Final (63/1/0); Closed as successful by – xeno talk at 21:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Valfontis ( talk · contribs) – It's about time to make Valfontis—a prolific Wikipedia editor—an administrator, don't you think? 58,000+ edits and almost 5 years of dedicated activity should satisfy even the most discriminating editcountophile. Valfontis is quite busy at Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon, has done good work for Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam, and is plenty familiar with AfD and reporting vandals to AIV. Valfontis has also wielded a fine-pointed copy editing pen to help promote five articles to GA status, and a FA, Oregon State Capitol. See for yourself the range of Valfontis's quality work...this site could benefit from giving an editor of her experience and leadership a few extra tools. Her clean blocklog, recognition from other editors, and collegial demeanor should seal this no-brainer. — Scien tizzle 14:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Nomination from
Pete (
talk)
I am very pleased to second the nomination of Valfontis, who is one of the most prolific editors, and possesses some of the best judgment, of anyone I've encountered in my two five years of active editing.
Valfontis is among the best we've got, and can be trusted to wield the mop with the humility and discretion appropriate to the task. - Pete ( talk) 20:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
#:Pending Q5 answer. Moving to support
Swarm
X
09:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
reply
Final (63/1/0); Closed as successful by – xeno talk at 21:46, 25 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Valfontis ( talk · contribs) – It's about time to make Valfontis—a prolific Wikipedia editor—an administrator, don't you think? 58,000+ edits and almost 5 years of dedicated activity should satisfy even the most discriminating editcountophile. Valfontis is quite busy at Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon, has done good work for Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam, and is plenty familiar with AfD and reporting vandals to AIV. Valfontis has also wielded a fine-pointed copy editing pen to help promote five articles to GA status, and a FA, Oregon State Capitol. See for yourself the range of Valfontis's quality work...this site could benefit from giving an editor of her experience and leadership a few extra tools. Her clean blocklog, recognition from other editors, and collegial demeanor should seal this no-brainer. — Scien tizzle 14:58, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Nomination from
Pete (
talk)
I am very pleased to second the nomination of Valfontis, who is one of the most prolific editors, and possesses some of the best judgment, of anyone I've encountered in my two five years of active editing.
Valfontis is among the best we've got, and can be trusted to wield the mop with the humility and discretion appropriate to the task. - Pete ( talk) 20:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review their contributions before commenting.
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
---|---|
Counters | |
Analysis | |
Cross-wiki |
#:Pending Q5 answer. Moving to support
Swarm
X
09:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
reply