Final (64/0/0) Ended Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:19:59 (UTC)
Cholmes75 ( talk · contribs) – Cholmes was a pupil of admin coaching under myself and Hoopydink. While I was coaching him, I came to the realization that the coaching was completely unnecessary, considering he was alreadly well versed and understood Wikipedia policy. Cholmes contributes quite well to articles (he has heavily contributed to five Good articles), is a nice guy, valuable to the project, and does solid work on the "non-admin yet admin" aspect of the project. I believe he has stepped out of the shadow of the oppose opinions that was expressed on his previous RfA. He has now, in my honest opinion, become an ideal Wikipedian.
Wikipedia has benefited greatly from Cholmes, let's give him the chance to enhance his role on the 'pedia. Yanksox 19:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Final (64/0/0) Ended Sat, 11 Nov 2006 20:19:59 (UTC)
Cholmes75 ( talk · contribs) – Cholmes was a pupil of admin coaching under myself and Hoopydink. While I was coaching him, I came to the realization that the coaching was completely unnecessary, considering he was alreadly well versed and understood Wikipedia policy. Cholmes contributes quite well to articles (he has heavily contributed to five Good articles), is a nice guy, valuable to the project, and does solid work on the "non-admin yet admin" aspect of the project. I believe he has stepped out of the shadow of the oppose opinions that was expressed on his previous RfA. He has now, in my honest opinion, become an ideal Wikipedian.
Wikipedia has benefited greatly from Cholmes, let's give him the chance to enhance his role on the 'pedia. Yanksox 19:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC) reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:
Discussion
Support
Oppose
Neutral