Bureaucrat note: User is now known as "Kiteinthewind"
Voice your opinion on this candidate ( talk page)
(13/22/8); Scheduled to end 01:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn. –
xeno
talk
13:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
Arbiteroftruth (
talk ·
contribs) – I have pleasure in presenting this candidate for the position of administrator. Arbiteroftruth recently came to my talkpage to ask my opinion whether they should run for adminship, so I conducted pretty much the same review that I would any candidate I was not especially familiar with; I was so impressed with what I found that not only did I agree that he should make the request, being that I would support such a candidature, but offered to nominate.
Arbiteroftruth has made just over 10,000 edits (including 1,220+ deleted contributions), but most noteworthy is that he has edited every month since April 2004 and just over half of these edits are to article space. The other 49% are pretty spread over the rest of wiki space, so he likely has a very good understanding of most aspects of the project. I have in the recent past interacted with Arbiteroftruth with regard to one particular sockmaster/vandal, and I have been very impressed with his handling of the situation as regards his calmness and the wisdom (and respect) within his comments and actions. As may be evidenced by his meagre collection of Barnstars, Arbiteroftruth is not someone who would seek the office of administrator for whatever "kudos" might accrue but as a means to better contribute toward the growth of the encyclopedia, and has demonstrated the commitment and trustworthiness expected of the position. I trust that others will also recognise the candidate as a worthy addition to the sysop ranks.
LessHeard vanU (
talk)
20:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Arbiteroftruth before commenting.
Bureaucrat note: User is now known as "Kiteinthewind"
Voice your opinion on this candidate ( talk page)
(13/22/8); Scheduled to end 01:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Nomination withdrawn. –
xeno
talk
13:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
reply
Arbiteroftruth (
talk ·
contribs) – I have pleasure in presenting this candidate for the position of administrator. Arbiteroftruth recently came to my talkpage to ask my opinion whether they should run for adminship, so I conducted pretty much the same review that I would any candidate I was not especially familiar with; I was so impressed with what I found that not only did I agree that he should make the request, being that I would support such a candidature, but offered to nominate.
Arbiteroftruth has made just over 10,000 edits (including 1,220+ deleted contributions), but most noteworthy is that he has edited every month since April 2004 and just over half of these edits are to article space. The other 49% are pretty spread over the rest of wiki space, so he likely has a very good understanding of most aspects of the project. I have in the recent past interacted with Arbiteroftruth with regard to one particular sockmaster/vandal, and I have been very impressed with his handling of the situation as regards his calmness and the wisdom (and respect) within his comments and actions. As may be evidenced by his meagre collection of Barnstars, Arbiteroftruth is not someone who would seek the office of administrator for whatever "kudos" might accrue but as a means to better contribute toward the growth of the encyclopedia, and has demonstrated the commitment and trustworthiness expected of the position. I trust that others will also recognise the candidate as a worthy addition to the sysop ranks.
LessHeard vanU (
talk)
20:33, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
reply
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/Arbiteroftruth before commenting.