Editors involved in this dispute

1. Unbiasedpov ( talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Vanamonde93 ( talk · contribs)
3. Sdmarathe ( talk · contribs)
4. Kautilya3 ( talk · contribs)
5. regentspark ( talk · contribs)
6. maunus ( talk · contribs)
7. VictoriaGrayson ( talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. 2002 Gujarat riots#Godhra train burning ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
2. 2002 Gujarat riots#Attacks on Hindus ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:2002_Gujarat_riots#RfC:_-Add_series_.22Violence_against_Hindus.22_or_Remove_series_.22Violence_against_Muslims_in_India.22.3F
• Talk:2002_Gujarat_riots#Proposal:_Make_Godhra_train_burning_sub-section_accurate

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

See the Proposal on talk page for details:-

1. Should a navigation bar for series 'Violence against Hindus' be added to "Godhra Train Burning" sub-section of this article?
2. Should the sub-section "Attack on Hindus" be added to series 'Violence against Hindus'?

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

1. Agree. Unbiasedpov ( talk) 22:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC) reply
2. Agree. VictoriaGrayson ^Talk 22:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC) reply
3. Agree. Sdmarathe ( talk) 23:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC) reply
4. Do not agree. The nominator exhibits poor understanding of Wikipedia policies and neglected to explore other avenues like WP:RSN and WP:DRN. - Kautilya3 ( talk) 13:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC) reply
5. Disagree. There is no clearly defined debate here, merely baseless statements about the bias of certain sources. Vanamonde93 ( talk) 13:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC) reply

• Reject. Fails to satisfy prerequisite for mediation #5, "A majority of the parties to the dispute consent to mediation." For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan ( TALK) 21:49, 17 September 2015 (UTC) reply