This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 27, 2020.
More redirects with stray "()"
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
wbm1058 (
talk) 20:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
These are all artefacts of a bizarre technique for moving articles. All of these have been the title of the article for between hours and one day (except for
Bzyb River, which was there for two days back in 2016). Implausible as search terms, no meaningful chance of incoming links. –
Uanfala (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete all per nom. Useless and implausible search terms.
CycloneYoris
talk! 01:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete all per nom. Nice job digging these up. -
Eureka Lott 02:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per
WP:RDAB (newly expanded to include such cases). —
Godsy (
TALK
CONT) 02:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete all per everyone above me. We don't need all this junk with empty disambiguators, especially if it isn't written that way in the target. Are there any more such redirects like this? Regards,
SONIC
678 02:30, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom --
Devokewater
(talk) 10:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Transformational ministry
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
A Google search for this phrase suggests it is commonly used for Christian ministry focusing on whole life transformations, this seems to be too narrow of a target.
Hog Farm
Bacon 23:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Michi Saagiig Anishinaabe
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was No consensus/retarget. There is no consensus here but equally no support for the status quo, and as two relists have failed to attract more input it seems unlikely a third relist would be fruitful. Accordingly I'm closing this as no-consensus but retargetting as the softer option.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at the target or the about page of the subject's own website. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed,
Rosguill
talk 18:26, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment appears to be an alternative spelling of the
Anishinaabe language name for the
Mississaugas (i.e. the whole group, not just this one band).
59.149.124.29 (
talk) 00:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Mississaugas. Google searches of these phrases with -wikipedia show some legitimate usage. I think they're mostly referring to the Curve Lake First Nation, but I agree that this seems to be a rendering of "Mississauga Anishinaabe", and if in doubt, it's better to point to the broader topic. --
BDD (
talk) 16:01, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Wug·
a·po·des 22:56, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Garage days revisited
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
The term "Garage Days Revisited" more correctly refers to the B-sides of the Creeping Death single. This is referenced in the article for the current redirect target:
The $5.98 E.P. - Garage Days Re-Revisited. A source would be the website of the Riot Fest punk rock festival:
https://riotfest.org/2018/04/revisiting-garage-days/. I believe that the redirect should be retargeted to the
Creeping Death page.
JJPMaster (
talk) 16:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as the EP is more notable than the origin of the name which is by Metallica anyway. The EP/album should explain the origin of the name though if it hasn't already.
AngusW🐶🐶F (
bark •
sniff) 17:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 19:19, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 21:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Xiao Ding Dang
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 4#Xiao Ding Dang
Baltimore accent ()
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
wbm1058 (
talk) 16:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Empty disambiguator. No incoming mainspace links; page views have been minimal. Delete. Note: this is a {{
r from move}}, but the article was only at this title for less than a day in 2013. -
Eureka Lott 20:23, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Torching paper
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Per author request below.
Hut 8.5 20:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Delete. This is not mentioned on the target article or anywhere else on Wikipedia (or Wiktionary). The exact phrase does get google hits, but almost all are in the sense of setting light to paper, non-English contexts or derived from this redirect, the rest have various other uses and that don't seem to be meaning toilet paper as far as I can tell.
Thryduulf (
talk) 20:14, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Speedy delete I'm not sure what 2009 me was thinking. I think this is a direct translation of the French slang term. Feel free to CSD this, if the option is available.
Acebulf (
talk |
contribs) 20:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Fuck-you-money
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned at target.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (
𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 19:02, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Comment: there is one extant link in an article,
[1] which was added after the redirect was created. I'd be inclined to replace it there with a self-explanatory phrase. –
Fayenatic
London 08:55, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, I'm inclined to agree with 1234qwer. Perhaps we could create
Fuck-you money to redirect to
wikt:fuck-you money if someone really sees the utility of a redirect of this type. --
Tavix (
talk) 17:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 19:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Keep although it isn't mentioned at the target, this is a synonym for financial independence (or rather the amount of money which makes someone financially independent), so the redirect makes sense. There isn't any requirement that a redirect has to be mentioned at the target article, as long as it's a plausible search term, and this definitely is.
Hut 8.5 20:40, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- keep per Hut 8.5.
Hobit (
talk) 22:27, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Paradife loft.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Implausible with a full stop. We already have
Paradife loft without full stop.
Soumya-8974
talk
contribs
subpages 18:06, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Per nom --
intelati
talk 20:48, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep The cover for the original edition, as shown in the article, read "Paradiſe Loſt." –
LaundryPizza03 (
d
c̄) 16:18, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
CycloneYoris
talk! 19:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete, and I'm also about to RFD the other one, which seems clearly to be a joke. –
Roscelese (
talk ⋅
contribs) 00:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete since the version without a full stop exists.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 11:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Burn It All
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 5#Burn It All
Environmental causes
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 5#Environmental causes
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Thames foot tunnel (disambiguation). Per
WP:MALPLACED, redirecting to an existing disambiguation page is unnaceptable, so I'm going to swap the DAB page with "Thames foot tunnel" to make it avoidable. (
non-admin closure) Seventyfiveyears (
talk) 13:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Thames Tunnel is not a foot tunnel anymore, so make sense to retarget to
Tunnels underneath the River Thames, which clearly states which tunnels are foot tunnels
Joseph
2302 (
talk) 16:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed,
Rosguill
talk 17:17, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Veil of Aphrodite
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was Delete.
Ruslik_
Zero 20:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Article no longer mentions the term; target article history suggests that its inclusion was promotional, and thus likely won't be reintroduced.
Vahurzpu (
talk) 15:59, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete It appears that the term "Veil of Aphrodite" was coined by
Mani Menon of the Vattikuti Urology Institute, but I admit a redirect to any article without mentioning the term (the meaning of which is not obvious) is confusing if the article says nothing about it. If Enwiki has nothing, it's better to have no redirect.
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk) 14:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Ideally we should have some content relating to this, but all I've found is a mention at
Anthony J. Costello#Career, but I don't think that's enough to anchor a redirect. I'm hesitant to say per
WP:REDLINK as I don't think there is scope for an article here, but that's the spirit my recommendation is made in.
Thryduulf (
talk) 16:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Baltimoron
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete.
wbm1058 (
talk) 16:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
reply
Known derogatory term for someone from Baltimore with no mention in the target whatsoever.
Jalen Folf
(talk) 02:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - Completely unnecessary, this wouldn't be the right article for it anyway
BlackholeWA (
talk) 15:12, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete seems to be more commonly used as a (derogatory) term for someone from Baltimore, rather than someone with a Baltimore accent. We don't have a suitable target for that.
Hut 8.5 20:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom --
Devokewater
(talk) 20:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.