Final (46/0/1) ended 12:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
kcordina ( talk · contribs) – I nominate myself for adminship following 6 months of significant (in my opinion) work on wikipedia. In that time I've been involved in many aspects of wikipedia - adding content to articles, improving the quality of articles, merging many hundreds of articles from the merge backlog, copyediting, contributing to AFD, helping out at the mediation cabal, and plenty of vandal fighting. I now feel that I have a good grasp of wikipedia policies and the way things work, and that I am now sufficiently competent here to make a valuable contribution using the additional tools available to admins. Kcordina Talk 12:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Self nomination accepted. Kcordina Talk 12:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Username Kcordina Total edits 5092 Distinct pages edited 3601 Average edits/page 1.414 First edit 11:24, December 6, 2005 (main) 3440 Talk 277 User 113 User talk 675 Image 5 Template 14 Template talk 3 Category 83 Category talk 2 Wikipedia 463 Wikipedia talk 15 Portal 2G. H e 00:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC) reply
All user's edits. Voice-of-All T| @| ESP 23:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC) reply
User contributions --Viewing contribution data for user Kcordina (over the 4935 edit(s) shown on this page)-- (FAQ) Time range: 134 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 23hr (UTC) -- 18, May, 2006 Oldest edit on: 15hr (UTC) -- 6, December, 2005 Overall edit summary use: Major edits: 88.5% Minor edits: 99.75% Article edit summary use: Major article edits: 95.51% Minor article edits: 99.92% Average edits per day (current): 36.82 Notable article edits (creation/expansion/rewrites/major sourcing): 3.91% (193) Unique pages edited: 3347 | Average edits per page: 1.47 | Edits on top: 13.72% Breakdown of edits: All significant edits (non-minor/reverts): 25.98% Minor edits (non reverts): 47.96% Marked reverts: 21.2% Unmarked edits: 4.86% Edits by Wikipedia namespace: Article: 67.5% (3331) | Article talk: 5.49% (271) User: 2.27% (112) | User talk: 13.17% (650) Wikipedia: 9.08% (448) | Wikipedia talk: 0.3% (15) Image: 0.1% (5) Template: 0.28% (14) Category: 1.68% (83) Portal: 0.02% (1) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.1% (5)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Question from JoshuaZ
1 You mention in your answer to question 1 above using your admin tools to help out with copyvio issues. What have you done that gives your prior experience with copy right issues on Wikipedia?
Anyway, that was a bit of long waffle, but hopefully it shows the way I like to work. In future on the copyvio issue I'd like to be more pro-active in resolving issues and ultimately removing copyvio work. Being active in this manner is difficult without the tools to finalise the issue if the material does need to be removed.
Hopefully the fact that I'm an intellectual property attorney in real life will help me arrive at good decisions. ;-) Kcordina Talk 08:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Final (46/0/1) ended 12:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
kcordina ( talk · contribs) – I nominate myself for adminship following 6 months of significant (in my opinion) work on wikipedia. In that time I've been involved in many aspects of wikipedia - adding content to articles, improving the quality of articles, merging many hundreds of articles from the merge backlog, copyediting, contributing to AFD, helping out at the mediation cabal, and plenty of vandal fighting. I now feel that I have a good grasp of wikipedia policies and the way things work, and that I am now sufficiently competent here to make a valuable contribution using the additional tools available to admins. Kcordina Talk 12:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Self nomination accepted. Kcordina Talk 12:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC) reply
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Comments
Username Kcordina Total edits 5092 Distinct pages edited 3601 Average edits/page 1.414 First edit 11:24, December 6, 2005 (main) 3440 Talk 277 User 113 User talk 675 Image 5 Template 14 Template talk 3 Category 83 Category talk 2 Wikipedia 463 Wikipedia talk 15 Portal 2G. H e 00:01, 24 May 2006 (UTC) reply
All user's edits. Voice-of-All T| @| ESP 23:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC) reply
User contributions --Viewing contribution data for user Kcordina (over the 4935 edit(s) shown on this page)-- (FAQ) Time range: 134 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 23hr (UTC) -- 18, May, 2006 Oldest edit on: 15hr (UTC) -- 6, December, 2005 Overall edit summary use: Major edits: 88.5% Minor edits: 99.75% Article edit summary use: Major article edits: 95.51% Minor article edits: 99.92% Average edits per day (current): 36.82 Notable article edits (creation/expansion/rewrites/major sourcing): 3.91% (193) Unique pages edited: 3347 | Average edits per page: 1.47 | Edits on top: 13.72% Breakdown of edits: All significant edits (non-minor/reverts): 25.98% Minor edits (non reverts): 47.96% Marked reverts: 21.2% Unmarked edits: 4.86% Edits by Wikipedia namespace: Article: 67.5% (3331) | Article talk: 5.49% (271) User: 2.27% (112) | User talk: 13.17% (650) Wikipedia: 9.08% (448) | Wikipedia talk: 0.3% (15) Image: 0.1% (5) Template: 0.28% (14) Category: 1.68% (83) Portal: 0.02% (1) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.1% (5)
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Question from JoshuaZ
1 You mention in your answer to question 1 above using your admin tools to help out with copyvio issues. What have you done that gives your prior experience with copy right issues on Wikipedia?
Anyway, that was a bit of long waffle, but hopefully it shows the way I like to work. In future on the copyvio issue I'd like to be more pro-active in resolving issues and ultimately removing copyvio work. Being active in this manner is difficult without the tools to finalise the issue if the material does need to be removed.
Hopefully the fact that I'm an intellectual property attorney in real life will help me arrive at good decisions. ;-) Kcordina Talk 08:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC) reply