Vote here (35/0/0) ending 14:40
10 September2005 (14:40 UTC)Angr (
talk·contribs) - a professional linguist editing mainly (but not only) linguistics related articles, I am always glad to see Angr's name show up on my watchlist. He has proven himself valuable in both adding original content, and defending existing content against degradation.
kate says Angr has 7372 edits (two thirds of which are to article namespace).
dab(ᛏ) 14:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)reply
I am pleased and honored to accept
dab's nomination for adminship.
Thought he was one. --
Merovingian(t)(c) 16:00, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Angr is one of a few editors whose contributions I occasionally go and have a look at just to see what interesting stuff he has been working on. Great contributor who also gets involved outside the article space in VfD AfD etc. Will make a fine admin. —
Trilobite 16:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, an ever-interesting contributor.
Rje 16:13, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support-Although I think there are no important things then edit counts, 7000+ shows and outstanding devotion. Ive also seen some of his work and think he will make an excellent admin. --Gpyoungtalk 18:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Strong support. Thought he was one.
Dmcdevit·
t 20:16, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Dependably good quality work from this user.
Fire Star 21:57, 3 September 2005 (UTC)reply
A. The admin privileges that are most important to me are: deleting appropriately (both speedy candidates and failed
AFD nominees), undeleting where necessary, and rolling back vandalism.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I'm especially proud of my contributions to the areas of Celtic linguistics, the field I know most about. The contributions to
Irish phonology are almost entirely mine; its current state can be compared with
what it looked like before I started work on it.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. Not too much. I had a fight with
Miskin a couple months ago after calling one of his edits vandalism (I was provoked by a sarcastic comment in an edit summary of his). I later apologized for doing so. The experience taught me a lot about dealing with other editors with whom I disagree, and to be more careful about
assuming good faith. My only other conflict was with
Zivinbudas, who came into conflict with a lot of editors and wound up getting banned for a year. With him, I had tried placation and the voice of reason to no avail.
Vote here (35/0/0) ending 14:40
10 September2005 (14:40 UTC)Angr (
talk·contribs) - a professional linguist editing mainly (but not only) linguistics related articles, I am always glad to see Angr's name show up on my watchlist. He has proven himself valuable in both adding original content, and defending existing content against degradation.
kate says Angr has 7372 edits (two thirds of which are to article namespace).
dab(ᛏ) 14:40, 3 September 2005 (UTC)reply
I am pleased and honored to accept
dab's nomination for adminship.
Thought he was one. --
Merovingian(t)(c) 16:00, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Angr is one of a few editors whose contributions I occasionally go and have a look at just to see what interesting stuff he has been working on. Great contributor who also gets involved outside the article space in VfD AfD etc. Will make a fine admin. —
Trilobite 16:09, 3 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Support, an ever-interesting contributor.
Rje 16:13, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support-Although I think there are no important things then edit counts, 7000+ shows and outstanding devotion. Ive also seen some of his work and think he will make an excellent admin. --Gpyoungtalk 18:14, 3 September 2005 (UTC)reply
Strong support. Thought he was one.
Dmcdevit·
t 20:16, September 3, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Dependably good quality work from this user.
Fire Star 21:57, 3 September 2005 (UTC)reply
A. The admin privileges that are most important to me are: deleting appropriately (both speedy candidates and failed
AFD nominees), undeleting where necessary, and rolling back vandalism.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I'm especially proud of my contributions to the areas of Celtic linguistics, the field I know most about. The contributions to
Irish phonology are almost entirely mine; its current state can be compared with
what it looked like before I started work on it.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. Not too much. I had a fight with
Miskin a couple months ago after calling one of his edits vandalism (I was provoked by a sarcastic comment in an edit summary of his). I later apologized for doing so. The experience taught me a lot about dealing with other editors with whom I disagree, and to be more careful about
assuming good faith. My only other conflict was with
Zivinbudas, who came into conflict with a lot of editors and wound up getting banned for a year. With him, I had tried placation and the voice of reason to no avail.