Home • Search • Translate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 20

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 20, 2016.

Star fox wii

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Star Fox Zero#Development. -- BDD ( talk) 17:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

There was apparently not a Star Fox game released for the Wii, making this redirect somewhat misleading. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • That actually seems like rationale to delete the redirect per WP:REDLINK, unless it is mentioned and identified in an article, then the redirect could be retargeted there so that readers can find the information they are looking for rather than no information about the subject. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

کریولیس

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was 'delete.'---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Originally an article in Persian about the Coriolis force uploaded by a one-edit account more than six years ago, this foreign-language redirect serves no purpose and should be deleted. — Gorthian ( talk) 22:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dry wash

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move Dry wash (disambiguation) over redirect. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Re-targeting to Dry wash (disambiguation). The target article doesn't use the phrase "dry wash", and the disambiguation page offers the term "waterless car wash", which itself redirects to car wash. Alternately, re-target to arroyo (creek) which does use the term "dry wash" and add an Other Uses there. Morfusmax ( talk) 22:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wavedashing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 16:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. A redirect at this title was nominated at RfD in the past and deleted, but before, it targeted a different subject. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry that you are not following WP:AGF. It was made in good faith. It is a likely search term. Cheers. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 23:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
I'll have to respectfully disagree with your first part of your statement, given the tone of the comment on SSTflyer's talk page, as well as the tone in the comment above (specifically the sentence Live with it.). Either way, "likely" search terms are only helpful if the term is either identified and defined at the target page, or if the search term is a likely alternative name or spelling variation for the alternative name (and the alternative name is mentioned on the target page.) This redirect currently meets neither of these criteria. In fact, the section which the redirect targets, Bunny hopping#Wave, currently doesn't exist. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
That, and "wavedashing" and " bunny hopping" (as defined in the article) are not the same thing. "bunny hopping" involves jumping; "wavedashing" involves somersaults or "somersault-like" movements. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I created this redirect 3 April 2015 at the same day I put in the anchor it pointed to: special:diff/654728147

The anchor was removed at some point during the last 14 months. Not sure exactly when or by whom. I would like to keep the redirect up and restore the information.

Patar knight the redirect was and.can be useful again. It is more useful to build a section on a bigger concept page and later split it off. Expecting a perfect article out of scratch on such an obscure topic is not realistic. I will take it was a redirect with possibilities. I will restore the lost section and feel.free to nominate it via the split section temate if you think it grows large enough to merit it's own page. Ranze ( talk) 08:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply

It's still rather confusing and unsourced, but at least it's there for someone to expand. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Menu 1

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

This is a name of a song used in multiple Super Smash Bros. series games. However, the subject of the redirect is not mentioned in the target article or the aforementioned series article. If there is a retargeting option, it would probably be Super Smash Bros.#Music, but the subject of the redirect is not mentioned there either. Without a specific mention, the title of this redirect makes it a vague search term. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Wow, seems as though I nominated this about a year and a half ago, but then changed my mind. Interesting how time helps form different opinions. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stages in Super Smash Bros. Melee

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 5#Stages in Super Smash Bros. Melee

Blast-Line

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 1#Blast-Line

Super Smash Bros. Melee's Debug Menu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 16:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The subject of the redirect is not mentioned or identified in the target article. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:38, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokémon Appearances in Super Smash Bros.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 2#Pokémon Appearances in Super Smash Bros.

L-canceling

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 16:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I believe this redirect refers to cancelling performing a move in the game by blocking. Anyways, WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ridley is too big

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 16:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Does this qualify for a WP:CSD? The redirect refers to Ridley (Metroid), but the redirect is an obvious WP:NPOV issue. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
It's a meme that refers to an common issue among fants that IGN saw fit to conduct an interview the creative director of the series with. This is definitely a plausible redirect and it should go to Ridley_(Metroid)#In_other_media, where this information is discussed and sourced. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 03:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Smash bros hd

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

These terms seem to not refer to any specific game in the Super Smash Bros. series. The only game in the series that is compatible with HD is Super Smash Bros. for Wii U, but the redirects were never an official name for the subject. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Heh, then any video game could be HD by that definition. Wait until there's something that has the title and HD before associating this, as with Final Fantasy Type-0 HD AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 22:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply
It could be. I wouldn't object to keeping them as long as they're not outright mistargeted (e.g. "GAME HD" exists as an article but a variant of it points to "GAME (series)"). it seems that if readers are looking for an HD version, by going to the series page, they can see that no such game exists, or click through to individual game articles and look at development/sequel/remake sections. Since what readers are looking for is clear, we should direct them to the place with that information. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paternity (Biology and Medicine)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

This seems like an implausible search term, and I'm also afraid it could be misleading as well. The article discusses paternity in biology, but I'm not so sure about the "medicine" part; the word is only mentioned once in the article, and for an unrelated reason. -- Tavix ( talk) 19:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SSBW

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 14:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Apparently, this acronym is supposed to stand for "Super Smash Bros: War", but what that subject is itself is unclear and unreferenced. Most searches on search engines for "Super Smash Bros: War" return results for a fan-made game that is not the redirect's target ( WP:NOTWIKIA), and most searches for "SSBW" return Twitter hashtag results hinting that this acronym has some sort of similar meaning to BBW, specifically Big Beautiful Woman. Also, the following redirects do not exist: Super Smash Bros: War, Super Smash Bros War, SSB:W, etc. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • I suppose the redirect stands for "Super Smash Bros. Wii".-- Prisencolin ( talk) 20:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super smash division

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The target page doesn't identify what a "division" is, and neither does Super Smash Bros., the series article. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Smash Bros. Brawl secrets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 14:58, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Such a list of "secrets" does not exist at the target article. And if it did, the list would probably fail WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cook Kirby

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 1#Cook Kirby

San Angelo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Interesting that it took so long to get that hatnote up. Sant' and Santo Ângelo lead towards the big side of small details, I suppose. Though there was another hatnote there for a long time:
For the fortress in Rome, Italy, see Castel Sant'Angelo. wbm1058 ( talk) 13:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Since this redirect has existed since 2004, the current situation may be correct, but I'm not completely sure. I recently discovered the disambiguation page Sant'Angelo, and it seems that several of the subjects listed on this disambiguation page could be referred to as "San Angelo" as an English transliteration. With that being said, the current situation makes me wonder if it is actually not a WP:WORLDWIDE view and needs to be "fixed" to remove any possible systemic bias. So, is the current situation correct (which means that the target page may need to be moved over the redirect as a primary topic and essentially the only topic spelled like this), should the redirect be retargeted to Sant'Angelo or is there another option that may be more plausible? Steel1943 ( talk) 16:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3 CD Collector's Set (Rihanna album

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was 'delete.'---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

This would have been a reasonable {{ R to list entry}}. Note the lack of a closing parenthesis. SST flyer 16:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Drug house

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move target as proposed by Tavix. (closed by a page mover) SST flyer 08:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Not all drug houses are crack houses. Is there a better target out there in the world? I think this could potentially be a viable topic for an article too. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 15:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Comment Not all drug houses are crack houses — is there some other use of the term "drug house" I'm missing (aside from the unintentionally hilarious WP:PTM Drug Houses of Australia)? As far as I can see, "drug house" isn't a supertopic of "crack house" but simply an alternative, less common name; crack house itself notes that the term isn't literally limited to crack ("illegal drugs, including crack cocaine"). 210.6.254.106 ( talk) 16:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
I don't think it's accurate to use the term "crack house" as a metonymous definition for any house at which any drug is bought, sold, consumed, or produced. The term "crack house" has a rather complex history in the United States, and it is often used pejoratively (often with racist connotations). Another option would be to move the current article at crack house to drug house (over the redirect) and make the article about drug houses in general. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 16:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
It really depends on what the most notable term is. If that's crack house then use that and alias the others to this one, listing and bolding them in the lead. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 19:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The term "crack house" is ubiquitous, but it is not the preferred term when referring to locations that involve drugs other than crack. Indeed, "drug house" is the preferred term for the BBC, New York Times, U.S. Supreme Court, state supreme courts, and state narcotics agencies. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 20:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Assault weapons legislation

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 6#Assault weapons legislation

Everybody Dies Young

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 16:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

For instance, the album That's Why God Made the Radio's first song is Think About the Days. No redirect. The next two songs have articles while Spring Vacation , or more correctly spring vacation, is a redirect, but to spring break. Other Bach Boys' songs are redirects but only because editors created articles for them and they were not sufficiently notable. I have never seen this sort of behaviour before and would not like it to continue. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Redirects are cheap. What's the issue? VQuakr ( talk) 08:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
On the face of it, there's no issue with keeping the redirects. But what happens if at some point in the future an artist releases another song titled "Everybody Dies Young" and it becomes a huge global hit, and becomes the unambiguous primary topic on Wikipedia? Do we then need to create a disambiguation for the redirect, when almost certainly everybody will be searching for the big hit by the same name? Richard3120 ( talk) 09:29, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Do we then need to create a disambiguation for the redirect Nope, per WP:TWODABS you wouldn't need a disambiguation page in that case. You'd just overwrite the redirect with an article about the notable song, with a {{ for}} hatnote to the non-notable song. 210.6.254.106 ( talk) 11:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yet PC78 ( talk · contribs) is making that exact argument at Talk:Where the Light Gets In (album)#Requested move 18 June 2016
And redirects are costly. And so the issue is that we do not create articles for every song name. There is no policy to do so. There is no guideline to do so. Just because an editor has done so for a while doe not mean it should continue. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 13:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Irresponsible? Oy... -- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Quite irresponsible! As I stated, if this had been an empty article stating
"Everybody Dies Young" is a song off ...
and that went to a speedy, no redirect would have been left.
If that speedy was contested and it went to a PROD, no redirect would have been left.
If that PROD was contested and it went to an AfD, no redirect would have been left.
Why? Because it's not a likely search term. So why is it responsible to circumvent that and simply create redirects for unlikely search terms? If the song had charted, it might be a likely search term, but this is not a responsible action. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
You are very worked up about these redirects, which are harmless and helpful to the project. I'm going to move on to other tasks now, so we'll see how this plays out. But I see no harm in creating these redirects and wish you would stop calling me irresponsible. Take care. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
They are neither helpful nor harmless. I would call any editor who created a redirect for an unlikely search terms irresponsible. Don't take it personally. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Just because you may not search for the term does not mean someone else won't. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Just because you think that someone else will use it as a search term doesn't mean that they will. Could you please provide metrics to support that previously created redirects have been used at least once a month? Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
No, I am moving on to other tasks. I've spent too much time on this already. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry. I didn't mean to task you with something like this. It was simply a request to show that people are using your redirects as a search terms. Without empirical proof to support your claim, they should be deleted. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Another Believer, I'm not sure it is helpful to the project: they seem to be creating a solution for a demand that doesn't exist. It's very unlikely anybody is looking for a non-notable album track on Wikipedia, and they are even less likely to try several possible spellings or disambiguators to find it, especially if the first one they try redirects to the album they are looking for. You're also implying that the song passes WP:NSONGS because it's worthy of keeping as a redirect. Why not simply delete the article? Richard3120 ( talk) 14:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete The only notable song on this album is "American Country Love Song". The album hasn't even been released (July 29, 2016). If others get released as singles and garner significant airplay and reviews then you can add back. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I note the creator also created a redirect for Everybody Dies Young (Jake Owen song), so we have two redirects for the same song. At this stage it is no longer an editor considering what redirects are necessary (i.e. a WP function), but somebody title grabbing for an artist (a marketing function). As song titles are used over and over again, as noted by Notecardforfree this means redirects are not as cheap as we think, nor does primarytopic or concise work as well and clearly as some would have us beleive- after all this redirect might actually be PT, but we have no information whatsoever other than a track listing. Again hard for some to comprehend, but we do song articles, not articles about recordings of songs. Walter Görlitz makes an argument that redirects should only be created via AfD/Prod process, but there are problems with that because it is patently clear we should have a redirect at William Clinton.
It becomes clear that mere existence is not worthy of a redirect, otherwise we can create redirects for all our friends, neighbours, family, or every song in our record collection and that creates a problem that needs addressing.
In the meantime all the redirects below should also be deleted, unless somebody can prove that one or two have some kind of separate notability yet still fails WP:NSONGS. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 08:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
That's not my argument. There are many valid reasons to create redirects or to turn articles into redirects that do not require a discussion. I don't believe that all songs on an album need to have redirects, only those that are likely to be search terms. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry, Walter Görlitz I interpreted your words above, "Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching..." as meaning don't create redirects. My point is not to object to you, but to find a way forward to stop wholesale creation of redirects, without affecting the day to day necessity for redirects. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 16:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
I see. Yes. It should probably have read "when redirects are created as part of an AfD or similar deletion process" as it's reasonable to create redirects without a deletion process. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 20:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Love (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to American Love (disambiguation).---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Comment Please note that Another Believer has recently created redirects for all the tracks on American Love and other albums. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Retarget to the DAB page now that it is there and covers multiple songs with the same title. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

After Midnight (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

A Burning Soul (song)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 5#A Burning Soul (song)

Bad Talkers (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure)

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

An Island (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Island (disambiguation)#Music. Note that I've merged An Island there, as it only had two entries, one of which was already at the larger dab. -- BDD ( talk) 16:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Tavix: Looking at this again, Chevelle (band) released a song called "An Island" [6], so a making a DAB at Tavix's suggested location ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 21:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)page might be best here. Others songs mentioned by Notecardforfree above can be added to the page in a see also section if people want. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 21:33, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks for double checking, Patar knight. Changing my !vote accordingly. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:46, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Update: I've created the disambiguation page, although now I'm wondering if it should be merged to Island (disambiguation). I was wondering if I could find an island called "An", but was unsuccessful. In any case, the relevant information is there. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply
That would work as well, as {{ R from incomplete disambiguation}}, I guess. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 23:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bad Talkers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Burned Out (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Burned Out---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 03:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Good Company (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Empty Bottle (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Empty Bottle (disambiguation).---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elements and Things (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate by retargeting to Elements and Things. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elements and Things

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You Gotta Try

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep. SST flyer 08:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You Ain't Going Nowhere (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Won't Go Back (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Won't Go Back. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Won't Go Back

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Where I Am (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Where I Am (disambiguation).---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 16:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Where I Am

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move DAB over redirect as Where I Am (disambiguation) shows that there is no primary topic for Where I Am. These two RfDs should have been bundled together. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 16:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Where I Am (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. SST flyer 13:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Desperate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Desperate. DAB page added to page. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 17:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sleep Is a Myth (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The only single on this album that has some notability would be "Lost". All others are just on the album, and have not been promoted in any manner. The album has not even been released: July 29, 2016. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Also, no such general term to have to throw in a (song) disambiguator. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sleep Is a Myth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Settled Down (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Settled Down, a disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Settled Down

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lovers Come and Go

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. SST flyer 13:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Little Boy Preacher

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 15:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LAX (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LAX (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LAX (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The album isn't even released yet, and there is only one notable single. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lady in Gold (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep, noting that the redirect has been retargeted during this discussion. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The song referenced is essentially the title song of the eponymous album, which currently seems to be the primary topic since it is the only notable topic. (See next comment for information.) (Notability for the song has yet to be proven since the album has yet to be released.) Unless the situation changes in a way other than I just described, the current situation makes complete sense. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Well, actually after reviewing this, I wonder if Lady in Gold should be moved to Lady in Gold (album) and redirect the ambiguous title to Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I or make it a disambiguation page. Either way, my opinion of "keep"-in the redirect (or retargeting it to Lady in Gold (album) if the article is moved) hasn't changed. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
I believe consensus has been reached with Steel1943's recent moves. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L.A.X. (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LAX (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Retarget to DAB per Notecardforfree. Good find! AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L.A.X. (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

If He Ain't Gonna Love You

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I Felt a Change (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ( talk) 20:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I Felt a Change

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ( talk) 20:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Everybody Dies Young (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 15:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You Gotta Try (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep. SST flyer 08:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sleep Is a Myth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix ( talk) 04:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Is it usual to redirect a track name to an upcoming album? dstone66( talk) 04:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I redirect song titles to album articles all the time. This is the first time I've been called out for doing so. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 04:43, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry, I only just discovered the other (old, unrelated) issue with an admin making hundreds of spurious redirects, thought maybe this was similar at first. I'm happy to withdraw this; what's the most efficient way? -- dstone66( talk) 04:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
All you need to do is say you're withdrawing. I'll handle the rest by closing the discussion. -- Tavix ( talk) 04:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suprahuman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget all to Superhuman. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 15:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Would it make sense to target to Übermensch? Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 03:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete, Wiktionary it or Redirect to Superhuman as the terms are closely related. [7] Also not mentioned in the target article at all. The first two choices could also foster creation of an article proper that can explain how it is slightly different from the superhuman. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Redirect to Superhuman. I'm not familiar with its usage in a philosophical context. Google attributes the term to writings about Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, both of whom likely refer to very different things with similar terms. BabyJonas ( talk) 03:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Song of God

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep without prejudice against conversion to disambiguation page. Deryck C. 12:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Song of God can refer to a whole lot of things. Is disambiguation a plausible alternative here? Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 01:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

What else is known as "Song of God"? older ≠ wiser 17:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - The name " Sune" apparently also means "Song of God". There may be some recorded tracks by this name, though I've not come across them. I'm not sure if a disambiguation page is needed, though, since the connection of the term to the Gita text is by far the primary usage around the world. At least, I think... some more international perspectives here are needed. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 12:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep and hatnote if required to other uses. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 17:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. My search shows plenty of use in English for this. I mainly see it as a subtitle (eg: "Bhagavad Gita: The Song of God"). [8]. I don't think a hatnote to Sune is necessary—we don't disambiguate translations unless they're used in English. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_20&oldid=1138581063"
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 20

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 20, 2016.

Star fox wii

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Star Fox Zero#Development. -- BDD ( talk) 17:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

There was apparently not a Star Fox game released for the Wii, making this redirect somewhat misleading. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • That actually seems like rationale to delete the redirect per WP:REDLINK, unless it is mentioned and identified in an article, then the redirect could be retargeted there so that readers can find the information they are looking for rather than no information about the subject. Steel1943 ( talk) 23:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

کریولیس

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was 'delete.'---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Originally an article in Persian about the Coriolis force uploaded by a one-edit account more than six years ago, this foreign-language redirect serves no purpose and should be deleted. — Gorthian ( talk) 22:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dry wash

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move Dry wash (disambiguation) over redirect. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Re-targeting to Dry wash (disambiguation). The target article doesn't use the phrase "dry wash", and the disambiguation page offers the term "waterless car wash", which itself redirects to car wash. Alternately, re-target to arroyo (creek) which does use the term "dry wash" and add an Other Uses there. Morfusmax ( talk) 22:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wavedashing

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 16:14, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

The redirect is not mentioned in the target article. A redirect at this title was nominated at RfD in the past and deleted, but before, it targeted a different subject. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry that you are not following WP:AGF. It was made in good faith. It is a likely search term. Cheers. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 23:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
I'll have to respectfully disagree with your first part of your statement, given the tone of the comment on SSTflyer's talk page, as well as the tone in the comment above (specifically the sentence Live with it.). Either way, "likely" search terms are only helpful if the term is either identified and defined at the target page, or if the search term is a likely alternative name or spelling variation for the alternative name (and the alternative name is mentioned on the target page.) This redirect currently meets neither of these criteria. In fact, the section which the redirect targets, Bunny hopping#Wave, currently doesn't exist. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:17, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
That, and "wavedashing" and " bunny hopping" (as defined in the article) are not the same thing. "bunny hopping" involves jumping; "wavedashing" involves somersaults or "somersault-like" movements. Steel1943 ( talk) 00:26, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I created this redirect 3 April 2015 at the same day I put in the anchor it pointed to: special:diff/654728147

The anchor was removed at some point during the last 14 months. Not sure exactly when or by whom. I would like to keep the redirect up and restore the information.

Patar knight the redirect was and.can be useful again. It is more useful to build a section on a bigger concept page and later split it off. Expecting a perfect article out of scratch on such an obscure topic is not realistic. I will take it was a redirect with possibilities. I will restore the lost section and feel.free to nominate it via the split section temate if you think it grows large enough to merit it's own page. Ranze ( talk) 08:20, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply

It's still rather confusing and unsourced, but at least it's there for someone to expand. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:05, 4 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Menu 1

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

This is a name of a song used in multiple Super Smash Bros. series games. However, the subject of the redirect is not mentioned in the target article or the aforementioned series article. If there is a retargeting option, it would probably be Super Smash Bros.#Music, but the subject of the redirect is not mentioned there either. Without a specific mention, the title of this redirect makes it a vague search term. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:50, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Wow, seems as though I nominated this about a year and a half ago, but then changed my mind. Interesting how time helps form different opinions. Steel1943 ( talk) 21:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Stages in Super Smash Bros. Melee

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 5#Stages in Super Smash Bros. Melee

Blast-Line

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 1#Blast-Line

Super Smash Bros. Melee's Debug Menu

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 16:54, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The subject of the redirect is not mentioned or identified in the target article. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:38, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokémon Appearances in Super Smash Bros.

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 2#Pokémon Appearances in Super Smash Bros.

L-canceling

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 16:51, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I believe this redirect refers to cancelling performing a move in the game by blocking. Anyways, WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ridley is too big

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix ( talk) 16:53, 29 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Does this qualify for a WP:CSD? The redirect refers to Ridley (Metroid), but the redirect is an obvious WP:NPOV issue. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:22, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
It's a meme that refers to an common issue among fants that IGN saw fit to conduct an interview the creative director of the series with. This is definitely a plausible redirect and it should go to Ridley_(Metroid)#In_other_media, where this information is discussed and sourced. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 03:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Smash bros hd

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:12, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

These terms seem to not refer to any specific game in the Super Smash Bros. series. The only game in the series that is compatible with HD is Super Smash Bros. for Wii U, but the redirects were never an official name for the subject. Steel1943 ( talk) 20:15, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Heh, then any video game could be HD by that definition. Wait until there's something that has the title and HD before associating this, as with Final Fantasy Type-0 HD AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 22:17, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply
It could be. I wouldn't object to keeping them as long as they're not outright mistargeted (e.g. "GAME HD" exists as an article but a variant of it points to "GAME (series)"). it seems that if readers are looking for an HD version, by going to the series page, they can see that no such game exists, or click through to individual game articles and look at development/sequel/remake sections. Since what readers are looking for is clear, we should direct them to the place with that information. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 04:39, 4 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Paternity (Biology and Medicine)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete both.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

This seems like an implausible search term, and I'm also afraid it could be misleading as well. The article discusses paternity in biology, but I'm not so sure about the "medicine" part; the word is only mentioned once in the article, and for an unrelated reason. -- Tavix ( talk) 19:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

SSBW

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 14:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Apparently, this acronym is supposed to stand for "Super Smash Bros: War", but what that subject is itself is unclear and unreferenced. Most searches on search engines for "Super Smash Bros: War" return results for a fan-made game that is not the redirect's target ( WP:NOTWIKIA), and most searches for "SSBW" return Twitter hashtag results hinting that this acronym has some sort of similar meaning to BBW, specifically Big Beautiful Woman. Also, the following redirects do not exist: Super Smash Bros: War, Super Smash Bros War, SSB:W, etc. Steel1943 ( talk) 18:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • I suppose the redirect stands for "Super Smash Bros. Wii".-- Prisencolin ( talk) 20:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super smash division

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- BDD ( talk) 16:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

The target page doesn't identify what a "division" is, and neither does Super Smash Bros., the series article. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:54, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Super Smash Bros. Brawl secrets

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 14:58, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Such a list of "secrets" does not exist at the target article. And if it did, the list would probably fail WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE. Steel1943 ( talk) 17:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Snow Keep as a likely search term. It doesn't seem to matter if there's anything about a subject in an article if someone, sometime, somewhere might look for a term, even if the article doesn't contain one iota of information about the subject as can be seen by the closing of the redirects to songs below. The precedent has been set. Live with it. 208.81.212.224 ( talk) 21:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Cook Kirby

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 1#Cook Kirby

San Angelo

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Interesting that it took so long to get that hatnote up. Sant' and Santo Ângelo lead towards the big side of small details, I suppose. Though there was another hatnote there for a long time:
For the fortress in Rome, Italy, see Castel Sant'Angelo. wbm1058 ( talk) 13:34, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Since this redirect has existed since 2004, the current situation may be correct, but I'm not completely sure. I recently discovered the disambiguation page Sant'Angelo, and it seems that several of the subjects listed on this disambiguation page could be referred to as "San Angelo" as an English transliteration. With that being said, the current situation makes me wonder if it is actually not a WP:WORLDWIDE view and needs to be "fixed" to remove any possible systemic bias. So, is the current situation correct (which means that the target page may need to be moved over the redirect as a primary topic and essentially the only topic spelled like this), should the redirect be retargeted to Sant'Angelo or is there another option that may be more plausible? Steel1943 ( talk) 16:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

3 CD Collector's Set (Rihanna album

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was 'delete.'---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 02:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

This would have been a reasonable {{ R to list entry}}. Note the lack of a closing parenthesis. SST flyer 16:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Drug house

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move target as proposed by Tavix. (closed by a page mover) SST flyer 08:30, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Not all drug houses are crack houses. Is there a better target out there in the world? I think this could potentially be a viable topic for an article too. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 15:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Comment Not all drug houses are crack houses — is there some other use of the term "drug house" I'm missing (aside from the unintentionally hilarious WP:PTM Drug Houses of Australia)? As far as I can see, "drug house" isn't a supertopic of "crack house" but simply an alternative, less common name; crack house itself notes that the term isn't literally limited to crack ("illegal drugs, including crack cocaine"). 210.6.254.106 ( talk) 16:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
I don't think it's accurate to use the term "crack house" as a metonymous definition for any house at which any drug is bought, sold, consumed, or produced. The term "crack house" has a rather complex history in the United States, and it is often used pejoratively (often with racist connotations). Another option would be to move the current article at crack house to drug house (over the redirect) and make the article about drug houses in general. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 16:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
It really depends on what the most notable term is. If that's crack house then use that and alias the others to this one, listing and bolding them in the lead. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 19:04, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The term "crack house" is ubiquitous, but it is not the preferred term when referring to locations that involve drugs other than crack. Indeed, "drug house" is the preferred term for the BBC, New York Times, U.S. Supreme Court, state supreme courts, and state narcotics agencies. -- Notecardforfree ( talk) 20:23, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Assault weapons legislation

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 6#Assault weapons legislation

Everybody Dies Young

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- BDD ( talk) 16:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

For instance, the album That's Why God Made the Radio's first song is Think About the Days. No redirect. The next two songs have articles while Spring Vacation , or more correctly spring vacation, is a redirect, but to spring break. Other Bach Boys' songs are redirects but only because editors created articles for them and they were not sufficiently notable. I have never seen this sort of behaviour before and would not like it to continue. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Redirects are cheap. What's the issue? VQuakr ( talk) 08:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
On the face of it, there's no issue with keeping the redirects. But what happens if at some point in the future an artist releases another song titled "Everybody Dies Young" and it becomes a huge global hit, and becomes the unambiguous primary topic on Wikipedia? Do we then need to create a disambiguation for the redirect, when almost certainly everybody will be searching for the big hit by the same name? Richard3120 ( talk) 09:29, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Do we then need to create a disambiguation for the redirect Nope, per WP:TWODABS you wouldn't need a disambiguation page in that case. You'd just overwrite the redirect with an article about the notable song, with a {{ for}} hatnote to the non-notable song. 210.6.254.106 ( talk) 11:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yet PC78 ( talk · contribs) is making that exact argument at Talk:Where the Light Gets In (album)#Requested move 18 June 2016
And redirects are costly. And so the issue is that we do not create articles for every song name. There is no policy to do so. There is no guideline to do so. Just because an editor has done so for a while doe not mean it should continue. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 13:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Irresponsible? Oy... -- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Quite irresponsible! As I stated, if this had been an empty article stating
"Everybody Dies Young" is a song off ...
and that went to a speedy, no redirect would have been left.
If that speedy was contested and it went to a PROD, no redirect would have been left.
If that PROD was contested and it went to an AfD, no redirect would have been left.
Why? Because it's not a likely search term. So why is it responsible to circumvent that and simply create redirects for unlikely search terms? If the song had charted, it might be a likely search term, but this is not a responsible action. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
You are very worked up about these redirects, which are harmless and helpful to the project. I'm going to move on to other tasks now, so we'll see how this plays out. But I see no harm in creating these redirects and wish you would stop calling me irresponsible. Take care. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
They are neither helpful nor harmless. I would call any editor who created a redirect for an unlikely search terms irresponsible. Don't take it personally. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:23, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Just because you may not search for the term does not mean someone else won't. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:27, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Just because you think that someone else will use it as a search term doesn't mean that they will. Could you please provide metrics to support that previously created redirects have been used at least once a month? Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:37, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
No, I am moving on to other tasks. I've spent too much time on this already. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:39, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry. I didn't mean to task you with something like this. It was simply a request to show that people are using your redirects as a search terms. Without empirical proof to support your claim, they should be deleted. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:41, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Another Believer, I'm not sure it is helpful to the project: they seem to be creating a solution for a demand that doesn't exist. It's very unlikely anybody is looking for a non-notable album track on Wikipedia, and they are even less likely to try several possible spellings or disambiguators to find it, especially if the first one they try redirects to the album they are looking for. You're also implying that the song passes WP:NSONGS because it's worthy of keeping as a redirect. Why not simply delete the article? Richard3120 ( talk) 14:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

  • Delete The only notable song on this album is "American Country Love Song". The album hasn't even been released (July 29, 2016). If others get released as singles and garner significant airplay and reviews then you can add back. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. I note the creator also created a redirect for Everybody Dies Young (Jake Owen song), so we have two redirects for the same song. At this stage it is no longer an editor considering what redirects are necessary (i.e. a WP function), but somebody title grabbing for an artist (a marketing function). As song titles are used over and over again, as noted by Notecardforfree this means redirects are not as cheap as we think, nor does primarytopic or concise work as well and clearly as some would have us beleive- after all this redirect might actually be PT, but we have no information whatsoever other than a track listing. Again hard for some to comprehend, but we do song articles, not articles about recordings of songs. Walter Görlitz makes an argument that redirects should only be created via AfD/Prod process, but there are problems with that because it is patently clear we should have a redirect at William Clinton.
It becomes clear that mere existence is not worthy of a redirect, otherwise we can create redirects for all our friends, neighbours, family, or every song in our record collection and that creates a problem that needs addressing.
In the meantime all the redirects below should also be deleted, unless somebody can prove that one or two have some kind of separate notability yet still fails WP:NSONGS. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 08:47, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
That's not my argument. There are many valid reasons to create redirects or to turn articles into redirects that do not require a discussion. I don't believe that all songs on an album need to have redirects, only those that are likely to be search terms. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry, Walter Görlitz I interpreted your words above, "Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching..." as meaning don't create redirects. My point is not to object to you, but to find a way forward to stop wholesale creation of redirects, without affecting the day to day necessity for redirects. -- Richhoncho ( talk) 16:48, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
I see. Yes. It should probably have read "when redirects are created as part of an AfD or similar deletion process" as it's reasonable to create redirects without a deletion process. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 20:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

American Love (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to American Love (disambiguation).---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Comment Please note that Another Believer has recently created redirects for all the tracks on American Love and other albums. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:49, 22 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Retarget to the DAB page now that it is there and covers multiple songs with the same title. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

After Midnight (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:03, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

A Burning Soul (song)

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2016 July 5#A Burning Soul (song)

Bad Talkers (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure)

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

An Island (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Island (disambiguation)#Music. Note that I've merged An Island there, as it only had two entries, one of which was already at the larger dab. -- BDD ( talk) 16:07, 5 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
@ Tavix: Looking at this again, Chevelle (band) released a song called "An Island" [6], so a making a DAB at Tavix's suggested location ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 21:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)page might be best here. Others songs mentioned by Notecardforfree above can be added to the page in a see also section if people want. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 21:33, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Thanks for double checking, Patar knight. Changing my !vote accordingly. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:46, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply
Update: I've created the disambiguation page, although now I'm wondering if it should be merged to Island (disambiguation). I was wondering if I could find an island called "An", but was unsuccessful. In any case, the relevant information is there. -- Tavix ( talk) 21:59, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply
That would work as well, as {{ R from incomplete disambiguation}}, I guess. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 23:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bad Talkers

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete.---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 15:04, 27 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Burned Out (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Burned Out---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 03:44, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Good Company (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Empty Bottle (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Empty Bottle (disambiguation).---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 16:50, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elements and Things (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate by retargeting to Elements and Things. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:39, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Elements and Things

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:13, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You Gotta Try

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep. SST flyer 08:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You Ain't Going Nowhere (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Won't Go Back (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Won't Go Back. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:27, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Won't Go Back

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:24, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Where I Am (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Where I Am (disambiguation).---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 16:53, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Where I Am

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move DAB over redirect as Where I Am (disambiguation) shows that there is no primary topic for Where I Am. These two RfDs should have been bundled together. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 16:57, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:06, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Where I Am (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. SST flyer 13:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:04, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:07, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The Desperate

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Desperate. DAB page added to page. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 17:02, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sleep Is a Myth (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Delete The only single on this album that has some notability would be "Lost". All others are just on the album, and have not been promoted in any manner. The album has not even been released: July 29, 2016. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Also, no such general term to have to throw in a (song) disambiguator. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sleep Is a Myth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 13:54, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Settled Down (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Settled Down, a disambiguation page. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:34, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Settled Down

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lovers Come and Go

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. SST flyer 13:55, 1 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Little Boy Preacher

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 15:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LAX (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LAX (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:36, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:09, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

LAX (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The album isn't even released yet, and there is only one notable single. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lady in Gold (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep, noting that the redirect has been retargeted during this discussion. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:42, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. The song referenced is essentially the title song of the eponymous album, which currently seems to be the primary topic since it is the only notable topic. (See next comment for information.) (Notability for the song has yet to be proven since the album has yet to be released.) Unless the situation changes in a way other than I just described, the current situation makes complete sense. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Well, actually after reviewing this, I wonder if Lady in Gold should be moved to Lady in Gold (album) and redirect the ambiguous title to Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I or make it a disambiguation page. Either way, my opinion of "keep"-in the redirect (or retargeting it to Lady in Gold (album) if the article is moved) hasn't changed. Steel1943 ( talk) 22:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC) reply
I believe consensus has been reached with Steel1943's recent moves. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L.A.X. (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to LAX (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Retarget to DAB per Notecardforfree. Good find! AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 17:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

L.A.X. (Jake Owen song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:02, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

If He Ain't Gonna Love You

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 14:47, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I Felt a Change (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ( talk) 20:10, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I Felt a Change

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. -- Tavix ( talk) 20:09, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Everybody Dies Young (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 15:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

You Gotta Try (song)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus, default to keep. SST flyer 08:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC) (non-admin closure) reply

not a likely search term. We do not create redirects for every song on an album. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 06:08, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

No harm in redirecting song titles to album articles. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 14:00, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Yes there is. First, it goes against standard deletion policy. Redirects are only left in an AfD or similar deletion process if the term is likely to be used for searching, and redirects are costly. Finally, you're the editor who created them so I can see why you think there's no harm in it. This is a change to call you out for being irresponsible. Walter Görlitz ( talk) 14:05, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sleep Is a Myth

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was withdrawn. -- Tavix ( talk) 04:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Is it usual to redirect a track name to an upcoming album? dstone66( talk) 04:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

I redirect song titles to album articles all the time. This is the first time I've been called out for doing so. --- Another Believer ( Talk) 04:43, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Sorry, I only just discovered the other (old, unrelated) issue with an admin making hundreds of spurious redirects, thought maybe this was similar at first. I'm happy to withdraw this; what's the most efficient way? -- dstone66( talk) 04:52, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
All you need to do is say you're withdrawing. I'll handle the rest by closing the discussion. -- Tavix ( talk) 04:56, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Suprahuman

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget all to Superhuman. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 15:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Would it make sense to target to Übermensch? Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 03:11, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

Delete, Wiktionary it or Redirect to Superhuman as the terms are closely related. [7] Also not mentioned in the target article at all. The first two choices could also foster creation of an article proper that can explain how it is slightly different from the superhuman. AngusWOOF ( bark • sniff) 18:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
Redirect to Superhuman. I'm not familiar with its usage in a philosophical context. Google attributes the term to writings about Kierkegaard and Nietzsche, both of whom likely refer to very different things with similar terms. BabyJonas ( talk) 03:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Song of God

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep without prejudice against conversion to disambiguation page. Deryck C. 12:03, 2 July 2016 (UTC) reply

Song of God can refer to a whole lot of things. Is disambiguation a plausible alternative here? Oiyarbepsy ( talk) 01:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC) reply

What else is known as "Song of God"? older ≠ wiser 17:54, 23 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Comment - The name " Sune" apparently also means "Song of God". There may be some recorded tracks by this name, though I've not come across them. I'm not sure if a disambiguation page is needed, though, since the connection of the term to the Gita text is by far the primary usage around the world. At least, I think... some more international perspectives here are needed. CoffeeWithMarkets ( talk) 12:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep and hatnote if required to other uses. ---- Patar knight - chat/ contributions 17:24, 28 June 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Keep. My search shows plenty of use in English for this. I mainly see it as a subtitle (eg: "Bhagavad Gita: The Song of God"). [8]. I don't think a hatnote to Sune is necessary—we don't disambiguate translations unless they're used in English. -- Tavix ( talk) 22:10, 1 July 2016 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from " https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2016_June_20&oldid=1138581063"

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook




Top Of Page

Home • Search • Translate

© CSE