This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 20, 2023.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 29#Dispersal order
Highly ambiguous. Mediawiki is not the only thing in existence to use templates or to have a "templating feature". 192.76.8.70 ( talk) 20:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
This redirect should not target to a single person's view on the matter, regardless of where they stand. See also Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_July_9#WP:MINIMUMDEATHS BangJan1999 23:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
— Bagumba ( talk) 08:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)A much more in-depth and formal version of this essay can be found here
The target subject is not exclusive to Hollywood. The redirect creates that assumption, which is false and thus misleading. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Retarget to British Columbia for consistency with British Colombia/ British Columbian. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 18:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
All incoming links seem to mean this to refer to WP:Subject-matter expert, i.e. WP:Expert editors, rather than the current target, with this confusion actually being discussed here and here. Seems like this should be retargeted to Wikipedia:Expert editors and the corresponding expansion of the initialism redirected to the same page. Mdewman6 ( talk) 18:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
The most reliable self-published works are by [[WP:SME|subject-matter experts]](nowiki'd)
No consensus from this 2020 RSN discussion. The author might arguably be a WP:SME.
I could see the value in citing a letter if it's written by an WP:SME and says something significant that is not in any other RS.
Ultimate NZ Soccer is a self published source; I have not been able to identify the author, as their are images of him but no name, suggesting that WP:SME is not met.
[B]ecause the authors are not WP:SME, the articles do not count towards notability.
I'm not particularly familiar with whether Mallory Moore is a, also pointed out in the nomination.WP:SMESME for this sort of stuff
I see nothing particualar about the freelance writer that would indicate that they are an WP:SME, so I see no reasonable reason to see this as reliable except for the author's opinion.
[[WP:SME|Subject-matter experts]]at Talk:Rosemarie_Koczy#Proposed_New_Section_about_Controversy is pretty indicative of confusion regarding where this shortcut targets. Any user following the link from that discussion will be astonished. As another example, a user writing
The author might arguably be a WP:SMEat Talk:Land/GA1#GA_Review clearly did not mean the author is a "Super mario effect" or someone in reference to it. And to be clear, I am not advocating deletion, but retargeting to the target users are actually seeking with this abbreviation. Mdewman6 ( talk) 21:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Next general election seems like it would cause problems if there wasn't someone to update it for every election unless there was a bot or something to automate this. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 16:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Two redirects from applications that were hosted on Google Play. They have always been redirects, with no article in the history. Neither are they mentioned in the article right now nor have they been when the redirects were made. Delete as not helpful to the reader. Randi🦋 Talk Contribs 15:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 20, 2023.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 29#Dispersal order
Highly ambiguous. Mediawiki is not the only thing in existence to use templates or to have a "templating feature". 192.76.8.70 ( talk) 20:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on retargeting?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
23:35, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
This redirect should not target to a single person's view on the matter, regardless of where they stand. See also Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_July_9#WP:MINIMUMDEATHS BangJan1999 23:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
— Bagumba ( talk) 08:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)A much more in-depth and formal version of this essay can be found here
The target subject is not exclusive to Hollywood. The redirect creates that assumption, which is false and thus misleading. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:32, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Retarget to British Columbia for consistency with British Colombia/ British Columbian. – dudhhr talk contribs (he/they) 18:17, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
All incoming links seem to mean this to refer to WP:Subject-matter expert, i.e. WP:Expert editors, rather than the current target, with this confusion actually being discussed here and here. Seems like this should be retargeted to Wikipedia:Expert editors and the corresponding expansion of the initialism redirected to the same page. Mdewman6 ( talk) 18:16, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
The most reliable self-published works are by [[WP:SME|subject-matter experts]](nowiki'd)
No consensus from this 2020 RSN discussion. The author might arguably be a WP:SME.
I could see the value in citing a letter if it's written by an WP:SME and says something significant that is not in any other RS.
Ultimate NZ Soccer is a self published source; I have not been able to identify the author, as their are images of him but no name, suggesting that WP:SME is not met.
[B]ecause the authors are not WP:SME, the articles do not count towards notability.
I'm not particularly familiar with whether Mallory Moore is a, also pointed out in the nomination.WP:SMESME for this sort of stuff
I see nothing particualar about the freelance writer that would indicate that they are an WP:SME, so I see no reasonable reason to see this as reliable except for the author's opinion.
[[WP:SME|Subject-matter experts]]at Talk:Rosemarie_Koczy#Proposed_New_Section_about_Controversy is pretty indicative of confusion regarding where this shortcut targets. Any user following the link from that discussion will be astonished. As another example, a user writing
The author might arguably be a WP:SMEat Talk:Land/GA1#GA_Review clearly did not mean the author is a "Super mario effect" or someone in reference to it. And to be clear, I am not advocating deletion, but retargeting to the target users are actually seeking with this abbreviation. Mdewman6 ( talk) 21:53, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Next general election seems like it would cause problems if there wasn't someone to update it for every election unless there was a bot or something to automate this. Dr vulpes ( 💬 • 📝) 16:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
Two redirects from applications that were hosted on Google Play. They have always been redirects, with no article in the history. Neither are they mentioned in the article right now nor have they been when the redirects were made. Delete as not helpful to the reader. Randi🦋 Talk Contribs 15:40, 20 June 2023 (UTC)