This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 26, 2016.
Not a valid alternative spelling. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 23:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
R from incorrect spelling}}
, with which I have just marked it.
Si Trew (
talk) 10:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)A redirect, with one incoming link, to a DAB page on which there is no relevant entry other than a circular link. I suggest deletion to turn the links red, or the article will never get written. Narky Blert ( talk) 22:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Round-cornered table tennis tables do exist, but there's not much to say about them, and in particular the target article says nothing. A reader searching for rounded tables specifically will be misled and disappointed; a reader who isn't searching for that style of table specifically will simply search "table tennis". 64.105.98.115 ( talk) 21:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Weak delete. According to the section, it's sometimes called a BTA drill, but the caps here is wrong, and that's red... Si Trew ( talk) 18:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete both, WP:RFD#D2 confusing. No mention of drag at the target. Si Trew ( talk) 18:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete as WP:RFOREIGN. No particular affinity to German; WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. An article exists at de:Forstnerbohrer (which IW's to Drill bit#Forstner bits, not via this redirect: that's done the old-fashioned way and not via Wikidata). Si Trew ( talk) 18:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 3
Delete as WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target (nor at its previous target, Non-denominational Muslim). Si Trew ( talk) 01:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 9#Muslimites
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 9#Wikipedia:FILMOGRAPHY
No affinity for German. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Not linked from anywhere, not plausible for a typo. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 3#Caroline Scott
Per all the other similar redirects, (I can't seem to find that nomination now). - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
These whole lot of redirects are very inconsistent with one another for some are WikiProjects, others redirecting to a template on the topics, yet others to administrative divisions, and worst of all, some point to a template about a narrow and certain topic about the country, thus, these should all be deleted. PS, some of the entries at the list I have at User:Champion/Template:(country)_redirects are actually templates rather than redirects, so I'm not sure what to do with them, anyway, they are beyond the scope of RFD. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
Anchor}}
to create anchors for the removed redundant headings if you don't want to manually update the "straggler" RfD notices to point to the combined section. This will obviate any perceived need to add redundant support/oppose comments to each of the sections above. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 01:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Foo}}
was a standardized wikiproject banner naming convention, after the invention of navboxes, during the creation and spread of ISO country code templates, and on). It's routine for our namespace issues to be cleaned up toward consistency without begging buy-in from particular special interests.If you invite commentary from 100+ country wikiprojects, as input that is somehow especially sought over that of Wikipedians who actually focus on template and redirect naming as a systematic matter, it's very likely to be unhelpful. Many wikiprojects consist of only 1–3 active editors (if that), often resistant to anyone messing with "their" pages, so we'd probably get a boatload of unproductive bickering. This is not a country-related matter; it's simply coincidental that this batch of messy template redirects happened to be about countries (the next one could be about something radically different). This is a namespace cleanup and template logistics and infrastructure matter, like many multi-redir noms are, and as we commonly see at CfD and other venues where internal page naming consistency arises frequently. That's an all-Wikipedia issue, not a "will parochial wikiprojects, that often have scope-overreach and proprietary-behavior problems, all agree with each other and will that voting bloc in turn agree with everyone else?" matter. PS: I say all that as founder and co-founder of numerous wikiprojects; I'm simply aware of their limitations and territorial tendencies, especially when they're geographical, ethnic, or linguistic in scope. It's no accident that a high percentage of ArbCom cases are centered on politco-cultural topics.
—
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 04:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 26, 2016.
Not a valid alternative spelling. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 23:28, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
R from incorrect spelling}}
, with which I have just marked it.
Si Trew (
talk) 10:08, 27 November 2016 (UTC)A redirect, with one incoming link, to a DAB page on which there is no relevant entry other than a circular link. I suggest deletion to turn the links red, or the article will never get written. Narky Blert ( talk) 22:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Round-cornered table tennis tables do exist, but there's not much to say about them, and in particular the target article says nothing. A reader searching for rounded tables specifically will be misled and disappointed; a reader who isn't searching for that style of table specifically will simply search "table tennis". 64.105.98.115 ( talk) 21:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Weak delete. According to the section, it's sometimes called a BTA drill, but the caps here is wrong, and that's red... Si Trew ( talk) 18:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete both, WP:RFD#D2 confusing. No mention of drag at the target. Si Trew ( talk) 18:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Delete as WP:RFOREIGN. No particular affinity to German; WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target. An article exists at de:Forstnerbohrer (which IW's to Drill bit#Forstner bits, not via this redirect: that's done the old-fashioned way and not via Wikidata). Si Trew ( talk) 18:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 3
Delete as WP:RFD#D2 confusing, not at target (nor at its previous target, Non-denominational Muslim). Si Trew ( talk) 01:50, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 9#Muslimites
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 9#Wikipedia:FILMOGRAPHY
No affinity for German. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:24, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Not linked from anywhere, not plausible for a typo. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:22, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 December 3#Caroline Scott
Per all the other similar redirects, (I can't seem to find that nomination now). - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 02:08, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
These whole lot of redirects are very inconsistent with one another for some are WikiProjects, others redirecting to a template on the topics, yet others to administrative divisions, and worst of all, some point to a template about a narrow and certain topic about the country, thus, these should all be deleted. PS, some of the entries at the list I have at User:Champion/Template:(country)_redirects are actually templates rather than redirects, so I'm not sure what to do with them, anyway, they are beyond the scope of RFD. - CHAMPION ( talk) ( contributions) ( logs) 00:35, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{
Anchor}}
to create anchors for the removed redundant headings if you don't want to manually update the "straggler" RfD notices to point to the combined section. This will obviate any perceived need to add redundant support/oppose comments to each of the sections above. —
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 01:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
{{WikiProject Foo}}
was a standardized wikiproject banner naming convention, after the invention of navboxes, during the creation and spread of ISO country code templates, and on). It's routine for our namespace issues to be cleaned up toward consistency without begging buy-in from particular special interests.If you invite commentary from 100+ country wikiprojects, as input that is somehow especially sought over that of Wikipedians who actually focus on template and redirect naming as a systematic matter, it's very likely to be unhelpful. Many wikiprojects consist of only 1–3 active editors (if that), often resistant to anyone messing with "their" pages, so we'd probably get a boatload of unproductive bickering. This is not a country-related matter; it's simply coincidental that this batch of messy template redirects happened to be about countries (the next one could be about something radically different). This is a namespace cleanup and template logistics and infrastructure matter, like many multi-redir noms are, and as we commonly see at CfD and other venues where internal page naming consistency arises frequently. That's an all-Wikipedia issue, not a "will parochial wikiprojects, that often have scope-overreach and proprietary-behavior problems, all agree with each other and will that voting bloc in turn agree with everyone else?" matter. PS: I say all that as founder and co-founder of numerous wikiprojects; I'm simply aware of their limitations and territorial tendencies, especially when they're geographical, ethnic, or linguistic in scope. It's no accident that a high percentage of ArbCom cases are centered on politco-cultural topics.
—
SMcCandlish ☺
☏
¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 04:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)