Evidence of disruptive page moves in the Sea of Japan article, recently by Toyko ( talk · contribs):
Group 2: Some of these were coordinated attacks, operating in the same time frame as General Tojo ( talk · contribs) socks in January below:
Group 3: Problematic IP address used in January:
Submitted by: Endroit ( talk) 17:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 17:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC) |
This is a violation of the " Parties reminded" remedy of the Arbcom case Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks. Revert-warring is occurring accross multiple articles, along nationalistic lines (Korea vs. Japan), and there appeared to be no civil discussion in the talk pages in most cases. (For the other side of the revert-war, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou and Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amazonfire.) -- Endroit ( talk) 17:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
I copy and paste these differs from [2] [3]
, 's job who vandalized my report on Amazonefire. 4 timesSupposed that I'm a sock of the aforementioned people, the articles Endroit provides for evidences are just random and irrelevant from any possible violation on 3RR except Kofun period article. So please check it. I hope everything becomes clear soon. -- Appletrees ( talk) 15:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Possible that
Appletrees (
talk ·
contribs) and
Ecthelion83 (
talk ·
contribs) are related. Note that the overlap between the two accounts is minor and only recent, so if these accounts are the same person, then they just have to make sure not to overlap again. Of course,
coincidence and
synchronicity exist, and checkusers can't see through the pipe to really know who is at the other end.
Thatcher
01:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Revert was repeated by these two accounts as for Nihon Shoki.
These compared diffs are exactly time-matched edits by Appletrees (me) and Ecthelion83 on Jan. 8th 2008. Although the time records show up to minute, but I don't see why I have to put up with this false accusation of a sockpuppeter or meatpuppter by whom many editors believe them as disruptive POV editors and possible sockpuppet masters. I didn't make a whole comparison between my edits and the other's, but I think it might clear things up.
Each table holds all of edits by Appletrees and Ecthelion82 on Jan. 8th 2008. And the indents are overlapped time ranges and bold texts indicate exactly overlapped time. -- Appletrees ( talk) 15:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Appletrees' edits on January 8th 2008 |
---|
Special:Contributions/Appletrees
|
Ecthelion83' edits on January 8th 2008 |
---|
Special:Contributions/Ecthelion83
|
FYI, Orchi29, you should be aware of Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets#User:Azukimonaka reported by the admin. I looked through your contribution history, and not surprisingly your time ranges of editing don't overlap with any accused editors at all. I might add much more to there.-- Appletrees ( talk)
1st series
2nd series
These interval times are too short. Amazonfire ( talk) 22:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Unrelated
Thatcher
13:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
And you know what - even though I probably don't have to, I wanted to apologize to Appletrees for overlapping a little and giving these puppets (some might go so far as to call them douchebags and other four-letter-plus words that are inappropriate for civil conversation) any ammunition. I was just trying to correct mistakes where I found them (if you looked at the listing of my edits - the really long one, you'll also see one edit on the "spermatogenesis" article; it's a spelling correction). Too bad that other people use their accounts (or multiple accounts) to cause all sorts of problems and delay the progression of Wikipedia into a reliable, professional-looking, finished (well, for those articles that no longer need editing) product. Ecthelion83 ( talk) 12:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Evidence of disruptive page moves in the Sea of Japan article, recently by Toyko ( talk · contribs):
Group 2: Some of these were coordinated attacks, operating in the same time frame as General Tojo ( talk · contribs) socks in January below:
Group 3: Problematic IP address used in January:
Submitted by: Endroit ( talk) 17:01, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
request links:
main •
•
links •
history •
watch •
talk Filed: 17:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC) |
This is a violation of the " Parties reminded" remedy of the Arbcom case Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Liancourt Rocks. Revert-warring is occurring accross multiple articles, along nationalistic lines (Korea vs. Japan), and there appeared to be no civil discussion in the talk pages in most cases. (For the other side of the revert-war, see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/KoreanShoriSenyou and Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Amazonfire.) -- Endroit ( talk) 17:50, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
I copy and paste these differs from [2] [3]
, 's job who vandalized my report on Amazonefire. 4 timesSupposed that I'm a sock of the aforementioned people, the articles Endroit provides for evidences are just random and irrelevant from any possible violation on 3RR except Kofun period article. So please check it. I hope everything becomes clear soon. -- Appletrees ( talk) 15:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Possible that
Appletrees (
talk ·
contribs) and
Ecthelion83 (
talk ·
contribs) are related. Note that the overlap between the two accounts is minor and only recent, so if these accounts are the same person, then they just have to make sure not to overlap again. Of course,
coincidence and
synchronicity exist, and checkusers can't see through the pipe to really know who is at the other end.
Thatcher
01:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Revert was repeated by these two accounts as for Nihon Shoki.
These compared diffs are exactly time-matched edits by Appletrees (me) and Ecthelion83 on Jan. 8th 2008. Although the time records show up to minute, but I don't see why I have to put up with this false accusation of a sockpuppeter or meatpuppter by whom many editors believe them as disruptive POV editors and possible sockpuppet masters. I didn't make a whole comparison between my edits and the other's, but I think it might clear things up.
Each table holds all of edits by Appletrees and Ecthelion82 on Jan. 8th 2008. And the indents are overlapped time ranges and bold texts indicate exactly overlapped time. -- Appletrees ( talk) 15:21, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Appletrees' edits on January 8th 2008 |
---|
Special:Contributions/Appletrees
|
Ecthelion83' edits on January 8th 2008 |
---|
Special:Contributions/Ecthelion83
|
FYI, Orchi29, you should be aware of Wikipedia:Suspected_sock_puppets#User:Azukimonaka reported by the admin. I looked through your contribution history, and not surprisingly your time ranges of editing don't overlap with any accused editors at all. I might add much more to there.-- Appletrees ( talk)
1st series
2nd series
These interval times are too short. Amazonfire ( talk) 22:31, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Unrelated
Thatcher
13:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
And you know what - even though I probably don't have to, I wanted to apologize to Appletrees for overlapping a little and giving these puppets (some might go so far as to call them douchebags and other four-letter-plus words that are inappropriate for civil conversation) any ammunition. I was just trying to correct mistakes where I found them (if you looked at the listing of my edits - the really long one, you'll also see one edit on the "spermatogenesis" article; it's a spelling correction). Too bad that other people use their accounts (or multiple accounts) to cause all sorts of problems and delay the progression of Wikipedia into a reliable, professional-looking, finished (well, for those articles that no longer need editing) product. Ecthelion83 ( talk) 12:34, 8 March 2008 (UTC)