The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This logo was forwarded to me by a representitive of the Mercury Newspaper in Hobart for use on this article, it is no longer in use and accurately portrays what the league was known as in 1999. Removing it will, once again, tarnish the article. Forfuxake ( talk) 06:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This logo was also forwarded to me by a representitive of the Mercury Newspaper in Hobart for use on this article, it is no longer in use and accurately portrays what the league was known as in 2000. Removing it will, once again, tarnish the article.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
There is no copyright on this logo. Forfuxake ( talk) 06:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This logo is no longer in use and therefore should stay in the interests of ACCURACY. The TFL no longer exists as such (it was liquidated 11 years ago) and the actual image is from the Full Points Footy website. Removing it will, once again, make a mockery of the article. Forfuxake ( talk) 06:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn; now how could I have missed that? - FASTILYsock (TALK) 06:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Seems likely to me that BQZip01's changes make this a {{ pd-textlogo}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Seddon ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) James ( T| C) 02:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed as non-free and in use. — ξ xplicit 18:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 18:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete. As the summary stated when the user uploaded the file, "This photograph is from the personal collection of photographs where he is the sole owner" (emphasis on he added). This is insufficient information to imply that the uploader took the picture or owns the copyright, as "he" suggests that the work does not belong to the uploader. — ξ xplicit 23:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by JohnCD ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed as non-free. — ξ xplicit 18:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:50, 4 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This logo was forwarded to me by a representitive of the Mercury Newspaper in Hobart for use on this article, it is no longer in use and accurately portrays what the league was known as in 1999. Removing it will, once again, tarnish the article. Forfuxake ( talk) 06:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This logo was also forwarded to me by a representitive of the Mercury Newspaper in Hobart for use on this article, it is no longer in use and accurately portrays what the league was known as in 2000. Removing it will, once again, tarnish the article.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
There is no copyright on this logo. Forfuxake ( talk) 06:44, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Garion96 ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC) reply
This logo is no longer in use and therefore should stay in the interests of ACCURACY. The TFL no longer exists as such (it was liquidated 11 years ago) and the actual image is from the Full Points Footy website. Removing it will, once again, make a mockery of the article. Forfuxake ( talk) 06:43, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn; now how could I have missed that? - FASTILYsock (TALK) 06:15, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
Seems likely to me that BQZip01's changes make this a {{ pd-textlogo}}. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:31, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:01, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Seddon ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) James ( T| C) 02:08, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed as non-free and in use. — ξ xplicit 18:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ xplicit 18:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete. As the summary stated when the user uploaded the file, "This photograph is from the personal collection of photographs where he is the sole owner" (emphasis on he added). This is insufficient information to imply that the uploader took the picture or owns the copyright, as "he" suggests that the work does not belong to the uploader. — ξ xplicit 23:03, 12 May 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by JohnCD ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: keep. File licensed as non-free. — ξ xplicit 18:48, 11 April 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC) reply