This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 8, 2019.
See WP:CNR. Redirects from mainspace to Project space are normally not desirable, and I don't see the value in keeping this particular one, which a reader (non-editor) would be unlikely to search. funplussmart ( talk) 02:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Change redirect target to Christians. The main meaning of "Christian identity" is not the Christian Identity movement, as a Google Books or Google Scholar search will show. Srnec ( talk) 18:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
No mention in article Abote2 ( talk) 01:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia redirects created in error. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely misspelling of Dam Yisrael Noter, the full Hebrew name of Nakam Catrìona ( talk) 03:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete - target article has nothing to do with redirect. Ajf773 ( talk) 19:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 15#Nokmim
I can't see why speculative philosophy should be redirected to continental philosophy. It is true that post-Kantian continental philosophy tends to be more non-empirical than analytic philosophy, but this has always been true of mainland European philosophy, e.g. with the rationalists Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz (against the British empiricists Locke, Berkeley and Hume), who came before "continental philosophy" in the post-Kantian sense (which is what the continental philosophy article is focusing on; as the article states, 'The history of continental philosophy (taken in its narrower sense) is usually thought to begin with German idealism'). For as long as Anglo-Saxon philosophy has existed, it has tended to be more empirical than mainland European philosophy. Post-Kantian continental philosophy is distinguished both from Anglo-Saxon (including analytic) philosophy and from pre-Kantian mainland European philosophy by things other than being speculative, most notably by its overwhelming adherence to Kant's "Copernican revolution" and its overwhelming rejection of realism. (Admittedly I'm painting in broad brush strokes here.)
Looking at the history of Speculative philosophy, it seems somebody tried to delete it by blanking it in 2010, saying 'del bad redirect', but the page was then changed back by someone saying 'Please do not blank redirects. To delete them, list them at WP:RFD but do not just blank pages.'.
A few pages link to Speculative philosophy - see /info/en/?search=Special:WhatLinksHere/Speculative_philosophy. But I'd be happy to go through those pages and edit them to remove the links and whatnot, and moreover, I had a look at some of the pages and some of the pages seem to illustrate precisely why "speculative philosophy" and "continental philosophy" cannot be taken as synonymous. For example, from Islamic-Jewish relations:
'The 12th century saw the apotheosis of pure philosophy. This supreme exaltation of philosophy was due, in great measure, to Ghazali (1058–1111) among the Arabs, and to Judah ha-Levi (1140) among the Jews. Like Ghazali, Judah ha-Levi took upon himself to free religion from the shackles of speculative philosophy, and to this end wrote the Kuzari, in which he sought to discredit all schools of philosophy alike.'
In this, the phrase 'speculative philosophy' is linked to the page Speculative philosophy.
Another example, from Isaac Watts:
'Throughout Logic, Watts revealed his high conception of logic by stressing the practical side of logic, rather than the speculative side.'
In this, the word 'speculative' is linked to the page Speculative philosophy.
A final example, from Christopher Jacob Boström:
'According to the different kinds of personal beings that are known to us, theoretical philosophy is further divided into speculative theology, speculative ethnology and speculative anthropology; practical philosophy into philosophy of religion, philosophy of law and ethics, corresponding to the terms of the division of theoretical philosophy'
In this, the first occurrence of the word 'speculative' is linked to the page Speculative philosophy.
I think this page should be deleted rather than re-targeted or turned into an article - I can't think of anything better to re-target it to (looking at its history, it was once targeted to Sublation but this was changed back) and I don't think it deserves an article of its own any more than, say, "Abstract philosophy". Matthew Fennell ( talk) 17:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete Misformed foreign language redirect; copied from a non-en wiki's non-article namespace. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 18:07, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Apparently, this page was redirected in 2011 as a result of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Semiprotect. However, as it stands, the redirect does not make sense since the target is not a WikiProject about semi-protection. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete This misformed (space then slash) redirect pollutes the search bar. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 16:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
This is a hardly used name ( 29 views since its creation with few mentions in outside sources) and was previously deleted under WP:R3. ComplexRational ( talk) 19:46, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Propose retargetting to Daniel Farke. It is perfectly acceptable to redirect Farke to the person, as people will search for him by surname, as that is how football players are usually mentioned. Daniel Farke gets 600 views a day, whereas the place is obscure, and only gets 2 views a day, of which only 4 this month have been from Farke redirect. As such, I believe that Daniel Farke is the primary topic for the Farke redirect, and hatnote from Daniel Farke to Farkë would be sufficient Joseph 2302 ( talk) 01:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The target section for this redirect is broken (it should be Arabic diacritics#I‘jām (phonetic distinctions of consonants), but I'm not sure that this section is a suitable target anyway. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete This misformed (plural) soft redirect pollutes the search bar. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 15:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete, title is a typo of Earth food which already exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John a s ( talk • contribs) 14:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Huh? A double negative? Wouldn't this just be a successful birth? — Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs) 06:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete Normally we don't have redirects that include honorifics. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 04:58, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete Section has been deleted, and term does not appear in the target article. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 04:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 17#ALL-CAPS with spaces redirects to Wikipedia:Protection policy
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 22#Parturient
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 8, 2019.
See WP:CNR. Redirects from mainspace to Project space are normally not desirable, and I don't see the value in keeping this particular one, which a reader (non-editor) would be unlikely to search. funplussmart ( talk) 02:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Change redirect target to Christians. The main meaning of "Christian identity" is not the Christian Identity movement, as a Google Books or Google Scholar search will show. Srnec ( talk) 18:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
No mention in article Abote2 ( talk) 01:59, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete Wikipedia:Wikipedia redirects created in error. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 20:31, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely misspelling of Dam Yisrael Noter, the full Hebrew name of Nakam Catrìona ( talk) 03:52, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete - target article has nothing to do with redirect. Ajf773 ( talk) 19:32, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 15#Nokmim
I can't see why speculative philosophy should be redirected to continental philosophy. It is true that post-Kantian continental philosophy tends to be more non-empirical than analytic philosophy, but this has always been true of mainland European philosophy, e.g. with the rationalists Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz (against the British empiricists Locke, Berkeley and Hume), who came before "continental philosophy" in the post-Kantian sense (which is what the continental philosophy article is focusing on; as the article states, 'The history of continental philosophy (taken in its narrower sense) is usually thought to begin with German idealism'). For as long as Anglo-Saxon philosophy has existed, it has tended to be more empirical than mainland European philosophy. Post-Kantian continental philosophy is distinguished both from Anglo-Saxon (including analytic) philosophy and from pre-Kantian mainland European philosophy by things other than being speculative, most notably by its overwhelming adherence to Kant's "Copernican revolution" and its overwhelming rejection of realism. (Admittedly I'm painting in broad brush strokes here.)
Looking at the history of Speculative philosophy, it seems somebody tried to delete it by blanking it in 2010, saying 'del bad redirect', but the page was then changed back by someone saying 'Please do not blank redirects. To delete them, list them at WP:RFD but do not just blank pages.'.
A few pages link to Speculative philosophy - see /info/en/?search=Special:WhatLinksHere/Speculative_philosophy. But I'd be happy to go through those pages and edit them to remove the links and whatnot, and moreover, I had a look at some of the pages and some of the pages seem to illustrate precisely why "speculative philosophy" and "continental philosophy" cannot be taken as synonymous. For example, from Islamic-Jewish relations:
'The 12th century saw the apotheosis of pure philosophy. This supreme exaltation of philosophy was due, in great measure, to Ghazali (1058–1111) among the Arabs, and to Judah ha-Levi (1140) among the Jews. Like Ghazali, Judah ha-Levi took upon himself to free religion from the shackles of speculative philosophy, and to this end wrote the Kuzari, in which he sought to discredit all schools of philosophy alike.'
In this, the phrase 'speculative philosophy' is linked to the page Speculative philosophy.
Another example, from Isaac Watts:
'Throughout Logic, Watts revealed his high conception of logic by stressing the practical side of logic, rather than the speculative side.'
In this, the word 'speculative' is linked to the page Speculative philosophy.
A final example, from Christopher Jacob Boström:
'According to the different kinds of personal beings that are known to us, theoretical philosophy is further divided into speculative theology, speculative ethnology and speculative anthropology; practical philosophy into philosophy of religion, philosophy of law and ethics, corresponding to the terms of the division of theoretical philosophy'
In this, the first occurrence of the word 'speculative' is linked to the page Speculative philosophy.
I think this page should be deleted rather than re-targeted or turned into an article - I can't think of anything better to re-target it to (looking at its history, it was once targeted to Sublation but this was changed back) and I don't think it deserves an article of its own any more than, say, "Abstract philosophy". Matthew Fennell ( talk) 17:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete Misformed foreign language redirect; copied from a non-en wiki's non-article namespace. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 18:07, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Apparently, this page was redirected in 2011 as a result of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Semiprotect. However, as it stands, the redirect does not make sense since the target is not a WikiProject about semi-protection. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:00, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete This misformed (space then slash) redirect pollutes the search bar. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 16:43, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
This is a hardly used name ( 29 views since its creation with few mentions in outside sources) and was previously deleted under WP:R3. ComplexRational ( talk) 19:46, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Propose retargetting to Daniel Farke. It is perfectly acceptable to redirect Farke to the person, as people will search for him by surname, as that is how football players are usually mentioned. Daniel Farke gets 600 views a day, whereas the place is obscure, and only gets 2 views a day, of which only 4 this month have been from Farke redirect. As such, I believe that Daniel Farke is the primary topic for the Farke redirect, and hatnote from Daniel Farke to Farkë would be sufficient Joseph 2302 ( talk) 01:36, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
The target section for this redirect is broken (it should be Arabic diacritics#I‘jām (phonetic distinctions of consonants), but I'm not sure that this section is a suitable target anyway. Shhhnotsoloud ( talk) 08:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete This misformed (plural) soft redirect pollutes the search bar. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 15:37, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete, title is a typo of Earth food which already exists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by John a s ( talk • contribs) 14:13, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Huh? A double negative? Wouldn't this just be a successful birth? — Mr. Guye ( talk) ( contribs) 06:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete Normally we don't have redirects that include honorifics. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 04:58, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete Section has been deleted, and term does not appear in the target article. UnitedStatesian ( talk) 04:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 17#ALL-CAPS with spaces redirects to Wikipedia:Protection policy
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 22#Parturient