The image is tilted, and I believe slightly oversaturated. There are also noticeable JPEG artifacts, noticeable in the sky and possibly loss of detail in the racing track. It would be better from an enc perspective for there to be racing cars with motion blur.
MER-C 02:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes it's a tiny bit tilted, but I don't have a problem with the saturation. JPEG artefacts are really subtle, but yea they do exist. My main complaint is the busy composition. Maybe crop the tower on the right out?
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 10:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)reply
It has been cropped. Nascar1996 16:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Much better, but still not sure if it's good enough got a FP. I'm no pro around here though, so don't take my word as gospel!
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 20:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)reply
The image is tilted, and I believe slightly oversaturated. There are also noticeable JPEG artifacts, noticeable in the sky and possibly loss of detail in the racing track. It would be better from an enc perspective for there to be racing cars with motion blur.
MER-C 02:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Yes it's a tiny bit tilted, but I don't have a problem with the saturation. JPEG artefacts are really subtle, but yea they do exist. My main complaint is the busy composition. Maybe crop the tower on the right out?
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 10:44, 27 February 2011 (UTC)reply
It has been cropped. Nascar1996 16:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)reply
Much better, but still not sure if it's good enough got a FP. I'm no pro around here though, so don't take my word as gospel!
Aaadddaaammm (
talk) 20:55, 28 February 2011 (UTC)reply