Anyone, whether directly involved or not, may add evidence to this page. Please make a header for your evidence and sign your comments with your name.

When placing evidence here, please be considerate of the arbitrators and be concise. Long, rambling, or stream-of-conciousness rants are not helpful.

As such, it is extremely important that you use the prescribed format. Submitted evidence should include a link to the actual page diff; links to the page itself are not sufficient. For example, to cite the edit by Mennonot to the article Anomalous phenomenon adding a link to Hundredth Monkey use this form: [http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Anomalous_phenomenon&diff=5587219&oldid=5584644] [1].

This page is not for general discussion - for that, see talk page.

Please make a section for your evidence and add evidence only in your own section. Please limit your evidence to a maximum 1000 words and 100 diffs, a much shorter, concise presentation is more likely to be effective. Please focus on the issues raised in the complaint and answer and on diffs which illustrate behavior which relates to the issues.

If you disagree with some evidence you see here, please cite the evidence in your own section and provide counter-evidence, or an explanation of why the evidence is misleading. Do not edit within the evidence section of any other user.

Be aware that the Arbitrators may at times rework this page to try to make it more coherent. If you are a participant in the case or a third party, please don't try to refactor the page, let the Arbitrators do it. If you object to evidence which is inserted by other participants or third parties please cite the evidence and voice your objections within your own section of the page. It is especially important to not remove evidence presented by others. If something is put in the wrong place, please leave it for the arbitrators to move.

The Arbitrators may analyze evidence and other assertions at /Workshop. /Workshop provides for comment by parties and others as well as arbitrators. After arriving at proposed principles, findings of fact or remedies voting by Arbitrators takes place at /Proposed decision. Only Arbitrators may edit /Proposed decision.

Rex071404's Edits to John Kerry's First Purple Heart Section

This is a simple list of all of Rex's edits to the First Purple Heart Section of John Kerry starting from Rex's return from his Self-Imposed Ban on October 18. Only the text where Rex tries to insert his POV about "minor" will be posted on this list. Other edits to this section not pertaining to "minor", will also be listed with a short description. It will also be noted whether or not the edit is a revert. Minor edits, such as typos, are not included. Edits pertaining to other sections or articles will be listed elsewhere.

• 02:40, 18 October 2005
  • [2] - Rex's first insertion of "minor" since his self-imposed ban, using this account: User:216.153.214.94. This is also Rex's very First edit since his self-imposed ban.

• 05:22, 19 October
  • [3] - Revert to "minor".

• 05:31, 19 October 2005
  • [4] - Revert to "minor".

• 01:11, 22 October 2005
  • [5] - Uses "small" instead of "minor" this time.

• 21:11, 22 October 2005
  • [6] - Revert to "small".

• 02:39, 23 October 2005
  • [7] - Uses "superficial" instead of "minor" this time.

• 06:15, 23 October 2005
  • [8] - Revert to "superficial".

• 02:18, 24 October 2005
  • [9] - Revert to "superficial".

• 03:54, 25 October 2005
  • [10] - Revert to "superficial".

• 05:30, 26 October 2005
  • [11] - Revert to "superficial".

• 05:57, 26 October 2005
  • [12] - Revert to "superficial".

• 09:10, 26 October 2005
  • [13] - Revert to "superficial".

• 23:41, 28 October 2005
  • [14] - Revert to "superficial".

• 23:56, 28 October 2005
  • [15] - Revert to "superficial".

• 00:45, 29 October 2005
  • [16] - Changes "wound" to "injury" this time.

• 10:34, 30 October 2005
  • [17] - Revert to "superficial".

• 18:05, 30 October 2005
  • [18] - Revert to "superficial".

• 13:33, 31 October 2005
  • [19] - Revert to "superficial". Also deleted several sections about Kerry's lineage, which is also a revert as he deleted the same sections earlier.

• 08:05, 1 November 2005
  • [20] - Revert to "minor".

• 08:26, 1 November 2005
  • [21] - Revert to "minor".

• 08:45, 1 November 2005
  • [22] - Revert to "minor".

• 09:55, 1 November 2005
  • [23] - Revert to "minor".

• 09:03, 2 November 2005
  • [24] - Revert to "minor".

• 10:21, 2 November 2005
  • [25] - Revert to "minor".

• 10:44, 2 November 2005
  • [26] - Revert to "minor".

• 21:31, 2 November 2005
  • [27] - Changes to "uncategorized severity" this time.

• 23:16, 2 November 2005
  • [28] - Changes to "received" this time.

• 23:18, 2 November 2005
  • [29] - Removes "injury".

• 01:25, 3 November 2005
  • [30] - Changes to "alleged".

• 13:50, 3 November 2005
  • [31] - Changes to "source of shrapnel is unclear".

• 13:51, 3 November 2005
  • [32] - Removes "incident".

• 23:11, 3 November 2005
  • [33] - Removes "subsequent Naval review found John Kerry's wound to be correctly given".

• 04:41, 4 November 2005
  • [34] - Removes "George Elliott, has said that the award to Kerry was in keeping with the Navy's practice at the time".

• 06:40, 4 November 2005
  • [35] - Revert to Removal of George Elliot quote.

• 06:49, 4 November 2005
  • [36] - Revert to Removal of George Elliot quote.

• 07:00, 4 November 2005
  • [37] - Revert to Removal of George Elliot quote.

• 08:02, 5 November 2005
  • [38] - Revert to Removal of George Elliot quote.

• 22:48, 5 November 2005
  • [39] - Removes source, adds wikilink to Sick Call.

• 21:13, 6 November 2005
  • [40] - Revert to "received". Then adds wikilink to Judicial Watch.

• 23:27, 6 November 2005
  • [41] - Revert to "received" and Judicial Watch. And reverts other miscellaneous edits.

• 00:30, 7 November 2005
  • [42] - Revert to "received" and Judicial Watch. And reverts other miscellaneous edits.

• 04:04, 7 November 2005
  • [43] - Revert to "received" and Judicial Watch. And reverts other miscellaneous edits.

• 08:48, 7 November 2005
  • [44] - Changes to "not serious".

• 20:29, 7 November 2005
  • [45] - Revert to "received". IE deletes "wound" entirely.

• 20:34, 7 November 2005
  • [46] - Removes source.

• 20:37, 7 November 2005
  • [47] - Adds "little scratch".

• 20:43, 7 November 2005
  • [48] - Revert to "received". IE delete "wound" entirely. Edit Summary is also misleading: "fix typo".

• 21:43, 7 November 2005
  • [49] - Revert to "not serious".

• 21:45, 7 November 2005
  • [50] - Changes "incident" to "wound".

• 01:31, 9 November 2005
  • [51] - Revert to Judicial Watch.

• 12:14, 9 November 2005
  • [52] - Changes "bandage" to "dressing". Also labels this k1v1, which refers to this List of versions Rex likes to revert to.

• 19:46, 9 November 2005
  • [53] - Revert Derex's edits. Removes "bandage". Readds Sick Call. IE k1 v1 on Rex's List.

• 00:16, 10 November 2005
  • [54] - Revert to "not serious".

• 00:22, 10 November 2005
  • [55] - Removes "when Kerry returned to base".

• 01:06, 10 November 2005
  • [56] - Removes "qualified Kerry under Naval regulations for his first Purple Heart award".

• 01:13, 10 November 2005
  • [57] - Remove quotation marks around "not serious".

• 01:40, 10 November 2005
  • [58] - Revert to removal of "qualified Kerry under Naval regulations for his first Purple Heart award". Also "k1 v3" refers to this List.

• 01:50, 10 November 2005
  • [59] - Revert to "not serious". Edit Summary: "fix last sentence error" is misleading. IE k1 v3 on Rex's List.

• 04:28, 10 November 2005
  • [60] - Readds Purple Heart which was lost in all the edit-warring.

• 04:54, 10 November 2005
  • [61] - Revert to removal of "qualified him under Naval regulations for a Purple Heart". IE k1 v5 on Rex's List.

• 09:21, 10 November 2005
  • [62] - Removes "Kerry suffered a shrapnel wound in the left arm above the elbow". k1 v6 refers to this List.

• 09:45, 10 November 2005
  • [63] - Changes "available records" to "existing documentation". IE k1 v6 on Rex's List.

• 10:15, 10 November 2005
  • [64] - Revert to "minor". And reverts to "dressing" instead of "bandage". K1 v7 refers to this List of versions Rex likes to revert to.

• 14:59, 10 November 2005
  • [65] - Removes "bandage" and source. IE k1 v8 on Rex's List.

• 18:06, 10 November 2005
  • [66] - Revert to "not serious". k1 v4 refers to this List and corresponds to the version Rex has just reverted to.

• 18:31, 10 November 2005
  • [67] - Revert to "dressing". IE k1 v1 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "Then please stop reverting" is misleading.

• 18:41, 10 November 2005
  • [68] - Revert to "not serious". IE k1 v2 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "Kiz, support your suggestions on talk, as I have been. How is this version for you?" is misleading.

• 19:01, 10 November 2005
  • [69] - Revert to "not serious". IE k1 v3 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "KZ, is this better?" is misleading.

• 07:18, 11 November 2005
  • [70] - Revert to removal of "bandage" and source. Very similiar to k1 v10 on Rex's List.

• 10:16, 11 November 2005
  • [71] - Revert to removal of "bandage". IE k1 v10 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "plus these links better support text. Mr. Tibbs please don't just revert and threaten 3rr. Join talk dialog" is misleading.

• 02:48, 12 November 2005
  • [72] - Revert to "minor". Also adds "laceration. IE k1 v11 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "as per proof from talk page re: Brinckley + medical term" is misleading.

• 03:30, 12 November 2005
  • [73] - Revert to "dressing". IE k1 v1 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "k1v1 Kizzle, since you left no ES, I have to guess what's bothering you. How's this look?" is misleading.

• 03:55, 12 November 2005
  • [74] - Revert to "not serious". IE k1 v2 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "Kizzle, by focusing on me in your the ES instead of stating specific objections, you leave me guessing. How's this?" - is misleading.

• 07:09, 12 November 2005
  • [75] - Revert to "not serious". IE k1 v2 on Rex's List.

• 07:32, 12 November 2005
  • [76] - Revert to "later claimed". IE k1 v12 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "Tibbs, it is not true that I am re-inserting the same as what was just in or even most recently in. I am trying to reach agreement with you. Please also try that. How is this" is Extremely misleading.

• 07:51, 12 November 2005
  • [77] - Revert to "laceration" and "dressing. IE k1 v13 on Rex's List. Edit Summary: "Tiibs u r simply mistaken, if you joined talk instead of just reverting, you would know that I am offering each edit I make as a compromise towards NPOV. Will you accept this?" is Extremely misleading.

• 04:07, 14 November 2005
  • [78] - Revert to "minor". Edit being tagged as minor is misleading.

• 04:17, 14 November 2005
  • [79] - Replaces one source with another.

• 04:31, 14 November 2005
  • [80] - Changes "bandage" to "wound dressed".

• 04:42, 14 November 2005
  • [81] - Replaces "suffered" with "received".

Rex071404's Edits to Stolen Honor

This is a simple list of all of Rex's edits to Stolen Honor starting from Rex's return from his Self-Imposed Ban on October 18. It will be noted whether or not the edit is a revert. Minor edits, such as typos, are not included. Edits pertaining to other articles will be listed elsewhere.

• 03:03, 18 October 2005
  • [82] - Adds: "There is nothing in the public record indicating that anything of import came of these complaints.". This is Rex's first significant edit to Stolen Honor since his Self-Imposed ban.

• 04:18, 19 October 2005
  • [83] - ReAdds same content rephrased: "Whether or not the FCC, DOJ or FEC had any authority to act on complaints of this type, was not made clear by the various news reports which followed this story. Within a few weeks after election 2004, this controversy fell out of the news."

• 04:19, 20 October 2005
  • [84] - Removed 4 paragraphs from the article.

• 04:20, 20 October 2005
  • [85] - Changes the tense of a sentence.

• 16:12, 20 October 2005
  • [86] - Revert to Removal of 4 paragraphs.

• 20:59, 22 October 2005
  • [87] - Revert to Removal of 4 paragraphs.

• 01:26, 23 October 2005
  • [88] - Revert to Removal of 4 paragraphs.

• 04:27, 23 October 2005
  • [89] - Revert to Removal of 4 paragraphs.

• 04:29, 23 October 2005
  • [90] - Changes tense of a sentence.

• 04:31, 23 October 2005
  • [91] - Adds wikilink.

• 02:01, 24 October 2005
  • [92] - Revert to Removal of 4 paragraphs.

• 04:52, 24 October 2005
  • [93] - Revert to Removal of 4 paragraphs.

• 16:01, 24 October 2005
  • [94] - Revert to Removal of 4 paragraphs.

• 21:49, 24 October 2005
  • [95] - Rewrites sentence.

• 21:50, 24 October 2005
  • [96] - Removes single paragraph.

• 03:19, 25 October 2005
  • [97] - Revert to Removal of single paragraph.

• 03:28, 25 October 2005
  • [98] - Removes two sentences.

• 05:09, 25 October 2005
  • [99] - Revert to Removal of single paragraph.

• 05:25, 25 October 2005
  • [100] - Changes "announced" to "reported".

• 05:27, 25 October 2005
  • [101] - Rewrites sentence.

• 05:38, 25 October 2005
  • [102] - Rewrites several sentences.

• <timestamp1>
  • What happened.

• <timestamp2>
  • What happened.

• <timestamp3>
  • What happened.

Bucking consensus

My first batch of evidence is going to pertain to Rex071404's continued attempt to buck a consensus on the John Kerry article. The consensus on this part of the article came about over a year ago. This is how it reads:

"During this encounter, Kerry suffered a shrapnel wound in the left arm above the elbow. Later, medical staff removed the shrapnel and applied a bacitracin dressing. The next day, with Kerry's arm bandaged, he returned to regular Swift boat patrol duty."

Mr. Tibbs already documented all of Rex's attempts to change it to read "minor wound" or insisting that applying bacitracin is not a bandage. I'm going to focus on the continued bucking of the consensus. Several votes have been taken to end the debate. The point is that it has prevented any other discussion on the issues.

• 00:20, 9 November 2005
  • [103] - End of vote to end debate, which Rex071404 clearly lost. And this demonstrates how he tries to muddle votes by basically making up voting categories.

• 01:24, 9 November 2005
  • [104] - Rex lost the vote unanimously and yet still insisted that a consensus had not been reached. As you can see, a stop sign template was constructed to show Rex that it was time to move on.

• 00:56, 9 November 2005
  • [105] - Even though it had been barely an hour since consensus was established by the vote (and admin Titoxd had unprotected the article for that reason. See here. [106]), Rex put it up for another vote to determine whether what was just determined as consensus was really consensus!

• 04:09, 12 November 2005
  • [107] - Yet another vote to end discussion was proposed. Even though he had already lost a previous vote and had been warring with everyone else since (apx. 200 posts between the 2 votes and every one was trying to push his POV despite the consensus), he claimed that the 2nd vote was invalid.

• 21:36, 13 November 2005
  • [108] - On November 13th, another vote was called. It was the last one that Rex participated in. There was another vote called on the 14th but that's when he attacked me and then went into exile. This time, he labeled the vote as an "invalid final vote" and then made a statement:

"Jtdirl says "Your view on the issue is irrelevant". Indeed, this has been clear for some time. Be advised however, that my editors rights are in full force and I will not agree to waive them on the basis of a vote for stasis."

Again, this is after consensus had been established not once, but twice and was about to be established for a 3rd time.

Evidence of sockpuppet use

Rex's odd behavior

This is evidence involving Rex's possible use of sockpuppets. The evidence is circumstantial in that a checkuser showed that it was not definitely Rex, but as I showed in my original statement on this matter, when I was visciously attacked a few days ago, it was while Rex was absent and it was also right after I had revealed his gaming tactics on the Kerry article. The evidence...

• 22:00, 13 November 2005
  • [ [109]] - My post accusing Rex of gaming the system

• 00:03, 14 November 2005
  • [110] - Rex's unusual post on the Price-Anderson Act article.

• 00:11, 14 November 2005
  • [111] - The appearance of the first sockpuppet, Anonrtgtt

• 00:32, 14 November 2005
  • [112] - Rex's last post before the vandals hit (on the George W. Bush military service controversy article)

• 04:02, 14 Movember 2005
  • [113] - The return of Rex. He removed my valid accusations from his talk page.

The sockpuppets themselves

User:Woohookitty/Vandals is my listing of the vandals. Below will be the contributions per vandal.

• User:Anonrtgtt (00:11 to 01:20, 14 November 2005)
  • Contributions: Special:Contributions/Anonrtgtt

• User:Anonrtgt (01:29 to 01:47, 14 November 2005)
  • Contributions: Special:Contributions/Anonrtgt

• User:Anonrtg (02:02 to 02:17, 14 November 2005)
  • Contributions: Special:Contributions/Anonrtg

• User:Anonrt (02:21 to 02:22, 14 November 2005)
  • Contributions: Special:Contributions/Anonrt

• User:Anonr (02:25, 14 November 2005)
  • Contributions: Special:Contributions/Anonr

After that, the anons were blocked...

<day1> <month>

• <timestamp1>
  • What happened.

• <timestamp2>
  • What happened.

• <timestamp3>
  • What happened.

<day2> <month>

• <timestamp1>
  • What happened.

• <timestamp2>
  • What happened.

• <timestamp3>
  • What happened.