The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 20:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

If this is an official signature, it can't have been created by the uploader (unless the uploader is the person in question). If it isn't the official signature, then Wikipedia shouldn't be using it anyway. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 02:57, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

As I mention below, signatures are PD-ineligible. So, if this is authentic or not (and I see no reason to assume bad faith here with regards to its authenticity), the sole question relevant at PUI is answered. IronGargoyle ( talk) 20:05, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

Oops; I'd forgotten that I'd nominated this one, too. Withdrawn. – Drilnoth ( T •  C •  L) 20:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Source listed as a photo session; image is low-res and has no metadata, which seems to indicate it's snagged from a web source somewhere. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I'm inclined to disagree. I got a funny feeling Shock G took these himself specifically to place on his own Wikipedia article. Bobbygalaxy ( talk) 20:46, 29 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Same source/author info given as above; same low resolution and lack of metadata to arouse suspicion. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:40, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Source gives no indication that the image is so released. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I have written permission from the author of the photo, how do I prove this? Deltawk ( talk) 04:44, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

I am the author of the image in question, I have updated the footer of the site (www.tchips.com) to indicate the licensing on the image.-- Dnaito ( talk) 05:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Thank you Daniel! This is a big help - thanks for helping me improve the Robotics section on our wiki. Deltawk ( talk) 16:47, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

Looks good. I'll withdraw the listing. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 19:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Image description gives no indication that it is a work of the US government. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

My apologies, I will try to remember to include specific citation of the government source in the future. This image is from a paper presented to the Workshop on Gasification Technologies in Indianapolis IN, June 2007, by Daniel Cicero, who is the technology manager of hydrogen and syngas for the National Energy Technology Laboratory, under ot Office of Fossil Energy of the U.S. Department Of Energy. The paper is publicly available here: http://www.gasification.org/Docs/Workshops/2007/Indianapolis/06Cicero%20GTC_June2007.pdf

Although the image can be found on slide 7 of the PDF presentation you linked, the presentation doesn't cite where that image came from. I don't know enough about the way these presentations are typically compiled to make any claims about this image. I'm vaguely uncomfortable sourcing this image to someone's powerpoint presentation, but I'll leave the call to another set of eyes. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 04:33, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply

I don't think it's clear enough that this is PD. Stifle ( talk) 19:44, 20 July 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Source indicates "Pictures may be reproduced and spread but not sold commercially", which is not a compatible license. No proof copyright holder has broadened permission to the indicated license. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 15:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Source indicates "Pictures may be reproduced and spread but not sold commercially", which is not a compatible license. No proof copyright holder has broadened permission to the indicated license. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 15:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Source indicates "Pictures may be reproduced and spread but not sold commercially", which is not a compatible license. No proof copyright holder has broadened permission to the indicated license. ( ESkog)^{( Talk)} 15:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No copyright info available Willking1979 (talk) 18:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

This image is a crop of the Pennsylvania Department of Highway's 1960 state map at [1], which is a copyrighted image. As a derivative work, this image is equally copyrighted and the given license is blatantly wrong. – T M F 19:58, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Image taken from Indianapolis Zoo's website [2] and claimed as uploader's own work. This user has uploaded many images with problems of this nature. L P ^talk 21:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Taken from website and claimed as own work by uploader. [3] L P ^talk 21:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Taken from website and claimed as uploader's own work. [4] L P ^talk 21:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Organizational logo claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 23:34, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Peripitus ( talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:39, 25 February 2012 (UTC) reply

Artist's rendering of proposed construction project, claimed as uploader's own work. L P ^talk 23:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.