This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 22, 2022.
Mudak
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Zhopa
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Slaughter(livestock)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The target article has altogether two sentences about the blossoms, buried inside the section with the botanican description, and I doubt these could satsify any readers who may be looking for content on the blossoms of apples. More importantly, I'm not convinced there is a
primary topic here: the dab page
Apple Blossom has entries for two other plants with the name (as well as half a dozen proper nouns). I propose retargeting there.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wikipedia:OVERSIGHT
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep for the sake of the 2500 incoming wikilinks. I've also got into the habit of searching for WP:+caps when someone uses an unfamiliar term, e.g.
WP:QAV if someone refers to QAV without explanation. Maybe others have too.
Certes (
talk)
14:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Per above, it is common to try WP:NAMEINCAPS when wanting info on a topic. For example, if I haven't got a clue about the wikitext for tables I might try
WP:TABLES or
WP:TABLE if I am aware of the preference for singular names.
Johnuniq (
talk)
22:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
SwitchOTR
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
See similar discussions
ZieZie,
Juhn and more. Reasons for deletion
WP:RDELETE #2 : might cause confusion since SwitchOTR is not a member of
A1 x J1. They have cooperated once, but so did
Joel Corry and are even mentioned at
List of UK top-ten singles in 2022. Removing the redirect will allow for better search results.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Väinö I of Finland
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per comments on Frederik Kaarle I of Finland. Misleading to the point deletion is a better answer, he was not King of Finland.
SnowFire (
talk)
00:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Aasha (2015 film)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Geko (rapper)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
See similar discussions
ZieZie,
Juhn and more. Reasons for deletion
WP:RDELETE #2 : might cause confusion since Geko is not a member of
NSG. They have cooperated once, but so did
Ill Blu,
Tion Wayne and more.
WP:RDELETE #10: could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. With "6:30" being certified Gold, and "Yo Darlin’" certified Silver, it might be time for an article.
Muhandes (
talk)
10:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment since the original creator does not object and the article is ready at draft space, I am going to ask for a technical move. --
Muhandes (
talk)
11:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Edward II of Portugal
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Edward III of Portugal
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
John IV of France
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Aimone I of Italy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
William III, German Emperor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Louis Ferdinand I, German Emperor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, Mr Prinz von Preussen may have been many things, but "German Emperor" is something for alternate histories. —
Kusma (
talk)
09:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Georg Friedrich I, German Emperor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Louis Ferdinand I, King of Prussia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Georg Friedrich I, King of Prussia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Nicholas III of Russia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Louis I of Brazil
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pedro III of Brazil
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Does not appear to be the primary topic for this term. If a better target cannot be found, perhaps it should be deleted.
DrKay (
talk)
07:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - very confusing and unhelpful to any would-be searcher. If reliable sources organised them this way then it would be fine but failing that these should be deleted.
A7V2 (
talk)
06:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete They’re not linear in any way and no reliable source would ever organize them in such a way. They are three connected series, but not unified to justify this--
CreecregofLife (
talk)
06:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, since these redirects are named for
Sam Raimi-directed films, which violates
WP:CRYSTAL and
WP:NFF. No reliable sources found for these redirects, and search results for those may vary in finding such topics.
Chompy Ace07:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Article's title appears to be a fan-made project that has not garnered significant notability. Though it is based on the TV series, that in itself does not merit enough evidence of notability on WP. There is no mention of "The Walking Ed" in the target article. —
Paper LuigiT •
C00:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
RYE
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keepor retarget to
Rotary Youth Exchange per
WP:DIFFCAPS, similar to BEANS, APPLE, GREEN, WHIP, COWS, etc. which all point to the dab pages and not the normally-capitalised base titles. Correct capitalisation of acronyms & codes should take priority over incorrect capitalisation of the grain. I suspect Wikipedia covers other topics that are correctly written as RYE but I will have to put in a bit of legwork to search for them.
61.239.39.90 (
talk)
06:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have
nukedRomanceLove88's redirects given the sheer volume of them that are problematic. If anyone wants to recreate any they find useful, they are welcome to do so. --
Tavix(
talk)20:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
This redirect doesn't make sense. Why would someone who is looking for information about the black widow spider type in "widow black" in the search bar?
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
00:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - typing "widow b" into google it prefills "widow black ..." for various different things so clearly enough people search this on google for them to bother, so presumably that may be the case here. It seems plausible enough and doesn't seem like it would cause any problems.
A7V2 (
talk)
01:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. A recent mass spam of bad redirect creations by the same editor. We shouldn't start creating redirects from words in backwards order and more specifically, shouldn't give this specific editor the OK to keep spam creating these. Ain't useful.
Gonnym (
talk)
05:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pointless MCU redirects
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have
nukedRomanceLove88's redirects given the sheer volume of them that are problematic. If anyone wants to recreate any they find useful, they are welcome to do so. --
Tavix(
talk)20:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all. A recent mass spam of bad redirect creations by the same editor who has never even edited these articles. As the nom points out, these films were never called episodes or chapters.
Gonnym (
talk)
05:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pointless MCU redirects (pt. 2)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have
nukedRomanceLove88's redirects given the sheer volume of them that are problematic. If anyone wants to recreate any they find useful, they are welcome to do so. --
Tavix(
talk)20:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
More absurd and unnecessary redirects. These films and TV series are never called that, so it doubtful any reader would search up these keywords.
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
00:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Not sure if this is the proper procedure, but adding the following redirect that was just created as well:
Delete all. A recent mass spam of bad redirect creations by the same editor who has never even edited these articles. As the nom points out, these films were never called by these absurd short names. Delete also The Black Widow (2021 film) which is not the name of the film and for over a year the wiki worked without that, making that search time just not something editors were missing.
Gonnym (
talk)
05:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
There is no requirement to edit an article prior to creating a redirect to it. Comments like that are unnecessarily bite-y and smack of ownership issues.
Argento Surfer (
talk)
13:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
When an editor creates around a hundred pointless redirects in an area they haven't edited and which almost all of them are complete garbage, I believe pointing that out is very appropriate.
Gonnym (
talk)
15:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Why? Would the redirects be more acceptable garbage if the editor had paid dues first by making edits to an article? Unless you request sanctions against them for a lack of competence, I don't see the benefit to your comment.
Argento Surfer (
talk)
20:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all except maybe The Black Widow (2021 film), which seems to be the only one where it is reasonable someone might search for that. The others are very implausible to be searched for or used as redirects. —El Millo (
talk)
17:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pointless MCU redirects (pt. 3)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have
nukedRomanceLove88's redirects given the sheer volume of them that are problematic. If anyone wants to recreate any they find useful, they are welcome to do so. --
Tavix(
talk)20:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Third set of pointless redirects. A number after the phrase "Marvel Cinematic Universe" or "MCU" is ambiguous and unhelpful, and MCU phases are never called "seasons".
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
00:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep these, they seem plausible enough. What in particular are they ambiguous with? Also FYI new discussions at RFD should go at the top of the page, not the bottom (though I suppose in this case it helps to keep these large discussions out of the way).
A7V2 (
talk)
01:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
They are ambiguous. "MCU: One" could refer to the first MCU film, the first MCU TV show, the first MCU phase, etc. In any case, nobody uses "MCU: One" to refer to any of those topics, which is why the redirects are illogical. The many variants make them even more ludicrous.
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
02:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all. A recent mass spam of bad redirect creations by the same editor who has never even edited these articles. As the nom points out, these leave ambiguity if dealing with the phase or with a specific film. Also "season" is not a term used for films.
Gonnym (
talk)
05:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all Theyre ridiculous, unnecessary, and even vague too. As the releases per year have grown, one could just as much interpret the seasons as yearly, heck, even as far back as Agents of SHIELD season 1, you know, the presence of television seasons no matter how many overlap, would definitely help that. “MCU #” could be a film-by-film or work-by-work thing too. These redirects are dumb.
CreecregofLife (
talk)
11:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep the "Mcu: phase [written-out number]" redirects and delete the rest per Oinkers. That's a valid way to search for the phases, all the rest...just are ambiguous. Regards,
SONIC67815:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
What exactly is holding these up anyway? I mean I guess it’s the manual nature of deleting all these pages, and that they’re big enough to be sectioned like this. It seems like a pretty unanimous wipe, are we just running out a clock at this point?
CreecregofLife (
talk)
06:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 22, 2022.
Mudak
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Zhopa
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Slaughter(livestock)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The target article has altogether two sentences about the blossoms, buried inside the section with the botanican description, and I doubt these could satsify any readers who may be looking for content on the blossoms of apples. More importantly, I'm not convinced there is a
primary topic here: the dab page
Apple Blossom has entries for two other plants with the name (as well as half a dozen proper nouns). I propose retargeting there.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Wikipedia:OVERSIGHT
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep for the sake of the 2500 incoming wikilinks. I've also got into the habit of searching for WP:+caps when someone uses an unfamiliar term, e.g.
WP:QAV if someone refers to QAV without explanation. Maybe others have too.
Certes (
talk)
14:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep Per above, it is common to try WP:NAMEINCAPS when wanting info on a topic. For example, if I haven't got a clue about the wikitext for tables I might try
WP:TABLES or
WP:TABLE if I am aware of the preference for singular names.
Johnuniq (
talk)
22:29, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
SwitchOTR
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
See similar discussions
ZieZie,
Juhn and more. Reasons for deletion
WP:RDELETE #2 : might cause confusion since SwitchOTR is not a member of
A1 x J1. They have cooperated once, but so did
Joel Corry and are even mentioned at
List of UK top-ten singles in 2022. Removing the redirect will allow for better search results.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Väinö I of Finland
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete per comments on Frederik Kaarle I of Finland. Misleading to the point deletion is a better answer, he was not King of Finland.
SnowFire (
talk)
00:59, 23 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Aasha (2015 film)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Geko (rapper)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
See similar discussions
ZieZie,
Juhn and more. Reasons for deletion
WP:RDELETE #2 : might cause confusion since Geko is not a member of
NSG. They have cooperated once, but so did
Ill Blu,
Tion Wayne and more.
WP:RDELETE #10: could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject. With "6:30" being certified Gold, and "Yo Darlin’" certified Silver, it might be time for an article.
Muhandes (
talk)
10:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment since the original creator does not object and the article is ready at draft space, I am going to ask for a technical move. --
Muhandes (
talk)
11:17, 25 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Edward II of Portugal
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Edward III of Portugal
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
John IV of France
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Aimone I of Italy
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
William III, German Emperor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Louis Ferdinand I, German Emperor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete, Mr Prinz von Preussen may have been many things, but "German Emperor" is something for alternate histories. —
Kusma (
talk)
09:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Georg Friedrich I, German Emperor
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Louis Ferdinand I, King of Prussia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Georg Friedrich I, King of Prussia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Nicholas III of Russia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Louis I of Brazil
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pedro III of Brazil
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Does not appear to be the primary topic for this term. If a better target cannot be found, perhaps it should be deleted.
DrKay (
talk)
07:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete - very confusing and unhelpful to any would-be searcher. If reliable sources organised them this way then it would be fine but failing that these should be deleted.
A7V2 (
talk)
06:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete They’re not linear in any way and no reliable source would ever organize them in such a way. They are three connected series, but not unified to justify this--
CreecregofLife (
talk)
06:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, since these redirects are named for
Sam Raimi-directed films, which violates
WP:CRYSTAL and
WP:NFF. No reliable sources found for these redirects, and search results for those may vary in finding such topics.
Chompy Ace07:20, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Article's title appears to be a fan-made project that has not garnered significant notability. Though it is based on the TV series, that in itself does not merit enough evidence of notability on WP. There is no mention of "The Walking Ed" in the target article. —
Paper LuigiT •
C00:06, 15 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
RYE
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keepor retarget to
Rotary Youth Exchange per
WP:DIFFCAPS, similar to BEANS, APPLE, GREEN, WHIP, COWS, etc. which all point to the dab pages and not the normally-capitalised base titles. Correct capitalisation of acronyms & codes should take priority over incorrect capitalisation of the grain. I suspect Wikipedia covers other topics that are correctly written as RYE but I will have to put in a bit of legwork to search for them.
61.239.39.90 (
talk)
06:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have
nukedRomanceLove88's redirects given the sheer volume of them that are problematic. If anyone wants to recreate any they find useful, they are welcome to do so. --
Tavix(
talk)20:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
This redirect doesn't make sense. Why would someone who is looking for information about the black widow spider type in "widow black" in the search bar?
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
00:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep - typing "widow b" into google it prefills "widow black ..." for various different things so clearly enough people search this on google for them to bother, so presumably that may be the case here. It seems plausible enough and doesn't seem like it would cause any problems.
A7V2 (
talk)
01:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete. A recent mass spam of bad redirect creations by the same editor. We shouldn't start creating redirects from words in backwards order and more specifically, shouldn't give this specific editor the OK to keep spam creating these. Ain't useful.
Gonnym (
talk)
05:12, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pointless MCU redirects
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have
nukedRomanceLove88's redirects given the sheer volume of them that are problematic. If anyone wants to recreate any they find useful, they are welcome to do so. --
Tavix(
talk)20:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all. A recent mass spam of bad redirect creations by the same editor who has never even edited these articles. As the nom points out, these films were never called episodes or chapters.
Gonnym (
talk)
05:06, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pointless MCU redirects (pt. 2)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have
nukedRomanceLove88's redirects given the sheer volume of them that are problematic. If anyone wants to recreate any they find useful, they are welcome to do so. --
Tavix(
talk)20:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
More absurd and unnecessary redirects. These films and TV series are never called that, so it doubtful any reader would search up these keywords.
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
00:17, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Not sure if this is the proper procedure, but adding the following redirect that was just created as well:
Delete all. A recent mass spam of bad redirect creations by the same editor who has never even edited these articles. As the nom points out, these films were never called by these absurd short names. Delete also The Black Widow (2021 film) which is not the name of the film and for over a year the wiki worked without that, making that search time just not something editors were missing.
Gonnym (
talk)
05:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
There is no requirement to edit an article prior to creating a redirect to it. Comments like that are unnecessarily bite-y and smack of ownership issues.
Argento Surfer (
talk)
13:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
When an editor creates around a hundred pointless redirects in an area they haven't edited and which almost all of them are complete garbage, I believe pointing that out is very appropriate.
Gonnym (
talk)
15:13, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Why? Would the redirects be more acceptable garbage if the editor had paid dues first by making edits to an article? Unless you request sanctions against them for a lack of competence, I don't see the benefit to your comment.
Argento Surfer (
talk)
20:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all except maybe The Black Widow (2021 film), which seems to be the only one where it is reasonable someone might search for that. The others are very implausible to be searched for or used as redirects. —El Millo (
talk)
17:16, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Pointless MCU redirects (pt. 3)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. I have
nukedRomanceLove88's redirects given the sheer volume of them that are problematic. If anyone wants to recreate any they find useful, they are welcome to do so. --
Tavix(
talk)20:41, 26 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Third set of pointless redirects. A number after the phrase "Marvel Cinematic Universe" or "MCU" is ambiguous and unhelpful, and MCU phases are never called "seasons".
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
00:22, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep these, they seem plausible enough. What in particular are they ambiguous with? Also FYI new discussions at RFD should go at the top of the page, not the bottom (though I suppose in this case it helps to keep these large discussions out of the way).
A7V2 (
talk)
01:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
They are ambiguous. "MCU: One" could refer to the first MCU film, the first MCU TV show, the first MCU phase, etc. In any case, nobody uses "MCU: One" to refer to any of those topics, which is why the redirects are illogical. The many variants make them even more ludicrous.
InfiniteNexus (
talk)
02:51, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all. A recent mass spam of bad redirect creations by the same editor who has never even edited these articles. As the nom points out, these leave ambiguity if dealing with the phase or with a specific film. Also "season" is not a term used for films.
Gonnym (
talk)
05:10, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete all Theyre ridiculous, unnecessary, and even vague too. As the releases per year have grown, one could just as much interpret the seasons as yearly, heck, even as far back as Agents of SHIELD season 1, you know, the presence of television seasons no matter how many overlap, would definitely help that. “MCU #” could be a film-by-film or work-by-work thing too. These redirects are dumb.
CreecregofLife (
talk)
11:55, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
Keep the "Mcu: phase [written-out number]" redirects and delete the rest per Oinkers. That's a valid way to search for the phases, all the rest...just are ambiguous. Regards,
SONIC67815:09, 22 March 2022 (UTC)reply
What exactly is holding these up anyway? I mean I guess it’s the manual nature of deleting all these pages, and that they’re big enough to be sectioned like this. It seems like a pretty unanimous wipe, are we just running out a clock at this point?
CreecregofLife (
talk)
06:14, 25 March 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.