This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 13, 2020.
2020 Silverstone Formula 3 round
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 19:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominating for deletion per
WP:RfD#D10 (to promote article creation). SSSB (
talk) 21:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom to encourage article creation, especially due to the presence of redlinks on the main season article.
A7V2 (
talk) 10:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
ISOGAL
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 19:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
No mention. Unclear why this should even redirect. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 19:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete they appear to be a team working at the
Infrared Space Observatory, as per image caption on
[1]. But as that's the only mention of them, I doubt anyone would be searching for them. And if they are searching, they're not going to find anything in target article.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 10:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per Joseph2302. If nobody has added mention yet, we are only going to
WP:SURPRISE people. It can be re-created at an appropriate time if added in the future. -
2pou (
talk) 19:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Conservateur
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 19:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
French for conservative, it's used in dozens of different contexts on Wikipedia, too broadly to be worth disambiguating. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Canadian Pizza
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to
List of pizza varieties by country#Canada. Involved close, I don't have any issue with this proposal and the redirect's creator has already implemented it. signed, Rosguilltalk 23:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
While Hawaiian pizza was invented in Canada, it doesn't appear to ever be referred to as "Canadian pizza". Searching online, I mostly get results for Canadian pizza chains, including some non-notable restaurants titled "Canadian Pizza". I would lean towards deletion, although redirecting to
List of Canadian pizza chains may be a workable alternative. signed, Rosguilltalk 16:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Just to like you know, i'm going to change the redirect thanks for the idea
Andrewbdfe (
talk) 17:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Formyl hexanoate
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 19:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Chemically non-sensical term. The only uses I can find are an echo-chamber of online databases that themselves do not appear to have actual curation or reliable sourcing ("outside the garden") for this sort of detail. All I can find by google or
SciFinder are it as a substring in the name of other chemicals, or as a synonym for a different chemical altogether, none of which have WP articles.
DMacks (
talk) 16:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes, just delete it as it doesn't make sense for methyl hexanoate and if it meant anything would be the mixed anhydride between hexanoic acid and formic acid. That's in Pubchem
"here". but not in Chemspider and
WP:NOTNOTABLE, I think. If I remember correctly, any derivative of
formic acid with a decent leaving group just decomposes, giving carbon monoxide etc.
Michael D. Turnbull (
talk) 16:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Correct about the rapid decomposition of formyl–LG structures. Many are isolatable and can be kept at low temp in solution for "a while" and are notable enough for articles (
formyl fluoride,
formic anhydride,
acetic formic anhydride, all of which citedly do decompose), but I agree with the lack of notability of this one.
DMacks (
talk) 18:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Propose retargeting to
Template:Uw-disruptive1. Reason: I do not remember a single warning template where the prefix redirects to anything higher than level 1. Most disruptive editors are acting in good faith. I did not realize that this was a problem until one of the scripts I am working on sent a bunch of level 3 warning messages. Aasim 03:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Support don't excessively bite editors who might be editing in good faith, as we
assume they are. (
t ·
c) buidhe 04:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per everyone above.
Thryduulf (
talk) 12:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, probably snow at this point. Utopes(talk / cont) 23:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 13, 2020.
2020 Silverstone Formula 3 round
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 19:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Nominating for deletion per
WP:RfD#D10 (to promote article creation). SSSB (
talk) 21:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom to encourage article creation, especially due to the presence of redlinks on the main season article.
A7V2 (
talk) 10:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
ISOGAL
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 19:25, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
No mention. Unclear why this should even redirect. –MJL‐Talk‐☖ 19:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete they appear to be a team working at the
Infrared Space Observatory, as per image caption on
[1]. But as that's the only mention of them, I doubt anyone would be searching for them. And if they are searching, they're not going to find anything in target article.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 10:35, 17 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete per Joseph2302. If nobody has added mention yet, we are only going to
WP:SURPRISE people. It can be re-created at an appropriate time if added in the future. -
2pou (
talk) 19:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Conservateur
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 19:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
French for conservative, it's used in dozens of different contexts on Wikipedia, too broadly to be worth disambiguating. I would suggest deletion. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Canadian Pizza
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to
List of pizza varieties by country#Canada. Involved close, I don't have any issue with this proposal and the redirect's creator has already implemented it. signed, Rosguilltalk 23:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
While Hawaiian pizza was invented in Canada, it doesn't appear to ever be referred to as "Canadian pizza". Searching online, I mostly get results for Canadian pizza chains, including some non-notable restaurants titled "Canadian Pizza". I would lean towards deletion, although redirecting to
List of Canadian pizza chains may be a workable alternative. signed, Rosguilltalk 16:58, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Just to like you know, i'm going to change the redirect thanks for the idea
Andrewbdfe (
talk) 17:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Formyl hexanoate
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk) 19:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Chemically non-sensical term. The only uses I can find are an echo-chamber of online databases that themselves do not appear to have actual curation or reliable sourcing ("outside the garden") for this sort of detail. All I can find by google or
SciFinder are it as a substring in the name of other chemicals, or as a synonym for a different chemical altogether, none of which have WP articles.
DMacks (
talk) 16:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Yes, just delete it as it doesn't make sense for methyl hexanoate and if it meant anything would be the mixed anhydride between hexanoic acid and formic acid. That's in Pubchem
"here". but not in Chemspider and
WP:NOTNOTABLE, I think. If I remember correctly, any derivative of
formic acid with a decent leaving group just decomposes, giving carbon monoxide etc.
Michael D. Turnbull (
talk) 16:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Correct about the rapid decomposition of formyl–LG structures. Many are isolatable and can be kept at low temp in solution for "a while" and are notable enough for articles (
formyl fluoride,
formic anhydride,
acetic formic anhydride, all of which citedly do decompose), but I agree with the lack of notability of this one.
DMacks (
talk) 18:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Propose retargeting to
Template:Uw-disruptive1. Reason: I do not remember a single warning template where the prefix redirects to anything higher than level 1. Most disruptive editors are acting in good faith. I did not realize that this was a problem until one of the scripts I am working on sent a bunch of level 3 warning messages. Aasim 03:21, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Support don't excessively bite editors who might be editing in good faith, as we
assume they are. (
t ·
c) buidhe 04:42, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Support per everyone above.
Thryduulf (
talk) 12:46, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
Support, probably snow at this point. Utopes(talk / cont) 23:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.