This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on July 24, 2015.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Cult of the Supreme Being. --
BDD (
talk)
14:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
WP:RFOREIGN
The Traditionalist (
talk)
20:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Comment - I guess it could go to
Cult of the Supreme Being (
French: Culte de l'Être suprême). Somewhat prefer deletion.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
21:30, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- I think in the US, we just call it a
Quarter Pounder. I believe the version with cheese is the "Etre Supreme with Cheese". --
BDD (
talk)
14:26, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Ok, I'll go along with it, then. Retarget per, uh, me.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
23:19, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. (
non-admin closure) —
Godsy(
TALK
CONT)
02:13, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
reply
Delete: This is the Latin name of the city, yet the city is in the Czech Republic. Doesn't seem strongly related to me.
Compassionate727 (
talk)
17:05, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Comment Although noted as a Latin name in the article, I couldn't find any source for this; it seems to be a legitimate name, but one that mostly appears in Jewish contexts. (In some places it's called Hebrew or Yiddish, but the best RSes I could find, e.g.
[1], simply note it as a name used by Jews. It was originally inserted in the article as a "Hebrew/Latin" name, way back in 2006, but the "Hebrew" was later removed.) Whether this makes it any more relevant to a city in the Czech Republic, I'm not sure, though the article does mention that "in the 17th and 18th centuries, Mladá Boleslav was an important Jewish center."
Sideways713 (
talk)
20:42, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep Generally, I'm quick to support deletion for foreign language names, but Latin is a bit of a special case. Since Latin was used as a scholarly and diplomatic language in Europe for so long, I would argue that older European cities like Mladá Boleslav do have a connection to Latin. Readers may come across the Latin forms in old books, treaties, or secondary sources referring to the same. In this case, the Latin name is also apparently important enough to be mentioned in the lede. This would be a surer thing if the city existed in Roman times, but I'm still comfortable with it as is.
- That's all if this is really Latin. I don't really know Latin, but the name doesn't look especially Latin to me. Even if it's just Hebrew or Yiddish, though, I think Sideways713 demonstrates that this is a legitimate, useful alternative name. --
BDD (
talk)
14:25, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
United States of America/OldPage
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was no consensus. --
BDD (
talk)
14:23, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Old page that was previously information that was copied over from
CIA World Factbook, turned into redirect. ~
GottaGoFast
Step
it
up
02:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Since the redirect contains merged material in its history, our copyrights do not allow deletion (as this would also delete credit for the authors). See
WP:Merge and delete for more information on this.
Oiyarbepsy (
talk)
05:22, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per
WP:MAD ; rename to
United States (America) without leaving a redirect behind at "OldPage", to get rid of the
WP:SUBPAGE location. (or some other viable search term name (or existing redirect which contains no history))--
67.70.32.20 (
talk)
08:14, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete unnecessary and implausible. This would be a perfect candidate for what I like to call the "
Qantas Flight Numbers" treatment. (See:
Wikipedia:Merge and delete#Record authorship and delete history and you can follow the redlink to the RFD discussion.) --
Tavix (
talk)
15:15, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. Not an encyclopaedic aid. --
Bermicourt (
talk)
07:03, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. Since subpages are no longer used in mainspace, those that remain are redirects with old history, and there are still
lots of these around. From the category,
These redirects are kept to retain edit history, and to avoid breaking links that may have been made externally.
'Nuff said. –
Paine
11:18, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. --
BDD (
talk)
14:21, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
This seems like a really improbably mispelling to me. I say we delete it.
Compassionate727 (
talk)
15:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep. English has confusing plural rules. See
English plurals. Someone could easily think that the plural of Arab is Arabes, especially for speakers of
ESL. --
Tavix (
talk)
16:30, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per above. ~
GottaGoFast
Step
it
up
18:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete. By the time someone types "Arab", the plural "Arabs" will have popped up. No need for unlikely misspellings. --
Bermicourt (
talk)
07:02, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Weak keep {{
R from typo}} --
67.70.32.190 (
talk)
12:37, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per Tavix. @
Bermicourt: search suggestions are only available to people with javascript enabled who are using the internal search tool. There are many other ways to search and browse Wikipedia, including following links from bookmarks and external websites.
Thryduulf (
talk)
12:39, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep likely misspelling, as it's a common ending for English plurals and is the spelling used in French and Latin.
Peter James (
talk)
19:46, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep - For JavaScript-less browsers, typos, and non-native English speakers.--
216.186.185.230 (
talk)
18:16, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Neutral comment - Yeah, what a strange plural this is.
Qwertyxp2000 (
talk |
contribs)
05:03, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- In my view, this feels like it's not quite done. On one hand, it could be a plausible misspelling of a pluralization; on the other, it's a redirect from a foreign language with no affinity for the target. The discussion is certainly going in a particular direction, but I thought more discussion was appropriate.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
21:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- I'll try to manhandle my way to a better explanation.
-es is a common plural ending in Latin and Greek in 4th conjugation if I remember correctly (only did woodwork at school), which then declines according to the rules of that declension (e.g.
Forceps ->
Forcipes), so it is a common misconception that those words derived therefrom must be plural when they are in fact singular. But it is in no way common in English to add an E rather than to
elide one. It does happen occasionally, usually with an apostrophe, for disambiguation, but this is generally handled by the 19th century rules on apostrophes, which are rather a jumble. For example it is not
St Jameses Park (there is your "-es" for you) but (
St James's Park (that is what we write today): the "-es" one may have in speech is represented by apostrophe ess in written text.
Greengrocers' apostrophes are not
Greengrocers' apostropheses, even though
apostropheses would agree in Greek, as would
thesis with
theses. In short, this is not English.
Si Trew (
talk)
22:05, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- I was thinking of the -es added in English for many fricatives/affricates (such as "watches"), some vowels ("potatoes"), as well as "-f" sometimes becoming "-ves" in plural, so a misspelling in English influenced by other plurals in English and existence of the spelling in other languages.
Peter James (
talk)
23:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 1#Hardware system
Untitled Indian film projects (concluded)
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:15, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Delete. These are all outdated redirects. The projects that these redirects refer to all have titles. They should be deleted as confusing because it might lead people to think they are referring to a separate, future untitled project. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:47, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:RFD#D8 as this is a "novel or obscure" name for God. --
Tavix (
talk)
18:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Good one – (that was some "good shoot, man! You know what 'shoot' is, doncha man? That's 'shit' with two o's, man!") –
Paine
15:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Undeveloped The Office spin-off
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:12, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
WP:FORRED. DVDs aren't exclusive to Japanese.
Steel1943 (
talk)
16:27, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Dynamic address translation
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
From what I am finding, it seems that this term is not synonymous with "virtual memory". In fact, I would say that these redirects should be deleted per
WP:REDLINK since it seems that this term could be its own encyclopedic article/subject.
Steel1943 (
talk)
14:52, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- I was thinking that this redirect might be a connection with that term as well. However, from what I have found, the closest match that relates to "network address translation" (NAT) is "dynamic network address translation" (DNAT). However, it seems that DNAT and "dynamic address translation" (DAT) are two different concepts.
Steel1943 (
talk)
18:11, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Virtual memory is not generally dynamically readdressed: in fact, that is the point.
Physical memory ->
Computer_data_storage#Primary_storage may be readdressed through or by
virtual memory allowing computer applications still to run in the same
address space.
- The VAX/VMS Software Handbook 1981 gives details, if you need sources, and someone else said they also had one, but neither of us completed the tidying up (or to put it less generously, the other editor didn't bother to start on it.)
Si Trew (
talk)
23:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
VRAM by nomimator (me).
Steel1943 (
talk)
15:27, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
The redirect is not explained or identified on the target article. Assuming that this term is an abbreviation for "virtual RAM", the closest article match I can find is
Virtual memory, but the term is not mentioned by its specific name in that article either.
Steel1943 (
talk)
14:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Due to the question mark at the end of the title of this redirect, I don't see this being a plausible search term.
Steel1943 (
talk)
14:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Delete Don't know why I created this one. Sorry for any problems this caused.
Nightscream — Preceding
undated comment added 18:25, 24 July 2015
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:04, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
WP:NOTFAQ.
Steel1943 (
talk)
14:42, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 1#Goulddigger
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. --
BDD (
talk)
14:01, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
No idea what this means. -
The
ChampionMan
1234
05:47, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- This was originally a redirect to
Ankara.
In December 2013, a vandal redirected
Ankara to
United Kingdom, and
a bot "fixed" the "double redirect" before
the vandal had a chance to self-revert.
58.176.246.42 (
talk)
08:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete Engürü is a valid alternative name for Ankara,
according to Turkish Wikipedia. However, Enguerue is not a valid alternative spelling of Engürü. The German-to-English rule of respelling "ü" as "ue" doesn't apply to Turkish, and isn't seen in reliable sources or even unreliable ones.
58.176.246.42 (
talk)
08:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Delete - implausible, per 58.176's explanation.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
04:21, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep per 58.176.246.42 due to the widely known convention of converting umlauts from German in English, people may misapply this for Turkish, making this a valid {{
R from mispelling}} so it should retarget to
Ankara --
67.70.32.190 (
talk)
06:09, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Comment. That derivation would make sense if "Ankara" was an English word. It isn't.
Si Trew (
talk)
23:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget. Sorry about doing this early (I'm an oldtimer); feel free to revert if desired.
JesseW, the juggling janitor 03:59, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Delete, confusing. The disambiguation qualifier would imply a redirect to a surname article, but it's not. --
Tavix (
talk)
03:50, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Keep -- It looks like
Abdin is just a variant romanization of
Abidin, which is an already-existing surname disambiguation page. Since we do have multiple articles on people with the surname Abdin (and more once the variants are included), I think re-targeting the page in question to point at the relevant disambiguation page would be better than deleting it, and I have now done so (feel free to redirect if desired). I am not particularly familiar with Arabic, so I may be in error about the romanization. If a more knowledgeable person speaks up, please listen to them instead!
JesseW, the juggling janitor 05:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was retarget to
Richard Parker (specifically
Richard Parker#Sportspeople) as an ambiguously-titled redirect due to lack of substantial evidence presented below that qualifies either subject referenced below for
WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT of this term. (
non-admin closure)
Steel1943 (
talk)
19:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
reply
This page is all a bit screwed up, basically there is no
footballer called Richard Parker. There was previously a page created under the name, but the player's name was later found to be
Reginald Parker.
Beatpoet (
talk)
13:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Weak retarget to
Richard Parker (rugby league). While "footballer" almost always means "association footballer" in Wikipedia usage,
Footballer redirects to
Football player, which includes rugby league. So technically, we have one article on a footballer named Richard Parker. I see the potential for confusion. I'm not super concerned about it if there's no other article for readers to find, but deletion does make sense. --
BDD (
talk)
14:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. --
BDD (
talk)
14:02, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- It's also worth asking why we ever thought Reginald's name was Richard. If it's the mistake of one editor, fine, but if it's an error made in reliable sources as well, then it's definitely worth noting somehow. I see he's listed as Richard at brentfordfchistory.co.uk, the only web source on the article, though I don't know how reliable that is. Could we be confusing two people here? --
BDD (
talk)
14:04, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
-
BDD, I believed the player was called Richard Parker because he was listed in the Timeless Bees
Brentford book under that name. That book is incredibly reliable and this player's name is the only one that has turned out to be wrong.
brentfordfchistory.co.uk is reliable too, but I think it has borrowed many names/stats from Timeless Bees. Joyce's Football League Players' Records 1888 to 1939 lists Parker as Reginald, and that book is pretty much the definitive record of players of that period. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Beatpoet (
talk •
contribs)
14:51, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Keep Thanks for clarifying. If such an important Brentford F.C. book has listed him under this name, I think we should keep this, tag it as {{
R from incorrect name}}, and mention it in the article. Something like "Reginald Parker, sometimes erroneously cited as Richard Parker, was an English footballer..." --
BDD (
talk)
18:17, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 1#Northeastern Australia
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was delete. I see that WikiProject Australia was notified about this. --
BDD (
talk)
13:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Non-notable neologism/term. -
The
ChampionMan
1234
01:50, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Relisted, see
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 August 1#Garaoke
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was keep. --
BDD (
talk)
13:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
This doesn't seem like a particularly probable search term to me.
Compassionate727 (
talk)
19:36, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Delete per
WP:NOTFAQ. If this redirect falls in the
forest, does anybody
hear?
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
19:33, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Mild keep Not a search term (of course) but might be convenient for use in prose. For example, the sentence: “The poem, in which the speaker rhetorically asks why he has lost his ability to write poetry, uses boating references” can certainly be written this way: “The poem, in which the speaker [[Rhetorical question|rhetorically asks]] why he has lost his ability to write poetry, uses boating references” but if this redirect exists, it can be written this way: “The poem, in which the speaker [[rhetorically asks]] why he has lost his ability to write poetry, uses boating references” saving a pipe-link.--
The Traditionalist (
talk)
11:31, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Keep per The Traditionalist 's reasoning.
JesseW, the juggling janitor 05:58, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
@
Tavix: We can add it to other articles. There are plenty which contain these words. It may also be used when creating a new article.--
The Traditionalist (
talk)
17:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- As an R to a section in an article that does not mention it.
Si Trew (
talk)
23:41, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was dabify. --
BDD (
talk)
13:34, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Propose retarget to
Windows 10. Now that the ‘GWX’ (as in Get Windows X) app is much discussed, this orthography starts to get somewhat used
� (
talk)
09:52, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Retarget to
Windows 10. It would also seem to me that "X" would be the
roman numeral for "10."
Compassionate727 (
talk)
13:04, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
Delete as there is no Windows OS version named "Windows X". There are no other Roman numeral redirects to versions of Windows, such as
Windows XII →
Windows 7 or
Windows XIII →
Windows 8. It's nonsense, and speculation based on
rumours. +
m
t — Preceding
undated comment added 21:09, 14 July 2015
-
Windows 10 is more likely.
X Window System is really a partial title match, but could be hatnoted.
Ivanvector 🍁 (
talk)
17:19, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- I wouldn't say that. X-Windows has a lot of variant names. It would more likely refer to Windows/X (X-Windows) than Windows 10 --
67.70.32.190 (
talk)
06:14, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Just some humor:
The Mystery of Windows X
Wbm1058 (
talk)
16:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Comment.
GWX is a red link, so it's apparently not that much discussed on Wikipedia. I had to
look that up to see what it was: the infamous "Get Windows 10" nagware. BTW, I've removed that update from my Windows 7 system, and hidden it from Automatic Updates. "Windows X" does not support my beloved
Windows Media Center, so upgrading my "Media Center PC" is a nonstarter for me.
Wbm1058 (
talk)
17:19, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Comment.
Windows 9x is another disambiguation option, i.e. "Win x" could mean "Windows 95 and 98 OS family". A likely reason to favor "10" over "X", and to skip "Windows 9": already done that in the 90s.
Windows X Some interesting commentary.
Wbm1058 (
talk)
18:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- Then you have
X Window System implementations that run under Microsoft Windows, such as
Cygwin/X and
Xming. See
X.Org Server § Adoption,
Windows X-server. Because of all this stuff, I suspect any actual usage of "X" by Microsoft will be limited to obscure internal file names such as GWX.exe – it's like their way to obscure the fact that file has anything to do with Windows 10... it's just an "important Windows 7/8.1 update", right?
Wbm1058 (
talk)
20:30, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
reply
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Pokemon Orange Islands Gym Leaders