From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 5, 2018.

Vaas Montenegro

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 12#Vaas Montenegro

Harry Randall Truman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix ( talk) 17:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Implausible redirect when the subject did not know his own middle name. Should be deleted as speculative at best. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 20:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  • So this is awkward. I found a number of sources for "Randall," but it looks like we may have a case of citogenesis here. (Funny, given that the word "citogenesis" was coined by Randall Munroe.) Basically, for years, this article referred to him as "Harry Randall Truman", without any source attesting to the middle name. In that time, USA Today picked it up, as did Find A Grave and even the book Caesar's Last Breath by Sam Kean. While it's a shame that an error on here had such widespread effects, I think we have no choice but to keep this redirect as an {{ r from incorrect name}} due to its widespread use. It may also be a good idea to change the clause in the article about his middle name to something like While some non-contemporaneous sources have given his middle name as Randall, Truman stated that he did not know his middle name, but rather just the initial, R.—  PinkAmpers & (Je vous invite à me parler) 00:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - The error didn't start here. Harry Randall Truman was adopted based on the Find a Grave site; I only recently changed the article name to Harry R. Truman. Therefore, I don't think it should be deleted, because it may well be a correct name, but there are no reliable sources that support Randall as his middle name. I hope that clarifies the situation. ceran thor 04:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • USA Today is overall a credible publication (not as sure about the Sam Kean book), but if he really didn't know what his middle name was after all, then it would help to have a note like PinkAmpersand suggested should the redirect be kept. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 04:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:GuldbaggeAwardBestActor 2011–2030

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Unused and unlikely to be used again. Magioladitis ( talk) 19:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Free Software Lawsuits

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Was an article before it was redirected, target does not contain adequate content, hence the redirect is unhelpful. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 09:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Urheberrecht

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

WP:RFOREIGN, not an especially German-related topic. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 09:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Copyrights and related rights

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

WP:XY, also vague as to what "related" means. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 09:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete both. Implausible search terms.—  PinkAmpers & (Je vous invite à me parler) 01:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Redirect / Delete - No article there, either redirect or delete fine. Jonpatterns ( talk) 10:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tropical Storm Israel

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 13#Tropical Storm Israel

Gembaku

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 13#Gembaku

Abhilash Pudukad

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 14#Abhilash Pudukad

Disinfomedia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fake news websites in the United States#Jestin Coler. If further consensus is desired, I would be more than happy to reopen & relist, just drop me a line on my talk page (all I ask is that you please be civil) (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 03:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

This term is not mentioned in the article. This would more likely refer to fake news in general. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 20:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk) 03:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spider Ball

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article. Unnecessary redirect - delete. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

X-Ray Visor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Far too vague to redirect to Metroid. Should be deleted and let the search function do its job. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

X-Ray Scope

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 12#X-Ray Scope

Metroid creatures

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 12#Metroid creatures

Ice Beam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Another Pokemon attack that is far too vague to redirect to Metroid. Should be deleted and let the search function do its job. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hyper Beam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

If I recall this is a Pokemon attack too. Far too vague to redirect to Metroid, should be deleted and let search function do its job. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shock Coil

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Way too vague to be a pertinent redirect, and not mentioned in target article. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Force Ball

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. (Isn't the Force Ball like Jedi prom?) -- BDD ( talk) 21:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

A variant of the Metroid item Morph Ball, but way too vague to be a pertinent redirect. Not mentioned in target article either. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Creatures in the Metroid series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restored version and sent to AfD per consensus. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 03:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Article arguably does not pertain to the topic of the target article, which only has some creatures and does not claim to be a list of them. Any history in the redirect is purely fancruft and has since been transwikied. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Metroid bosses

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 17:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete per WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. The target article has some bosses but does not claim to be a list of them. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Items in the Metroid series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was version restored and sending over to AfD per consensus. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 02:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Target page does not pertain to the topic of the redirect. Unnecessary/fancruft, merits deletion. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vhozon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in the target article anymore. Merits deletion. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rezbit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
All prior XfDs for this page:


Not mentioned in the target article anymore. Merits deletion. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete I agree with the nominator, deletion is merited as the target does not mention the redirect anymore. If the information were re-added to the article, I would not see any issue with the redirect being restored. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:00, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Autrack

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article anymore. Merits deletion. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Czech:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. SNOW close, pointless redirects. Tone 09:32, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Nonsense redirects created by a now-blocked user, not CSD eligible, but seems like a case of WP:SNOW to me. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Korstanje, Maximiliano E.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 21:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Improbable search term. Guy ( Help!) 21:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since #Korstanje, M. E. was relisted, I felt it would be good to do so with this case.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 00:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Korstanje, M. E.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Korstanje, M. E. is a potentially viable search term that may be sought by outside searches and is within the style that many printed encyclopedias use. Having a redirect to this version of the name may prove beneficial/useful in the future. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this close, please do let me know on my talk page (and please be civil). (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Improbable search term Guy ( Help!) 21:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Dear Guy, May I say au contraire. Korstanje, M. E. - Google Search yields results for books and articles where that's the nomenclature ie "surname, name and/or initial". It makes it easier for indexing and for a future print index; "{{R from sort name}}" is added to such redirects. Granted wikipedia at present doesn't have any articles that contain "Korstanje, M. E." but outside searches are a possibility. Similar applies to "Korstanje, Maximiliano E.". "Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje" yields more results on Google.

I've been through this with other redirects I've made. The consensus is keep in those cases. eg discussion to address the redirect Stromboulopoulos, George All the best. DadaNeem ( talk) 00:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi PamD. Excuse me but what do you mean by "Wikipedia does not use surname-first format"? DadaNeem ( talk) 03:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply
I mean just that: Wikipedia does not use "Smith, John" as an article title although many printed encyclopedias would do so. It does not in general provide a redirect from that version to "John Smith". But I now see that there are some 80k redirects of this sort - though only a tiny proportion of all biographical articles - so it's not worth the bother of fighting here against the existence of these two, although I still consider them totally unnecessary and mildly unhelpful (in that they might encourage a reader or editor to start to expect to find an article or link at this inverted form instead of using the standard Wikipedia form of "forename surname"). On the other hand I do believe that it's useful, even important, to provide redirects from every plausible version of a person's non-inverted name, such as the redirect from Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje: I create a lot of these, and it's pleasing how often they manage to turn an existing redlink blue, perhaps in a list of award-winners where people are listed with their formal full names. They also make it less likely that a future editor will accidentally create a duplicate article at a plausible alternative name. Pam D 09:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 00:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as a fairly standard {{ R from sort name}}: these don't yet exist for every biography but new ones get constantly created and it's likely that we will eventually catch up. This is is one of the things that I've heard wikipedia actually getting praised for. – Uanfala (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Hence Hawking, S. W.. Oh, wait, that's a redlink. Actually I think Wikidata sorts this in the end. Guy ( Help!) 10:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. It appears reasonable that a full name of an individual would be useful as it could very well be a viable search term. (For example, Michael Philip Jagger redirects to Mick Jagger, Taylor Alison Swift redirects to Taylor Swift etc). I do not see much sense in deleting this redirect as it currently stands. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Improbable search term Guy ( Help!) 21:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 00:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Prod was removed by Ammarpad. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 5

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 5, 2018.

Vaas Montenegro

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 12#Vaas Montenegro

Harry Randall Truman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix ( talk) 17:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Implausible redirect when the subject did not know his own middle name. Should be deleted as speculative at best. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 20:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  • So this is awkward. I found a number of sources for "Randall," but it looks like we may have a case of citogenesis here. (Funny, given that the word "citogenesis" was coined by Randall Munroe.) Basically, for years, this article referred to him as "Harry Randall Truman", without any source attesting to the middle name. In that time, USA Today picked it up, as did Find A Grave and even the book Caesar's Last Breath by Sam Kean. While it's a shame that an error on here had such widespread effects, I think we have no choice but to keep this redirect as an {{ r from incorrect name}} due to its widespread use. It may also be a good idea to change the clause in the article about his middle name to something like While some non-contemporaneous sources have given his middle name as Randall, Truman stated that he did not know his middle name, but rather just the initial, R.—  PinkAmpers & (Je vous invite à me parler) 00:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - The error didn't start here. Harry Randall Truman was adopted based on the Find a Grave site; I only recently changed the article name to Harry R. Truman. Therefore, I don't think it should be deleted, because it may well be a correct name, but there are no reliable sources that support Randall as his middle name. I hope that clarifies the situation. ceran thor 04:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • USA Today is overall a credible publication (not as sure about the Sam Kean book), but if he really didn't know what his middle name was after all, then it would help to have a note like PinkAmpersand suggested should the redirect be kept. Snuggums ( talk / edits) 04:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:GuldbaggeAwardBestActor 2011–2030

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 22:01, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Unused and unlikely to be used again. Magioladitis ( talk) 19:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Free Software Lawsuits

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:59, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Was an article before it was redirected, target does not contain adequate content, hence the redirect is unhelpful. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 09:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Urheberrecht

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

WP:RFOREIGN, not an especially German-related topic. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 09:43, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Copyrights and related rights

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

WP:XY, also vague as to what "related" means. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 09:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete both. Implausible search terms.—  PinkAmpers & (Je vous invite à me parler) 01:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Redirect / Delete - No article there, either redirect or delete fine. Jonpatterns ( talk) 10:46, 7 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Tropical Storm Israel

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 13#Tropical Storm Israel

Gembaku

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 13#Gembaku

Abhilash Pudukad

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 14#Abhilash Pudukad

Disinfomedia

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Fake news websites in the United States#Jestin Coler. If further consensus is desired, I would be more than happy to reopen & relist, just drop me a line on my talk page (all I ask is that you please be civil) (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 03:59, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

This term is not mentioned in the article. This would more likely refer to fake news in general. LaundryPizza03 ( talk) 20:58, 27 December 2017 (UTC) reply

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk) 03:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Spider Ball

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article. Unnecessary redirect - delete. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

X-Ray Visor

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Far too vague to redirect to Metroid. Should be deleted and let the search function do its job. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:42, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

X-Ray Scope

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 12#X-Ray Scope

Metroid creatures

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 January 12#Metroid creatures

Ice Beam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Another Pokemon attack that is far too vague to redirect to Metroid. Should be deleted and let the search function do its job. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hyper Beam

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:45, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

If I recall this is a Pokemon attack too. Far too vague to redirect to Metroid, should be deleted and let search function do its job. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:36, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shock Coil

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:44, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Way too vague to be a pertinent redirect, and not mentioned in target article. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Force Ball

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. (Isn't the Force Ball like Jedi prom?) -- BDD ( talk) 21:41, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

A variant of the Metroid item Morph Ball, but way too vague to be a pertinent redirect. Not mentioned in target article either. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Creatures in the Metroid series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restored version and sent to AfD per consensus. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 03:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Article arguably does not pertain to the topic of the target article, which only has some creatures and does not claim to be a list of them. Any history in the redirect is purely fancruft and has since been transwikied. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:26, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Metroid bosses

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 17:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Delete per WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. The target article has some bosses but does not claim to be a list of them. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Items in the Metroid series

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was version restored and sending over to AfD per consensus. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 02:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Target page does not pertain to the topic of the redirect. Unnecessary/fancruft, merits deletion. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:21, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Vhozon

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Killiondude ( talk) 23:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in the target article anymore. Merits deletion. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Rezbit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply
All prior XfDs for this page:


Not mentioned in the target article anymore. Merits deletion. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

  • Delete I agree with the nominator, deletion is merited as the target does not mention the redirect anymore. If the information were re-added to the article, I would not see any issue with the redirect being restored. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:00, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Autrack

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 21:39, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Not mentioned in target article anymore. Merits deletion. ZXCVBNM ( TALK) 02:16, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Czech:

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. SNOW close, pointless redirects. Tone 09:32, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Nonsense redirects created by a now-blocked user, not CSD eligible, but seems like a case of WP:SNOW to me. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:01, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Korstanje, Maximiliano E.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 21:23, 12 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Improbable search term. Guy ( Help!) 21:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since #Korstanje, M. E. was relisted, I felt it would be good to do so with this case.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 00:13, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Korstanje, M. E.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Korstanje, M. E. is a potentially viable search term that may be sought by outside searches and is within the style that many printed encyclopedias use. Having a redirect to this version of the name may prove beneficial/useful in the future. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this close, please do let me know on my talk page (and please be civil). (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:38, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Improbable search term Guy ( Help!) 21:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Dear Guy, May I say au contraire. Korstanje, M. E. - Google Search yields results for books and articles where that's the nomenclature ie "surname, name and/or initial". It makes it easier for indexing and for a future print index; "{{R from sort name}}" is added to such redirects. Granted wikipedia at present doesn't have any articles that contain "Korstanje, M. E." but outside searches are a possibility. Similar applies to "Korstanje, Maximiliano E.". "Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje" yields more results on Google.

I've been through this with other redirects I've made. The consensus is keep in those cases. eg discussion to address the redirect Stromboulopoulos, George All the best. DadaNeem ( talk) 00:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Hi PamD. Excuse me but what do you mean by "Wikipedia does not use surname-first format"? DadaNeem ( talk) 03:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply
I mean just that: Wikipedia does not use "Smith, John" as an article title although many printed encyclopedias would do so. It does not in general provide a redirect from that version to "John Smith". But I now see that there are some 80k redirects of this sort - though only a tiny proportion of all biographical articles - so it's not worth the bother of fighting here against the existence of these two, although I still consider them totally unnecessary and mildly unhelpful (in that they might encourage a reader or editor to start to expect to find an article or link at this inverted form instead of using the standard Wikipedia form of "forename surname"). On the other hand I do believe that it's useful, even important, to provide redirects from every plausible version of a person's non-inverted name, such as the redirect from Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje: I create a lot of these, and it's pleasing how often they manage to turn an existing redlink blue, perhaps in a list of award-winners where people are listed with their formal full names. They also make it less likely that a future editor will accidentally create a duplicate article at a plausible alternative name. Pam D 09:17, 29 December 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 00:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
  • Keep as a fairly standard {{ R from sort name}}: these don't yet exist for every biography but new ones get constantly created and it's likely that we will eventually catch up. This is is one of the things that I've heard wikipedia actually getting praised for. – Uanfala (talk) 14:45, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Hence Hawking, S. W.. Oh, wait, that's a redlink. Actually I think Wikidata sorts this in the end. Guy ( Help!) 10:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Maximiliano Emanuel Korstanje

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. It appears reasonable that a full name of an individual would be useful as it could very well be a viable search term. (For example, Michael Philip Jagger redirects to Mick Jagger, Taylor Alison Swift redirects to Taylor Swift etc). I do not see much sense in deleting this redirect as it currently stands. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply

Improbable search term Guy ( Help!) 21:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude ( talk) 00:10, 5 January 2018 (UTC) reply
Prod was removed by Ammarpad. -- TheSandDoctor ( talk) 04:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook