final (36/1/0) ending 08:28
11 August2005 (UTC)Lacrimosus (
talk·contribs) - I've been around since
June2004 and in that time have made a variety of contributions, mostly to topics relating to
Australia and Australian politics, but also a fair few copyedits, brushups and table adjustments, in articles ranging from
Holy Roman Emperors to Infinite Jest and
shaggy dog story. I tend to treat the Wikipedia as a reader and an editor in equal parts. Some contributions are listed
here. I've made 4727 edits. --
Slacspeak up! 08:28, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support
Strong Support: I was actually thinking of editors that should be nominated for Adminship, and Slac was among them. From what I have seen of his work, I am greatly impressed, and I think it's safe to say that he can be trusted wholeheartedly with Admin abilities.--
Cyberjunkie |
Talk 08:41, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Responsible editor that I've had good interactions with. Give this man a mop!!!!
Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 09:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I'm proud to say that this is my first "thought he already was one" vote. I see 'Slac' all the time, and never realized that that wasn't your real username. :P
Ryan 00:34, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Support, prolific article space editor. --
bainer (
talk) 06:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Happy to Support --
Roisterer 08:07, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support very good contributor of articles and edits.
David |
Talk 14:51, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support- great deal of edits, it'll be good to have an admin capable of doing something other than procedural stuff
Cynical 15:32, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. The usual "thought he already was one" business. Also, I'd be inclined to think anyone who can make it all the way through Infinite Jest has both the patience and the ability to make sense of long-running, complex situations and drawn-out fragmented discussions beneficial to an admin. ;-)
Mindspillage(spill yours?) 03:04, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, on the condition that we get to know why Lacrimosus is abbreviated as Slac. Seriously, though, good contributor to VfD.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Android79 (
talk •
contribs) 14:10, 6 August 2005
Support Slac always seems to make well-considered contributions to talk pages and valuable edits to articles. --
ScottDavis |
Talk 14:11, 7 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Edits and interactions with others seem exemplary. --
MPerel (
talk |
contrib) 04:10, 8 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Happy to support.
SlimVirgin(talk) 22:54, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Yes.
Func(
t,
c ) 04:29, 9 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, excellent candidate. —
Stormie 06:40, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Lacrimosus makes a lot of great article contributions and does a lot of work. He has almost 5000 edits now and looks like an excellent candidate for administrator. Support. —
Stevey7788 (
talk) 23:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Lots of good edits. The only person who seems to oppose this also voted against every single other nom. --
Briangotts(talk) 20:58, 10 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Edit count for Lacrimosus at Kate's tool. At the time of this post, says 4,739 total edits, with 3,248 edits to articles.
Redux 14:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A Mostly vandalism reverts, along with the occasional deletion debate closure. If accepted, I would ease myself in to admin functions gradually, holding off from contentious exercises of them until I feel more comfortable.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A I was involved with a number of other editors in the
dispute with GRider. I've had a few minor altercations with various users, of mild severity and limited duration. I think in most cases I'm capable of assuming good faith and my experience with GRider and deletion debates has taught me that It's A Big Wiki and that avoiding disputes will help me live longer :).
final (36/1/0) ending 08:28
11 August2005 (UTC)Lacrimosus (
talk·contribs) - I've been around since
June2004 and in that time have made a variety of contributions, mostly to topics relating to
Australia and Australian politics, but also a fair few copyedits, brushups and table adjustments, in articles ranging from
Holy Roman Emperors to Infinite Jest and
shaggy dog story. I tend to treat the Wikipedia as a reader and an editor in equal parts. Some contributions are listed
here. I've made 4727 edits. --
Slacspeak up! 08:28, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support
Strong Support: I was actually thinking of editors that should be nominated for Adminship, and Slac was among them. From what I have seen of his work, I am greatly impressed, and I think it's safe to say that he can be trusted wholeheartedly with Admin abilities.--
Cyberjunkie |
Talk 08:41, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Responsible editor that I've had good interactions with. Give this man a mop!!!!
Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 09:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support I'm proud to say that this is my first "thought he already was one" vote. I see 'Slac' all the time, and never realized that that wasn't your real username. :P
Ryan 00:34, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
Support, prolific article space editor. --
bainer (
talk) 06:53, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Happy to Support --
Roisterer 08:07, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support very good contributor of articles and edits.
David |
Talk 14:51, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support- great deal of edits, it'll be good to have an admin capable of doing something other than procedural stuff
Cynical 15:32, 5 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. The usual "thought he already was one" business. Also, I'd be inclined to think anyone who can make it all the way through Infinite Jest has both the patience and the ability to make sense of long-running, complex situations and drawn-out fragmented discussions beneficial to an admin. ;-)
Mindspillage(spill yours?) 03:04, 6 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, on the condition that we get to know why Lacrimosus is abbreviated as Slac. Seriously, though, good contributor to VfD.— Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Android79 (
talk •
contribs) 14:10, 6 August 2005
Support Slac always seems to make well-considered contributions to talk pages and valuable edits to articles. --
ScottDavis |
Talk 14:11, 7 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Edits and interactions with others seem exemplary. --
MPerel (
talk |
contrib) 04:10, 8 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Happy to support.
SlimVirgin(talk) 22:54, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Yes.
Func(
t,
c ) 04:29, 9 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, excellent candidate. —
Stormie 06:40, August 9, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Lacrimosus makes a lot of great article contributions and does a lot of work. He has almost 5000 edits now and looks like an excellent candidate for administrator. Support. —
Stevey7788 (
talk) 23:15, 9 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Lots of good edits. The only person who seems to oppose this also voted against every single other nom. --
Briangotts(talk) 20:58, 10 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Edit count for Lacrimosus at Kate's tool. At the time of this post, says 4,739 total edits, with 3,248 edits to articles.
Redux 14:11, 4 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A Mostly vandalism reverts, along with the occasional deletion debate closure. If accepted, I would ease myself in to admin functions gradually, holding off from contentious exercises of them until I feel more comfortable.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A I was involved with a number of other editors in the
dispute with GRider. I've had a few minor altercations with various users, of mild severity and limited duration. I think in most cases I'm capable of assuming good faith and my experience with GRider and deletion debates has taught me that It's A Big Wiki and that avoiding disputes will help me live longer :).