m Reverted edits by
Zogonthetyne (
talk) to last version by SineBot |
Zogonthetyne (
talk |
contribs) removing request by editor that was blocked for edit warring |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
[[sv:Wikipedia:IP-kontrollanter]] |
[[sv:Wikipedia:IP-kontrollanter]] |
||
[[tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği]] |
[[tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği]] |
||
Suspicious molag bal activity on the geordie page two users to check, they are removing template citations that are valid, which is what wiki asks. Could you check user 86.150.252.106 and Zog on the tyne. |
|||
And I'd like to request that the page be semi protected again. |
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Molag_Bal <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gregs the baker|Gregs the baker]] ([[User talk:Gregs the baker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gregs the baker|contribs]]) 18:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This is the place to request sockpuppet checks and other investigations requiring access to the Checkuser privilege. Possible alternatives are listed below. Requests likely to be accepted
Requests likely to be rejected
Privacy violation?
|
Indicators and templates ( v · e) | |
---|---|
These indicators are used by Checkusers, SPI clerks and other patrolling users, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
Case decisions: | |
IP blocked {{ IPblock}} | Tagged {{ Stagged}} |
Blocked but awaiting tags {{ Sblock}} | Not possible {{ Impossible}} |
Blocked and tagged {{ Blockedandtagged}} | Blocked without tags {{ Blockedwithouttags}} |
No tags {{ No tags}} | Blocked and tagged. Closing. {{ Blockedtaggedclosing}} |
Information: | |
Additional information needed {{ MoreInfo}} | Deferred {{ Deferred}} |
Note: {{ TakeNote}} | In progress {{ Inprogress}} |
Clerk actions: | |
Clerk assistance requested: {{ Clerk Request}} | Clerk note: {{ Clerk-Note}} |
Delisted {{ Delisted}} | Relisted {{ Relisted}} |
Clerk declined {{ Decline}} | Clerk endorsed {{ Endorse}} |
Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention {{ Selfendorse}} | CheckUser requested {{ CURequest}} |
Specific to CheckUser: | |
Confirmed {{ Confirmed}} | Unrelated {{ Unrelated}} |
Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). No comment with respect to IP address(es). {{ Confirmed-nc}} | |
Technically indistinguishable {{ Technically indistinguishable}} | |
Likely {{ Likely}} | Unlikely {{ Unlikely}} |
Possible {{ Possible}} | Inconclusive {{ Inconclusive}} |
Declined {{ Declined}} | Unnecessary {{ Unnecessary}} |
Stale (too old) {{ StaleIP}} | No comment {{ Nocomment}} |
CheckUser is not a crystal ball {{ Crystalball}} | CheckUser is not for fishing {{ Fishing}} |
CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{ Pixiedust}} | The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says: {{ 8ball}} |
Endorsed by a checkuser {{ Cu-endorsed}} | Check declined by a checkuser {{ Cudecline}} |
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) {{ possilikely}} |
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 1 October 2010 |
I think all three of these new Users are NisarKand's new sockpuppets. All of them have been changing the same articles that the previous socks have changed so please check these users before they cause any problem for other editors on wikipedia. Thank you-- Inuit18 ( talk) 06:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 8 March 2009 |
I think that User:NisarKand has created new sockpuppets, namely User:Omidirani and User:Abdul Wali. Both accounts have the same field of interest, and the writing style is similar to that of NisarKand. Tajik ( talk) 14:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This page has been blanked as a courtesy. |
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 1 October 2010 |
I think all three of these new Users are NisarKand's new sockpuppets. All of them have been changing the same articles that the previous socks have changed so please check these users before they cause any problem for other editors on wikipedia. Thank you-- Inuit18 ( talk) 06:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 8 March 2009 |
I think that User:NisarKand has created new sockpuppets, namely User:Omidirani and User:Abdul Wali. Both accounts have the same field of interest, and the writing style is similar to that of NisarKand. Tajik ( talk) 14:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
IP/ A |
NC |
Requests that do not follow the instructions at the top of the page will be moved here. Common reasons for noncompliance include:
The specific deficiencies may be noted with Additional information needed. Cases which are corrected may be moved back to the pending section. Cases which are not corrected will be deleted after 3 days.
Please note that meeting these three criteria does not ensure that your check will be run. The checkusers retain final discretion over all cases.
m Reverted edits by
Zogonthetyne (
talk) to last version by SineBot |
Zogonthetyne (
talk |
contribs) removing request by editor that was blocked for edit warring |
||
Line 116: | Line 116: | ||
[[sv:Wikipedia:IP-kontrollanter]] |
[[sv:Wikipedia:IP-kontrollanter]] |
||
[[tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği]] |
[[tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği]] |
||
Suspicious molag bal activity on the geordie page two users to check, they are removing template citations that are valid, which is what wiki asks. Could you check user 86.150.252.106 and Zog on the tyne. |
|||
And I'd like to request that the page be semi protected again. |
|||
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Molag_Bal <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gregs the baker|Gregs the baker]] ([[User talk:Gregs the baker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gregs the baker|contribs]]) 18:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
This is the place to request sockpuppet checks and other investigations requiring access to the Checkuser privilege. Possible alternatives are listed below. Requests likely to be accepted
Requests likely to be rejected
Privacy violation?
|
Indicators and templates ( v · e) | |
---|---|
These indicators are used by Checkusers, SPI clerks and other patrolling users, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments. | |
Case decisions: | |
IP blocked {{ IPblock}} | Tagged {{ Stagged}} |
Blocked but awaiting tags {{ Sblock}} | Not possible {{ Impossible}} |
Blocked and tagged {{ Blockedandtagged}} | Blocked without tags {{ Blockedwithouttags}} |
No tags {{ No tags}} | Blocked and tagged. Closing. {{ Blockedtaggedclosing}} |
Information: | |
Additional information needed {{ MoreInfo}} | Deferred {{ Deferred}} |
Note: {{ TakeNote}} | In progress {{ Inprogress}} |
Clerk actions: | |
Clerk assistance requested: {{ Clerk Request}} | Clerk note: {{ Clerk-Note}} |
Delisted {{ Delisted}} | Relisted {{ Relisted}} |
Clerk declined {{ Decline}} | Clerk endorsed {{ Endorse}} |
Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention {{ Selfendorse}} | CheckUser requested {{ CURequest}} |
Specific to CheckUser: | |
Confirmed {{ Confirmed}} | Unrelated {{ Unrelated}} |
Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). No comment with respect to IP address(es). {{ Confirmed-nc}} | |
Technically indistinguishable {{ Technically indistinguishable}} | |
Likely {{ Likely}} | Unlikely {{ Unlikely}} |
Possible {{ Possible}} | Inconclusive {{ Inconclusive}} |
Declined {{ Declined}} | Unnecessary {{ Unnecessary}} |
Stale (too old) {{ StaleIP}} | No comment {{ Nocomment}} |
CheckUser is not a crystal ball {{ Crystalball}} | CheckUser is not for fishing {{ Fishing}} |
CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{ Pixiedust}} | The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says: {{ 8ball}} |
Endorsed by a checkuser {{ Cu-endorsed}} | Check declined by a checkuser {{ Cudecline}} |
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) {{ possilikely}} |
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 1 October 2010 |
I think all three of these new Users are NisarKand's new sockpuppets. All of them have been changing the same articles that the previous socks have changed so please check these users before they cause any problem for other editors on wikipedia. Thank you-- Inuit18 ( talk) 06:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 8 March 2009 |
I think that User:NisarKand has created new sockpuppets, namely User:Omidirani and User:Abdul Wali. Both accounts have the same field of interest, and the writing style is similar to that of NisarKand. Tajik ( talk) 14:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This page has been blanked as a courtesy. |
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 1 October 2010 |
I think all three of these new Users are NisarKand's new sockpuppets. All of them have been changing the same articles that the previous socks have changed so please check these users before they cause any problem for other editors on wikipedia. Thank you-- Inuit18 ( talk) 06:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
request links:
view •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 8 March 2009 |
I think that User:NisarKand has created new sockpuppets, namely User:Omidirani and User:Abdul Wali. Both accounts have the same field of interest, and the writing style is similar to that of NisarKand. Tajik ( talk) 14:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
This page is currently inactive and is retained for
historical reference. Either the page is no longer relevant or consensus on its purpose has become unclear. To revive discussion, seek broader input via a forum such as the village pump. |
IP/ A |
NC |
Requests that do not follow the instructions at the top of the page will be moved here. Common reasons for noncompliance include:
The specific deficiencies may be noted with Additional information needed. Cases which are corrected may be moved back to the pending section. Cases which are not corrected will be deleted after 3 days.
Please note that meeting these three criteria does not ensure that your check will be run. The checkusers retain final discretion over all cases.