From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 12

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 12, 2020.

Tropical storm Rene

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Tropical Storm Rene. Literally withdrawing my own nomination, since consensus became evident rather quickly. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Miscapitalized, easily confused with Tropical Storm Rene which is a DAB page. I suggest deletion or a retarget to the aforementioned DAB. CycloneYoris talk! 23:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pandemic team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at the target, on top of being a fairly broad search term that could easily refer to other groups. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 19:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

JetRaider

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This redirect is not mentioned in the primary article, most likely because it was removed 3 years ago. However, it could also be a mispelling of Jet Rider. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 17:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suspended congress

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Well, this is mentioned in the target article. However, WP:ASTONISH might be in play here, as there seems to be a decent number of hits on Google for various legislative bodies known as Congress being suspended. Anyone looking for a suspended legal body is going to be like "what the hell" when they wind up here. Hog Farm Bacon 02:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 ( talk) 16:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:T

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Retarget to Teahouse. This is currently redirected to the now-defunct WP:Tutorial (historical), it would likely provide more use if redirected to the Teahouse. — Yours, Berrely •  TalkContribs 13:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

  • This was discussed two months ago at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 23#Wikipedia:T. – Uanfala (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep per the recent discussion. Or failing that, keep per the arguments I made in that discussion since when nothing has changed. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Support retarget. I agree that the Teahouse is a good suggestion as a target that would get plenty of use, especially in a "tutorial" type context since it is a place for newbie editors. It is certainly a better target than a defunct page that shouldn't be linked to anymore—especially not with such a prominent single-letter shortcut. It's a shame that the previous discussion got derailed due to "preserving links", which is silly if one understands where most of the links are coming from. As I explained at the previous discussion and at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 10#Wikipedia:9, most links to single digit letters and numbers were created via User:TomasBat/Welcome, which links all single letter shortcuts without any context, so it doesn't matter what the target is. Other links should still make sense in context since the Teahouse is a place for asking tutorial-type questions, and any other confusion can be resolved with an explanatory hatnote. Disambiguate per Uanfala, especially the reply on why a hatnote at the Teahouse page is not ideal. -- Tavix ( talk) 15:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Edited 18:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
    • That's true, but there's still a significant number of links to the tutorial (some examples: Talk:Amon (demon), Talk:Shorinji Kempo, Talk:Lanzarote. If this is retargeted, then these links will need to be fixed (Teahouse is a very different place than the tutorial). – Uanfala (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC) reply
      • None of the discussions in the examples you have cited are likely to be used, or even read, in the future. They are one-off links in obscure talk pages meant for the person who is being replied to at that time. Rather, it is far more useful as a shortcut for an active page and I am fine with any suggestion that would help achieve that goal. -- Tavix ( talk) 17:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC) reply
    • I have read your arguments against the need to preserve links. They didn't convince me last time (nor did they convince a sufficient number of other people) and they don't convince me this time. Please do not confuse that with the discussion getting "derailed". Thryduulf ( talk) 01:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
      • In the last discussion you lead off with faulty information, citing "4,000 links". However, because of User:TomasBat/Welcome, that is highly misleading. Others may have based their !votes off of that inaccuracy, which effectively derailed that discussion. I am well aware that you aren't convinced—I have long given up on trying to convince you of anything. -- Tavix ( talk) 02:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
        • 4000 links is not inaccurate. That you dispute the relevance of these links does not negate their existence, nor mean that they hold no value. I shall choose not to interpret your other comments as a needless personal attack. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
          • Yeah, the overwhelming majority of these come from a user welcome template, where the link forms part of a header, alongside all other single-letter shortcuts. For that context it's irrelevant where the link is pointing. – Uanfala (talk) 16:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Do not retarget. There's a substantial number of incoming links where it's precisely the tutorial page that is intended. There are probably 100 or fewer of them, so it will be viable to go back and change them, freeing up the shortcut for other uses. However, this is so short as a shortcut that it's likely that different editors will expect it to target different pages. We might be tolerant of such ambiguity for shortcuts, but that's usually because most of them have had established uses since the early days of the project: they're entrenched in practice and there's nothing we can do to change that. But here for WP:T, we have control and we can stop an infelicitous shortcut from gaining ground. Yes, the teahouse is a plausible target, but it already has good shortcuts like WP:TEA and WP:TH, which are both short and clear. And there are other targets that are plausible too, like Help:Templates (the target of H:T and WP:TEMP), or the talk guidelines, or Wikipedia:Tips, or Wikipedia:Tools. We should either keep this shortcut pointing to its historic target (which will hopefully not pick up any further use in the future), or turn it into a disambiguation page listing a handful of most plausible targets. – Uanfala (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • A hatnote could be added to redirect users, eg. "WP:T redirects here, for the page this shortcut redirected to previously, see..." — Yours, Berrely •  TalkContribs 07:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
    Of course, but a hatnote comes into the picture only if you first grant that the Teahouse should be the primary topic. I was arguing that it isn't, but even if it were, then it will still be desirable to avoid placing hatnotes there: you'd want newbie-facing pages like it to be as free of clutter as possible, and the teahouse in particular has a beautiful header that will not work well with a hatnote. – Uanfala (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • I've drafted a dab page below the redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 19:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Disambiguate. Personally, I think that this is exactly the scenario where a shortcut should be disambiguated. With the disambig, the target the editor wants to go to is likely listed – with the added benefit that links to the previous target don't need to be changed as the old target is listed clearly at the dab page. J947 messageedits 20:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Walking Dead (season 5) redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

These redirects are not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection(s) unclear. Chompy Ace 11:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Miro(wrestler)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Certainly an implausible redirect, moreover there may be many wrestlers named "Miro" or "Miroslov" as well. Java Hurricane 10:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

According to Cagematch, there is only one wrestler who uses the name Miro, the Best Man Miro (AKA, Rusev). There is a no notable wrestler who previously worked as Miroslav, but since Rusev is working as Miro, I think the redirect works. -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 10:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of bitcoin wallets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

the page "Bitcoin" doesn't actually cover other Bitcoin wallets, so the redirect is useless Ysangkok ( talk) 14:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: While there is a section on wallets, there is no enwiki page for a list of wallets — Yours, Berrely •  TalkContribs 13:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete It wouldn't matter that we don't have an article listing bitcoin wallets if we had a list on some other page. However, while we have lists of types of wallet we don't have a list of individual wallets (either comprehensive or even just notable ones) and given the characteristics of this topic area and the high incidence of spamming related to it, it seems unlikely that one will be created anytime soon. Thryduulf ( talk) 22:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Exodus (The Walking Dead)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blazing Hell

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Signs (The Walking Dead)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Do It Now (The Walking Dead)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

And Here We Are

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Strong Threats (The Walking Dead)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CORONA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to the disambiguation page. ( non-admin closure) Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 15:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Could also mean coronavirus disease 2019, CORONA (rocket), etc. I suggest retargeting to Corona (disambiguation). Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:IOS 15

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restore previous version. signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Implausible redirect. While I get that it is the next version of iOS, it is WP:TOOSOON. PRAHLAD balaji ( M•T•AC) This message was left at 01:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 12

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 12, 2020.

Tropical storm Rene

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to Tropical Storm Rene. Literally withdrawing my own nomination, since consensus became evident rather quickly. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 02:19, 13 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Miscapitalized, easily confused with Tropical Storm Rene which is a DAB page. I suggest deletion or a retarget to the aforementioned DAB. CycloneYoris talk! 23:08, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pandemic team

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:21, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned at the target, on top of being a fairly broad search term that could easily refer to other groups. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 19:05, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

JetRaider

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

This redirect is not mentioned in the primary article, most likely because it was removed 3 years ago. However, it could also be a mispelling of Jet Rider. Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 17:28, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suspended congress

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:20, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Well, this is mentioned in the target article. However, WP:ASTONISH might be in play here, as there seems to be a decent number of hits on Google for various legislative bodies known as Congress being suspended. Anyone looking for a suspended legal body is going to be like "what the hell" when they wind up here. Hog Farm Bacon 02:44, 5 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 ( talk) 16:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:T

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. signed, Rosguill talk 18:57, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Retarget to Teahouse. This is currently redirected to the now-defunct WP:Tutorial (historical), it would likely provide more use if redirected to the Teahouse. — Yours, Berrely •  TalkContribs 13:02, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

  • This was discussed two months ago at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 23#Wikipedia:T. – Uanfala (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy keep per the recent discussion. Or failing that, keep per the arguments I made in that discussion since when nothing has changed. Thryduulf ( talk) 21:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Support retarget. I agree that the Teahouse is a good suggestion as a target that would get plenty of use, especially in a "tutorial" type context since it is a place for newbie editors. It is certainly a better target than a defunct page that shouldn't be linked to anymore—especially not with such a prominent single-letter shortcut. It's a shame that the previous discussion got derailed due to "preserving links", which is silly if one understands where most of the links are coming from. As I explained at the previous discussion and at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 10#Wikipedia:9, most links to single digit letters and numbers were created via User:TomasBat/Welcome, which links all single letter shortcuts without any context, so it doesn't matter what the target is. Other links should still make sense in context since the Teahouse is a place for asking tutorial-type questions, and any other confusion can be resolved with an explanatory hatnote. Disambiguate per Uanfala, especially the reply on why a hatnote at the Teahouse page is not ideal. -- Tavix ( talk) 15:00, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Edited 18:53, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
    • That's true, but there's still a significant number of links to the tutorial (some examples: Talk:Amon (demon), Talk:Shorinji Kempo, Talk:Lanzarote. If this is retargeted, then these links will need to be fixed (Teahouse is a very different place than the tutorial). – Uanfala (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC) reply
      • None of the discussions in the examples you have cited are likely to be used, or even read, in the future. They are one-off links in obscure talk pages meant for the person who is being replied to at that time. Rather, it is far more useful as a shortcut for an active page and I am fine with any suggestion that would help achieve that goal. -- Tavix ( talk) 17:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC) reply
    • I have read your arguments against the need to preserve links. They didn't convince me last time (nor did they convince a sufficient number of other people) and they don't convince me this time. Please do not confuse that with the discussion getting "derailed". Thryduulf ( talk) 01:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
      • In the last discussion you lead off with faulty information, citing "4,000 links". However, because of User:TomasBat/Welcome, that is highly misleading. Others may have based their !votes off of that inaccuracy, which effectively derailed that discussion. I am well aware that you aren't convinced—I have long given up on trying to convince you of anything. -- Tavix ( talk) 02:08, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
        • 4000 links is not inaccurate. That you dispute the relevance of these links does not negate their existence, nor mean that they hold no value. I shall choose not to interpret your other comments as a needless personal attack. Thryduulf ( talk) 12:35, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
          • Yeah, the overwhelming majority of these come from a user welcome template, where the link forms part of a header, alongside all other single-letter shortcuts. For that context it's irrelevant where the link is pointing. – Uanfala (talk) 16:26, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Do not retarget. There's a substantial number of incoming links where it's precisely the tutorial page that is intended. There are probably 100 or fewer of them, so it will be viable to go back and change them, freeing up the shortcut for other uses. However, this is so short as a shortcut that it's likely that different editors will expect it to target different pages. We might be tolerant of such ambiguity for shortcuts, but that's usually because most of them have had established uses since the early days of the project: they're entrenched in practice and there's nothing we can do to change that. But here for WP:T, we have control and we can stop an infelicitous shortcut from gaining ground. Yes, the teahouse is a plausible target, but it already has good shortcuts like WP:TEA and WP:TH, which are both short and clear. And there are other targets that are plausible too, like Help:Templates (the target of H:T and WP:TEMP), or the talk guidelines, or Wikipedia:Tips, or Wikipedia:Tools. We should either keep this shortcut pointing to its historic target (which will hopefully not pick up any further use in the future), or turn it into a disambiguation page listing a handful of most plausible targets. – Uanfala (talk) 17:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • A hatnote could be added to redirect users, eg. "WP:T redirects here, for the page this shortcut redirected to previously, see..." — Yours, Berrely •  TalkContribs 07:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
    Of course, but a hatnote comes into the picture only if you first grant that the Teahouse should be the primary topic. I was arguing that it isn't, but even if it were, then it will still be desirable to avoid placing hatnotes there: you'd want newbie-facing pages like it to be as free of clutter as possible, and the teahouse in particular has a beautiful header that will not work well with a hatnote. – Uanfala (talk) 10:27, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • I've drafted a dab page below the redirect. – Uanfala (talk) 19:44, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Disambiguate. Personally, I think that this is exactly the scenario where a shortcut should be disambiguated. With the disambig, the target the editor wants to go to is likely listed – with the added benefit that links to the previous target don't need to be changed as the old target is listed clearly at the dab page. J947 messageedits 20:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Walking Dead (season 5) redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:18, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

These redirects are not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection(s) unclear. Chompy Ace 11:06, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Miro(wrestler)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Certainly an implausible redirect, moreover there may be many wrestlers named "Miro" or "Miroslov" as well. Java Hurricane 10:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

According to Cagematch, there is only one wrestler who uses the name Miro, the Best Man Miro (AKA, Rusev). There is a no notable wrestler who previously worked as Miroslav, but since Rusev is working as Miro, I think the redirect works. -- HHH Pedrigree ( talk) 10:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of bitcoin wallets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

the page "Bitcoin" doesn't actually cover other Bitcoin wallets, so the redirect is useless Ysangkok ( talk) 14:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 16:55, 31 August 2020 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: While there is a section on wallets, there is no enwiki page for a list of wallets — Yours, Berrely •  TalkContribs 13:13, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
  • Delete It wouldn't matter that we don't have an article listing bitcoin wallets if we had a list on some other page. However, while we have lists of types of wallet we don't have a list of individual wallets (either comprehensive or even just notable ones) and given the characteristics of this topic area and the high incidence of spamming related to it, it seems unlikely that one will be created anytime soon. Thryduulf ( talk) 22:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Exodus (The Walking Dead)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Blazing Hell

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Signs (The Walking Dead)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 18:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Do It Now (The Walking Dead)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:07, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

And Here We Are

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:43, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Strong Threats (The Walking Dead)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 19:06, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article, leaving the connection unclear. Chompy Ace 06:40, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

CORONA

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to the disambiguation page. ( non-admin closure) Seventyfiveyears ( talk) 15:08, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Could also mean coronavirus disease 2019, CORONA (rocket), etc. I suggest retargeting to Corona (disambiguation). Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:41, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:IOS 15

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restore previous version. signed, Rosguill talk 18:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Implausible redirect. While I get that it is the next version of iOS, it is WP:TOOSOON. PRAHLAD balaji ( M•T•AC) This message was left at 01:12, 12 September 2020 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook