This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 31, 2023.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7#DayQuil
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 8#Great Privy Seal
Completely unnecessary redirect due to the article "The". Does not need to exist in any capacity, and it says an overwhelming precedent for any noun on Wikipedia to have redirects utilizing "The", "A", or "An". Please delete. TNstingray ( talk) 18:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Not a real search term. Delete. TNstingray ( talk) 18:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7#Rickmat
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7#Free term
This redirect is in a non-standard format (should be "Bharti (surname)"), but in any case I think it's unnecessary. Bharti is a DAB, and there are only 2 people listed with Bharti as a surname on it. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 05:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
That was never the title of the film. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely search term. Could maybe justify redirecting to Hobbit, but this really is just an unnecessary redirect. TNstingray ( talk) 17:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete, not a viable search term, especially in this strange plural form. Negligible pageviews. Lennart97 ( talk) 22:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:R#DELETE, n. 3 ("(splinter group)"). Veverve ( talk) 17:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
22:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
06:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the late retarget suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
The planet Kepler-277c in the same system also has a standalone article, so it is impossible to redirect the host star to planet b. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 14:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Seems in regards to the current target, this redirect may not be accurate. The more accurate target may be Asphalt concrete, but even then the redirect may still be inaccurate. Either target is not about a road made of oil, even though oil, specifically petroleum, is either where the product is derived ( Bitumen) or one material of various materials used in the topic ( Asphalt concrete). Steel1943 ( talk) 19:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure how helpful this redirect really is. There is some mention once about oil wells in the target article, but not the specific phrase. Also, Asphaltum oil well, the singular version, does not exist. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
This presumably is in reference to the Wurzels' song I am a Cider Drinker; however, that article does not itself have an article (other than an article about a cover version at Remember Me/I Am a Cider Drinker that does talk some about the song's history). I was thinking this could go there to be consistent with I Am A Cider Drinker as it is currently or be targeted to Cider, or stay where it is and I am unsure what the best option is. Tartar Torte 17:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
No evidence found that "Ctpr" is ever used as a shortcut for "Current tennis rankings" Fram ( talk) 15:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Questionable redirect per WP:XY. If they are billed co-headliners, they shouldn't be BLARRED for that coheadlining tour. The outcome of this co-headlining tour should be deleted by the similar situation to the AFD, I don't know Aspects pointed which redirect would be a suitable target to, either Supposed Former Infatuation Junkie or To Venus and Back, however it indicates that it failed WP:NTOUR. As a result, it should be deleted, in which a co-headlining tours cannot be BLARed by without sending to AFD. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:9DFE:C535:CFDA:2BAF ( talk) 03:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Thryduulf (
talk)
11:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
Eejit43 (
talk)
14:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article. For this reason, it is unclear what subject this redirect is meant to identify. In addition, as a term without definition, this phrase came to considered rather vague, including describing color in graphics in general, not necessarily graphics in a computer sense. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
22:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No additional discussion since last relist...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lord Roem ~ (
talk)
20:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
WP:INVOLVED relist for clearing the backlog and to seek further input...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
22:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
Eejit43 (
talk)
14:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is not recommended, and while having a deletion notice on a page is not harmful, its presence over several weeks can become disheartening for its editors. Therefore, in general, debates should not be relisted more than twice.This is a fourth(!) relist. Why are you doing this? -- Tavix ( talk) 15:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
No longer mentioned in this article. Relevant content apparently removed in 2013, but without any clear explanation. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 05:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
11:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7#Ural District
There are two space shuttle explosions: the Columbia and the Challenger. Redirecting to one of them is incorrect. Also, spaceship explosion is too general - incidents such as Apollo 13 also involved explosion. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Problematic redirect, even for a non-neutral redirect. Template redirects like this should never be transcluded in a mainspace article. It will be interpreted as Wikipedia's affirmation of the contentious label 'terrorist' in regard to such groups. Delete. — Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs) 00:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 31, 2023.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7#DayQuil
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 8#Great Privy Seal
Completely unnecessary redirect due to the article "The". Does not need to exist in any capacity, and it says an overwhelming precedent for any noun on Wikipedia to have redirects utilizing "The", "A", or "An". Please delete. TNstingray ( talk) 18:19, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Not a real search term. Delete. TNstingray ( talk) 18:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7#Rickmat
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7#Free term
This redirect is in a non-standard format (should be "Bharti (surname)"), but in any case I think it's unnecessary. Bharti is a DAB, and there are only 2 people listed with Bharti as a surname on it. Laterthanyouthink ( talk) 05:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:04, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
That was never the title of the film. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:27, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
18:03, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely search term. Could maybe justify redirecting to Hobbit, but this really is just an unnecessary redirect. TNstingray ( talk) 17:56, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Delete, not a viable search term, especially in this strange plural form. Negligible pageviews. Lennart97 ( talk) 22:54, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
WP:R#DELETE, n. 3 ("(splinter group)"). Veverve ( talk) 17:36, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
22:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
06:22, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For consideration of the late retarget suggestion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:52, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
The planet Kepler-277c in the same system also has a standalone article, so it is impossible to redirect the host star to planet b. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 14:06, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Seems in regards to the current target, this redirect may not be accurate. The more accurate target may be Asphalt concrete, but even then the redirect may still be inaccurate. Either target is not about a road made of oil, even though oil, specifically petroleum, is either where the product is derived ( Bitumen) or one material of various materials used in the topic ( Asphalt concrete). Steel1943 ( talk) 19:59, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:03, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:44, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
I'm not sure how helpful this redirect really is. There is some mention once about oil wells in the target article, but not the specific phrase. Also, Asphaltum oil well, the singular version, does not exist. Steel1943 ( talk) 19:01, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
02:02, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
This presumably is in reference to the Wurzels' song I am a Cider Drinker; however, that article does not itself have an article (other than an article about a cover version at Remember Me/I Am a Cider Drinker that does talk some about the song's history). I was thinking this could go there to be consistent with I Am A Cider Drinker as it is currently or be targeted to Cider, or stay where it is and I am unsure what the best option is. Tartar Torte 17:17, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
No evidence found that "Ctpr" is ever used as a shortcut for "Current tennis rankings" Fram ( talk) 15:53, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Questionable redirect per WP:XY. If they are billed co-headliners, they shouldn't be BLARRED for that coheadlining tour. The outcome of this co-headlining tour should be deleted by the similar situation to the AFD, I don't know Aspects pointed which redirect would be a suitable target to, either Supposed Former Infatuation Junkie or To Venus and Back, however it indicates that it failed WP:NTOUR. As a result, it should be deleted, in which a co-headlining tours cannot be BLARed by without sending to AFD. 2600:1700:9BF3:220:9DFE:C535:CFDA:2BAF ( talk) 03:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
✗
plicit
14:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Thryduulf (
talk)
11:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
Eejit43 (
talk)
14:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Not mentioned in target article. For this reason, it is unclear what subject this redirect is meant to identify. In addition, as a term without definition, this phrase came to considered rather vague, including describing color in graphics in general, not necessarily graphics in a computer sense. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk
22:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: No additional discussion since last relist...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Lord Roem ~ (
talk)
20:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment:
WP:INVOLVED relist for clearing the backlog and to seek further input...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk!
22:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~
Eejit43 (
talk)
14:07, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisting debates repeatedly in the hope of getting sufficient participation is not recommended, and while having a deletion notice on a page is not harmful, its presence over several weeks can become disheartening for its editors. Therefore, in general, debates should not be relisted more than twice.This is a fourth(!) relist. Why are you doing this? -- Tavix ( talk) 15:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
No longer mentioned in this article. Relevant content apparently removed in 2013, but without any clear explanation. – LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄) 05:37, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Jay
💬
11:42, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 7#Ural District
There are two space shuttle explosions: the Columbia and the Challenger. Redirecting to one of them is incorrect. Also, spaceship explosion is too general - incidents such as Apollo 13 also involved explosion. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Problematic redirect, even for a non-neutral redirect. Template redirects like this should never be transcluded in a mainspace article. It will be interpreted as Wikipedia's affirmation of the contentious label 'terrorist' in regard to such groups. Delete. — Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs) 00:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)