This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 26, 2010
Unlikely redirect, a reader will either look for Horse Island Light, or Sacketts Harbor Light
Muhandes (
talk)
23:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
This cross name space redirect leads to a set of lists which were deleted from mainspace 3 years ago Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books by title: 0-9 (2nd nomination). Deleted material should not by accesible from main space via a redirect. Yoenit ( talk) 17:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Implausible redirect Acather96 ( talk) 17:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete both. Apparently Scott M. Perrilloux is the name of the district attorney in a particular district of Louisiana. An enthusiastic user even added his picture to the District attorney article. However, that does not make these redirects useful to readers. An article about this particular individual might be useful, but the district attorney article is not about him, and the redirects are misleading. R'n'B ( call me Russ) 13:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't see how "GAG" has to do with the banning policy. Very implausible. — Train2104 ( talk • contribs • count) 01:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 26, 2010
Unlikely redirect, a reader will either look for Horse Island Light, or Sacketts Harbor Light
Muhandes (
talk)
23:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
This cross name space redirect leads to a set of lists which were deleted from mainspace 3 years ago Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books by title: 0-9 (2nd nomination). Deleted material should not by accesible from main space via a redirect. Yoenit ( talk) 17:56, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Implausible redirect Acather96 ( talk) 17:44, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Delete both. Apparently Scott M. Perrilloux is the name of the district attorney in a particular district of Louisiana. An enthusiastic user even added his picture to the District attorney article. However, that does not make these redirects useful to readers. An article about this particular individual might be useful, but the district attorney article is not about him, and the redirects are misleading. R'n'B ( call me Russ) 13:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
I don't see how "GAG" has to do with the banning policy. Very implausible. — Train2104 ( talk • contribs • count) 01:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC)