This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 31, 2021.
2028 United States Presidential Election
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete without salting at this time, as I don't see any evidence of it being repeatedly recreated. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
This is just
WP:CRYSTAL and
WP:TOOSOON material.
Dominicmgm (
talk)
22:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and/or protect as
2024 United States presidential election/
United States presidential election, 2024 was until after the 2020 election, per AFD. A redirect is not a big deal, but it is too soon for this to be open to becoming an article.
Reywas92
Talk
22:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete and salt.
WP:CRYSTAL and repeatedly recreated, so until there's significant discussion or we're in 2024, such a redirect will inevitably not lead readers to relevant information (in the target article specific to 2028) and be subject to repeated attempts to create an article.
ComplexRational (
talk)
13:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment I'm very surprised that I've not been able to find any content about this. I wasn't expecting much more than a sentence or two saying it's expected to be held on <date>, the electoral college votes are expected be the same as/different to 2024, and any other notable aspirations/plans/hopes notable people/groups have said/expressed about 2028; but I was expecting something.
Thryduulf (
talk)
14:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Can't see the point of redirecting an actress's name to an article about an actor in which all we ever learn about her is that she once starred opposite him. Also,
WP:R#DELETE #10.
Victor Lopes
Fala!•
C
20:07, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 8#.NET
Complete List of Beyblade Characters
Complete list of Booknotes interviews
Complete List of Jasoosi Dunya (Old)
Complete list of authors published as UK first editions by Collins Crime Club
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. The facts that the list does appear to be complete, and the length of time this page existed at this title, leads to greater weight being given to those arguments versus the vague boilerplate nomination. ~
mazca
talk
15:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Implausible
WP:PANDORA redirect, see
WP:COMPLETELIST.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
12:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete as extremely long redirect title.
Dominicmgm (
talk)
12:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: per nominator. A long title is not a reason for deletion, though (the target article has quite a long title, too).
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
12:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Strong keep the nomination is completely incorrect - the search term is highly plausible and correct - the first sentence of the target is
This is a complete list of authors published as UK first editions by Collins Crime Club
and no additional works are being published so the list will remain complete.
WP:PANDORA is not a thing (redirects are evaluated only on their own merits) and
WP:COMPLETELIST is too blunt to be of use to anybody. This is possibly the worst of these mass nominations as it's clear the nominator has not even looked at the page.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. The Crime Club has not been publishing since 1994, so the list is complete and will likely remain complete for the foreseeable future. The main list was at this title for 4 years until moved in 2017, so this is also a useful R from page move.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
00:43, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per Thryduulf's comprehensive argument. This redirect is unambiguous and gets
very high amounts of usage and thus deleting it serves only to deter many potential readers. As an aside, I highly doubt that this particular (horrible)
PANDORA argument espoused by the nominator has any basis – surely readers would be likely to after searching this up, look at the big black title at the top of the page, and subconsciously remind themselves that including the word complete is unnecessary? They'd at least be more likely to do that than pay no attention to the extremely easily noticed big black title at all and continue typing things exactly the same way, as the flawed PANDORA argument assumes. I think that a person's use of two similar everyday phrases like complete list / list tend to vary, with a tendency towards the more concise phrase – but then again, my armchair linguistic psychology with no basis probably shouldn't be relied upon. But neither should this PANDORA psychology. —
J947 ‡
message ⁓
edits
01:26, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Complete List of Imran Series (Old)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed,
Rosguill
talk
19:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Implausible
WP:PANDORA redirect, see
WP:COMPLETELIST.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
12:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep I thought the "(Old)" was a placeholder from page views, but it seems to be indicating the "old" original Imran series, which has been continued by subsequent authors. Given that, and its status as a previous title, I don't see a reason to delete. --
BDD (
talk)
16:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Complete list of Rock Band Network songs
Complete list of works produced by Hanna-Barbera
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Category:Fringe theory. At the risk of sounding like a supervote, there doesn't seem to be a reason to prefer the more specific
Category:Fringe science over this.
WP:FRINGE itself doesn't refer exclusively to science. Many fringe theories relate to science, but not all. --
BDD (
talk)
16:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
There's more than one category related to a topic with "fringe" in its name, like
Category:Fringe festivals,
Category:Fringe (TV series), or even
Category:Fringe science, so I suggest deleting this shortcut.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
11:55, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget per HotdogPi, this is clearly what the "FRINGE" shortcut means on Wikipedia.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
11:41, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget per HotdogPi - all other things being equal, the current target would be a reasonable one for this shortcut, but
WP:FRINGE is a commonly used shortcut with a specific meaning in Wikipedia, and it seems best to make this consistent. ~
mazca
talk
13:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget, but to
Category:Fringe theory, which is the catch all category for fringe material including Fringe science. Both
WP:FRINGE and {{
Fringe}} are about generic fringe theories, they're not specifically fringe science, and they could equally well be applied to pseudo-history or Conspiracy theories, for example.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
18:55, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Delete.
Thryduulf (
talk)
15:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
No mention at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,
Rosguill
talk
17:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
I say delete the page. It is clearly not androcide, I have made a mistake and I hope to improve
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Complete list of downloadable content for the Rock Band series
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
List of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series#Complete list of available songs. Formally no consensus, implementing the refine proposal as it appears to uncontroversially be an improvement over the status quo. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Implausible
WP:PANDORA redirect, see
WP:COMPLETELIST.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
12:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: per nominator.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
12:43, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete both per nom. As new games are released, likely so will new downloadable content (which might be in the making right now even without new games in the series being made). I'm also adding
List of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series (complete list) here. Regards,
SONIC
678
16:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep The search term is plausible,
WP:PANDORA is not a thing (redirects are evaluated only on their own merits) and
WP:COMPLETELIST is too blunt to be of use to anybody, so the nomination is incorrect on all counts. This is a slightly different situation to most of the other similar nominations (although the nominator apparently not looking at anything beyond the title is the same) in that the list is still growing, but it is being maintained has been consistently for years so the title is accurate and not (as some have incorrectly speculated above) misleading.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:58, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Refine all to
List of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series#Complete list of available songs to be specific. Per Thryduulf, there is no valid reason to delete this redirect. —
J947 ‡
message ⁓
edits
01:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Refine: per J947.
JJP...MASTER!
[talk to] JJP... master?
12:41, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Complete list of NJ Transit stations
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely search term, "complete list" -> "list" should not be something we redirect in general
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
11:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.Relisting comment: There seems to be a lack of consensus, and it doesn't feel plausible to keep the redirect.
WP:PANDORA is probably one of the valid reasons for deletion, stated by
1234qwer1234qwer4.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seventyfiveyears (
talk)
16:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment
WP:PANDORA is very much not a valid reason to delete anything. Redirects are judged on their own merits, regardless of whether similar redirects do or do not exist. The existence of one redirect implies nothing about the desirability or otherwise of another redirect.
Thryduulf (
talk)
22:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Complete list of non-English Wikipedias available
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Unlikely search term, "complete list" -> "list" should not be something we redirect in general
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
11:37, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete: per
WP:PANDORA/the newly created
WP:COMPLETELIST. Note also that the list also includes the English Wikipedia.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
12:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Contains both English and simple English Wikipedias, so it's not a list of non-English Wikipedias. The list doesn't seem to be complete either, e.g. there's no mention of the hoax "
Siberian Language" wikipedia.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
17:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per 86.23.109.101.
Crouch, Swale (
talk)
20:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep the search term is plausible,
WP:PANDORA is not a thing (redirects are evaluated only on their own merits) and
WP:COMPLETELIST is too blunt to be of use to anybody. The title is also not incorrect - that the list includes English Wikipedias does not alter the fact that it does contain a complete list of non-English Wikpedias. The deleted Siberian Wikipedia is not available so it's absence from the list is also irrelevant.
Thryduulf (
talk)
13:07, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. The title is accurate.
HotdogPi
00:11, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per Thryduulf and what I've outlined in similar nominations. It isn't helpful to nominate these harmless redirects to RfD. Note also that this redirect is pretty old history – it's from 2002. —
J947 ‡
message ⁓
edits
02:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:11, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
wrong capitalization and no need for the word "complete" in redirects.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
11:36, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Complete list of Michael Cimino's unrealized projects
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Michael Cimino's unrealized projects. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:10, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
If kept, this should be retargeted to
Michael Cimino's unrealized projects, where more information is provided; however, I don't think this is a likely search term.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
11:21, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:COMPLETELIST of course.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
13:51, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to the complete list of Michael Cimino's unrealized projects at
Michael Cimino's unrealized projects where searches will find exactly what they are looking for. Given that the target is a complete list,
WP:COMPLETELIST (which reflects the opinion of only 1 or 2 editors and is far too blunt to be anything approaching useful) is not relevant.
Thryduulf (
talk)
13:12, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- @
Thryduulf: (only replying once, though this addresses most of your comments on this page) fair enough. I wasn't trying to act like
WP:COMPLETELIST was a policy, more that it's more efficient to link a short essay than to write the reasoning in every nomination. I do think that the redirects are generally harmful to the project, though.
Elliot321 (
talk |
contribs)
04:57, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The point is that that that essay is a gross oversimplification built on top of the fundamentally wrong idea that no list on Wikipedia can ever be complete. That there exist so many "complete list of..." redirects additionally demonstrates that the idea these are implausible search terms is also incorrect. The reference to PANDORA (an idea that is equally faulty and not representative of either reality or consensus) is also telling - these redirects need to be examined individually to asses their utility. A redirect that accurately describes that content it leads to, is unambiguous and not in the way of anything else is never going to be harmful absent truly extraordinary circumstances - circumstances that would need to be identified individually.
Thryduulf (
talk)
14:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Michael Cimino's unrealized projects per Thryduulf and don't delete per what I've outlined in similar nominations. It isn't helpful to nominate these harmless redirects to RfD. —
J947 ‡
message ⁓
edits
02:15, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 8#Black Friday (2007 film)
Gould (Europeans cricketer)
Hyde (Europeans cricketer)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not useful XNRs; a reader does not learn anything about the person from the list at the category. Delete to encourage article creation. Neither of these seem to have mentions on Wikipedia: there are quite a few cricketers named "Hyde" and "Duncan" on Wikipedia, but none of them seems to have played for Europeans; "B. Gaillard" only returns unrelated citations; the rest has no slightly related search results at all.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
11:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Māori All Blacks redirect
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
As per the edit summary of the page creation, "stupid idea".
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
10:29, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in the targeted article.
Jovanmilic97 (
talk)
09:47, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. This seems to have been a 1 line stub on a non notable video game that was blanked and redirected. The redirect is clearly inappropriate as there is no mention of the game at the target, and I can't find anywhere else it could point to.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Not currently mentioned at the target.
WP:BEFORE could not find anything of substance except as a possible unverifiable hoax or non-notable fan fiction, courtesy of the original creator. This redirect should be deleted.
Haleth (
talk)
09:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Melbourne Sports and Entertainment Centre redir
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:05, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
As mentioned in the article, Marianne Schönauer's real name was Schifferes after her father Karl Schifferes. Schifferer appears to be a plausible typo, as this is the more common and 'natural' name in German. But we should not prolong and encourage the error by having that redirect.
KnightMove (
talk)
21:45, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Yes, agreed.
Lord Cornwallis (
talk)
22:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 8#Stats grok
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 8#28-3
Storm Over the Pacific (Move)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
Leftovers from page moves, not more needed.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠)
00:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. signed,
Rosguill
talk
20:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
While I can understand why
Pedophile priest would be a helpful redirect to
Catholic Church sexual abuse cases,
Pedophile pope doesn't seem a particularly helpful redirect to this subject and needlessly defamatory. (Regardless of one's views on the Church's handling of the situation or the inaction taken, afaik there haven't been any seriously regarded accusations of paedophilia or child sexual abuse against any Pope). I would argue this should be deleted.
Bangalamania (
talk)
00:10, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete considering that the sexual abuse scandal is more about homosexuality with adolescents than pedophilia, I would consider both of your mentions to be needlessly defamatory.
Elizium23 (
talk)
00:27, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, lest this sets a trend for redirects of "Pedophile (profession)", like "Pedophile DJ" for
Jimmy Savile.
Dominicmgm (
talk)
01:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Comment (by creator) I must not have thought this one through before I created it (on request) some ten years ago. As Bangalamania said, there's no widely publicized pedophilia accusations against any pope (that I'm aware of), so this isn't a plausible redirect. No objections against deletion.
decltype
(
talk)
02:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. I can't find any significant uses of the exact term, all the hits on google are tags, separate sentences or similar ("1 in 50 priests is a pedophile - Pope Francis" for example). There is one exception to this in the top 20 google hits is a Pintrest caption "Satanist pedophile Pope Francis working to bring Anti Christ false peace in Middle East with Islam." but even if that were in a reliable source and not a one-off it would not indicate this was a useful search term.
Thryduulf (
talk)
03:42, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Does not seem to be used in reliable sources to describe the event, and no pope has seriously been accused of paedophilia as far as I can tell.
86.23.109.101 (
talk)
11:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
reply
- Delete The article it leads too is not about Popes.
Dimadick (
talk)
19:56, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.