This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 8, 2010
Proposed deletion of implausible redirect. "Predator Plane" is a rather...odd way of describing the aircraft, both inaccurate and "slang-y". Now, that in itself wouldn't be enough to make me nominate it; after all, redirects don't take up much space, and "Predator plane" would be vaguely plausible (and also doesn't exist; "Predator aircraft" would be much more plausible - and does not have a redirect either). However, the capitalised "P" in "Plane" pushes it over the edge, IMHO, as not just uncommon (a Google for "Predator Plane" turns up only 1,000 total hits!) but misspelled/miscapitalised to boot; in order to appear as a wikilink in an article, it would have to be piped (like so: Predator plane) in order to avoid being ungrammatical. - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 16:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
This is a simple redirect with no content. There is no mention of "fuck handles" in the Clear heels article, nor have I found a source to suggest this name other than the Urban Dictionary. (There are however, several other definitions of "fuck handles"). In my view it should be deleted. Fainites barley scribs 16:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm moving this over from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Colonialism and the BBC. User:GeorgeLouis recommended deletion based on the following rationale: "This redirect has nothing to do with either British colonialism or the BBC." He has a point. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 13:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I feel as though this redirect should be removed for a variety of reasons. The books is still 2 years from being published, and even a title hasn't been announced yet. Once again, the second book doesn't even have a name and this redirect is for the third book, the third book isn't even mentioned in the main article The Kane Chronicles. On that note, this redirect is for the 3rd book which is way off into the horizon. So in short, I believe that this redirect should be deleted. Also the name of the page is not useful as a search term, need I say more? Jab843 ( talk) 04:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Implausible cross-namespace redirect. No incoming links, no significant page history, and not useful as a search term. -- Black Falcon ( talk) 03:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not a plausible search term, especially when considering all of the possible dash and spacing variants. -- Black Falcon ( talk) 03:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 8, 2010
Proposed deletion of implausible redirect. "Predator Plane" is a rather...odd way of describing the aircraft, both inaccurate and "slang-y". Now, that in itself wouldn't be enough to make me nominate it; after all, redirects don't take up much space, and "Predator plane" would be vaguely plausible (and also doesn't exist; "Predator aircraft" would be much more plausible - and does not have a redirect either). However, the capitalised "P" in "Plane" pushes it over the edge, IMHO, as not just uncommon (a Google for "Predator Plane" turns up only 1,000 total hits!) but misspelled/miscapitalised to boot; in order to appear as a wikilink in an article, it would have to be piped (like so: Predator plane) in order to avoid being ungrammatical. - The Bushranger Return fire Flank speed 16:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
This is a simple redirect with no content. There is no mention of "fuck handles" in the Clear heels article, nor have I found a source to suggest this name other than the Urban Dictionary. (There are however, several other definitions of "fuck handles"). In my view it should be deleted. Fainites barley scribs 16:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm moving this over from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Colonialism and the BBC. User:GeorgeLouis recommended deletion based on the following rationale: "This redirect has nothing to do with either British colonialism or the BBC." He has a point. Dylanfromthenorth ( talk) 13:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
I feel as though this redirect should be removed for a variety of reasons. The books is still 2 years from being published, and even a title hasn't been announced yet. Once again, the second book doesn't even have a name and this redirect is for the third book, the third book isn't even mentioned in the main article The Kane Chronicles. On that note, this redirect is for the 3rd book which is way off into the horizon. So in short, I believe that this redirect should be deleted. Also the name of the page is not useful as a search term, need I say more? Jab843 ( talk) 04:20, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Implausible cross-namespace redirect. No incoming links, no significant page history, and not useful as a search term. -- Black Falcon ( talk) 03:46, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Not a plausible search term, especially when considering all of the possible dash and spacing variants. -- Black Falcon ( talk) 03:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)