Final (57/0/0) ended 03:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Ianblair23(
talk·contribs·count) – This wonder from
Down Under has topped 11,000 edits since he began in December, 2004. This includes over 8,500 article edits, and hundreds of project space and talk space edits that show that he is a communicator, and a participant in work beyond article creation and maintenance. His interactions are courteous and positive. He is active in numerous Australia-related projects, and has created and/or polished countless articles relating to the places and institutions of that country, although his penchant for article creation is international (particularly when it comes to media, and to the
Commonwealth Games). I would also note that, although his use of edit summaries was lacking early on, he has been rock solid in using them since September. I am pleased to nominate
Ianblair23 for an adminship.
BD2412T22:09, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support Always good to have well-qualified sysops in under-represented time zones for mopping up when other admins are sleeping or otherwise occupied.
Youngamerican04:06, 10 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. I remember that the first interaction I had with Ianblair23 was to nominate one of his articles for deletion... he handled that case very calmly and civilly. I see that Ian has done a great deal of excellent work with Wikipedia, and I think his answers to Aaron's questions are great. I see no reason not to support.
Sjakkalle(Check!)08:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Strong Support for a wonderful contributor. In fact, nominating Ian was on my list of things
to-do - and I certainly don't mind being beaten to it; he should have been one ages ago. --
Cyberjunkie |
Talk09:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
I disagree. If you're going to have an annoying fancy .sig (not that I intend to imply anything about your annoying fancy .sig, BD2412, which is a very fine annoying fancy .sig indeed) you can at least take the time to learn how to do it properly.
fuddlemark (
fuddle me!)
15:23, 15 November 2005 (UTC)reply
There is no doubt from looking at your contributions that you're a hard worker. Thanks to examining your contributions I'm also happy to now know about
The Disneyland Memorial Orgy. I'd like some further drill-down on your answers, though, as well as some fresh questions:
What has been stopping you from participating in
WP:AfD,
WP:CfD, etc. until now?
When you say that you'd use rollback in fighting trolls, can you explain how a bit more?
You say that you haven't had conflict, but can you give some examples of positive and co-operative interactions with other users?
How comfortable are you with Wikipedia (not main) space, and how familiar you are with the policies relevant to admin powers?
How do you interpret
WP:IAR and when can you imagine that you would use it?
A few curly questions there Aaron, but important ones.
Well nothing has stopped me from participating in these activities; I just haven’t been a regular. I have voted in the past and I’m familiar the policies. I have worked on articles up for deletion to get it up to a higher standard,
North Sydney Girls High School and
Getaway come to mind. However, if the topic is rubbish, vanity etc. then clearly it deserved to be deleted. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
02:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)reply
The rollback function is one of the best tools that are available to admins. This tool is invaluable in the fight against vandals and trolls. I would like to start patrolling
WP:RC more and this tool would most definitely help. However, this tool must be used with caution when reverting newbie edits as this might put them off side thinking that their edits are not worthy. To prevent this, I feel that the use of {{test}}, {{test2}}, etc. on their userpage and/or a mention of why revert occurred on the article's talk page is necessary. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
08:12, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
I feel very comfortable editing and working in the Project space, having already made several hundreds edits. In regard to the policies relevant to admin powers, I have read the
administrators' reading list and I will enforce policies where appropriate. I can assure you, I will not abuse my admin powers. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
06:57, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
One of the reasons why Wikipedia has been such a huge success and will continue to be huge success is the enforcing of the rules and policies under which it was established. Four of the five pillars of Wikipedia are
WP:NOT,
WP:NPOV,
WP:GFDL and
WP:WQT, with the fifth being
WP:IAR. The way I interpret
WP:IAR is that if any rules are getting in the way of the betterment of this encyclopaedia then do not just blatantly follow it but do what is the best for Wikipedia. Now this does not mean that admins or anyone else can use this as a way make up rules, but if genuine bureaucracy and red tape is hindering the project then IAR may be used. I like the final the sentence in the policy the most: "The spirit of the rules is more important than the letter". --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
06:33, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. I would most certainly help clear the backlog on
Requested moves. I would also like to work on
WP:AfD,
WP:CfD,
WP:TfD and the like. The rollback feature would most definitely help me in fighting vandals and trolls where I come across it and I would be very happy to help users with any problems they may have. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
00:42, 10 November 2005 (UTC)reply
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Being from Australia, I have worked on alot of Australian related material. I'm really pleased on progress I have made on the
TV Week Logie Awards, the Australian version of the
Emmys. I have also created several articles on Australian television programs, worked on
List of Australian television series and created the template {{Logie Awards years}}
I have also done alot of work in regard to Australian schools. I broke up the
List of schools in Australia into the 8 pages "List of schools in state/territory". I'm working hard on
List of schools in New South Wales (the table that hopefully will be used on all the other state pages). I also created the categories "Schools in state/territory" and the stub {{Australia-school-stub}}
In addition to all that I also partake in alot of maintenance work fixing redirect links. In particular correcting links from "Title (movie)" to "Title (film)" of which there is a massive amount. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
00:13, 10 November 2005 (UTC)reply
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Final (57/0/0) ended 03:14, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Ianblair23(
talk·contribs·count) – This wonder from
Down Under has topped 11,000 edits since he began in December, 2004. This includes over 8,500 article edits, and hundreds of project space and talk space edits that show that he is a communicator, and a participant in work beyond article creation and maintenance. His interactions are courteous and positive. He is active in numerous Australia-related projects, and has created and/or polished countless articles relating to the places and institutions of that country, although his penchant for article creation is international (particularly when it comes to media, and to the
Commonwealth Games). I would also note that, although his use of edit summaries was lacking early on, he has been rock solid in using them since September. I am pleased to nominate
Ianblair23 for an adminship.
BD2412T22:09, 9 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support Always good to have well-qualified sysops in under-represented time zones for mopping up when other admins are sleeping or otherwise occupied.
Youngamerican04:06, 10 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. I remember that the first interaction I had with Ianblair23 was to nominate one of his articles for deletion... he handled that case very calmly and civilly. I see that Ian has done a great deal of excellent work with Wikipedia, and I think his answers to Aaron's questions are great. I see no reason not to support.
Sjakkalle(Check!)08:31, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Strong Support for a wonderful contributor. In fact, nominating Ian was on my list of things
to-do - and I certainly don't mind being beaten to it; he should have been one ages ago. --
Cyberjunkie |
Talk09:05, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
I disagree. If you're going to have an annoying fancy .sig (not that I intend to imply anything about your annoying fancy .sig, BD2412, which is a very fine annoying fancy .sig indeed) you can at least take the time to learn how to do it properly.
fuddlemark (
fuddle me!)
15:23, 15 November 2005 (UTC)reply
There is no doubt from looking at your contributions that you're a hard worker. Thanks to examining your contributions I'm also happy to now know about
The Disneyland Memorial Orgy. I'd like some further drill-down on your answers, though, as well as some fresh questions:
What has been stopping you from participating in
WP:AfD,
WP:CfD, etc. until now?
When you say that you'd use rollback in fighting trolls, can you explain how a bit more?
You say that you haven't had conflict, but can you give some examples of positive and co-operative interactions with other users?
How comfortable are you with Wikipedia (not main) space, and how familiar you are with the policies relevant to admin powers?
How do you interpret
WP:IAR and when can you imagine that you would use it?
A few curly questions there Aaron, but important ones.
Well nothing has stopped me from participating in these activities; I just haven’t been a regular. I have voted in the past and I’m familiar the policies. I have worked on articles up for deletion to get it up to a higher standard,
North Sydney Girls High School and
Getaway come to mind. However, if the topic is rubbish, vanity etc. then clearly it deserved to be deleted. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
02:51, 10 November 2005 (UTC)reply
The rollback function is one of the best tools that are available to admins. This tool is invaluable in the fight against vandals and trolls. I would like to start patrolling
WP:RC more and this tool would most definitely help. However, this tool must be used with caution when reverting newbie edits as this might put them off side thinking that their edits are not worthy. To prevent this, I feel that the use of {{test}}, {{test2}}, etc. on their userpage and/or a mention of why revert occurred on the article's talk page is necessary. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
08:12, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
I feel very comfortable editing and working in the Project space, having already made several hundreds edits. In regard to the policies relevant to admin powers, I have read the
administrators' reading list and I will enforce policies where appropriate. I can assure you, I will not abuse my admin powers. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
06:57, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
One of the reasons why Wikipedia has been such a huge success and will continue to be huge success is the enforcing of the rules and policies under which it was established. Four of the five pillars of Wikipedia are
WP:NOT,
WP:NPOV,
WP:GFDL and
WP:WQT, with the fifth being
WP:IAR. The way I interpret
WP:IAR is that if any rules are getting in the way of the betterment of this encyclopaedia then do not just blatantly follow it but do what is the best for Wikipedia. Now this does not mean that admins or anyone else can use this as a way make up rules, but if genuine bureaucracy and red tape is hindering the project then IAR may be used. I like the final the sentence in the policy the most: "The spirit of the rules is more important than the letter". --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
06:33, 11 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Questions for the candidate A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
A. I would most certainly help clear the backlog on
Requested moves. I would also like to work on
WP:AfD,
WP:CfD,
WP:TfD and the like. The rollback feature would most definitely help me in fighting vandals and trolls where I come across it and I would be very happy to help users with any problems they may have. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
00:42, 10 November 2005 (UTC)reply
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. Being from Australia, I have worked on alot of Australian related material. I'm really pleased on progress I have made on the
TV Week Logie Awards, the Australian version of the
Emmys. I have also created several articles on Australian television programs, worked on
List of Australian television series and created the template {{Logie Awards years}}
I have also done alot of work in regard to Australian schools. I broke up the
List of schools in Australia into the 8 pages "List of schools in state/territory". I'm working hard on
List of schools in New South Wales (the table that hopefully will be used on all the other state pages). I also created the categories "Schools in state/territory" and the stub {{Australia-school-stub}}
In addition to all that I also partake in alot of maintenance work fixing redirect links. In particular correcting links from "Title (movie)" to "Title (film)" of which there is a massive amount. --
Ianblair23 (
talk)
00:13, 10 November 2005 (UTC)reply
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.