From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by Zogonthetyne ( talk) to last version by SineBot
Zogonthetyne ( talk | contribs)
removing request by editor that was blocked for edit warring
Line 116: Line 116:
[[sv:Wikipedia:IP-kontrollanter]]
[[sv:Wikipedia:IP-kontrollanter]]
[[tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği]]
[[tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği]]


Suspicious molag bal activity on the geordie page two users to check, they are removing template citations that are valid, which is what wiki asks. Could you check user 86.150.252.106 and Zog on the tyne.

And I'd like to request that the page be semi protected again.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Molag_Bal <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gregs the baker|Gregs the baker]] ([[User talk:Gregs the baker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gregs the baker|contribs]]) 18:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 19:25, 15 February 2008


    Read this first


    This is the place to request sockpuppet checks and other investigations requiring access to the Checkuser privilege. Possible alternatives are listed below.


    Requests likely to be accepted

    Code Situation Solution, requirements
    A Blatant attack or vandalism accounts, need IP block Submit new section at #Requests for IP check, below
    B Evading blocks, bans and remedies issued by arbitration committee Submit case subpage, including link to closed arb case
    C Ongoing, serious pattern vandalism with many incidents Submit case subpage, including diffs
    D Vote fraud, closed vote, fraud affects outcome Submit case subpage, including link to closed vote
    E 3RR violation using sockpuppets Submit case subpage, including diffs of violation
    F Evading blocks, bans and remedies issued by community Submit case subpage, including link to evidence of remedy
    G Does not fit above, but you believe check needed Submit case subpage, briefly summarize and justify

    Requests likely to be rejected

    Situation Solution
    Obvious, disruptive sock puppet Block, no checkuser needed
    Disruptive "throwaway" account used only for a few edits Block, no checkuser needed
    Checkuser on yourself to "prove your innocence" Such requests are rarely accepted, please do not ask
    Related to ongoing arbitration case Request checkuser on the arbitration case pages
    Vote fraud, ongoing vote Wait until vote closes before listing, or post at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
    Vote fraud, closed vote, did not affect outcome List at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
    Other disruption of articles List at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
    Open proxy, IP address already known List at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
    You want access to the checkuser tool yourself Contact the Arbitration Committee, but such access is granted rarely


    When submitting a request

    • If submitting a new case subpage, use the inputbox below; if adding to an existing case subpage, see WP:RFCU/P#Repeat requests.
    • Choose the code letter that best fits your request. Provide evidence such as diff links as required or requested. Note that some code letters inherently require specific evidence.
    • When listing suspected accounts or IP addresses, use the {{ checkuser}} or {{ checkip}} templates. Please do not use this template in a section header.
    • You may add your request to the top of the #Outstanding requests section, by adding {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CASENAMEHERE}}. If you do not, clerks should check for pages in Category:Checkuser requests to be listed and will do this for you.
    • Sign your request.


    After submitting a request


    Privacy violation?

    Indicators and templates   ( v  · e)
    These indicators are used by Checkusers, SPI clerks and other patrolling users, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
    Case decisions:
     IP blocked  {{ IPblock}}  Tagged  {{ Stagged}}
     Blocked but awaiting tags  {{ Sblock}}  Not possible  {{ Impossible}}
     Blocked and tagged  {{ Blockedandtagged}}  Blocked without tags  {{ Blockedwithouttags}}
     No tags  {{ No tags}}  Blocked and tagged. Closing.  {{ Blockedtaggedclosing}}
    Information:
     Additional information needed  {{ MoreInfo}}  Deferred  {{ Deferred}}
    information Note:  {{ TakeNote}}  In progress  {{ Inprogress}}
    Clerk actions:
     Clerk assistance requested:  {{ Clerk Request}}  Clerk note:  {{ Clerk-Note}}
     Delisted  {{ Delisted}}  Relisted  {{ Relisted}}
     Clerk declined  {{ Decline}}  Clerk endorsed  {{ Endorse}}
    Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention  {{ Selfendorse}} CheckUser requested  {{ CURequest}}
    Specific to CheckUser:
     Confirmed  {{ Confirmed}} Red X Unrelated  {{ Unrelated}}
     Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es).  {{ Confirmed-nc}}
     Technically indistinguishable  {{ Technically indistinguishable}}
     Likely  {{ Likely}}  Unlikely  {{ Unlikely}}
     Possible  {{ Possible}}  Inconclusive  {{ Inconclusive}}
    no Declined  {{ Declined}} no Unnecessary  {{ Unnecessary}}
     Stale (too old)  {{ StaleIP}} no No comment  {{ Nocomment}}
    crystal ball  CheckUser is not a crystal ball  {{ Crystalball}} fish  CheckUser is not for fishing  {{ Fishing}}
      CheckUser is not magic pixie dust  {{ Pixiedust}} magic eight ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says:  {{ 8ball}}
     Endorsed by a checkuser  {{ Cu-endorsed}}  Check declined by a checkuser  {{ Cudecline}}
     Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely)  {{ possilikely}}


    If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please Purge the cache.

    Outstanding requests

    NisarKand (1 October 2010)

    I think all three of these new Users are NisarKand's new sockpuppets. All of them have been changing the same articles that the previous socks have changed so please check these users before they cause any problem for other editors on wikipedia. Thank you-- Inuit18 ( talk) 06:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply

    Please also do a checkuser on the filer, Inuit18 ( talk · contribs), he is likely a sockpuppet of banned User:Anoshirawan [1]. His every edit is identical to Anoshirawan and they both are in USA (likely California). [2] [3] An admin had already established that Anoshirawan was in the US. [4] Inuit18 and Anoshirawan both decorated their pages identically [5] [6], both do small edits periodically, both edit same Afghanistan related pages with same identical POVs and both watch around for Pashtun editors only-- Lagoo sab ( talk) 00:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC) reply

    NisarKand (8 March 2009)

    I think that User:NisarKand has created new sockpuppets, namely User:Omidirani and User:Abdul Wali. Both accounts have the same field of interest, and the writing style is similar to that of NisarKand. Tajik ( talk) 14:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC) reply















    Declined requests




    Completed requests













    NisarKand (1 October 2010)

    I think all three of these new Users are NisarKand's new sockpuppets. All of them have been changing the same articles that the previous socks have changed so please check these users before they cause any problem for other editors on wikipedia. Thank you-- Inuit18 ( talk) 06:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply

    Please also do a checkuser on the filer, Inuit18 ( talk · contribs), he is likely a sockpuppet of banned User:Anoshirawan [7]. His every edit is identical to Anoshirawan and they both are in USA (likely California). [8] [9] An admin had already established that Anoshirawan was in the US. [10] Inuit18 and Anoshirawan both decorated their pages identically [11] [12], both do small edits periodically, both edit same Afghanistan related pages with same identical POVs and both watch around for Pashtun editors only-- Lagoo sab ( talk) 00:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC) reply

    NisarKand (8 March 2009)

    I think that User:NisarKand has created new sockpuppets, namely User:Omidirani and User:Abdul Wali. Both accounts have the same field of interest, and the writing style is similar to that of NisarKand. Tajik ( talk) 14:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC) reply












    IP/ A

    Requests for IP check

    • Vandal and attack accounts may be listed here for the purpose of identifying and blocking the underlying IP address or open proxy. Requests to confirm sockpuppets of known users should be listed in the sockpuppet section above.
    • If you already know the IP address of the suspected open proxy, list it at Wikipedia:Open Proxies instead.
    • Use === Subsections ===; do not create subpages.
    • List user names using the {{checkuser|username}} template. Add new reports to the top of the section.
    • Requests may be acted on or declined according to the discretion of the checkuser admins. Responses will be noted here. Specific evidence of abuse in the form of diffs may be required so as to avoid the impression of fishing for evidence.
    • Answered requests will be moved to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive for 7 days, after which they will be deleted. No separate archive (other than the page history) will be maintained.

    NC

    Requests that do not follow the instructions at the top of the page will be moved here. Common reasons for noncompliance include:

    • Did not cite a code letter, or cite more than one code letter.
    • Did not cite any supporting diffs if the code letter requires diffs.
    • Included IP addresses.

    The specific deficiencies may be noted with Additional information needed. Cases which are corrected may be moved back to the pending section. Cases which are not corrected will be deleted after 3 days.

    Please note that meeting these three criteria does not ensure that your check will be run. The checkusers retain final discretion over all cases.

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    Content deleted Content added
    m Reverted edits by Zogonthetyne ( talk) to last version by SineBot
    Zogonthetyne ( talk | contribs)
    removing request by editor that was blocked for edit warring
    Line 116: Line 116:
    [[sv:Wikipedia:IP-kontrollanter]]
    [[sv:Wikipedia:IP-kontrollanter]]
    [[tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği]]
    [[tr:Vikipedi:Denetçi isteği]]


    Suspicious molag bal activity on the geordie page two users to check, they are removing template citations that are valid, which is what wiki asks. Could you check user 86.150.252.106 and Zog on the tyne.

    And I'd like to request that the page be semi protected again.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Molag_Bal <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Gregs the baker|Gregs the baker]] ([[User talk:Gregs the baker|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Gregs the baker|contribs]]) 18:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

    Revision as of 19:25, 15 February 2008


      Read this first


      This is the place to request sockpuppet checks and other investigations requiring access to the Checkuser privilege. Possible alternatives are listed below.


      Requests likely to be accepted

      Code Situation Solution, requirements
      A Blatant attack or vandalism accounts, need IP block Submit new section at #Requests for IP check, below
      B Evading blocks, bans and remedies issued by arbitration committee Submit case subpage, including link to closed arb case
      C Ongoing, serious pattern vandalism with many incidents Submit case subpage, including diffs
      D Vote fraud, closed vote, fraud affects outcome Submit case subpage, including link to closed vote
      E 3RR violation using sockpuppets Submit case subpage, including diffs of violation
      F Evading blocks, bans and remedies issued by community Submit case subpage, including link to evidence of remedy
      G Does not fit above, but you believe check needed Submit case subpage, briefly summarize and justify

      Requests likely to be rejected

      Situation Solution
      Obvious, disruptive sock puppet Block, no checkuser needed
      Disruptive "throwaway" account used only for a few edits Block, no checkuser needed
      Checkuser on yourself to "prove your innocence" Such requests are rarely accepted, please do not ask
      Related to ongoing arbitration case Request checkuser on the arbitration case pages
      Vote fraud, ongoing vote Wait until vote closes before listing, or post at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
      Vote fraud, closed vote, did not affect outcome List at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
      Other disruption of articles List at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents or Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets
      Open proxy, IP address already known List at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
      You want access to the checkuser tool yourself Contact the Arbitration Committee, but such access is granted rarely


      When submitting a request

      • If submitting a new case subpage, use the inputbox below; if adding to an existing case subpage, see WP:RFCU/P#Repeat requests.
      • Choose the code letter that best fits your request. Provide evidence such as diff links as required or requested. Note that some code letters inherently require specific evidence.
      • When listing suspected accounts or IP addresses, use the {{ checkuser}} or {{ checkip}} templates. Please do not use this template in a section header.
      • You may add your request to the top of the #Outstanding requests section, by adding {{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/CASENAMEHERE}}. If you do not, clerks should check for pages in Category:Checkuser requests to be listed and will do this for you.
      • Sign your request.


      After submitting a request


      Privacy violation?

      Indicators and templates   ( v  · e)
      These indicators are used by Checkusers, SPI clerks and other patrolling users, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
      Case decisions:
       IP blocked  {{ IPblock}}  Tagged  {{ Stagged}}
       Blocked but awaiting tags  {{ Sblock}}  Not possible  {{ Impossible}}
       Blocked and tagged  {{ Blockedandtagged}}  Blocked without tags  {{ Blockedwithouttags}}
       No tags  {{ No tags}}  Blocked and tagged. Closing.  {{ Blockedtaggedclosing}}
      Information:
       Additional information needed  {{ MoreInfo}}  Deferred  {{ Deferred}}
      information Note:  {{ TakeNote}}  In progress  {{ Inprogress}}
      Clerk actions:
       Clerk assistance requested:  {{ Clerk Request}}  Clerk note:  {{ Clerk-Note}}
       Delisted  {{ Delisted}}  Relisted  {{ Relisted}}
       Clerk declined  {{ Decline}}  Clerk endorsed  {{ Endorse}}
      Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention  {{ Selfendorse}} CheckUser requested  {{ CURequest}}
      Specific to CheckUser:
       Confirmed  {{ Confirmed}} Red X Unrelated  {{ Unrelated}}
       Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). no No comment with respect to IP address(es).  {{ Confirmed-nc}}
       Technically indistinguishable  {{ Technically indistinguishable}}
       Likely  {{ Likely}}  Unlikely  {{ Unlikely}}
       Possible  {{ Possible}}  Inconclusive  {{ Inconclusive}}
      no Declined  {{ Declined}} no Unnecessary  {{ Unnecessary}}
       Stale (too old)  {{ StaleIP}} no No comment  {{ Nocomment}}
      crystal ball  CheckUser is not a crystal ball  {{ Crystalball}} fish  CheckUser is not for fishing  {{ Fishing}}
        CheckUser is not magic pixie dust  {{ Pixiedust}} magic eight ball The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says:  {{ 8ball}}
       Endorsed by a checkuser  {{ Cu-endorsed}}  Check declined by a checkuser  {{ Cudecline}}
       Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely)  {{ possilikely}}


      If this page is displaying outdated contents even after you refresh the page in your browser, please Purge the cache.

      Outstanding requests

      NisarKand (1 October 2010)

      I think all three of these new Users are NisarKand's new sockpuppets. All of them have been changing the same articles that the previous socks have changed so please check these users before they cause any problem for other editors on wikipedia. Thank you-- Inuit18 ( talk) 06:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply

      Please also do a checkuser on the filer, Inuit18 ( talk · contribs), he is likely a sockpuppet of banned User:Anoshirawan [1]. His every edit is identical to Anoshirawan and they both are in USA (likely California). [2] [3] An admin had already established that Anoshirawan was in the US. [4] Inuit18 and Anoshirawan both decorated their pages identically [5] [6], both do small edits periodically, both edit same Afghanistan related pages with same identical POVs and both watch around for Pashtun editors only-- Lagoo sab ( talk) 00:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC) reply

      NisarKand (8 March 2009)

      I think that User:NisarKand has created new sockpuppets, namely User:Omidirani and User:Abdul Wali. Both accounts have the same field of interest, and the writing style is similar to that of NisarKand. Tajik ( talk) 14:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC) reply















      Declined requests




      Completed requests













      NisarKand (1 October 2010)

      I think all three of these new Users are NisarKand's new sockpuppets. All of them have been changing the same articles that the previous socks have changed so please check these users before they cause any problem for other editors on wikipedia. Thank you-- Inuit18 ( talk) 06:46, 2 October 2010 (UTC) reply

      Please also do a checkuser on the filer, Inuit18 ( talk · contribs), he is likely a sockpuppet of banned User:Anoshirawan [7]. His every edit is identical to Anoshirawan and they both are in USA (likely California). [8] [9] An admin had already established that Anoshirawan was in the US. [10] Inuit18 and Anoshirawan both decorated their pages identically [11] [12], both do small edits periodically, both edit same Afghanistan related pages with same identical POVs and both watch around for Pashtun editors only-- Lagoo sab ( talk) 00:56, 3 October 2010 (UTC) reply

      NisarKand (8 March 2009)

      I think that User:NisarKand has created new sockpuppets, namely User:Omidirani and User:Abdul Wali. Both accounts have the same field of interest, and the writing style is similar to that of NisarKand. Tajik ( talk) 14:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC) reply












      IP/ A

      Requests for IP check

      • Vandal and attack accounts may be listed here for the purpose of identifying and blocking the underlying IP address or open proxy. Requests to confirm sockpuppets of known users should be listed in the sockpuppet section above.
      • If you already know the IP address of the suspected open proxy, list it at Wikipedia:Open Proxies instead.
      • Use === Subsections ===; do not create subpages.
      • List user names using the {{checkuser|username}} template. Add new reports to the top of the section.
      • Requests may be acted on or declined according to the discretion of the checkuser admins. Responses will be noted here. Specific evidence of abuse in the form of diffs may be required so as to avoid the impression of fishing for evidence.
      • Answered requests will be moved to Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/IP check/Archive for 7 days, after which they will be deleted. No separate archive (other than the page history) will be maintained.

      NC

      Requests that do not follow the instructions at the top of the page will be moved here. Common reasons for noncompliance include:

      • Did not cite a code letter, or cite more than one code letter.
      • Did not cite any supporting diffs if the code letter requires diffs.
      • Included IP addresses.

      The specific deficiencies may be noted with Additional information needed. Cases which are corrected may be moved back to the pending section. Cases which are not corrected will be deleted after 3 days.

      Please note that meeting these three criteria does not ensure that your check will be run. The checkusers retain final discretion over all cases.


      Videos

      Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

      Websites

      Google | Yahoo | Bing

      Encyclopedia

      Google | Yahoo | Bing

      Facebook