Humanities desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 8 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 10 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
I was wondering if there are some articles written on this subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raul Miguel Rodriguez ( talk • contribs) 02:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Housewarming party?.. hotclaws 15:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
A common definition of knowledge ("knowing" a particular proposition) is "justified true belief". However, one would often hear something like "I know God exists". Simple analysis shows:
Are such cases being included as "knowledge" as well (as in "justified belief not yet falsified" instead of "justified true belief")? If not, What exactly is "knowing" in this context? Also please direct me to the readings that are related. K61824 ( talk) 05:26, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
In the Netherlands, it is either legal or tolerated that people carry other people on the pannier racks at the rear of their bicycles... which of the two is it? And in England, is it legal? I remember seeing kids carrying their friends via those things sticking out of the hubs on stunt-bikes, but not sure whether I also remember the police intervening. -- 84.13.85.158 ( talk) 14:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Artificial hair integrations doesn't really help. This Youtube video seems to imply that it isn't really "strand-by-strand", but a bunch of strands. I read that a person has about 120 000 hairs on one's head. Suppose one got a crew-cut and proceeded to have, say, a 2 foot long strand of artificial hair glued to every stub of natural hair. At, say, 9 seconds per strand, it'd take about 300 hours--maybe less if a more systematic approach made it faster--and at 1/2" a month growth, would definitely take less than 4 years to grow it. Would it be as good, perhaps better, than natural hair? Could one comb, shampoo, and frequently swim in chlorinated pools of seawater with little or no damage? Would it be as tangle, mat, and dandruff free as natural hair? Thanks. 70.54.181.70 ( talk) 16:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Some good extensions are very good indeed and can be pretty much treated like real hair.They tend to tangle worse than real hair though.The real problem is, however extensions are attached to the clump of real hair, the real hair grows out and sheds.Eventually the extension will fall out or have an ugly lump matting a strand of natural hair together a few inches down from the scalp..Most full heads seem to take about 8 hours and in all honesty need to be redone every three weeks to look natural.A common shortcut is just to put extensions at the back of the head, making the hair seem fuller and longer but leaving the natural hair on top... hotclaws 15:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Humanities desk | ||
---|---|---|
< April 8 | << Mar | April | May >> | April 10 > |
Welcome to the Wikipedia Humanities Reference Desk Archives |
---|
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages. |
I was wondering if there are some articles written on this subject. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raul Miguel Rodriguez ( talk • contribs) 02:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Housewarming party?.. hotclaws 15:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
A common definition of knowledge ("knowing" a particular proposition) is "justified true belief". However, one would often hear something like "I know God exists". Simple analysis shows:
Are such cases being included as "knowledge" as well (as in "justified belief not yet falsified" instead of "justified true belief")? If not, What exactly is "knowing" in this context? Also please direct me to the readings that are related. K61824 ( talk) 05:26, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
In the Netherlands, it is either legal or tolerated that people carry other people on the pannier racks at the rear of their bicycles... which of the two is it? And in England, is it legal? I remember seeing kids carrying their friends via those things sticking out of the hubs on stunt-bikes, but not sure whether I also remember the police intervening. -- 84.13.85.158 ( talk) 14:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
The article Artificial hair integrations doesn't really help. This Youtube video seems to imply that it isn't really "strand-by-strand", but a bunch of strands. I read that a person has about 120 000 hairs on one's head. Suppose one got a crew-cut and proceeded to have, say, a 2 foot long strand of artificial hair glued to every stub of natural hair. At, say, 9 seconds per strand, it'd take about 300 hours--maybe less if a more systematic approach made it faster--and at 1/2" a month growth, would definitely take less than 4 years to grow it. Would it be as good, perhaps better, than natural hair? Could one comb, shampoo, and frequently swim in chlorinated pools of seawater with little or no damage? Would it be as tangle, mat, and dandruff free as natural hair? Thanks. 70.54.181.70 ( talk) 16:23, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
Some good extensions are very good indeed and can be pretty much treated like real hair.They tend to tangle worse than real hair though.The real problem is, however extensions are attached to the clump of real hair, the real hair grows out and sheds.Eventually the extension will fall out or have an ugly lump matting a strand of natural hair together a few inches down from the scalp..Most full heads seem to take about 8 hours and in all honesty need to be redone every three weeks to look natural.A common shortcut is just to put extensions at the back of the head, making the hair seem fuller and longer but leaving the natural hair on top... hotclaws 15:37, 13 April 2010 (UTC)