all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.
On this case, 1 Arbitrators is recused and 3 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
Why have I been included in a Request for Arbitration against KaintheScion and ElKabong?
I am not either. I do not use sockpuppets nor am I a sockpuppet. Enviroknot 03:22, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
After further reflection and seeing the hateful and wrong comments left by others regarding me, I formally REJECT this kangaroo court. Do what you will. I know you for what you are, hateful, horrid people who have no interest in the truth. Enviroknot 03:32, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
1) {text of proposed orders}
1) User:Enviroknot using any account is prohibited from editing any Wikipedia page other then his talk page and the pages of this arbitration until a final decision is made in this case.
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) While is is permissible for a person to have several user accounts on Wikipedia, such accounts may be misused in a variety of ways. When there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets, see Wikipedia:Sock puppet
1.1) While controversial and perhaps exacerbating conflict, it is acceptable to place Template:Sockpuppet on the user page of a suspected account together with links to supporting evidence, see Wikipedia:Sock_puppet#Tagging_identified_sock_puppets.
2) Personal attacks and disparaging remarks directed at other users are unacceptable, see Wikipedia:No personal attacks
3) Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy, see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.
4) Wikipedia editors may be banned from articles where their point of view advocacy has proven disruptive.
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) ElKabong ( talk · contribs), Enviroknot ( talk · contribs), KaintheScion ( talk · contribs), 66.69.141.11 ( talk · contribs), 129.7.35.1 ( talk · contribs), 38.112.194.37 ( talk · contribs), 136.145.54.123 ( talk · contribs) and possibly 207.241.238.149 ( talk · contribs), and 64.229.186.50 ( talk · contribs) are controlled by the same person Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive22#User:KaintheScion_and_User:ElKabong, Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/KaintheScion_et_al./Evidence#Evidence_of_Sockpuppetry
2) Template:Sockpuppet has been placed on User:ElKabong, User:Enviroknot and User:KaintheScion. Placement of the template has been vigorously contested by Environot, see page history, Template talk:Sockpuppet, Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/Not_deleted/April_2005#Template:Sockpuppet, Wikipedia_talk:Administrators'_noticeboard#Vandalizing_my_user_page, Wikipedia_talk:Administrators'_noticeboard#My_user_page.2C_once_again_vandalized and Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Sockpuppet_template
3) User:Enviroknot strongly advocated retention and elaboration of the articles Islamofascism and Islamic fascism, since redirected to Neofascism and religion [1] [2], see Talk:Islamofascism.
3) User:Enviroknot has made personal attacks on his Wikipedia opponents who he perceives as "Islamist." [3], [4], [5], [6] and [7]
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) User:Enviroknot is required to use the account Enviroknot and no other.
2) User:Enviroknot is banned from editing articles or associated talk pages which relate to Islam for one year, this includes posting on the talk pages of other users material which relates to Islam.
2.1) User:Enviroknot is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year.
3) User:Enviroknot is placed on personal attack parole for one year.
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
1) In the event User:Enviroknot violates the remedies adopted in this matter he may be banned for a short period, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses.
2) Verified use of sockpuppet while a temporary block is in place shall result in a ban from editing Wikipedia for one month.
2.1) Verified use of sockpuppets while the one year ban is in place shall result in the ban being reset, as per standard Arbitration Committee practice.
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.
all proposed
Arbitrators should vote for or against each point or abstain.
Conditional votes for or against and abstentions should be explained by the Arbitrator before or after his/her time-stamped signature. For example, an Arbitrator can state that she/he would only favor a particular remedy based on whether or not another remedy/remedies were passed.
On this case, 1 Arbitrators is recused and 3 are inactive, so 5 votes are a majority.
Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on. Non-arbitrators may comment on the talk page.
Why have I been included in a Request for Arbitration against KaintheScion and ElKabong?
I am not either. I do not use sockpuppets nor am I a sockpuppet. Enviroknot 03:22, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
After further reflection and seeing the hateful and wrong comments left by others regarding me, I formally REJECT this kangaroo court. Do what you will. I know you for what you are, hateful, horrid people who have no interest in the truth. Enviroknot 03:32, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Four net "support" votes needed to pass (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first vote is normally the fastest an injunction will be imposed.
1) {text of proposed orders}
1) User:Enviroknot using any account is prohibited from editing any Wikipedia page other then his talk page and the pages of this arbitration until a final decision is made in this case.
1) {text of proposed principle}
1) While is is permissible for a person to have several user accounts on Wikipedia, such accounts may be misused in a variety of ways. When there is uncertainty whether a party is one user with sockpuppets or several users with similar editing habits they may be treated as one user with sockpuppets, see Wikipedia:Sock puppet
1.1) While controversial and perhaps exacerbating conflict, it is acceptable to place Template:Sockpuppet on the user page of a suspected account together with links to supporting evidence, see Wikipedia:Sock_puppet#Tagging_identified_sock_puppets.
2) Personal attacks and disparaging remarks directed at other users are unacceptable, see Wikipedia:No personal attacks
3) Wikipedia is not a platform for advocacy, see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not.
4) Wikipedia editors may be banned from articles where their point of view advocacy has proven disruptive.
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}
1) ElKabong ( talk · contribs), Enviroknot ( talk · contribs), KaintheScion ( talk · contribs), 66.69.141.11 ( talk · contribs), 129.7.35.1 ( talk · contribs), 38.112.194.37 ( talk · contribs), 136.145.54.123 ( talk · contribs) and possibly 207.241.238.149 ( talk · contribs), and 64.229.186.50 ( talk · contribs) are controlled by the same person Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive22#User:KaintheScion_and_User:ElKabong, Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/KaintheScion_et_al./Evidence#Evidence_of_Sockpuppetry
2) Template:Sockpuppet has been placed on User:ElKabong, User:Enviroknot and User:KaintheScion. Placement of the template has been vigorously contested by Environot, see page history, Template talk:Sockpuppet, Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion/Log/Not_deleted/April_2005#Template:Sockpuppet, Wikipedia_talk:Administrators'_noticeboard#Vandalizing_my_user_page, Wikipedia_talk:Administrators'_noticeboard#My_user_page.2C_once_again_vandalized and Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard#Sockpuppet_template
3) User:Enviroknot strongly advocated retention and elaboration of the articles Islamofascism and Islamic fascism, since redirected to Neofascism and religion [1] [2], see Talk:Islamofascism.
3) User:Enviroknot has made personal attacks on his Wikipedia opponents who he perceives as "Islamist." [3], [4], [5], [6] and [7]
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
1) {text of proposed remedy}
1) User:Enviroknot is required to use the account Enviroknot and no other.
2) User:Enviroknot is banned from editing articles or associated talk pages which relate to Islam for one year, this includes posting on the talk pages of other users material which relates to Islam.
2.1) User:Enviroknot is banned from editing Wikipedia for one year.
3) User:Enviroknot is placed on personal attack parole for one year.
1) {text of proposed enforcement}
1) In the event User:Enviroknot violates the remedies adopted in this matter he may be banned for a short period, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses.
2) Verified use of sockpuppet while a temporary block is in place shall result in a ban from editing Wikipedia for one month.
2.1) Verified use of sockpuppets while the one year ban is in place shall result in the ban being reset, as per standard Arbitration Committee practice.
Four net "support" votes needed to close case (each "oppose" vote subtracts a "support")
24 hours from the first motion is normally the fastest a case will close.