The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Kept for now. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:08, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Walmart complete.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Corporate logo Eeekster ( talk) 00:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep. Logo consists of only text, and is therefore ineligible for copyright. Changing license tag to {{ pd-text}}. SchuminWeb ( Talk) 20:04, 17 October 2010 (UTC) reply
• I agree it's pd-text, but delete anyway. Unused, very poor quality. -- Hammersoft ( talk) 21:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC) reply
• Keep as pd-text, but list at FFD as unused other than in userspace and low quality. Stifle ( talk) 08:10, 21 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Herbert E Abrams - self portrait.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyright most likely owned by the painter Eeekster ( talk) 02:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Ami cover.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• journal cover; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 04:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Amorantotkdclub.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• club logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 04:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:BOSS Logo 2.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• corporate logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 04:56, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Chathukulam.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• low quality image, bad cropping (upper right corner) makes it appear this was taken from another source - not provided Skier Dude ( talk 05:02, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:JCHS Logo.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 05:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:James campbell HS logo.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• school logo; no source; if legit, uploader would not be (c) holder Skier Dude ( talk 05:15, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Let it ensemble you.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• appears to be unused album cover; no source to verify (c) status Skier Dude ( talk 05:16, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Now that information has been added, linking to LOC records, we can all be happy. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:49, 17 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:L'Amore Medico 5083435239 8d76280596 o.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• PD-US is applied, and on the source page, the information regarding the date is '[no date recorded on caption card]'. ( [1]). So I don't think we can verify the date. Acather96 ( talk) 07:20, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Hmmm, an image of an opera premier from 1914 with a fat guy that died in 1918, and the Library of Congress listing it as "between ca. 1910 and ca. 1915", it should be a no brainer. My rule for myself is always: think twice, then tag just once". -- Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) ( talk) 07:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

Is the Library of Congress listing online, because I can't see any date information at all from the source you have provided. Could have missed something though. Acather96 ( talk) 07:31, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Almirante padilla class frigate.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I'm inclined to believe that all the photos uploaded by Flanker-B ( talk · contribs) are copyright violations. For all photos, the uploader claimed that "It is a picture of my own property, i am an officer of the Colombian navy, ensign rank, im not aware if this image is or is not already on the internet, but it is not copyrighted." Having a photo in one's possession does not make one the author or copyright holder, and if they're not, saying that it's not copyrighted doesn't make it so. The photos are taken in a range of different styles with various cameras ranging from a $500 Canon PowerShot A20 point-and-shoot to a $2000 Nikon D100 DSLR. File:Nimrod ATGM fired.jpg, File:CH-53 firing a nimrod.jpg, File:Iai arava colombia.jpg and File:Colombian kfir c7.JPG have already been deleted as blatant copyright violations. commons:File:EMB 314 2.jpg was deleted from Commons for missing proper source information after having been transferred there, and commons:File:Agm-142.jpg have nap.jpg was deleted following commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agm-142 have nap.jpg after having been transferred, and the remaining photos that had been transferred were deleted through commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Photos uploaded by Flanker-B on English Wikipedia. Please delete this photo to prevent further transfers. — LX ( talk, contribs) 08:28, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:S28pijao.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I'm inclined to believe that all the photos uploaded by Flanker-B ( talk · contribs) are copyright violations. For all photos, the uploader claimed that "It is a picture of my own property, i am an officer of the Colombian navy, ensign rank, im not aware if this image is or is not already on the internet, but it is not copyrighted." Having a photo in one's possession does not make one the author or copyright holder, and if they're not, saying that it's not copyrighted doesn't make it so. The photos are taken in a range of different styles with various cameras ranging from a $500 Canon PowerShot A20 point-and-shoot to a $2000 Nikon D100 DSLR. File:Nimrod ATGM fired.jpg, File:CH-53 firing a nimrod.jpg, File:Iai arava colombia.jpg and File:Colombian kfir c7.JPG have already been deleted as blatant copyright violations. commons:File:EMB 314 2.jpg was deleted from Commons for missing proper source information after having been transferred there, and commons:File:Agm-142.jpg have nap.jpg was deleted following commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agm-142 have nap.jpg after having been transferred, and the remaining photos that had been transferred were deleted through commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Photos uploaded by Flanker-B on English Wikipedia. Please delete this photo to prevent further transfers. — LX ( talk, contribs) 08:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Sx506.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I'm inclined to believe that all the photos uploaded by Flanker-B ( talk · contribs) are copyright violations. For all photos, the uploader claimed that "It is a picture of my own property, i am an officer of the Colombian navy, ensign rank, im not aware if this image is or is not already on the internet, but it is not copyrighted." Having a photo in one's possession does not make one the author or copyright holder, and if they're not, saying that it's not copyrighted doesn't make it so. The photos are taken in a range of different styles with various cameras ranging from a $500 Canon PowerShot A20 point-and-shoot to a $2000 Nikon D100 DSLR. File:Nimrod ATGM fired.jpg, File:CH-53 firing a nimrod.jpg, File:Iai arava colombia.jpg and File:Colombian kfir c7.JPG have already been deleted as blatant copyright violations. commons:File:EMB 314 2.jpg was deleted from Commons for missing proper source information after having been transferred there, and commons:File:Agm-142.jpg have nap.jpg was deleted following commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agm-142 have nap.jpg after having been transferred, and the remaining photos that had been transferred were deleted through commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Photos uploaded by Flanker-B on English Wikipedia. Please delete this photo to prevent further transfers. — LX ( talk, contribs) 08:39, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Gloria1.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I'm inclined to believe that all the photos uploaded by Flanker-B ( talk · contribs) are copyright violations. For all photos, the uploader claimed that "It is a picture of my own property, i am an officer of the Colombian navy, ensign rank, im not aware if this image is or is not already on the internet, but it is not copyrighted." Having a photo in one's possession does not make one the author or copyright holder, and if they're not, saying that it's not copyrighted doesn't make it so. The photos are taken in a range of different styles with various cameras ranging from a $500 Canon PowerShot A20 point-and-shoot to a $2000 Nikon D100 DSLR. File:Nimrod ATGM fired.jpg, File:CH-53 firing a nimrod.jpg, File:Iai arava colombia.jpg and File:Colombian kfir c7.JPG have already been deleted as blatant copyright violations. commons:File:EMB 314 2.jpg was deleted from Commons for missing proper source information after having been transferred there, and commons:File:Agm-142.jpg have nap.jpg was deleted following commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agm-142 have nap.jpg after having been transferred, and the remaining photos that had been transferred were deleted through commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Photos uploaded by Flanker-B on English Wikipedia. Please delete this photo to prevent further transfers. — LX ( talk, contribs) 08:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Kfir col 8.JPG ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• I'm inclined to believe that all the photos uploaded by Flanker-B ( talk · contribs) are copyright violations. For all photos, the uploader claimed that "It is a picture of my own property, i am an officer of the Colombian navy, ensign rank, im not aware if this image is or is not already on the internet, but it is not copyrighted." Having a photo in one's possession does not make one the author or copyright holder, and if they're not, saying that it's not copyrighted doesn't make it so. The photos are taken in a range of different styles with various cameras ranging from a $500 Canon PowerShot A20 point-and-shoot to a $2000 Nikon D100 DSLR. File:Nimrod ATGM fired.jpg, File:CH-53 firing a nimrod.jpg, File:Iai arava colombia.jpg and File:Colombian kfir c7.JPG have already been deleted as blatant copyright violations. commons:File:EMB 314 2.jpg was deleted from Commons for missing proper source information after having been transferred there, and commons:File:Agm-142.jpg have nap.jpg was deleted following commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Agm-142 have nap.jpg after having been transferred, and the remaining photos that had been transferred were deleted through commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Photos uploaded by Flanker-B on English Wikipedia. Please delete this photo to prevent further transfers. — LX ( talk, contribs) 08:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Fortisip.gif ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Clearly product artwork and previous PUI marked this as fair-use Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 10:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Romeo and Juliet Posters.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Promotional posters, more information needed to justify self claim Sfan00 IMG ( talk) 14:57, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:A1not.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Sourced to the uploader and released under the GFDL and CC-BY-SA, however the subject of the image is a book, and I doubt the uploader holds the copyright. Acather96 ( talk) 17:41, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• The uploader is a copyright holder in this image; there is a degree of creative composition etc - it's not just a straightforward picture of the front of the book. All the same the use of the book cover design is not incidental or trivial, so the image does need a fair use justification for that book cover. We don't do a good job of telling uploaders what to do when there is more than one copyright interest in an image. Thparkth ( talk) 21:53, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:NancyHopkins 01.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Need to establish that copyright was not renewed. Can't be claimed under fair use as currently unused. (Contributor not directly notified, as is aware of and watching CCI.) Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:26, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
• Note: also nominated for deletion on other grounds here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:35, 17 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:39, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Wunderground 0504 thumb.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Copyrighted thumbnail image of a 2008 newspaper. No evidence that uploader is the copyright holder. GrapedApe ( talk) 19:40, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
  • Confirmed copyvio: [2]-- GrapedApe ( talk) 19:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, file is tagged as non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Blackberry torch.png ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Appears to be a modified version of the image at http://www.mobiletor.com/2010/09/03/blackberry-torch-9800-retailing-with-bell-from-september-24/ Eeekster ( talk) 20:19, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply
• There's some resemblance. It certainly looks like a professional, promotional image and unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:38, 17 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Now tagged as {{ non-free promotional}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 17:11, 17 October 2010 (UTC) reply

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:RodriguezwithF15.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney ( talk) 20:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:IraqiMiG-23.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Source is Iraqi, not U.S. Military VernoWhitney ( talk) 20:43, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Tankbattle2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney ( talk) 20:45, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Kuwaitcityinvaded.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney ( talk) 20:46, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Navalmine.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney ( talk) 20:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:Iraq safwan-surrender91.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• Not sourced to government website. No original source noted. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:00, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC) reply

File:GuardingM2A2.jpg ( delete | talk | history | logs).

• No actual source noted. Image appears elsewhere on interenet, e.g. http://web.archive.org/web/20010831040940/fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m2a2-980120-A-0000B-002.jpg from 2001. VernoWhitney ( talk) 21:14, 16 October 2010 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.