Voice your opinion ( talk page) (50/33/3) final Andre ( talk) 01:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC) reply
TenPoundHammer ( talk · contribs) - Self-nomination, inspired by this comment left by User:Edison on my talk page. I was previously nominated in May by User:Whstchy, but my previous nomination was pretty much split between opposition and support, in part due to some comments towards a user who had attacked me. I feel that since then I have improved on my reaction to attack by other users, and I also think that I have improved overall in my editing skills (for instance, I now use the {{ cite web}} tag when making references). Overall, I feel that I have sufficient experience as an editor to handle adminship. Ten Pound Hammer • ((( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer before commenting.
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Neutral I like what I see for the most part, but the opposing side brings up some concerns.
Jmlk
1
7 23:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Changing to oppose.
Jmlk
1
7 04:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
#Neutral Most of the work of Hammer that I have seen has been in Afd's, and his statement that most of his work will be "on fighting vandalism on Wikipedia pages" seems disingenuous. But I must say that his closure of debates that I have seen has been an enacting of the will of the community, in the best sense of that phrase.
VanTucky
(talk) 08:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
#Withholding consideration I will not consider support until Q6 is addressed / fixed sufficiently. More information on how to fix this is found on
WP:ADMIN#Becoming_an_administrator under the security heading. Its just safe practices. Best regards,
Navou
banter
04:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
reply
Voice your opinion ( talk page) (50/33/3) final Andre ( talk) 01:43, 28 July 2007 (UTC) reply
TenPoundHammer ( talk · contribs) - Self-nomination, inspired by this comment left by User:Edison on my talk page. I was previously nominated in May by User:Whstchy, but my previous nomination was pretty much split between opposition and support, in part due to some comments towards a user who had attacked me. I feel that since then I have improved on my reaction to attack by other users, and I also think that I have improved overall in my editing skills (for instance, I now use the {{ cite web}} tag when making references). Overall, I feel that I have sufficient experience as an editor to handle adminship. Ten Pound Hammer • ((( Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 00:40, 21 July 2007 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. You may wish to answer the following optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep criticism constructive and polite. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/TenPoundHammer before commenting.
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Neutral I like what I see for the most part, but the opposing side brings up some concerns.
Jmlk
1
7 23:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Changing to oppose.
Jmlk
1
7 04:07, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
#Neutral Most of the work of Hammer that I have seen has been in Afd's, and his statement that most of his work will be "on fighting vandalism on Wikipedia pages" seems disingenuous. But I must say that his closure of debates that I have seen has been an enacting of the will of the community, in the best sense of that phrase.
VanTucky
(talk) 08:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
#Withholding consideration I will not consider support until Q6 is addressed / fixed sufficiently. More information on how to fix this is found on
WP:ADMIN#Becoming_an_administrator under the security heading. Its just safe practices. Best regards,
Navou
banter
04:18, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
reply