The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the
listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext
" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=
". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at
WT:PUF or at my talk page.
AnomieBOT
⚡
06:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
Sree yalavarti.Anjaneya shastry is a renowned Vedic Agama Shilpa Shastra pundit,from 1820 - 1900.During those days, The photographs used to be of less quality. So, the old photograph has been photoshoped to give a good shape by the veda pathashala authorities.The photograph, placed on the page, is collected from the veda pathashala, at tenali.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete, erring to the side of caution, as copyright of the images may have not yet expired. — ξ xplicit 01:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply
I've added it to the summary. I claim the work to be mine, as it my photo, but the original was found in Griehl's book. It was taken in c. 1940. They are E-1s under production. Dapi89 ( talk) 20:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete, erring to the side of caution, as copyright of the images may have not yet expired. — ξ xplicit 01:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the
listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext
" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=
". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at
WT:PUF or at my talk page.
AnomieBOT
⚡
06:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
reply
Sree yalavarti.Anjaneya shastry is a renowned Vedic Agama Shilpa Shastra pundit,from 1820 - 1900.During those days, The photographs used to be of less quality. So, the old photograph has been photoshoped to give a good shape by the veda pathashala authorities.The photograph, placed on the page, is collected from the veda pathashala, at tenali.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete, erring to the side of caution, as copyright of the images may have not yet expired. — ξ xplicit 01:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply
I've added it to the summary. I claim the work to be mine, as it my photo, but the original was found in Griehl's book. It was taken in c. 1940. They are E-1s under production. Dapi89 ( talk) 20:12, 17 July 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the discussion was: delete, erring to the side of caution, as copyright of the images may have not yet expired. — ξ xplicit 01:31, 2 August 2010 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:23, 31 July 2010 (UTC) reply