The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland is privately owned. As such, this would appear to be a non free image that is easily replaceable by a free one.-- Rockfang ( talk) 03:50, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

• Comment The source site says the images from the site can only be used for non-commercial purposes.-- Rockfang ( talk) 03:56, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

You are right, at the time I didn't realize that federal reserve banks and branches were truly privately owned. I made the mistake of believing that they were part of the federal government. You are right in that it is licensed for non-commercial use. (I have to go through and tag a few more images I uploaded as well regarding the banks). Smallman12q ( talk) 10:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

No knowledge of creator, or even uploader, no valid license. Image can be replaced with a less murky one. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 04:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Based on or copied from nl:Afbeelding:GemeentenNoord-HollandNrs.png, which is now gone. License was never specified here, so how do we figure it out? ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

I would question whether this qualifies for copyright protection or not, to be honest. Stifle ( talk) 13:04, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Deleted, no license. – Quadell ^{( talk)} 01:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Athaenara ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:13, 28 March 2009 (UTC) reply

"edited version of Image:Leaning-tower-of-pisa.jpg" - this has no license, so we need to know what the original was, and why it was deleted. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:46, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The picture is an edited version of this image from Commons. The file is GFDL-licenced and was deleted as a transfer to Commons (re-named without the hyphens). IronGargoyle ( talk) 22:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Thanks, that clears it up. I've tagged the image GFDL, and linked to the source image. Withdrawn. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Strike that, moved it to Commons. CSD F8. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 06:17, 27 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Closed as out of scope for PUF. See AnomieBOT's instructions for how to proceed. 
Stifle (
talk) 12:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
reply

Fancruft, no confirmation that this is the actual single cover --Legolas ^(talktome) 15:18, 20 March 2009 (UTC) reply

Then PUF is the wrong place. —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 22:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

• Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{ dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Work of a professional photographer; unlikely uploader holds the right to release the image under the indicated licenses. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 16:44, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Copyrighted UI and images (shows more than just the windows themselves), unlikely uploader has permission to release as PD. —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 22:40, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:05, 9 April 2009 (UTC) reply

Blatant unfree screenshot. —  neuro ^{(talk) (review)} 23:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.