This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 22, 2024.
Gaza death camp
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Delete The argument for deletion here isn't just that the term is not neutral (which the retarget/keep side is correct isn't a valid reason for deletion), but instead it's lack of utility as a redirect along the lines of CMD and FortunateSons' comments which have gone unrefuted.
* Pppery *
it has begun...
23:39, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
Delete for obvious severe neutrality concerns. There's also "Gaza concentration camp" and "Gaza extermination camp" which I'm too lazy to include at the moment.
Anonymous
19:42, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Gaza humanitarian crisis (2023–present). We have lots of
non-neutral redirects, and some of them are indeed quite offensive. But I don't see how these ones in particular do any harm. —
Trilletrollet [
Talk |
Contribs ]
21:15, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete for NPOV, per nom.
Longhornsg (
talk)
20:09, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete or Retarget to
Gaza humanitarian crisis (2023–present), per
WP:RNEUTRAL, redirects do not need to be neutral. The term has seen some use
[1]
[2], however I am not sure if it qualifies as common use. However my suggested retarget contains more information about deaths in Gaza strip.
Ca
talk to me!
08:12, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Good points, I've updated my vote. —
Trilletrollet [
Talk |
Contribs ]
08:37, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget as per Ca. As mentioned,
WP:RNEUTRAL dictates that redirects do not need to be neutral; not only are redirects much harder to see (your average reader isn't going to use the "what links here" tool), but also, if someone were to use a non-neutral search term for whatever reason (for example, "hey, I've heard this term being batted around, what the heck are people talking about?"), we shouldn't keep them from reaching the information we have on the topic.I agree that the Gaza Humanitarian Crisis article is a better target than Gaza Strip. However, barring the retarget, I would prefer keep over deletion.
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk)
13:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- However,
Lunamann, in your example, the person would not actually learn anything about the term and simply be redirected to a vaguely relevant article. You are certainly right that being useful is more important than neutrality when it comes to redirects, but the fact that the redirect has had exactly one view barring yesterday, having been around for about a month, does not help its case on that end either.
Anonymous
18:41, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget as per Ca.
BugGhost
🪲👻
12:58, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Maybe
Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza would be a better target?
BugGhost
🪲👻
13:09, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, at most this is a flowery epithet. It may not even be a single term, "death camp" serves as a descriptor for Gaza
[3]
[4]
[5]. The term serves no navigational use as a redirect, anyone who knows about the Gaza strip would be searching for that, and anyone who is genuinely seeking it out as a term will only be obliquely helped by redirecting to the humanitarian crisis. Another consideration is that searching Gaza death camp without quotes on google brings up actual specific camps, such as the
Sde Teiman detention camp, and it does seem a plausible descriptor for that too.
CMD (
talk)
07:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Strong Delete for severe NPOV.
DaringDonna (
talk)
20:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Note that, per WP:RNEUTRAL, redirects do not need to be neutral.
Ca
talk to me!
07:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
20:14, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
Hot magenta
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. Content was reinstated at the target.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
19:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
Primary topic should be the list of Crayola crayon colors, as the color isn't notable enough to cover in the current target article.
24.194.71.209 (
talk)
19:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment -
List of Crayola crayon colors#Fluorescent crayons does cover the color (also briefly mentioned in passing at
Timeline of Crayola), whereas the current target does not. The other option would be
List of colors (alphabetical)#G–H, where the color is also listed in a more generalized way. —
Godsy (
TALK
CONT)
21:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Please note that this color was covered at the target until very recently, when it and several other shades were
removed from the article. -
Eureka Lott
07:09, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- ...I'm not entirely certain why Hot Magenta and other shades were removed from the article there? Gonna move that to the talk page of the article, but in the meantime, I'm withholding my vote.
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk)
08:44, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - Hot Magenta has now been reinstated back in at
Shades of magenta#Hot magenta - assuming it stays there and doesn't get removed again, this redirect is worth keeping as-is
BugGhost
🪲👻
07:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per Bugghost.
Thryduulf (
talk)
09:55, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
List of celebrities in The Simpsons
Skymont (microarchitecture)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 29#Skymont (microarchitecture)
Sheiße
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Scheisse.
(non-admin closure)
CycloneYoris
talk!
19:40, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
This is an
WP:RLANG from what I guess is a misspelling of German
Scheiße. Although Wiktionary says the correct spelling is also an English word, its use as such is not discussed in the article, and the misspelling does not appear in the article at all. I suggest retargeting it to
Scheisse, to which "
Scheiße" already redirects.
PleaseStand (
talk)
10:41, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget as per nom. In german, the
ß character (aka the Eszette) is functionally interchangeable with two S-es. Therefore, this is functionally the exact same as typing "Sheisse", and we can easily retarget it to
Scheisse as an R from misspelling. Normally I'd discard it as a simple
WP:RLANG, but there's no sense doing that when there's a clear target.
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk)
11:27, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review).
The Bell- Iris Murdoch
Template:Bio-coat rack
Wikipedia:VN
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 29#Wikipedia:VN
Partisan movement
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 29#Partisan movement
Megabucks (slot machine)
Kelvin Lim
This redirect should be deleted, as all it serves is to redirect the Singaporean Basketball player Kelvin Lim to the completely unrelated criminal Kelvin Lim Hock Hin. There is no relation mentioned anywhere online or on Kelvin Lim Hock Hin's page.
JubaTuba (
talk)
05:59, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, this is a
WP:PTM and nom clearly lays out how it could be harmful. I will note that unless someone makes an actual page for Kelvin Lim, this issue will still persist in a form-- the search results pulled up by searching Kelvin Lim will still likely have Kelvin Lim Hock Hin at the very top of the list due to it being a partial title match.
𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (
talk)
06:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The nom has not established notability of the basketball player. There's no case for REDLINK, since this is a valid alternate spelling of the name for the criminal. It is his "English name" in the Singaporean context. If the basketball player gets an article, then this can be revisited. --
64.229.90.32 (
talk)
07:30, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Delete for safety. If someone is named Kelvin Lim, it could be devastating if someone googled their name and got this page. This is a
WP:BLP-adjacent issue.
Fieari (
talk)
06:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- The current target article's person is named "Kelvin Lim", it's right there in the infobox. Does that mean we need to delete all redirects to all criminals? Make criminal biographies impossible to find? What if there's some other person who is named "Kelvin Lim Hock Hin without an article somewhere in the world? Does that mean we need to hide this biography? There are many people in the world who share names with criminals. That's just life. People get harrassed at airports all the time because they have the same name as someone on the no-fly list. These incidents sometimes show up on local news.
WP:NOTCENSORED Wikipedia is not censored. --
64.229.90.32 (
talk)
07:17, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep because practically there was no other person on a Wikipedia article with the same name by the way. But I still understand your reasons (all of them are valid) to nominate this for deletion or something, and I accept it even if the result is delete. Alternatively if in the future, another Kelvin Lim made his way into Wikipedia as another unrelated article, I suggest we can still revive the redirect to include the same Kelvin Lims into a sort of disambiguation page. --
NelsonLee20042020 (
talk)
06:40, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep This person has an English given name "Kelvin" and a surname "Lim" and a Chinese given name "Hock Hin", thus this is a valid redirect from the "English name" rendering of his name "Kelvin Lim". It is a valid redirect. There is no other topic article on Wikipedia who uses this name. Alternately, disambiguate with Kelvin Lim Yong Sheng, a Singaporean field hockey player and silver medalist at the
Field hockey at the 2007 SEA Games. Kelvin Lim Leong Keat, a sailor who won gold for
Malaysia at the 2001 SEA Games, Kelvin Lim Kok Peng, a Singaporean zoologist, for which the species
Tioman Island rock gecko (Cnemaspis limi) is named for. Kelvin Lim, the defence lawyer in the
Orchard Towers double murders case and
Koh Swee Beng case and
Yishun triple murders and
Murder of William Tiah Hung Wai case. Clearly the basketball player isn't more notable. --
64.229.90.32 (
talk)
07:14, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Comment Is this basketball player also called Kelvin Lim Hong Da / Hong Da Kelvin Lim / Kelvin Hong Da Lim / Lim Hong Da / Hong Da Lim ?
[7]
[8]. Because, that should be the name of the basketball player's article then, and not just "Kelvin Lim" --
64.229.90.32 (
talk)
07:48, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - per 64.229.90.32 and NelsonLee20042020. "Kelvin Lim" is a name that Kelvin Lim Hock Hin used - it's listed in "Other names" in the infobox, and he is referred to as just "Kelvin Lim" 5 times in the body of the article. Whether or not there's also a basketball player who has a similar name the redirect is valid and correct. If the basketball player ever becomes notable enough to get an article and it's also asserted that they are recognised by the name "Kelvin Lim", then maybe a disambiguation page can be created - but for now it's fine as-is.
BugGhost
🪲👻
11:16, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:49, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
reply