This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 20, 2019.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 8#Sigma personality
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per
WP:R2 by
Fastily. --
Tavix (
talk)
22:20, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
Mistakenly left a redirect behind when moving a dud article back to draft
scope_creep
Talk
20:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 8#Ali Pur(Punjnad)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 7#466453
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 7#GOOGL (NASDAQ)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. I'm refining to the relevant section. The objection given to these redirects has been addressed. --
BDD (
talk)
02:28, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
reply
The target page does not contain a license.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
14:13, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
-
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:31, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
No list of terms mentioned in article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
14:07, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete per nom. If taken to mean "terms and conditions" (which was not the creator's intent), it could redirect to
YouTube#Community policy, but given just about everything on the internet has terms and conditions, I don't really see much plausibility in this redirect. Anyone search for YouTube's terms and conditions on Google will not be hoping to find the Wikipedia article on YouTube; they'll be looking for YouTube's page on the matter. —
the Man in Question
(in question)
21:00, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 7#YouTubeCanDoBetter
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
Seems like a self promoting redirect that has nothing to do with the target.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
12:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:32, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
Too vague to redirect here.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
12:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete both per nom. While "video manager" and "creator studio" might appear in the target article text, they are not clearly distinct to YouTube. For similar reasons "File Menu" and "Help Menu" should not redirect to articles on particular softwares. -
Ryk72
talk 12:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC) amended
Ryk72
talk
12:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
-
- Appreciate the ping. I've added to my !vote. -
Ryk72
talk
12:55, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Delete both Facebook also launched a Creator Studio so it could become a redirect, but then
MOS:DABMENTION would require it be mentioned in the article, which it doesn't for now. Video manager is also vague, could refer to YouTube, Vimeo, Sametime or any app that does video editing and management. It is also a job title at numerous businesses.
AngusWOOF (
bark •
sniff)
17:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
Not mentioned in article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
12:39, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:XY
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
08:52, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
Delete: it's unclear why a redirect with a
long s is required (or failing that retarget to
Esteem)
Shhhnotsoloud (
talk)
08:45, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. Consensus is that there is a primary topic, rendering disambiguation unnecessary.
(non-admin closure)
ComplexRational (
talk)
16:34, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
Disambiguate both, as their titles can also refer to proper nouns (see
Template:R from proper noun and
Category:Redirects from proper nouns, respectively).
Geolodus (
talk)
08:23, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Comment It's always worth making @
Paine Ellsworth: aware of discussions related to redirect categorisation, and I'd like to hear their take, but I'm leaning towards agreeing with the nomination.
Thryduulf (
talk)
10:12, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as is. In all these years I've never seen any reason to qualify the R from noun template redirect or its category since I've always seen "common noun" to be a sort of primary topic for the term "noun". A "proper noun" is more of a special case for the term, and common nouns are vastly more, well, common.
Paine Ellsworth,
ed.
put'r there
13:43, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- Keep as is. After reading all the above and thinking more on this I realise that "noun" is normally used to mean "common noun" outside specific discussions about language, and the status quo doesn't seem to have caused any issues in the past so changing would involve a lot of work for little gain.
Thryduulf (
talk)
10:37, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Star Wars planets (M-N)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
00:34, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
Implausible redirect, as it uses a categorization scheme that isn't used in the article.
ZXCVBNM (
TALK)
05:46, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 August 7#An acequia