Final: (126/36/19); ended 10:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Walton One ( talk · contribs) - This is a reconfirmation RfA.
While the community has not been exactly accepting of recent re-confirmations, hopefully this one can proceed without drama.
I co-nominated Walton for adminship successfully in April of 2007. Walton faithfully and diligently served the community as an administrator for seven months, desysopping himself in November of 2007. ( Walton One ( talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves)
Walton may get into the convoluted reasons of why he resigned his bit in the first place and why we are here at a re-confirmation, the reasons are detailed and many (and discussion can be found here).
The bottom line is that Walton made a promise to seek re-confirmation and not just ask a 'crat for the bit back if any editor in good standing asked him to run again, so here he is demonstrating his integrity. Walton has always been a vocal member of our community in discussing the direction of the project, and served well and uncontroversially as an administrator. I urge the community to support resysopping. This request is not just seeking a pat on the back. Keegan talk 01:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Walton One before commenting.
Final: (126/36/19); ended 10:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Walton One ( talk · contribs) - This is a reconfirmation RfA.
While the community has not been exactly accepting of recent re-confirmations, hopefully this one can proceed without drama.
I co-nominated Walton for adminship successfully in April of 2007. Walton faithfully and diligently served the community as an administrator for seven months, desysopping himself in November of 2007. ( Walton One ( talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves)
Walton may get into the convoluted reasons of why he resigned his bit in the first place and why we are here at a re-confirmation, the reasons are detailed and many (and discussion can be found here).
The bottom line is that Walton made a promise to seek re-confirmation and not just ask a 'crat for the bit back if any editor in good standing asked him to run again, so here he is demonstrating his integrity. Walton has always been a vocal member of our community in discussing the direction of the project, and served well and uncontroversially as an administrator. I urge the community to support resysopping. This request is not just seeking a pat on the back. Keegan talk 01:37, 6 December 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Walton One before commenting.