The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• בק"ש → Fire-control system  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This abbreviation has multiple meanings in Hebrew. The one it is seemingly going for is בקר שליטה ימית, however that seems to be just as commonly, if not more commonly abbreviated as בק’’שית as opposed to בק’’ש. Furthermore, with בקר שליטה ימית, or really nothing about Israeli FCSs mentioned at the target, this is approaching WP:RLOTE territory, so it seems this would be best deleted. Tartar Torte 17:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete No affinity for Hebrew. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete as vague in Hebrew -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 00:54, 15 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Psalm 136#Judaism. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 03:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• בְּיָ֣ד חֲ֭זָקָה וּבִזְר֣וֹעַ נְטוּיָ֑ה כִּ֖י לְעוֹלָ֣ם חַסְדּֽוֹ → With a strong hand and an outstretched arm  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This bible quote translates to "With a strong hand and a outstretched arm, because God's grace is forever." Also, this contains both cantillation and vowels, which makes it unlikely for someone to type in, unless one is copying from like mechon-mamre. It's a cheap redirect, just a pretty implausible one. ביד חזקה ובזרוע נטויה would be a much more plausible redirect as it contains just the words mentioned in the article and doesn't have cantillation. Tartar Torte 17:12, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Comment: I ended up creating ביד חזקה ובזרוע נטויה. Tartar Torte 17:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Retarget to Psalm 136, from which this is a quote. To my knowledge it doesn't appear anywhere else, although both the ביד חזקה ובזרוע נטויה and כי לעולם חסדו phrases separately pop up in Jewish liturgy quite often. The inclusion of trope marks is a bit unusual, but doesn't add ambiguity. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:11, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply

  I wouldn't opposed that, as that's where the phrase is found. Maybe Psalm 136#Judaism as a refinement? Tartar Torte 19:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Retarget to Psalm 136#Judaism per Rosguill and nom. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• L@@K → wiktionary:Appendix:Internet slang  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

No mention at target. wikt:Appendix:English internet slang, where this was pointing at before, does not list this either. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 16:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

For reference, the (unsourced) definition I was relying on back when I created the redirect in 2006 was first added in the earliest revision of the page (whose history has been moved around a few times, but is currently (deleted) under the title "List of Internet slang phrases"), at 20:26, 3 September 2005. It was:

"Look", from eBay. Used by sellers who have nothing interesting to say about their item, but who try to attract attention anyway

Given that this has always been unsourced, I'm fine with deleting the redirect. JesseW, the juggling janitor 19:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Sekaimon → EBay#International  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at target, nor elsewhere on the English Wikipedia. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 16:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 23:49, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• EachNet → EBay  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; previously redirected after an AfD. Can probably be retargeted to List of acquisitions by eBay if unlinked there. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 16:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete: Under WP:REDYES and as unsuitable target. The AfD in which this was made into a redirect from 10 years ago was likely before there was nearly as much coverage of EachNet as there is now, but it's certainly notable enough at this point to have its own page. There's articles covering it in detail from pretty reliable sources such as SCMP, Forbes, and the New York Times. Furthermore, a redirect to eBay is itself problematic as according to the SCMP, eBay later divested. Tartar Torte 16:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. BD2412 T 22:11, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• I love eBay → EBay  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 16:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete as an apparent nonsensical redirect. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 21:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:24, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• 2022 Hoover Dam explosion → Hoover Dam  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

This exists as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Hoover Dam explosion, which was closed as merge by Liz. However 20 minutes later Wehwalt redirected it without merging noting in the edit summary no useful. content to merge into target article. The target currently contains no information about relevant explosions (a temporary cofferdam was exploded in 1931 or 1932) and the only mentions of 2022 are in citations and categories.
Pinging the contributors to the AfD: @ Fram, Concordiad, SPECIFICO, Balon Greyjoy, Storchy, DirkJandeGeer, Alexandermcnabb, BusterD, Partofthemachine, Iamreallygoodatcheckers, Hughesdarren, Qwaiiplayer, SWinxy, and Gazamp:. Thryduulf ( talk) 07:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete, for the reasons expressed here. The merge quite possibly should have been a delete, but the matter was discussed, and a determination made through normal editing and discussion processes as to whether any content should be included. Since the editors of the article found no content worth including in the main article, an FA which covers ninety years of the dam, including its construction, there seems no point in having a redirect.-- Wehwalt ( talk) 12:41, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete This whole sequence of events -- from explosion article to AfD to POV in the main article to its removal -- should never have been inflicted on the community and is a textbook example of WP:NOTNEWS nonsense wasting editor resources. SPECIFICO talk 13:39, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete per Wehwalt. Storchy ( talk) 16:13, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete: As there was no mergeable content, this redirect is pointing to nothing. I can't really fault the merger for finding no mergeable content as the article, by the point of merger, was "A fire happened. It was put out. No structures were damaged. No one got hurt." Tartar Torte 16:16, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Delete, according to media, a transformer caught fire and caused the explosion, affecting a small area. I don't see any encyclopedic significance in that story, much less reason to merge/redirect. Having said that, I can understand why, in retrospect, some editors were waiting to see if a story developed and chose to merge or redirect. I've heard that draftify is the tool of deletionists whereas redirects are the tool of inclusionists, but I don't believe either one is true. It is more of the same RECENTISM, NOTNEWS issues that crop up from time to time, and create time sinks & backlogs for NPP, admins and AfD. ONUS is on the article creator - delete it or send it back to them to finish. We don't need a million "suggestions" for articles to create. We get enough of that at VRT. Atsme 💬 📧 16:38, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete seems to be a non notable news event not needed in the target article. -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 22:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Comment - The decision to include no content about the explosion was decided at Talk:Hoover Dam#2022 explosion. Iamreallygoodatcheckers ^t@lk 23:58, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Comment First, this discussion doesn't seem to be about whether or not a redirect should exist but why a merger wasn't done. I'll admit, when I look at the AFD, merge was a minority opinion (I see 7 mentions of Merge, 11 for Delete, some of those people said "Delete or Merge"). My hope with a Merge conclusion was if there was any relevant content, it could be merged to the main article on the dam. There was a very brief discussion about this at Talk:Hoover Dam#2022 explosion. I'd hope there would be more participation but there wasn't. I don't have an opinion on whether or not this redirect is kept. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:33, 16 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete: I thought page creator (and attempted prodder) User:Iamreallygoodatcheckers said something astute in the AfD: "...there really is not a natural place this could be briefly mentioned at Hoover Dam..." Hoover Dam is a featured article and is well-enough fortified it doesn't have a place for random YouTube posts which have no lasting impact. I must express admiration to the industrious and crafty humans working at that namespace. BusterD ( talk) 21:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Annual Reviews(publisher) → Annual Reviews (publisher)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Typo in disambiguation Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 05:40, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. More than fifteen years prior to now, it was moved to the correct title, so we don't really need this WP:UNNATURAL error anymore. Regards, SONIC 678 18:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete due to malformed modifier -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 01:59, 16 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per WP:RDAB. Steel1943 ( talk) 09:03, 16 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• African Philosophy (1533–1067) → Journal on African Philosophy  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Unlikely search term. Journal name plus ndashed (and therefore invalid) ISSN is nonsense. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 05:31, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete: It seems that a user moved this to have an endash in per WP:MOSDATE in 2009; however, these aren't years so WP:MOSDATE does not apply. Delete per nom as an ISSN with an endash is an invalid ISSN. Tartar Torte 14:45, 15 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 12:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• A a. s. 215 meeting → American Astronomical Society 215th meeting  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Unlikely typo/search term. Mixing both errors in miscapitalization and in dots. Headbomb { t · c · p · b} 05:26, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete I agree this is an unlikely search term. --- Steve Quinn ( talk) 18:56, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 02:44, 15 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit 05:14, 21 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Jail (upcomig film) → Jail (2021 film)  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

1) This movie has already been released (this redirect was left over from a page move), and 2) the word "upcoming" is misspelled (that's also a leftover from 3½ years earlier when the page had another move before that). See also the "Nightmare Alley (upcominh film)" discussion. Regards, SONIC 678 04:57, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply
• Delete per nom -- Lenticel ^{( talk)} 02:43, 15 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 14:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• J. R. Get Money → Universal Motown Records  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 
• Dem Get-A-Way Boyz → Universal Motown Records  ( talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure:  keep/ retarget/ delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target or anywhere else on Wikipedia, delete unless it's DUE to include at the target _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:55, 6 August 2022 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, lettherebedarklight, 晚安, おやすみなさい, ping me when replying 02:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

• Delete per nom. A7V2 ( talk) 06:54, 14 August 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.