Thylacoop5 ( talk) 13:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Dbouchaffra, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dbouchaffra ( talk) 18:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
PROD-ded in 2015, but they were just promoted to the Serbian second division. The information in the article should still be generally relevant and the club should easily pass WP:NFOOTY. — SportingFlyer talk 19:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Narayansg ( talk) 20:07, 18 June 2018 (UTC) The page on Mike Levin, a congressional candidate in California's 49th district, was deleted after it attracted vandalism from his political opponent in the primary election that occurred on June 5. Mike won the primary, and is the Democratic nominee for Congress in the 49th District. During the discussion regarding the deletion of the page, some administrators (although I do not know who) said that Levin will be notable enough for a Wikipedia page if he wins the primary and the Democratic nomination. Since he has won the primary and the Democratic nomination, this page should be undeleted and put back up.
I, Asoccer maniac, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Asoccer maniac ( talk) 22:23, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
Please note that I want to undelete the version from 2016/7 (i.e first edited Dec 2016/last edited ca. Jan 2017). Asoccer maniac ( talk) 22:25, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
PRODded in 2011 for no showing of ever having participated in the Serbian Cup. They made it to the 2nd round of the 2017-18 Serbian Cup, and I'd like to recreate the article. — SportingFlyer talk 04:57, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
(a) The proposed article is based on State of Texas legislature documents, which are in the public domain; (b) There is much debate but little centralized knowledge on the "Emerging Research Institution" requirements and similar programs in Texas — 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 21:10, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Please see link: http://www.house.state.tx.us/help/website-policies/texas-public-information-act/
Also note that there is no (c) copyright note in the document linked below, or in any similar documents cited in Draft:Texas Research Initiatives
http://www.house.state.tx.us/_media/pdf/committees/reports/82interim/House-Committee-on-Higher-Education-Interim-Report-2012.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 21:43, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
The purpose of the Draft:Texas Research Initiatives was to centralize information originating from State of Texas agencies. University of Texas System is an agency of the State of Texas. Please undelete the articles and I and others could reword it based on the Texas House documents which are in the public domain. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 21:49, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
In my opinion speedy deletion under G12 has been applied too harshly to this particular draft article. Please restore it so that the copyright issues can be addressed. Thank you and good luck to the soccer teams of your countries in the 2018 FIFA World Cup! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 01:34, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
This was only a draft article. Undelete it and it will be fixed. The concept of "emerging research university/institution" occurs in several places on Wikipedia, but it is not explained anywhere. It is why I started the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 03:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Examples:
Here's a similar page: Texas_Emerging_Technology_Fund to the one I wanted created.
Please be reasonable - thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 04:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Hut 8.5 I can address all these issues, but I do not have access to the article any more - like you administrators apparently have. The subject is an important one to many people as I tried to explain above, so please, be so kind and undelete the draft article. Thank you for your cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 16:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Hut 8.5, it would be very helpful to have the source back - thanks. And if I start a new draft article, can it have the same title i.e. "Texas Research Initiatives"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 19:27, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
You wrote that you can grant me access to the sources of the original draft article. Could you please do so? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 16:56, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Texas Research Initiatives was only a draft article and obviously imperfect. After a warning about the alleged copyright issues, I would have fixed the article right-away. As of right now, I lost any motivation to rewrite it from scratch. Please follow this link [1] and read how damages in copyright infringements are calculated. Who do you think would have written a 3-4 page court complain, pay $420 to file it in court and get zero in return? Because any judge would have found the similarities with the cited references fair use [2].
P.S. Wikipedia exists because of the content that is dded, not deleted, and maybe administrators should be also concerned about not driving editors away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.98.78.51 ( talk) 19:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
References
I request the undeletion of this page. It was deleted under WP:G11 but It's not a promotion at all. It's essential and useful article since this product has made a lot of news and is a best seller and has been recognized by critics as 'the best hair repair product'. it definitely has the required notability and verifiability. the "Hair care products" category needs this article — CerberaOdollam ( talk) 05:38, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Kelvin Mason ( talk) 11:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC) I have added blue interal Wikipedia links to the page
there is no reason why this page has been deleted. This page is important for the history of both the AFL and WAFL. This man is now a sandover medalist, an E.B Cook Medalist, two time Simpson Medalist, 3 time State player and played over 50 games for the Claremont Football Club. He is an amazing role model for his community and a biography is a must. Please allow page creation for this man. I do not understand why it was deleted on the first place? Thank you. — 144.138.241.130 ( talk) 16:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I used Twinkle on Module:Miscellaneous pages with authority control identifiers and assumed it created the correct entry for the Module, but instead it created a request for the Template. I wish to retrieve the Template and will delete the Module later. — ~ Tom.Reding ( talk ⋅ dgaf) 15:56, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I want to improve this page to make it eligible fow wikipedia — Sparkychknet ( talk) 23:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
I, 165.125.181.19, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 165.125.181.19 ( talk) 01:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Inamabidi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. inam 07:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I, Prof Crawf, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof Crawf ( talk • contribs) 17:40, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Done – as a
draft or
Articles for creation submission deleted under
CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —
C.Fred (
talk) 17:58, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
WP:REFUND applies as there was a deletion debate "with little or no participation other than the nominator". No other editor supported deletion, and one editor (myself) favoured retention, citing the relevant criterion. One other editor commented on the acceptability of the images, but that is not relevant to article deletion. No editor suggested that my justification might be invalid. The nominator did not mention PJ's recording history in the proposal — Davidships ( talk) 17:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Done
WP:Articles for deletion/Peter Jarvis closed as a soft delete, per the closing admin (
Premeditated Chaos). —
C.Fred (
talk) 18:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
He is the Democratic nominee for Congress in California's 50th District and he has won the primary so he is notable at this point — Narayansg ( talk) 17:06, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a
deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ammar Campa-Najjar, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the
administrator who closed the discussion, user
A Train (
talk ·
contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at
deletion review. @
Narayansg: Please note that winning the primary is not winning an election, so per
WP:NPOLITICIAN, he is still not notable. Further, the article was redirected, not deleted. —
C.Fred (
talk) 18:08, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
The page is important to him for college admission and we can correct any update any missing information/links — Nofal eg ( talk) 14:13, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a
deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Youssef Hazem, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the
administrator who closed the discussion, user
Timotheus Canens (
talk ·
contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at
deletion review.
Please note that Youssef Hazem BIO was moved to Youssef Hazem prior to the AfD. Technically, all that existed at this title was a redirect to the deleted article. — C.Fred ( talk) 18:11, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I've done some digging and can find quite a bit of mention of Gliese 3991 (mostly under the name G 203-47). Furthermore, it's the host system of the 9th nearest white dwarf, and the nearest compact white dwarf binary system. — exoplanetaryscience ( talk) 22:45, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Codo2411 ( talk) 00:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
The previously deleted article contained copyrighted martial if restored any copyrighted content will be removed.
Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Publish changes" button below — Codo2411 ( talk) 00:22, 22 June 2018 (UTC) The previously deleted article contained copyrighted martial if restored any copyrighted content will be removed.
I, Arlo Barnes, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Arlo James Barnes 03:18, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
I want to see my user page that was speedily deleted. I don't want it restored for public view, I just want to see it to copy it, and then I'll make a user page that fits the requirements — Chuck Baggett ( talk) 07:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)-- Chuck Baggett ( talk) 07:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)