(42/7/2) Ended Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:35:24 (UTC)
Rockpocket ( talk · contribs) – Rockpocket has been editing since December 2005 and has made 4,400 edits overall, including 2,200 edits to articles, with a focus on the biological sciences, and a good balance of contributions to talk pages and project space. ( Link to edit counter, but it's a bit slow.) He's an excellent editor who cares about our policies, uses sources carefully, writes neutrally, and has a calming influence on talk pages, where he tries to find a balance between both sides of any debate. I've encountered him on a number of animal-rights related articles, and although we have different views on that debate (Rockpocket opposes AR in general), he's someone whose edits I always trust because I know they'll be carefully written and well-sourced. He has also been involved in countering vandalism and in helping out on the Science reference desk, and has in general become a trusted and respected member of the community. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Optional questions from Malber ( talk · contribs)
Rockpocket's editcount summary stats as of 09:40, November 3 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 09:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral
(42/7/2) Ended Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:35:24 (UTC)
Rockpocket ( talk · contribs) – Rockpocket has been editing since December 2005 and has made 4,400 edits overall, including 2,200 edits to articles, with a focus on the biological sciences, and a good balance of contributions to talk pages and project space. ( Link to edit counter, but it's a bit slow.) He's an excellent editor who cares about our policies, uses sources carefully, writes neutrally, and has a calming influence on talk pages, where he tries to find a balance between both sides of any debate. I've encountered him on a number of animal-rights related articles, and although we have different views on that debate (Rockpocket opposes AR in general), he's someone whose edits I always trust because I know they'll be carefully written and well-sourced. He has also been involved in countering vandalism and in helping out on the Science reference desk, and has in general become a trusted and respected member of the community. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Optional questions from Malber ( talk · contribs)
Rockpocket's editcount summary stats as of 09:40, November 3 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 09:43, 3 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral