Support - I have seen him do great work on disambiguation link repair and but for my watchlist, I'd have not known of the lengths he had gone to in repairing the links. He uses edit summaries almost always with precise and to-the-point text. An admin status would definitely help him do some of the tasks that he has already been doing in a much faster way - and thus improve his productivity. The only complaint I have against him is that he is so humble that he marks most of his edits as minor. He is a trustworthy editor and hence I believe that he would also be an asset to wikipedia as admin. --
Gurubrahma 14:15, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support—Ive always seen this editor around.
Orane(t)(c)(@) 14:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
--
Wonderfoolt(c) 14:58, 29 October 2005 (UTC). I was gonna mention the fact hu almost always calls them "minor" edits. But it really doesn't matter. Vote per nomreply
Disambiguate... er... support. A fine contributor and project leader who I would have gladly nominated myself!
BD2412talk 15:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, seems to be a valuable candidate. Good work. --
Sn0wflake 17:14, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support highly valuable candidate. Robywayne's analysis seems to indicate that not only is Commander Keane's dedication to Wikipedia longstanding, but it continues to grow. There have been a very high amount of edits on some recent days. Good job!
Jacqui★ 17:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Okay, I know the "ITHAWO" comment is thrown around a lot--but I really did think the Commander was one. He has always been helpful and courteous in our exchanges. He is a pleasure to work with and he definitely deserves the key to the janitors' closet. >:Roby WayneTalk •
Hist •
E@ 23:01, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. The commander has been very active on the Disambiguation project. He seems to have the knack of being able to disagree with somebody without being unpleasant or impolite; an important skill for somebody who is to be entrusted with the mop. --
RoySmith 23:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support --
Rogerd 23:49, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, even though Commander Keen, is better.
PrivateButcher 23:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support And why not, eh? Seen him around a lot (bloody ubiquitous, he is), seems like a good bloke. --
fuddlemark (
fuddle me!) 00:17, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support wow - break out the clichés - I was sure he was...
Grutness...wha? 00:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Yeah.
JFW |
T@lk 01:55, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
I've seen a few disambiguations of his sometime ago... --Rschen7754 (
talk -
contribs) 02:40, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support Strong use of edit summaries. Has demonstrated commitment to housekeeping through disambiguation repair. --
Scott DavisTalk 23:58, 31 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support we need more disambiguators.
ALKIVAR™ 04:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Super Vorticon Support, solid user. -
CHAIRBOY (
☎) 06:42, 1 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support - I've noticed good work from this editor. --
Longhair |
Talk 20:46, 1 November 2005 (UTC)reply
No doubt my propensity for tasks like
link repair will lead me other admin related duties.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
It's a little out of date now, but RobyWayne's generated
statistics indicate my valued contributions.
The link above has just been updated for the Commander. >:Roby WayneTalk •
Hist •
E@ 00:30, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
2005 Tour de France was an exicting editing experience, as was the compilation of its
riders list, which was/is the best source of rider information easily accessible on the internet - that's what Wikipedia can do.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A.
Sure, conflict occaisionally (less than a dozen times) occurs in my disambiguation work and elsewhere and the way to deal with it is disucssion and compromise - making sure that both parties know what the community's opinion is, and what's best for Wikipedia.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Support - I have seen him do great work on disambiguation link repair and but for my watchlist, I'd have not known of the lengths he had gone to in repairing the links. He uses edit summaries almost always with precise and to-the-point text. An admin status would definitely help him do some of the tasks that he has already been doing in a much faster way - and thus improve his productivity. The only complaint I have against him is that he is so humble that he marks most of his edits as minor. He is a trustworthy editor and hence I believe that he would also be an asset to wikipedia as admin. --
Gurubrahma 14:15, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support—Ive always seen this editor around.
Orane(t)(c)(@) 14:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
--
Wonderfoolt(c) 14:58, 29 October 2005 (UTC). I was gonna mention the fact hu almost always calls them "minor" edits. But it really doesn't matter. Vote per nomreply
Disambiguate... er... support. A fine contributor and project leader who I would have gladly nominated myself!
BD2412talk 15:00, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, seems to be a valuable candidate. Good work. --
Sn0wflake 17:14, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support highly valuable candidate. Robywayne's analysis seems to indicate that not only is Commander Keane's dedication to Wikipedia longstanding, but it continues to grow. There have been a very high amount of edits on some recent days. Good job!
Jacqui★ 17:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. Okay, I know the "ITHAWO" comment is thrown around a lot--but I really did think the Commander was one. He has always been helpful and courteous in our exchanges. He is a pleasure to work with and he definitely deserves the key to the janitors' closet. >:Roby WayneTalk •
Hist •
E@ 23:01, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support. The commander has been very active on the Disambiguation project. He seems to have the knack of being able to disagree with somebody without being unpleasant or impolite; an important skill for somebody who is to be entrusted with the mop. --
RoySmith 23:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support --
Rogerd 23:49, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, even though Commander Keen, is better.
PrivateButcher 23:57, 29 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support And why not, eh? Seen him around a lot (bloody ubiquitous, he is), seems like a good bloke. --
fuddlemark (
fuddle me!) 00:17, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support wow - break out the clichés - I was sure he was...
Grutness...wha? 00:33, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Yeah.
JFW |
T@lk 01:55, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
I've seen a few disambiguations of his sometime ago... --Rschen7754 (
talk -
contribs) 02:40, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support Strong use of edit summaries. Has demonstrated commitment to housekeeping through disambiguation repair. --
Scott DavisTalk 23:58, 31 October 2005 (UTC)reply
Support we need more disambiguators.
ALKIVAR™ 04:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Super Vorticon Support, solid user. -
CHAIRBOY (
☎) 06:42, 1 November 2005 (UTC)reply
Support - I've noticed good work from this editor. --
Longhair |
Talk 20:46, 1 November 2005 (UTC)reply
No doubt my propensity for tasks like
link repair will lead me other admin related duties.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
It's a little out of date now, but RobyWayne's generated
statistics indicate my valued contributions.
The link above has just been updated for the Commander. >:Roby WayneTalk •
Hist •
E@ 00:30, 30 October 2005 (UTC)reply
2005 Tour de France was an exicting editing experience, as was the compilation of its
riders list, which was/is the best source of rider information easily accessible on the internet - that's what Wikipedia can do.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A.
Sure, conflict occaisionally (less than a dozen times) occurs in my disambiguation work and elsewhere and the way to deal with it is disucssion and compromise - making sure that both parties know what the community's opinion is, and what's best for Wikipedia.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.