This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 7, 2014.
List of World War II aces from Czechia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Chief Ministers of Sarawak/version 2
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Playground (Lindsay Lohan song)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Yugoslavian language
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Disambiguate. Both
Serbo-Croatian and the
Kingdom of Yugoslavia briefly mention different facts about "the" Yugoslavian language, but my gut instinct is that most searchers that hit this redirect are trying to understand what languages were spoken in the country most recently called Yugoslavia, not learn about Serbo-Croatian when it was officially called Yugoslavian (i.e. from 1929 to 1945, according to
Kingdom of Yugoslavia). It would serve readers better to clarify the different meanings that may have been intended.
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia#Languages lists the three main languages,
Serbo-Croatian,
Slovene language and
Macedonian language. A disambiguation page should at a minimum clarify that the term may refer to (1) one of the SFRY's three main languages (linking to
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia#Languages) or (2) the Kingdom of Yugoslavia's officially-named Yugoslavian language (linking to
Kingdom of Yugoslavia), though it could also reasonably include three more links to the three main languages.
Agyle (
talk)
04:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Yugoslavian currently redirects to
Yugoslavia, and would be another issue. And while Slovene and Macedonian were never called Yugoslavian (the noun), they were referred to as Yugoslavian languages (Yugoslavian being an adjective, as well). Sometimes they still are, though "former Yugoslavian language" or "ex-Yugoslavian language" seem more common.
Agyle (
talk)
08:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
I would agree if discussion was about
Language of Yugoslavia, but titles "[Country name]ian language" normally refer to the language name, not the list of languages. As an example,
Russian language is an article about the Russian language, and it does not have hatnotes about other official
languages of Russia (compare
Article 68 of Constitution of Russia to
Article 42 of Constitution of Yugoslavia). Disambiguation could be appropriate if Yugoslavian language would not exist, eg. like in case with
American language or
Canadian language, although page
Soviet language does not exist, and
Israeli language redirects to
Hebrew (Arabic is also official in Israel and Yiddish exists), so even for demonym-based titles this scheme does not apply consistently. But Yugoslavian is rightful alias to Serbo-Croatian. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
09:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
There are multiple meanings for the term; many reliable sources say that there is or was no Yugoslavian language, or "true" Yugoslavian language. Others use it as a synonym for Serbo-Croat. Others use it to describe Serbo-Croat, Slovene, and Macedonian, and still others to what are more often distinguished as dialects of those languages (e.g.,
Serbian language,
Croatian language). A variety of examples:
Norris, Kenneth S.; Wursig, Bernd; Wells, Randall S (1994).
The Hawaiian Spinner Dolphin. University of California Press. p. 161.
ISBN978-0-520-91354-7. This meant typifying sound types and how fre- 6. Note that there is no true Yugoslavian language, only Serbian, Croatian, Slovenian and so on.
Municio, Ingegerd (1981).
Split-report: family and position in the Swedish society. LiberFörl. p. 298.
ISBN978-91-38-06753-6. In this way, a text written in Slovene is not intended only for Slovenian children hut also for all the other Yugoslavian children in Sweden; conversely, a text written in some other Yugoslavian language is intended also for the Slovenian children...
Journal of Croatian Studies. Croatian Academy of America. 1961. p. 4. There is no Yugoslavian language either, just as there is no Swiss language.
Chevrel, Yves (1995).
Comparative literature today: methods & perspectives. T. Jefferson University Press. p. 10.
ISBN978-0-943549-24-8. Similarly, there may not be a Yugoslavian language per se, but the inhabitants of the republics where the languages of literature are Croatian, Macedonian, Serbian, and Slovenian...
Following your example of
American language, where multiple languages that could be meant, one might write:
Yugoslavian language or Yugoslavian languages may refer to:
Serbo-Croatian, the primary language of Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Montenegro, officially called Yugoslavian from 1929 to 1945 by the Kingdom of Yugoslavia
Serbian language, a variety of Serbo-Croatian used mainly by Serbs in Serbia, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Herzegovina
Croatian language, a variety of Serbo-Croatian used mainly by Croats, principally in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Serbian province of Vojvodina and other neighbouring countries
Slovene language, a language spoken mainly by people living in Slovenia
Macedonian language, a language spoken mainly in the Republic of Macedonia and by the Macedonian diaspora
So you present an evidence that majority of sources speak of Yugoslavian language as alias for Serbo-Croatian and conclude that it should be treated as toponym-based similar to "American language", which is not a language in any sence? I am afraid I don't follow your logic. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
21:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Agyle: I drafted DAB on redirect page. I tried hard to avoid "spoken by" or "spoken in", because in this particular case it is very far from neutral in my opinion. Please, oversee and either approve or criticize, so that this discussion could be finally closed. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
08:10, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Don't delete. The phrase gets tons of Google hits, whether things like
this popular page (someone's confused here) or
this (apparently) scholarly book. Whether we keep it as is, or whether we retarget it, I don't care, but since plenty of people think this is a real language, we need to be able to tell them "No it doesn't, but here's what the situation really is".
Nyttend (
talk)
22:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Serbian Cyrillic language
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep: this is likely search term, because in various operating systems the language selectors include Serbian Latin and Serbian Cyrillic, so one can conclude that "Serbian Cyrillic" is yet another dialect of Serbo-Croatian language. Given that every dialect of Serbo-Croatian is called "language" these days, the search term appears reasonable. The target article helps with fixing this possible misconception. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
12:42, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Actually, dialects are dialects, and languages are languages. Everybody know that dialects are Shtokavian, Eastern Herzegovinian etc., and they are not called language. Same for Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian, they are considered languages, not dialects. And Serbian Cyrillic is not language, nor dialect. Cyrillic is known as wiriting script (letters). Redirect should be deleted. --Lumi (
talk)
13:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
This exists because of {{Lang-sr-Cyrl}} links to it, it can't be deleted trivially without adjusting that, and the language templates have some sort of a logic that caused the redirect to be created. I fail to see why this came to the chopping block, because it's entirely innocuous... --
Joy [shallot] (
talk)
12:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Moldavien
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Moldovan language. The default for redirects is to keep. This is a long-standing redirect, over 5 years old and the view of the commentators is that it is a plausible typo. Such redirects are only deleted if they are in some way harmful.
WP:RFD#HARMFUL states "Therefore consider the deletion only of either really harmful redirects or of very recent ones.". Conversely, deleting could be harmful due to breaking long-standing external links. NAC.
The Whispering Wind (
talk)
12:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Giappone
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete this is neither in Japanese, romanization of Japanese, or English, therefore is a name with little affinity for Japan.
WP:NOT a translation dictionary. --
65.94.171.126 (
talk)
07:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Republic of Japan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep - Maybe I'm an idiot, but the Japanese people elect a group of people who then govern the country. Isn't that exactly what a republic is?
Ego White Tray (
talk)
20:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
And a constitutional monarchy is also known as a crowned republic. In every way that matters, Japan is a republic - the presence of a ceremonial Emperor with not governing powers doesn't change that.
Ego White Tray (
talk)
05:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Monarchy and republic are two (mutually exclusive) forms of government. The system where "people elect a group of people who then govern the country" is called
democracy. "Constitutional monarchy" is strict subset of "monarchy" with no intersection with "republic". "Crowned republic" is a [very misleading] wording from the historical context of
downfall of monarchies; it only serves descriptive purpose and does not make "constitutional monarchy" a subset of "republic". —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
08:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Not harmful. It can be marginally helpful: if you think Japan's a republic and type in this target, you'll quickly learn that you were wrong. Deletion would prevent you from learning this.
Nyttend (
talk)
22:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Giapan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete this is neither in Japanese, romanization of Japanese, or English, therefore is a name with little affinity for Japan.
WP:NOT a translation dictionary. --
65.94.171.126 (
talk)
07:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Jography
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The default for redirects is to keep. This is a long-standing redirect, over 6 years old and the view of the commentators is that it is a plausible typo. Such redirects are only deleted if they are in some way harmful.
WP:RFD#HARMFUL states "Therefore consider the deletion only of either really harmful redirects or of very recent ones.". Conversely, deleting could be harmful due to breaking long-standing external links. NAC.
The Whispering Wind (
talk)
12:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - Typing "Jography" into the Google search bar brings up the correct spelling "Geography" immediately in the drop-down menu. This is a plausible spelling error, especially for children who are sounding out the word.
Neelix (
talk)
14:56, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Screaming shits
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on June 7, 2014.
List of World War II aces from Czechia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
List of Chief Ministers of Sarawak/version 2
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Playground (Lindsay Lohan song)
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Yugoslavian language
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Disambiguate. Both
Serbo-Croatian and the
Kingdom of Yugoslavia briefly mention different facts about "the" Yugoslavian language, but my gut instinct is that most searchers that hit this redirect are trying to understand what languages were spoken in the country most recently called Yugoslavia, not learn about Serbo-Croatian when it was officially called Yugoslavian (i.e. from 1929 to 1945, according to
Kingdom of Yugoslavia). It would serve readers better to clarify the different meanings that may have been intended.
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia#Languages lists the three main languages,
Serbo-Croatian,
Slovene language and
Macedonian language. A disambiguation page should at a minimum clarify that the term may refer to (1) one of the SFRY's three main languages (linking to
Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia#Languages) or (2) the Kingdom of Yugoslavia's officially-named Yugoslavian language (linking to
Kingdom of Yugoslavia), though it could also reasonably include three more links to the three main languages.
Agyle (
talk)
04:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Yugoslavian currently redirects to
Yugoslavia, and would be another issue. And while Slovene and Macedonian were never called Yugoslavian (the noun), they were referred to as Yugoslavian languages (Yugoslavian being an adjective, as well). Sometimes they still are, though "former Yugoslavian language" or "ex-Yugoslavian language" seem more common.
Agyle (
talk)
08:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
I would agree if discussion was about
Language of Yugoslavia, but titles "[Country name]ian language" normally refer to the language name, not the list of languages. As an example,
Russian language is an article about the Russian language, and it does not have hatnotes about other official
languages of Russia (compare
Article 68 of Constitution of Russia to
Article 42 of Constitution of Yugoslavia). Disambiguation could be appropriate if Yugoslavian language would not exist, eg. like in case with
American language or
Canadian language, although page
Soviet language does not exist, and
Israeli language redirects to
Hebrew (Arabic is also official in Israel and Yiddish exists), so even for demonym-based titles this scheme does not apply consistently. But Yugoslavian is rightful alias to Serbo-Croatian. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
09:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
There are multiple meanings for the term; many reliable sources say that there is or was no Yugoslavian language, or "true" Yugoslavian language. Others use it as a synonym for Serbo-Croat. Others use it to describe Serbo-Croat, Slovene, and Macedonian, and still others to what are more often distinguished as dialects of those languages (e.g.,
Serbian language,
Croatian language). A variety of examples:
Norris, Kenneth S.; Wursig, Bernd; Wells, Randall S (1994).
The Hawaiian Spinner Dolphin. University of California Press. p. 161.
ISBN978-0-520-91354-7. This meant typifying sound types and how fre- 6. Note that there is no true Yugoslavian language, only Serbian, Croatian, Slovenian and so on.
Municio, Ingegerd (1981).
Split-report: family and position in the Swedish society. LiberFörl. p. 298.
ISBN978-91-38-06753-6. In this way, a text written in Slovene is not intended only for Slovenian children hut also for all the other Yugoslavian children in Sweden; conversely, a text written in some other Yugoslavian language is intended also for the Slovenian children...
Journal of Croatian Studies. Croatian Academy of America. 1961. p. 4. There is no Yugoslavian language either, just as there is no Swiss language.
Chevrel, Yves (1995).
Comparative literature today: methods & perspectives. T. Jefferson University Press. p. 10.
ISBN978-0-943549-24-8. Similarly, there may not be a Yugoslavian language per se, but the inhabitants of the republics where the languages of literature are Croatian, Macedonian, Serbian, and Slovenian...
Following your example of
American language, where multiple languages that could be meant, one might write:
Yugoslavian language or Yugoslavian languages may refer to:
Serbo-Croatian, the primary language of Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Montenegro, officially called Yugoslavian from 1929 to 1945 by the Kingdom of Yugoslavia
Serbian language, a variety of Serbo-Croatian used mainly by Serbs in Serbia, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Herzegovina
Croatian language, a variety of Serbo-Croatian used mainly by Croats, principally in Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Serbian province of Vojvodina and other neighbouring countries
Slovene language, a language spoken mainly by people living in Slovenia
Macedonian language, a language spoken mainly in the Republic of Macedonia and by the Macedonian diaspora
So you present an evidence that majority of sources speak of Yugoslavian language as alias for Serbo-Croatian and conclude that it should be treated as toponym-based similar to "American language", which is not a language in any sence? I am afraid I don't follow your logic. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
21:04, 14 June 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Agyle: I drafted DAB on redirect page. I tried hard to avoid "spoken by" or "spoken in", because in this particular case it is very far from neutral in my opinion. Please, oversee and either approve or criticize, so that this discussion could be finally closed. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
08:10, 21 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Don't delete. The phrase gets tons of Google hits, whether things like
this popular page (someone's confused here) or
this (apparently) scholarly book. Whether we keep it as is, or whether we retarget it, I don't care, but since plenty of people think this is a real language, we need to be able to tell them "No it doesn't, but here's what the situation really is".
Nyttend (
talk)
22:24, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Serbian Cyrillic language
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep: this is likely search term, because in various operating systems the language selectors include Serbian Latin and Serbian Cyrillic, so one can conclude that "Serbian Cyrillic" is yet another dialect of Serbo-Croatian language. Given that every dialect of Serbo-Croatian is called "language" these days, the search term appears reasonable. The target article helps with fixing this possible misconception. —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
12:42, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Actually, dialects are dialects, and languages are languages. Everybody know that dialects are Shtokavian, Eastern Herzegovinian etc., and they are not called language. Same for Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian, they are considered languages, not dialects. And Serbian Cyrillic is not language, nor dialect. Cyrillic is known as wiriting script (letters). Redirect should be deleted. --Lumi (
talk)
13:04, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
This exists because of {{Lang-sr-Cyrl}} links to it, it can't be deleted trivially without adjusting that, and the language templates have some sort of a logic that caused the redirect to be created. I fail to see why this came to the chopping block, because it's entirely innocuous... --
Joy [shallot] (
talk)
12:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Moldavien
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to
Moldovan language. The default for redirects is to keep. This is a long-standing redirect, over 5 years old and the view of the commentators is that it is a plausible typo. Such redirects are only deleted if they are in some way harmful.
WP:RFD#HARMFUL states "Therefore consider the deletion only of either really harmful redirects or of very recent ones.". Conversely, deleting could be harmful due to breaking long-standing external links. NAC.
The Whispering Wind (
talk)
12:41, 12 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Giappone
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete this is neither in Japanese, romanization of Japanese, or English, therefore is a name with little affinity for Japan.
WP:NOT a translation dictionary. --
65.94.171.126 (
talk)
07:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Republic of Japan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Keep - Maybe I'm an idiot, but the Japanese people elect a group of people who then govern the country. Isn't that exactly what a republic is?
Ego White Tray (
talk)
20:48, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
And a constitutional monarchy is also known as a crowned republic. In every way that matters, Japan is a republic - the presence of a ceremonial Emperor with not governing powers doesn't change that.
Ego White Tray (
talk)
05:21, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Monarchy and republic are two (mutually exclusive) forms of government. The system where "people elect a group of people who then govern the country" is called
democracy. "Constitutional monarchy" is strict subset of "monarchy" with no intersection with "republic". "Crowned republic" is a [very misleading] wording from the historical context of
downfall of monarchies; it only serves descriptive purpose and does not make "constitutional monarchy" a subset of "republic". —
Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (
talk•
track)
08:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep Not harmful. It can be marginally helpful: if you think Japan's a republic and type in this target, you'll quickly learn that you were wrong. Deletion would prevent you from learning this.
Nyttend (
talk)
22:21, 18 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Giapan
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Delete this is neither in Japanese, romanization of Japanese, or English, therefore is a name with little affinity for Japan.
WP:NOT a translation dictionary. --
65.94.171.126 (
talk)
07:51, 8 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Jography
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The default for redirects is to keep. This is a long-standing redirect, over 6 years old and the view of the commentators is that it is a plausible typo. Such redirects are only deleted if they are in some way harmful.
WP:RFD#HARMFUL states "Therefore consider the deletion only of either really harmful redirects or of very recent ones.". Conversely, deleting could be harmful due to breaking long-standing external links. NAC.
The Whispering Wind (
talk)
12:54, 12 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - Typing "Jography" into the Google search bar brings up the correct spelling "Geography" immediately in the drop-down menu. This is a plausible spelling error, especially for children who are sounding out the word.
Neelix (
talk)
14:56, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Screaming shits
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.