- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Imac sunflower2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- I believe this is an official Apple photo, not a user-generated image, and therefore not freely licensed. Pete ( talk) 04:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:PALPAP CEO.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- License doesn't match flickr source. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Image is clearly watermarked Life. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
_JPG.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
_JPG.jpg){kind=link}
_JPG.jpg&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2015+November+4%23File%3ADreadnoughtus+Size+%26%2338%3B+Weight+Comparision+%28Metric%29+JPG.jpg%5D%5D){kind=link}
_JPG.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_JPG.jpg&action=history){kind=link}
- This is a mess, and some of the underlying works are NC files. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Glick.Joe.TheBowery.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- A 1932/3 work is not automatically PD-US. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a Google Map view, then it's non-free and replacable with Open Street Map etc... Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Jeff Nelson.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Google+ Profile images are not automatically public domain, and there is no evidence of permission. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a simple text logo, given the inclusion of the clasped hands. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Logo is not just simple text, and is above the threshold of originality in my view. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Kaleidoscope Logo HRF RGB.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo is not just simple text, given the patterning on the K,
Australia also has a lower threshold of originality than the US. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Clearly not a textlogo! The watermark suggests it comes from a third party, and I can't find an explicit free license on the source given. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe c:Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama? -- Stefan2 ( talk) 17:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The original uploader gave this an FAL license in good faith,
however this painting is undated, which means that as the artist died in 1986 it may not be appropriate. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Lifeboat.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The wording "Private photo taken at the photo-shoot for the Off-Broadway production of An Adult Evening of Shel Silverstein" suggests that it isn't own work by the uploader. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Greek Frogs.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The wording "Production photo from the Rising Sun Performance Company's production of The Frogs" suggests that it is not own work by the uploader. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Eublepharis macularius 3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: three in one.
- File uploaded by Iterat ( talk · contribs) and Staecker ( talk · contribs): Properly sourced and licensed. Keep this one.
- File uploaded by Fahim23 ( talk · contribs): Sourced to Blogspot. Blogspot reveals that this is some "William Rodriguez" (ウィリアム・ロドリゲス), but does not state that the file is freely licensed. Delete as presumed unfree Internet image. Note that the file previously was called File:William.jpg - that explains why the picture was uploaded under this name.
- File uploaded by Raphael1966 ( talk · contribs): No source and no licence, so delete this. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Interior design.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The author is claimed to be a website, but the uploader also claims to be the copyright holder, which is contradicting. The website is no longer available. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Millerand.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The words "the French Governmental website" are not sufficiently specific to verify publication before 1923. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Matt Bevin.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unlikely this is the uploader's own work; low resolution image with no metadata, watermarked "Bevin" and previously published elsewhere in various forms before upload here (eg [1] [2] [3]. January ( talk) 20:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Crop of File:Matt Bevin.jpeg, see discussion above. January ( talk) 20:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I created this in good faith while assuming good faith regarding the license of the photo I cropped. I won't mind if it's deleted. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Msal.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo is not simple text. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: The file was moved from File:Msal.jpg to File:Moscow State Academy of Law.jpg by Stefan2 ( talk · contribs) at 23:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:TroveStar.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is not a simple text logo. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not used in the article namespace. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
.png){kind=link}
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3APossibly+unfree+files%2F2015+November+4%23File%3AOfficial+logo+of+the+Justice+Party+%28United+States%29.png%5D%5D){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
- This is not a simple logo, Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Bashkir University logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is not a simple text logo. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: 
Relisted at
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 12#File:Orenburg University.jpg. —
ξ
xplicit
05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Orenburg University.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is not a simple text logo, but FFD rather than PUF as this might be a "state symbol" which has an exemption in Russian copyright laws?
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
23:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Are you claiming that
{{ PD-RU-exempt}}might apply? I think that we need help from someone who knows more about Russian law in order to figure this out. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Are you claiming that
- That's exactly my concern. And this seems to have been listed at PUF not FFD as intended. (sigh) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Who can tell whether "PD-RU-exempt" applies? Pinging some Russian-speaking users:
User:Ymblanter,
User:A.Savin,
User:Alex Spade. --
Stefan2 (
talk)
16:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, do not know anything about this.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:OTJC benefit 18.6.14.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Poster art. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is not necessarily simple, given the graphic design elements in the logo. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Roux Method - CMLL.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is not a simple text logo, it's a representation of a rubix cube. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Imac sunflower2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- I believe this is an official Apple photo, not a user-generated image, and therefore not freely licensed. Pete ( talk) 04:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:PALPAP CEO.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- License doesn't match flickr source. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 13:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Image is clearly watermarked Life. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is a mess, and some of the underlying works are NC files. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Glick.Joe.TheBowery.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- A 1932/3 work is not automatically PD-US. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 15:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a Google Map view, then it's non-free and replacable with Open Street Map etc... Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Jeff Nelson.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Google+ Profile images are not automatically public domain, and there is no evidence of permission. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a simple text logo, given the inclusion of the clasped hands. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Logo is not just simple text, and is above the threshold of originality in my view. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Kaleidoscope Logo HRF RGB.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo is not just simple text, given the patterning on the K,
Australia also has a lower threshold of originality than the US. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Clearly not a textlogo! The watermark suggests it comes from a third party, and I can't find an explicit free license on the source given. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 16:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Maybe c:Template:Cc-by-3.0-BollywoodHungama? -- Stefan2 ( talk) 17:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- The original uploader gave this an FAL license in good faith,
however this painting is undated, which means that as the artist died in 1986 it may not be appropriate. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 17:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Lifeboat.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The wording "Private photo taken at the photo-shoot for the Off-Broadway production of An Adult Evening of Shel Silverstein" suggests that it isn't own work by the uploader. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Greek Frogs.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The wording "Production photo from the Rising Sun Performance Company's production of The Frogs" suggests that it is not own work by the uploader. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Eublepharis macularius 3.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Overwritten file: three in one.
- File uploaded by Iterat ( talk · contribs) and Staecker ( talk · contribs): Properly sourced and licensed. Keep this one.
- File uploaded by Fahim23 ( talk · contribs): Sourced to Blogspot. Blogspot reveals that this is some "William Rodriguez" (ウィリアム・ロドリゲス), but does not state that the file is freely licensed. Delete as presumed unfree Internet image. Note that the file previously was called File:William.jpg - that explains why the picture was uploaded under this name.
- File uploaded by Raphael1966 ( talk · contribs): No source and no licence, so delete this. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Interior design.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The author is claimed to be a website, but the uploader also claims to be the copyright holder, which is contradicting. The website is no longer available. Stefan2 ( talk) 19:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Millerand.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- The words "the French Governmental website" are not sufficiently specific to verify publication before 1923. Stefan2 ( talk) 20:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Matt Bevin.jpeg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unlikely this is the uploader's own work; low resolution image with no metadata, watermarked "Bevin" and previously published elsewhere in various forms before upload here (eg [1] [2] [3]. January ( talk) 20:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- Crop of File:Matt Bevin.jpeg, see discussion above. January ( talk) 20:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment I created this in good faith while assuming good faith regarding the license of the photo I cropped. I won't mind if it's deleted. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 20:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Msal.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo is not simple text. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: The file was moved from File:Msal.jpg to File:Moscow State Academy of Law.jpg by Stefan2 ( talk · contribs) at 23:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC). AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:TroveStar.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is not a simple text logo. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 20:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not used in the article namespace. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:21, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is not a simple logo, Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit 05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Bashkir University logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is not a simple text logo. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 22:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Relisted at
Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 12#File:Orenburg University.jpg. —
ξ
xplicit
05:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Orenburg University.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is not a simple text logo, but FFD rather than PUF as this might be a "state symbol" which has an exemption in Russian copyright laws?
Sfan00 IMG (
talk)
23:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Are you claiming that
{{ PD-RU-exempt}}might apply? I think that we need help from someone who knows more about Russian law in order to figure this out. -- Stefan2 ( talk) 23:24, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Are you claiming that
- That's exactly my concern. And this seems to have been listed at PUF not FFD as intended. (sigh) Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 09:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Who can tell whether "PD-RU-exempt" applies? Pinging some Russian-speaking users:
User:Ymblanter,
User:A.Savin,
User:Alex Spade. --
Stefan2 (
talk)
16:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, do not know anything about this.-- Ymblanter ( talk) 17:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:OTJC benefit 18.6.14.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- Poster art. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- This is not necessarily simple, given the graphic design elements in the logo. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:05, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
- File:Roux Method - CMLL.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is not a simple text logo, it's a representation of a rubix cube. Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 23:12, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.